Alexander Hamilton

Alexander Hamilton (January 11, 1755 or 1757Template:EfnTemplate:Spaced ndashJuly 12, 1804) was an American military officer, statesman, and Founding Father who served as the first U.S. secretary of the treasury from 1789 to 1795 during the presidency of George Washington, the first president of the United States.

Born out of wedlock in Charlestown, Nevis, Hamilton was orphaned as a child and taken in by a prosperous merchant. He was given a scholarship and pursued his education at King's College (now Columbia University) in New York City where, despite his young age, he was an anonymous but prolific and widely read pamphleteer and advocate for the American Revolution. He then served as an artillery officer in the American Revolutionary War, where he saw military action against the British Army in the New York and New Jersey campaign, served for four years as aide-de-camp to Continental Army commander in chief George Washington, and fought under Washington's command in the war's climactic battle, the Siege of Yorktown, which secured American victory in the war and with it the independence of the United States.

After the Revolutionary War, Hamilton served as a delegate from New York to the Congress of the Confederation in Philadelphia. He resigned to practice law and founded the Bank of New York. In 1786, Hamilton led the Annapolis Convention, which sought to strengthen the power of the loose confederation of independent states under the limited authorities granted it by the Articles of Confederation. The following year he was a delegate to the Philadelphia Convention, which drafted the U.S. Constitution creating a more centralized federal national government. He then authored 51 of the 85 installments of The Federalist Papers, which proved persuasive in securing its ratification by the states.

As a trusted member of President Washington's first cabinet, Hamilton served as the first U.S. secretary of the treasury. He envisioned a central government led by an energetic executive, a strong national defense, and a more diversified economy with significantly expanded industry. He successfully argued that the implied powers of the U.S. Constitution provided the legal basis to create the First Bank of the United States, and assume the states' war debts, which was funded by a tariff on imports and a whiskey tax. Hamilton opposed American entanglement with the succession of unstable French Revolutionary governments. In 1790, he persuaded the U.S. Congress to establish the U.S. Revenue Cutter service to protect American shipping. In 1793, he advocated in support of the Jay Treaty under which the U.S. resumed friendly trade relations with the British Empire. Hamilton's views became the basis for the Federalist Party, which was opposed by the Democratic-Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton and other Federalists supported the Haitian Revolution, and Hamilton helped draft Haiti's constitution in 1801.

After resigning as the nation's Secretary of the Treasury in 1795, Hamilton resumed his legal and business activities and helped lead the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade. In the Quasi-War, fought at sea between 1798 and 1800, Hamilton called for mobilization against France, and President John Adams appointed him major general. The U.S. Army, however, did not see combat in the conflict. Outraged by Adams' response to the crisis, Hamilton opposed his 1800 presidential re-election. Jefferson and Aaron Burr tied for the presidency in the electoral college and, despite philosophical differences, Hamilton endorsed Jefferson over Burr, whom he found unprincipled. When Burr ran for Governor of New York in 1804, Hamilton again opposed his candidacy, arguing that he was unfit for the office. Taking offense, Burr challenged Hamilton to a pistol duel, which took place in Weehawken, New Jersey, on July 11, 1804. Hamilton was mortally wounded and immediately transported back across the Hudson River in a delirious state to the home of William Bayard Jr. in Greenwich Village, New York, for medical attention. The following day, on July 12, 1804, Hamilton succumbed to his wounds.

Scholars generally regard Hamilton as an astute and intellectually brilliant administrator, politician, and financier who was sometimes impetuous. His ideas are credited with influencing the founding principles of American finance and government. In 1997, historian Paul Johnson wrote that Hamilton was a "genius—the only one of the Founding Fathers fully entitled to that accolade—and he had the elusive, indefinable characteristics of genius."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Early life and education

Hamilton was born on January 11, 1755, or 1757,Template:Efn in Charlestown, the capital of Nevis in the British Leeward Islands, where he spent his childhood. Hamilton and his older brother, James Jr.,<ref name=ramsing>Template:Cite journal</ref> were born out of wedlock to Rachel Lavien (née Faucette),Template:Efn a married woman of half-British and half-Huguenot descent,Template:Efn<ref>Chernow, 2005, p. 8.</ref> and James A. Hamilton, a Scotsman and the fourth son of Alexander Hamilton, the laird of Grange, Ayrshire.<ref name="Randall1">Template:Cite book</ref>

Prior to Alexander's birth, in 1745, Rachel Lavien married Johann Lavien in Saint Croix.<ref name=chernow10-12>Chernow, pp. 10–12.</ref> Together, they had one son, Peter. However, Rachel Lavien left her husband and first son in 1750, traveling to Saint Kitts, where she met James Hamilton.<ref name=chernow10-12/> Hamilton and Lavien moved together to Nevis, her birthplace, where she had inherited a seaside lot in town from her father.<ref name=chernow17/> While their mother was living, Alexander and James Jr. received individual tutoring<ref name=chernow17/> and classes in a private school led by a Jewish headmistress.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Alexander supplemented his education with a family library of 34 books.<ref name=chernow24>Chernow, p. 24.</ref>

James Hamilton later abandoned Rachel Lavien and their two sons, ostensibly to "spar[e] [her] a charge of bigamy...after finding out that her first husband intend[ed] to divorce her under Danish law on grounds of adultery and desertion."<ref name="Randall1"/> Lavien then moved with their two children back to Saint Croix, where she supported them by managing a small store in Christiansted. Both his mother and Hamilton contracted yellow fever. On February 19, 1768, Hamilton's mother died from the disease, leaving him orphaned.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> His mother's death may have had a severe emotional impact on Hamilton.<ref>e.g., Flexner, passim.</ref> In probate court, Lavien's "first husband seized her estate"<ref name="Randall1"/> and obtained the few valuables that she had owned, including some household silver. Many items were auctioned off, and a friend purchased the family's books, returning them to Hamilton.<ref name=chernow25-30>Chernow, pp. 25–30.</ref>

The brothers were briefly taken in by their cousin Peter Lytton. However, Lytton took his own life in July 1769, leaving his property to his mistress and their son, and the propertyless Hamilton brothers were subsequently separated.<ref name=chernow25-30/> James Jr. apprenticed with a local carpenter, while Alexander was given a home by Thomas Stevens, a merchant from Nevis.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Hamilton became a clerk at Beekman and Cruger, a local import-export firm that traded with the Province of New York and New England.<ref>Chernow, [[[:Template:GBurl]] p. 29].</ref> Though still a teenager, Hamilton proved capable enough as a trader to be left in charge of the firm for five months in 1771 while the owner was at sea.<ref name=Founders1771>Template:Cite web Archived from Template:Cite book</ref> He remained an avid reader, and later developed an interest in writing and a life outside Saint Croix. He wrote a detailed letter to his father regarding a hurricane that devastated Christiansted on August 30, 1772.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The Presbyterian Reverend Hugh Knox, a tutor and mentor to Hamilton, submitted the letter for publication in the Royal Danish-American Gazette. Biographer Ron Chernow found the letter astounding because "for all its bombastic excesses, it does seem wondrous [that a] self-educated clerk could write with such verve and gusto" and that a teenage boy produced an apocalyptic "fire-and-brimstone sermon" viewing the hurricane as a "divine rebuke to human vanity and pomposity."<ref name=chernow37>Chernow, p. 37.</ref> The essay impressed community leaders, who collected a fund to send Hamilton to the North American colonies for his education.<ref name="gordon">Template:Cite journal</ref>

In October 1772, Hamilton arrived by ship in Boston and then proceeded to New York City, where he boarded with Hercules Mulligan, the Irish-born brother of a trader known to Hamilton's benefactors. Mulligan assisted Hamilton in selling the cargo that Hamilton was to use to pay for his education and support.<ref name=OBrien-Mulligan>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=Newton64>Newton (2015), p. 64.</ref> Hamilton sought to fill gaps in his education in preparation for college, and later that year began to attend Elizabethtown Academy, a preparatory school run by Francis Barber in Elizabeth, New Jersey. While there, he was introduced to William Livingston, a local leading intellectual and revolutionary who influenced him, and he boarded with the Livingstons while studying.<ref name=Newton2019-227>Newton (2019), [[[:Template:GBurl]] pp. 227–228]. "Thus, when Alexander Hamilton arrived in Elizabethtown in October 1772 and moved in with the Livingstons, they lived in this house rented from Jacob De Hart."</ref>

In fall 1773, Hamilton returned to New York and entered Mulligan's alma mater, King's College (now Columbia University). Hamilton began as a private student and boarded again with Mulligan until he matriculated into the college the following year, in May 1774.<ref name=Newton69>Newton (2015), p. 69.</ref> His college roommate and lifelong friend Robert Troup spoke glowingly of Hamilton's clarity in concisely explaining Patriot case against the British during the American Revolution in what was Hamilton's first public appearance, on July 6, 1774.<ref>Randall, p. 78.</ref> As King's College students, Hamilton, Troup, and four other undergraduates formed an unnamed literary society that is regarded as a precursor to what is now the Philolexian Society.<ref name=chernow53>Chernow, p. 53.</ref><ref name=Cardozo1902>Template:Cite book</ref>

Later in 1774, Church of England clergyman Samuel Seabury in New York published a series of pamphlets promoting the Loyalist cause, seeking to provoke fear in the Thirteen Colonies, which he hoped would discourage them from uniting against the British.<ref>Miller, p. 9.</ref> Hamilton countered anonymously with his first published political writings, A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress and The Farmer Refuted. He published two additional pieces attacking the Quebec Act,<ref>Mitchell 1:65–73; Miller, p. 19.</ref> and may have also authored the 15 anonymous installments of "The Monitor" for Holt's New York Journal.<ref name=Newton116-117>Newton (2015), pp. 116, 117, 573.</ref> Hamilton supported the revolutionary cause before the war began, but he disapproved of mob violence against the Loyalists. On May 10, 1775, he was credited with saving King College president Myles Cooper, a Loyalist, from an angry mob by speaking to the crowd long enough to allow Cooper to escape.<ref>Mitchell, I:74–75.</ref> Hamilton was forced to discontinue his studies before graduating when the college closed its doors during the British occupation of New York City and his subsequent military service.<ref name="ReferenceA">Robert Troup "Memoir of General Hamilton", March 22, 1810</ref>

Revolutionary War (1775–1782)

Early military career

File:Alexander Hamilton 1757 1804 hi.jpg

Alexander Hamilton in the Uniform of the New York Artillery, a portrait by Alonzo Chappel

In 1775, following the outbreak of the Revolutionary War with the Battles of Lexington and Concord, Hamilton and other King's College students joined a New York volunteer militia company, the Corsicans, whose name reflected the Corsican Republic that was suppressed six years earlier and which young American patriots regarded as a political model to be emulated.<ref>Chernow, Ron. Alexander Hamilton. Penguin Press, (2004) (Template:ISBN).</ref>

Hamilton drilled with the company before classes in the graveyard of nearby St. Paul's Chapel, studied military history and tactics on his own, and was soon elected an officer.<ref name=Newton127>Newton (2015), pp. 127–128.</ref> Under fire from HMS Asia, and coordinating with Hercules Mulligan and the Sons of Liberty, he led his newly renamed unit the "Hearts of Oak" on a successful raid for British cannons in the Battery. The seizure of the cannons resulted in the unit being re-designated an artillery company.<ref name=McDonald>Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp

Through his connections with influential New York patriots, including Alexander McDougall and John Jay, Hamilton was commissioned by the revolutionary government to raise the New York Provincial Company of Artillery of 60 men in 1776, and was then appointed captain.<ref name=chernow72>Chernow, p. 72.</ref> The company took part in the campaign of 1776 in and around New York City; as rearguard of the Continental Army's retreat up Manhattan, serving at the Battle of Harlem Heights shortly after, and at the Battle of White Plains a month later. At the Battle of Trenton, the company was stationed at the high point of Trenton at the intersection of present-day Warren and Broad streets to keep the Hessians pinned in their Trenton barracks.<ref name=stryker158>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="ketchum361-64" />

Hamilton participated in the Battle of Princeton on January 3, 1777. After an initial setback, Washington rallied the Continental Army troops and led them in a successful charge against the British forces. After making a brief stand, the British fell back, some leaving Princeton, and others taking up refuge in Nassau Hall. Hamilton transported three cannons to the hall, and had them fire upon the building as others rushed the front door and broke it down. The British subsequently put a white flag outside one of the windows;<ref name="ketchum361-64">Template:Cite book</ref> 194 British soldiers walked out of the building and laid down their arms, ending the battle in an American victory.<ref name=stryker290>Template:Cite book</ref>

George Washington's staff

Hamilton was invited to become an aide to Continental Army general William Alexander, Lord Stirling, and another general, perhaps Nathanael Greene or Alexander McDougall.<ref name=Newton189-190>Newton (2015), pp. 189–190.</ref> He declined these invitations, believing his best chance for improving his station in life was glory on the Revolutionary War's battlefields. Hamilton eventually received an invitation he felt he could not refuse: to serve as George Washington's aide with the rank of lieutenant colonel.<ref>Lefkowitz, Arthur S., George Washington's Indispensable Men: The 32 Aides-de-Camp Who Helped Win the Revolution, Stackpole Books, 2003, pp. 15, 108.</ref> Washington believed that "Aides de camp are persons in whom entire confidence must be placed and it requires men of abilities to execute the duties with propriety and dispatch."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Hamilton served four years as Washington's chief staff aide. He handled letters to the Continental Congress, state governors, and the most powerful generals of the Continental Army. He drafted many of Washington's orders and letters under Washington's direction, and he eventually issued orders on Washington's behalf over his own signature.<ref name=chernow90>Chernow, p. 90.</ref> Hamilton was involved in a wide variety of high-level duties, including intelligence, diplomacy, and negotiation with senior army officers as Washington's emissary.<ref>Lodge, pp. 1:15–20</ref><ref>Miller, pp. 23–26.</ref>

While stationed at the army's winter headquarters in Morristown, New Jersey from December 1779 to March 1780, Hamilton met Elizabeth Schuyler, a daughter of General Philip Schuyler and Catherine Van Rensselaer. They married on December 14, 1780, at the Schuyler Mansion in Albany, New York.<ref name=chernow128-129>Chernow, pp. 128–129.</ref> They had eight children, Philip,<ref name=chernow654-655>Chernow, pp. 654–655.</ref> Angelica, Alexander, James,<ref>James Alexander Hamilton obituary Template:Webarchive, The New York Times, September 26, 1878.</ref> John, William, Eliza, and another Philip.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

During the Revolutionary War, Hamilton became the close friend of several fellow officers. His letters to the Marquis de Lafayette<ref>Flexner, Young Hamilton, p. 316.</ref> and to John Laurens, employing the sentimental literary conventions of the late 18th century and alluding to Greek history and mythology,<ref>Trees, Andrew S., "The Importance of Being Alexander Hamilton", Reviews in American History 2005, pp. 33(1):8–14, finding Chernow's inferences to be overreading the contemporary style.</ref> have been read by Jonathan Ned Katz as revelatory of a homosocial or even homosexual relationship.<ref>Katz, Jonathan Ned, Gay American History: Lesbians and Gay Men in the U.S.A., Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1976, Template:ISBN, p. 445.</ref> Biographer Gregory D. Massey amongst others, by contrast, dismisses all such speculation as unsubstantiated, describing their friendship as purely platonic camaraderie instead and placing their correspondence in the context of the flowery diction of the time.<ref>Gregory D. Massey, John Laurens and the American Revolution; University of South Carolina Press, 2000. Template:Page needed</ref>

Field command

While on Washington's staff, Hamilton long sought command and a return to active combat. As the war drew nearer to an end, he knew that opportunities for military glory were diminishing. On February 15, 1781, Hamilton was reprimanded by Washington after a minor misunderstanding. Although Washington quickly tried to mend their relationship, Hamilton insisted on leaving his staff.<ref>Chernow 2004, pp. 151–152</ref> He officially left in March, and settled with his new wife Elizabeth Schuyler close to Washington's headquarters. He continued to repeatedly ask Washington and others for a field command. Washington continued to demur, citing the need to appoint men of higher rank. This continued until early July 1781, when Hamilton submitted a letter to Washington with his commission enclosed, "thus tacitly threatening to resign if he didn't get his desired command."<ref>Chernow 2004, pp. 153–159</ref>

On July 31, Washington relented and assigned Hamilton as commander of a battalion of light infantry companies of the 1st and 2nd New York Regiments and two provisional companies from Connecticut.<ref>Murray, p. 69.</ref> In the planning for the assault on Yorktown, Hamilton was given command of three battalions, which were to fight in conjunction with the allied French troops in taking Redoubts No. 9 and No. 10 of the British fortifications at Yorktown. Hamilton and his battalions took Redoubt No. 10 with bayonets alone so as not to risk accidental gunfire and discovery in a nighttime action, as planned. The French also suffered heavy casualties and took Redoubt No. 9. These actions forced the British surrender of an entire army at Yorktown, marking the de facto end of the war, although small battles continued for two more years until the signing of the Treaty of Paris and the departure of the last British troops.<ref>Mitchell, pp. I:254–260.</ref><ref name="Morris1970">Template:Cite book</ref>

Return to civilian life (1782–1789)

Congress of the Confederation

After Yorktown, Hamilton returned to New York City and resigned his commission in March 1782. He passed the bar in July after six months of self-directed education and, in October, was licensed to argue cases before the Supreme Court of New York.<ref name=Murray2007>Template:Cite book</ref> He also accepted an offer from Robert Morris to become receiver of continental taxes for the New York state.<ref>Chernow, pp. 165–171</ref> Hamilton was appointed in July 1782 to the Congress of the Confederation as a New York representative for the term beginning in November 1782.<ref>Syrett, p. III:117; for a one-year term beginning the "first Monday in November next", arrived in Philadelphia between November 18 and 25, and resigned July 1783.</ref> Before his appointment to Congress in 1782, Hamilton was already sharing his criticisms of Congress. He expressed these criticisms in his letter to James Duane dated September 3, 1780: "The fundamental defect is a want of power in Congress ... the confederation itself is defective and requires to be altered; it is neither fit for war, nor peace."<ref>Hamilton, Alexander. Alexander Hamilton: Writings. Compiled by Joanne B. Freeman. New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 2001. pp. 70–71</ref>

While on Washington's staff, Hamilton had become frustrated with the decentralized nature of the wartime Continental Congress, particularly its dependence upon the states for voluntary financial support that was not often forthcoming. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had no power to collect taxes or to demand money from the states. This lack of a stable source of funding had made it difficult for the Continental Army both to obtain its necessary provisions and to pay its soldiers. During the war, and for some time after, Congress obtained what funds it could from subsidies from the King of France, European loans, and aid requested from the several states, which were often unable or unwilling to contribute.<ref>Kohn; Brant, p. 45; Rakove, p. 324.</ref>

An amendment to the Articles had been proposed by Thomas Burke, in February 1781, to give Congress the power to collect a five percent impost, or duty on all imports, but this required ratification by all states; securing its passage as law proved impossible after it was rejected by Rhode Island in November 1782. James Madison joined Hamilton in influencing Congress to send a delegation to persuade Rhode Island to change its mind. Their report recommending the delegation argued the national government needed not just some level of financial autonomy, but also the ability to make laws that superseded those of the individual states. Hamilton transmitted a letter arguing that Congress already had the power to tax, since it had the power to fix the sums due from the several states; but Virginia's rescission of its own ratification of this amendment ended the Rhode Island negotiations.<ref name=chernow176>Chernow, p. 176.</ref><ref>Brant, p. 100</ref>

Congress and the army

While Hamilton was in Congress, discontented soldiers began to pose a danger to the young United States. Most of the army was then posted at Newburgh, New York. Those in the army were funding much of their own supplies, and they had not been paid in eight months. Furthermore, after Valley Forge, the Continental officers had been promised in May 1778 a pension of half their pay when they were discharged.<ref>Martin and Lender, pp. 109, 160: at first for seven years, increased to life after Arnold's treason.</ref> By the early 1780s, due to the structure of the government under the Articles of Confederation, it had no power to tax to either raise revenue or pay its soldiers.<ref name=Tucker15>Tucker, p. 470.</ref> In 1782, after several months without pay, a group of officers organized to send a delegation to lobby Congress, led by Captain Alexander McDougall. The officers had three demands: the army's pay, their own pensions, and commutation of those pensions into a lump-sum payment if Congress were unable to afford the half-salary pensions for life. Congress rejected the proposal.<ref name=Tucker15/>

Several congressmen, including Hamilton, Robert Morris, and Gouverneur Morris, attempted to use the so-called Newburgh Conspiracy as leverage to secure support from the states and in Congress for funding of the national government. They encouraged MacDougall to continue his aggressive approach, implying unknown consequences if their demands were not met, and defeated proposals designed to end the crisis without establishing general taxation: that the states assume the debt to the army, or that an impost be established dedicated to the sole purpose of paying that debt.<ref name=ellis141>Kohn; Ellis 2004, pp. 141–144.</ref>

Hamilton suggested using the Army's claims to prevail upon the states for the proposed national funding system.<ref>Kohn, p. 196.</ref> The Morrises and Hamilton contacted General Henry Knox to suggest he and the officers defy civil authority, at least by not disbanding if the army were not satisfied. Hamilton wrote Washington to suggest that Hamilton covertly "take direction" of the officers' efforts to secure redress, to secure continental funding but keep the army within the limits of moderation.<ref name=chernow177>Chernow, pp. 177–180.</ref><ref>Hamilton's letter of February 13, 1783; Syrett, pp. III:253–255.</ref> Washington wrote Hamilton back, declining to introduce the army.<ref>Washington to Hamilton, March 4 and 12, 1783; Kohn; Martin and Lender, pp. 189–190.</ref> After the crisis had ended, Washington warned of the dangers of using the army as leverage to gain support for the national funding plan.<ref name=chernow177/><ref name=Washington1783>Template:Cite web</ref>

On March 15, Washington defused the Newburgh situation by addressing the officers personally.<ref name="ellis141"/> Congress ordered the Army officially disbanded in April 1783. In the same month, Congress passed a new measure for a 25-year impost—which Hamilton voted against<ref>Rakove, pp. 322, 325.</ref>—that again required the consent of all the states; it also approved a commutation of the officers' pensions to five years of full pay. Rhode Island again opposed these provisions, and Hamilton's robust assertions of national prerogatives in his previous letter were widely held to be excessive.<ref>Brant, p. 108.</ref>

In June 1783, a different group of disgruntled soldiers from Lancaster, Pennsylvania, sent Congress a petition demanding their back pay. When they began to march toward Philadelphia, Congress charged Hamilton and two others with intercepting the mob.<ref name=chernow177/> Hamilton requested militia from Pennsylvania's Supreme Executive Council, but was turned down. Hamilton instructed Assistant Secretary of War William Jackson to intercept the men. Jackson was unsuccessful. The mob arrived in Philadelphia, and the soldiers proceeded to harangue Congress for their pay. Hamilton argued that Congress ought to adjourn to Princeton, New Jersey. Congress agreed, and relocated there.<ref name=chernow182>Chernow, pp. 182–183.</ref> Frustrated with the weakness of the national government, Hamilton while in Princeton, drafted a call to revise the Articles of Confederation. This resolution contained many features of the future Constitution of the United States, including a strong federal government with the ability to collect taxes and raise an army. It also included the separation of powers into the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.<ref name=chernow182/>

Return to New York

Hamilton resigned from Congress in 1783.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> When the British left New York in 1783, he practiced there in partnership with Richard Harison. He specialized in defending Tories and British subjects, as in Rutgers v. Waddington, in which he defeated a claim for damages done to a brewery by the Englishmen who held it during the military occupation of New York. He pleaded for the mayor's court to interpret state law consistent with the 1783 Treaty of Paris, which had ended the Revolutionary War.<ref name=chernow197-199>Chernow, pp. 197–199.</ref><ref name=McDonald/>Template:Rp In 1784, Hamilton founded the Bank of New York.<ref name=Globe2011>Template:Cite news</ref>

Long dissatisfied with the Articles of Confederation as too weak to be effective, Hamilton played a major leadership role at the 1786 Annapolis Convention. He drafted its resolution for a constitutional convention, and in doing so brought one step closer to reality his longtime desire to have a more effectual, more financially self-sufficient federal government.<ref name=Morris1988>Template:Cite book</ref>

As a member of the legislature of New York, Hamilton argued forcefully and at length in favor of a bill to recognize the sovereignty of the State of Vermont, against numerous objections to its constitutionality and policy. Consideration of the bill was deferred to a later date. From 1787 to 1789, Hamilton exchanged letters with Nathaniel Chipman, a lawyer representing Vermont. After the Constitution of the United States went into effect, Hamilton said, "One of the first subjects of deliberation with the new Congress will be the independence of Kentucky, for which the southern states will be anxious. The northern will be glad to send a counterpoise in Vermont."<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Vermont was admitted to the Union in 1791.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In 1788, he was awarded a Master of Arts degree from his alma mater, the former King's College, now reconstituted as Columbia College.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> It was during this post-war period that Hamilton served on the college's board of trustees, playing a part in the reopening of the college and placing it on firm financial footing.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Constitution and The Federalist Papers

File:Alexander Hamilton making the first draft of the Constitution for the United States 1787 (cropped).jpg

Portrait of Hamilton authoring the first draft of the U.S. Constitution in 1787

In 1787, Hamilton served as assemblyman from New York County in the New York State Legislature and was chosen as a delegate at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia by his father-in-law Philip Schuyler.<ref name=schachner>Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp<ref>Morton, p. 169.</ref> Even though Hamilton had been a leader in calling for a new Constitutional Convention, his direct influence at the Convention itself was quite limited. Governor George Clinton's faction in the New York legislature had chosen New York's other two delegates, John Lansing Jr. and Robert Yates, and both of them opposed Hamilton's goal of a strong national government.<ref name=chernow227-228>Chernow, pp. 227–228.</ref><ref name=Morton15>Morton, p. 131.</ref> Thus, whenever the other two members of the New York delegation were present, they decided New York's vote, to ensure that there were no major alterations to the Articles of Confederation.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

Early in the convention, Hamilton made a speech proposing a president-for-life; it had no effect upon the deliberations of the convention. He proposed to have an elected president and elected senators who would serve for life, contingent upon "good behavior" and subject to removal for corruption or abuse; this idea contributed later to the hostile view of Hamilton as a monarchist sympathizer, held by James Madison.<ref name=chernow232>Chernow, p. 232.</ref> According to Madison's notes, Hamilton said in regards to the executive, "The English model was the only good one on this subject. The hereditary interest of the king was so interwoven with that of the nation, and his personal emoluments so great, that he was placed above the danger of being corrupted from abroad... Let one executive be appointed for life who dares execute his powers."<ref name=LarsonWinship2005>Template:Cite book</ref>

Hamilton argued, "And let me observe that an executive is less dangerous to the liberties of the people when in office during life than for seven years. It may be said this constitutes as an elective monarchy ... But by making the executive subject to impeachment, the term 'monarchy' cannot apply ..."<ref name=LarsonWinship2005/> In his notes of the convention, Madison interpreted Hamilton's proposal as claiming power for the "rich and well born". Madison's perspective all but isolated Hamilton from his fellow delegates and others who felt they did not reflect the ideas of revolution and liberty.<ref>Stewart, 2016, p. 33</ref>

During the convention, Hamilton constructed a draft for the Constitution based on the convention debates, but he never presented it. This draft had most of the features of the actual Constitution. In this draft, the Senate was to be elected in proportion to the population, being two-fifths the size of the House, and the president and senators were to be elected through complex multistage elections, in which chosen electors would elect smaller bodies of electors; they would hold office for life, but were removable for misconduct. The president would have an absolute veto. The Supreme Court was to have immediate jurisdiction over all lawsuits involving the United States, and state governors were to be appointed by the federal government.<ref>Mitchell, pp. I:397–398.</ref>

At the end of the convention, Hamilton was still not content with the final Constitution, but signed it anyway as a vast improvement over the Articles of Confederation, and urged his fellow delegates to do so also.<ref>Brant, p. 195.</ref> Since the other two members of the New York delegation, Lansing and Yates, had already withdrawn, Hamilton was the only New York signer to the United States Constitution.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp He then took a highly active part in the successful campaign for the document's ratification in New York in 1788, which was a crucial step in its national ratification. He first used the popularity of the Constitution by the masses to compel George Clinton to sign, but was unsuccessful. The state convention in Poughkeepsie in June 1788 pitted Hamilton, Jay, James Duane, Robert Livingston, and Richard Morris against the Clintonian faction led by Melancton Smith, Lansing, Yates, and Gilbert Livingston.<ref name=Denboer15>Denboer, p. 196.</ref>

Clinton's faction wanted to amend the Constitution, while maintaining the state's right to secede if their attempts failed, and members of Hamilton's faction were against any conditional ratification, under the impression that New York would not be accepted into the Union. During the state convention, New Hampshire and Virginia becoming the ninth and tenth states to ratify the Constitution, respectively, had ensured any adjournment would not happen and a compromise would have to be reached.<ref name=Denboer15/><ref name=Kaplan15>Kaplan, p. 75.</ref> Hamilton's arguments used for the ratifications were largely iterations of work from The Federalist Papers, and Smith eventually went for ratification, though it was more out of necessity than Hamilton's rhetoric.<ref name=Kaplan15/> The vote in the state convention was ratified 30 to 27, on July 26, 1788.<ref>Denboer, p. 197.</ref>

The Federalist Papers

Hamilton recruited John Jay and James Madison to write The Federalist Papers, a series of essays, to defend the proposed Constitution. He made the largest contribution to that effort, writing 51 of the 85 essays published. Hamilton supervised the entire project, enlisted the participants, wrote the majority of the essays, and oversaw the publication. During the project, each person was responsible for their areas of expertise. Jay covered foreign relations. Madison covered the history of republics and confederacies, along with the anatomy of the new government. Hamilton covered the branches of government most pertinent to him: the executive and judicial branches, with some aspects of the Senate, as well as covering military matters and taxation.<ref name=chernow247>Chernow, pp. 247–248.</ref> The papers first appeared in The Independent Journal on October 27, 1787.<ref name=chernow247/>

Hamilton wrote the first paper signed as Publius, and all of the subsequent papers were signed under the name.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Jay wrote the next four papers to elaborate on the confederation's weakness and the need for unity against foreign aggression and against splitting into rival confederacies, and, except for No. 64, was not further involved.<ref name=chernow252-257>Chernow, pp. 252–257.</ref><ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Hamilton's highlights included discussion that although republics have been culpable for disorders in the past, advances in the "science of politics" had fostered principles that ensured that those abuses could be prevented, such as the division of powers, legislative checks and balances, an independent judiciary, and legislators that were represented by electors (No. 7–9).<ref name=chernow252-257/> Hamilton also wrote an extensive defense of the constitution (No. 23–36), and discussed the Senate and executive and judicial branches (No. 65–85). Hamilton and Madison worked to describe the anarchic state of the confederation (No. 15–22), and the two have been described as not being significantly different in thought during this time period—in contrast to their stark opposition later in life.<ref name=chernow252-257/> Subtle differences appeared with the two when discussing the necessity of standing armies.<ref name=chernow252-257/>

First U.S. secretary of the treasury (1789–1795)

File:JEFraser Hamilton.jpg

A statue of Hamilton on the south patio of the Treasury Building in Washington, D.C.

In 1789, Washington—who had become the first president of the United States—appointed Hamilton to be his cabinet's Secretary of the Treasury on the advice of Robert Morris, Washington's initial pick.<ref>Chernow, 2005, pp. 286–287.</ref> On September 11, 1789, Hamilton was nominated and confirmed in the Senate<ref>Chernow, 2005, p. 288.</ref> and sworn in the same day as the first United States secretary of the treasury.<ref>White, 1944, p. 156.</ref>

Report on Public Credit

Before the adjournment of the House in September 1789, they requested Hamilton to make a report on suggestions to improve the public credit by January 1790.<ref name=Murray121>Murray, p. 121.</ref> Hamilton had written to Morris as early as 1781, that fixing the public credit will win their objective of independence.<ref name=Murray121/> The sources that Hamilton used ranged from Frenchmen such as Jacques Necker and Montesquieu to British writers such as Hume, Hobbes, and Malachy Postlethwayt.<ref name=chernow296-299>Chernow, pp. 296–299.</ref> While writing the report he also sought out suggestions from contemporaries such as John Witherspoon and Madison. Although they agreed on additional taxes such as distilleries and duties on imported liquors and land taxes, Madison feared that the securities from the government debt would fall into foreign hands.<ref name=chernow121>Chernow, p. 121.</ref><ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

Hamilton divided the debt into national and state, and further divided the national debt into foreign and domestic debt. While there was agreement on how to handle the foreign debt, especially with France, there was not with regards to the national debt held by domestic creditors. During the Revolutionary War, affluent citizens had invested in bonds, and war veterans had been paid with promissory notes and IOUs that plummeted in price during the Confederation. In response, the war veterans sold the securities to speculators for as little as fifteen to twenty cents on the dollar.<ref name=chernow296-299/><ref>Murray, p. 124.</ref>

Hamilton felt the money from the bonds should not go to the soldiers who had shown little faith in the country's future, but the speculators that had bought the bonds from the soldiers. The process of attempting to track down the original bondholders along with the government showing discrimination among the classes of holders if the war veterans were to be compensated also weighed in as factors for Hamilton. As for the state debts, Hamilton suggested consolidating them with the national debt and label it as federal debt, for the sake of efficiency on a national scale.<ref name=chernow296-299/>

In the report, Hamilton felt that the securities should be paid at full value to their legitimate owners, including those who took the financial risk of buying government bonds that most experts thought would never be redeemed. He argued that liberty and property security were inseparable, and that the government should honor the contracts, as they formed the basis of public and private morality. To Hamilton, the proper handling of the government debt would also allow America to borrow at affordable interest rates and would also be a stimulant to the economy.<ref name=chernow296-299/>

The last portion of the report dealt with eliminating the debt by utilizing a sinking fund that would retire five percent of the debt annually until it was paid off. Due to the bonds being traded well below their face value, the purchases would benefit the government as the securities rose in price.<ref name=chernow300-305>Chernow, pp. 300–305.</ref>Template:Rp When the report was submitted to the House of Representatives, detractors soon began to speak against it. Some of the negative views expressed in the House were that the notion of programs that resembled British practice were wicked, and that the balance of power would be shifted away from the representatives to the executive branch. William Maclay suspected that several congressmen were involved in government securities, seeing Congress in an unholy league with New York speculators.<ref name=chernow300-305/>Template:Rp Congressman James Jackson also spoke against New York, with allegations of speculators attempting to swindle those who had not yet heard about Hamilton's report.<ref name=chernow300-305/>Template:Rp

The involvement of those in Hamilton's circle such as Schuyler, William Duer, James Duane, Gouverneur Morris, and Rufus King as speculators was not favorable to those against the report, either, though Hamilton personally did not own or deal a share in the debt.<ref name=chernow300-305/>Template:Rp<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Madison eventually spoke against it by February 1790. Although he was not against current holders of government debt to profit, he wanted the windfall to go to the original holders. Madison did not feel that the original holders had lost faith in the government but sold their securities out of desperation.<ref name=chernow300-305/>Template:Rp The compromise was seen as egregious to both Hamiltonians and their dissidents such as Maclay, and Madison's vote was defeated 36 votes to 13 on February 22.<ref name=chernow300-305/>Template:Rp<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

The fight for the national government to assume state debt was a longer issue and lasted over four months. During the period, the resources that Hamilton was to apply to the payment of state debts was requested by Alexander White, and was rejected due to Hamilton's not being able to prepare information by March 3, and was even postponed by his own supporters in spite of configuring a report the next day, which consisted of a series of additional duties to meet the interest on the state debts.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Duer resigned as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, and the vote of assumption was voted down 31 votes to 29 on April 12.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

During this period, Hamilton bypassed the rising issue of slavery in Congress, after Quakers petitioned for its abolition, returning to the issue the following year.<ref name=chernow307>Chernow, p. 307.</ref>

Another issue in which Hamilton played a role was the temporary location of the capital from New York City. Tench Coxe was sent to speak to Maclay to bargain about the capital being temporarily located to Philadelphia, as a single vote in the Senate was needed and five in the House for the bill to pass.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Thomas Jefferson wrote years afterward that Hamilton had a discussion with him, around this time period, about the capital of the United States being relocated to Virginia by means of a "pill" that "would be peculiarly bitter to the Southern States, and that some concomitant measure should be adopted to sweeten it a little to them".<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp The bill passed in the Senate on July 21 and in the House 34 votes to 28 on July 26, 1790.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

Report on a National Bank

File:First Bank of the United States, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania LCCN2011633532 (edited).jpg

The First Bank of the United States in Philadelphia, commissioned by Hamilton when the nation adopted a single currency

Hamilton's Report on a National Bank was a projection from the first Report on the Public Credit. Although Hamilton had been forming ideas of a national bank as early as 1779,<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp he had gathered ideas in various ways over the past eleven years. These included theories from Adam Smith,<ref>Kaplan, p. 21.</ref> extensive studies on the Bank of England, the blunders of the Bank of North America and his experience in establishing the Bank of New York.<ref name=Cooke82/> He also used American records from James Wilson, Pelatiah Webster, Gouverneur Morris, and from his assistant treasury secretary Tench Coxe.<ref name=Cooke82/> He thought that this plan for a National Bank could help in any sort of financial crisis.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Hamilton suggested that Congress should charter the national bank with a capitalization of $10 million, one-fifth of which would be handled by the government. Since the government did not have the money, it would borrow the money from the bank itself, and repay the loan in ten even annual installments.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp The rest was to be available to individual investors.<ref>Cooke, p. 89.</ref> The bank was to be governed by a twenty-five-member board of directors that was to represent a large majority of the private shareholders, which Hamilton considered essential for his being under a private direction.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Hamilton's bank model had many similarities to that of the Bank of England, except Hamilton wanted to exclude the government from being involved in public debt, but provide a large, firm, and elastic money supply for the functioning of normal businesses and usual economic development, among other differences.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp The tax revenue to initiate the bank was the same as he had previously proposed, increases on imported spirits: rum, liquor, and whiskey.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp

The bill passed through the Senate practically without a problem, but objections to the proposal increased by the time it reached the House of Representatives. It was generally held by critics that Hamilton was serving the interests of the Northeast by means of the bank,<ref>Cooke, p. 90.</ref> and those of the agrarian lifestyle would not benefit from it.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Among those critics was James Jackson of Georgia, who also attempted to refute the report by quoting from The Federalist Papers.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Madison and Jefferson also opposed the bank bill. The potential of the capital not being moved to the Potomac if the bank was to have a firm establishment in Philadelphia was a more significant reason, and actions that Pennsylvania members of Congress took to keep the capital there made both men anxious.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp The Whiskey Rebellion also showed how in other financial plans, there was a distance between the classes as the wealthy profited from the taxes.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Madison warned the Pennsylvania congress members that he would attack the bill as unconstitutional in the House, and followed up on his threat. Madison argued his case of where the power of a bank could be established within the Constitution, but he failed to sway members of the House, and his authority on the constitution was questioned by a few members.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp The bill eventually passed in an overwhelming fashion 39 to 20, on February 8, 1791.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

Washington hesitated to sign the bill, as he received suggestions from Attorney General Edmund Randolph and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson dismissed the Necessary and Proper Clause as reasoning for the creation of a national bank, stating that the enumerated powers "can all be carried into execution without a bank."<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Along with Randolph and Jefferson's objections, Washington's involvement in the movement of the capital from Philadelphia is also thought to be a reason for his hesitation.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp In response to the objection of the clause, Hamilton stated that "Necessary often means no more than needful, requisite, incidental, useful, or conductive to", and the bank was a "convenient species of medium in which [taxes] are to be paid."<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Washington would eventually sign the bill into law.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

Hamilton's push for a national bank was not an isolated event but a broader, long-running effort to establish a central banking system in the United States—one that would ultimately result in the Federal Reserve.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> While Hamilton's vision laid the groundwork for a structured financial system, the concept of centralized banking has remained one of the most polarizing economic debates in American history, garnering both staunch criticism and fervent support from economists and the public alike.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Establishing the mint

Template:Main Template:Css Image Crop In 1791, Hamilton submitted the Report on the Establishment of a Mint to the House of Representatives. Many of Hamilton's ideas for this report were from European economists, resolutions from the 1785 and 1786 Continental Congress meetings, and people such as Robert Morris, Gouverneur Morris and Thomas Jefferson.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp<ref>Mitchell, p. 118.</ref>

Because the most circulated coins in the United States at the time were Spanish currency, Hamilton proposed that minting a United States dollar weighing almost as much as the Spanish peso would be the simplest way to introduce a national currency.<ref>Engerman; Gallman, p. 644.</ref> Hamilton differed from European monetary policymakers in his desire to overprice gold relative to silver, on the grounds that the United States would always receive an influx of silver from the West Indies.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp Despite his own preference for a monometallic gold standard,<ref name=Studentski>Studentski; Krooss, p. 62.</ref> he ultimately issued a bimetallic currency at a fixed 15:1 ratio of silver to gold.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp<ref name=nussbaum>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Cooke, p. 87.</ref>

Hamilton proposed that the U.S. dollar should have fractional coins using decimals, rather than eighths like the Spanish coinage.<ref>Engerman; Gallman, pp. 644–645.</ref> This innovation was originally suggested by Superintendent of Finance Robert Morris, with whom Hamilton corresponded after examining one of Morris's Nova Constellatio coins in 1783.<ref>James Ferguson, John Catanzariti, Elizabeth M. Nuxoll and Mary Gallagher, eds. The Papers of Robert Morris, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973–1999 (Volume 7, pp. 682–713)</ref> He also desired the minting of small value coins, such as silver ten-cent and copper cent and half-cent pieces, for reducing the cost of living for the poor.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp<ref name="Cooke82">Cooke, p. 88.</ref> One of his main objectives was for the general public to become accustomed to handling money on a frequent basis.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp

By 1792, Hamilton's principles were adopted by Congress, resulting in the Coinage Act of 1792, and the creation of the mint. There was to be a ten-dollar gold Eagle coin, a silver dollar, and fractional money ranging from one-half to fifty cents.<ref name=Studentski/> The coining of silver and gold was issued by 1795.<ref name=Studentski/>

Revenue Cutter Service

File:USRC Massachusetts (1791).jpg

A 19th-century portrait of a Revenue Marine cutter, which may be of either the USRC Massachusetts or its replacement, the Massachusetts II

Smuggling off American coasts was an issue before the Revolutionary War, and after the Revolution it was more problematic. Along with smuggling, lack of shipping control, pirating, and a revenue imbalance were also major problems.<ref name=Gibowicz07>Gibowicz, p. 256.</ref> In response, Hamilton proposed to Congress to enact a naval police force called revenue cutters in order to patrol the waters and assist the custom collectors with confiscating contraband.<ref name=chernow340>Chernow, p. 340.</ref> This idea was also proposed to assist in tariff controlling, boosting the American economy, and promote the merchant marine.<ref name=Gibowicz07/> It is thought that his experience obtained during his apprenticeship with Nicholas Kruger was influential in his decision-making.<ref name=chernow32>Chernow, p. 32.</ref>

Concerning some of the details of the System of Cutters,<ref>Gibowicz, pp. 256–257.</ref> Hamilton wanted the first ten cutters in different areas in the United States, from New England to Georgia.<ref name=chernow340/><ref>Storbridge, p. 2.</ref> Each of those cutters was to be armed with ten muskets and bayonets, twenty pistols, two chisels, one broad-ax and two lanterns. The fabric of the sails was to be domestically manufactured;<ref name=chernow340/> and provisions were made for the employees' food supply and etiquette when boarding ships.<ref name=chernow340/> Congress established the Revenue Cutter Service on August 4, 1790, which is viewed as the birth of the United States Coast Guard.<ref name=Gibowicz07/>

Whiskey as tax revenue

File:Google Arts Project - Alexander Hamilton (1792 portrait) by John Trumbull.jpg

Hamilton in 1792, painted by John Trumbull

One of the principal sources of revenue Hamilton prevailed upon Congress to approve was an excise tax on whiskey. In his first Tariff Bill in January 1790, Hamilton proposed to raise the three million dollars needed to pay for government operating expenses and interest on domestic and foreign debts by means of an increase on duties on imported wines, distilled spirits, tea, coffee, and domestic spirits. It failed, with Congress complying with most recommendations excluding the excise tax on whiskey. The same year, Madison modified Hamilton's tariff to involve only imported duties; it was passed in September.<ref>Stockwell, p. 357.</ref> In response of diversifying revenues, as three-fourths of revenue gathered was from commerce with Great Britain, Hamilton attempted once again during his Report on Public Credit when presenting it in 1790 to implement an excise tax on both imported and domestic spirits.<ref name=chernow342-343>Chernow, pp. 342–343.</ref><ref name="Murray141">Murray, p. 141.</ref> The taxation rate was graduated in proportion to the whiskey proof, and Hamilton intended to equalize the tax burden on imported spirits with imported and domestic liquor.<ref name="Murray141"/> In lieu of the excise on production citizens could pay 60 cents by the gallon of dispensing capacity, along with an exemption on small stills used exclusively for domestic consumption.<ref name="Murray141"/> He realized the loathing that the tax would receive in rural areas, but thought of the taxing of spirits more reasonable than land taxes.<ref name=chernow342-343/>

Opposition initially came from Pennsylvania's House of Representatives protesting the tax. William Maclay had noted that not even the Pennsylvanian legislators had been able to enforce excise taxes in the western regions of the state.<ref name=chernow342-343/> Hamilton was aware of the potential difficulties and proposed inspectors the ability to search buildings that distillers were designated to store their spirits, and would be able to search suspected illegal storage facilities to confiscate contraband with a warrant.<ref name="Murray40">Murray, pp. 141–142.</ref> Although the inspectors were not allowed to search houses and warehouses, they were to visit twice a day and file weekly reports in extensive detail.<ref name=chernow342-343/> Hamilton cautioned against expedited judicial means, and favored a jury trial with potential offenders.<ref name="Murray40"/> As soon as 1791, locals began to shun or threaten inspectors, as they felt the inspection methods were intrusive.<ref name=chernow342-343/> Inspectors were also tarred and feathered, blindfolded, and whipped. Hamilton had attempted to appease the opposition with lowered tax rates, but it did not suffice.<ref name=chernow468>Chernow, p. 468.</ref>

Strong opposition to the whiskey tax by cottage producers in remote, rural regions erupted into the Whiskey Rebellion in 1794; in Western Pennsylvania and western Virginia, whiskey was the basic export product and was fundamental to the local economy. In response to the rebellion, believing compliance with the laws was vital to the establishment of federal authority, Hamilton accompanied to the rebellion's site President Washington, General Henry "Light Horse Harry" Lee, and more federal troops than Washington had usually commanded during the Revolution.<ref>Chernow, 2005, pp. 475–476.</ref> This overwhelming display of force intimidated the leaders of the insurrection, ending the rebellion virtually without bloodshed.<ref>Mitchell, I:308–331.</ref>

Manufacturing and industry

File:Great Falls of Paterson 2016.jpg

The Great Falls of the Passaic River in Paterson, New Jersey, which Hamilton envisioned using to power new factories

Hamilton's next report was his Report on Manufactures. Although he was requested by Congress on January 15, 1790, for a report for manufacturing that would expand the United States' independence, the report was not submitted until December 5, 1791.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp In the report, Hamilton quoted from The Wealth of Nations and used the French physiocrats as an example for rejecting agrarianism and the physiocratic theory, respectively.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp Hamilton also refuted Smith's ideas of government noninterference, as it would have been detrimental for trade with other countries.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp Hamilton also thought that the United States, being a primarily agrarian country, would be at a disadvantage in dealing with Europe.<ref>Cooke, p. 100.</ref> In response to the agrarian detractors, Hamilton stated that the agriculturists' interest would be advanced by manufactures, and that agriculture was just as productive as manufacturing.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

Hamilton argued for industrial policy to support a modern manufacturing industry in the United States.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=Bairoch>Template:Cite book</ref> Among the ways that the government should assist manufacturing, Hamilton argued for government assistance to "infant industries" so they can achieve economies of scale, by levying protective duties on imported foreign goods that were also manufactured in the United States,<ref name=Cooke101>Cooke, p. 101.</ref> for withdrawing duties levied on raw materials needed for domestic manufacturing,<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp<ref name=Cooke101/> and pecuniary boundaries.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp He also encouraged immigration as a way to improve the American work force.<ref name=Cooke101/><ref>Mitchell, p. 145.</ref> Congress shelved the report without much debate, except for Madison's objection to Hamilton's formulation of the general welfare clause, which Hamilton construed liberally as a legal basis for his extensive programs.<ref>Stephen F. Knott, Alexander Hamilton and the Persistence of Myth (2002), pp. 43, 54, 56, 83, 108.</ref>

In 1791, Hamilton, along with Coxe and several entrepreneurs from New York City and Philadelphia formed the Society for the Establishment of Useful Manufactures, a private industrial corporation. In May 1792, the directors decided to examine the Great Falls of the Passaic River in New Jersey as a possible location for a manufacturing center. On July 4, 1792, the society directors met Philip Schuyler at Abraham Godwin's hotel on the Passaic River, where they led a tour prospecting the area for the national manufactory. It was originally suggested that they dig mile-long trenches and build the factories away from the falls, but Hamilton argued that it would be too costly and laborious.<ref name=Shriner>Template:Cite web</ref>

The location at Great Falls of the Passaic River in New Jersey was selected due to access to raw materials, it being densely inhabited, and having access to water power from the falls of the Passaic.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp The factory town was named Paterson after New Jersey's Governor William Paterson, who signed the charter.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp<ref name=Cooke103>Cooke, p. 103.</ref> The profits were to derive from specific corporates rather than the benefits to be conferred to the nation and the citizens, which was unlike the report.<ref name=Cooke102>Cooke, p. 102.</ref> Hamilton also suggested the first stock to be offered at $500,000 and to eventually increase to $1 million, and welcomed state and federal government subscriptions alike.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp<ref name=Cooke102/> The company was never successful, with numerous shareholders reneged on stock payments and some going bankrupt. William Duer, the governor of the program, was sent to debtors' prison, where he died.<ref name=Matson>Template:Cite journal</ref> In spite of Hamilton's efforts to mend the disaster, the company folded.<ref name=Cooke103/>

Jay Treaty

When France and Britain went to war in early 1793, all four members of the Cabinet were consulted on what to do. They and Washington unanimously agreed to remain neutral, and to have the French ambassador who was raising privateers and mercenaries on American soil, Edmond-Charles Genêt, recalled.<ref name="Elkins McK">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp However, in 1794, policy toward Britain became a major point of contention between the two parties. Hamilton and the Federalists wished for more trade with Britain, the largest trading partner of the newly formed United States. The Republicans saw monarchist Britain as the main threat to republicanism and proposed instead to start a trade war.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

To avoid war, Washington sent Chief Justice John Jay to negotiate with the British, with Hamilton largely writing Jay's instructions. The result was a treaty denounced by the Republicans, but Hamilton mobilized support throughout the land.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The Jay Treaty passed the Senate in 1795 by exactly the required two-thirds majority. The treaty resolved issues remaining from the Revolution, averted war, and made possible ten years of peaceful trade between the United States and Britain.<ref name="Elkins McK" />Template:Rp Historian George Herring notes the "remarkable and fortuitous economic and diplomatic gains" produced by the Treaty.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Several European states had formed the Second League of Armed Neutrality against incursions on their neutral rights; the cabinet was also consulted on whether the United States should join the alliance and decided not to. It kept that decision secret, but Hamilton revealed it in private to George Hammond, the British minister to the United States, without telling Jay or anyone else. His act remained unknown until Hammond's dispatches were read in the 1920s. This revelation may have had limited effect on the negotiations; Jay did threaten to join the League at one point, but the British had other reasons not to view the alliance as a serious threat.<ref name="Elkins McK" />Template:Rp<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Resignation from public office

Hamilton's wife suffered a miscarriage<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> while he was absent during his armed repression of the Whiskey Rebellion.<ref name=Chernow478>Chernow, p. 478.</ref> In the wake of this, Hamilton tendered his resignation from office on December 1, 1794, giving Washington two months' notice,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Before leaving his post on January 31, 1795, Hamilton submitted the Report on a Plan for the Further Support of Public Credit to Congress to curb the debt problem. Hamilton grew dissatisfied with what he viewed as a lack of a comprehensive plan to fix the public debt. He wished to have new taxes passed with older ones made permanent and stated that any surplus from the excise tax on liquor would be pledged to lower public debt. His proposals were included in a bill by Congress within slightly over a month after his departure as treasury secretary.<ref name=chernow480>Chernow, p. 480.</ref> Some months later, Hamilton resumed his law practice in New York to remain closer to his family.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Emergence of political parties

File:T Jefferson by Charles Willson Peale 1791 2.jpg

A 1791 portrait of Hamilton's political rival Thomas Jefferson

Hamilton's vision was challenged by Virginia agrarians Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who formed the Democratic-Republican Party. They favored strong state governments based in rural America and protected by state militias as opposed to a strong national government supported by a national army and navy. They denounced Hamilton as insufficiently devoted to republicanism, too friendly toward corrupt Britain and the monarchy in general, and too oriented toward cities, industry and banking.<ref name=Henretta2011>Template:Cite book</ref>

The two-party system began to emerge as political parties coalesced around competing interests. A congressional caucus, led by Madison, Jefferson, and William Branch Giles, began as an opposition group to Hamilton's financial programs. Hamilton and his allies began to call themselves the Federalists.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref name=Smith832>See also Smith (2004), p. 832.</ref>

Hamilton assembled a nationwide coalition to garner support for the administration, including the expansive financial programs Hamilton had made administration policy and especially the president's policy of neutrality in the European war between Britain and France. Hamilton publicly denounced French minister Genêt, who commissioned American privateers and recruited Americans for private militias to attack British ships and colonial possessions of British allies. Eventually, even Jefferson joined Hamilton in seeking Genêt's recall.<ref name=Young2011>Template:Cite journal</ref> If Hamilton's administrative republic was to succeed, Americans had to see themselves first as citizens of a nation and experience an administration that proved firm and demonstrated the concepts found within the Constitution.<ref name="Cook2014">Template:Cite book</ref> The Federalists did impose some internal direct taxes, but they departed from most implications of Hamilton's administrative republic as risky.<ref>Balogh 2009, 72–110</ref>

The Republicans opposed banks and cities and favored the series of unstable revolutionary governments in France. They built their own national coalition to oppose the Federalists. Both sides gained the support of local political factions, and each side developed its own partisan newspapers. Noah Webster, John Fenno, and William Cobbett were energetic editors for the Federalists, while Benjamin Franklin Bache and Philip Freneau were fiery Republican editors. All of their newspapers were characterized by intense personal attacks, major exaggerations, and invented claims. In 1801, Hamilton established a daily newspaper, the New York Evening Post, and brought in William Coleman as its editor.<ref name=Nevins1922>Allan Nevins, The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism (1922) ch. 1 online</ref> Hamilton's and Jefferson's incompatibility was heightened by the unavowed wish of each to be Washington's principal and most trusted advisor.<ref>Cooke, pp. 109–110</ref>

An additional partisan irritant to Hamilton was the 1791 United States Senate election in New York, which resulted in the election of Democratic-Republican candidate Aaron Burr over Federalist candidate Philip Schuyler, the incumbent and Hamilton's father-in-law. Hamilton blamed Burr personally for this outcome, and negative characterizations of Burr began to appear in his correspondence thereafter. The two men did work together from time to time thereafter on various projects, including Hamilton's army of 1798 and the Manhattan Water Company.<ref>Lomask, pp. 139–140, 216–217, 220.</ref>

1796 presidential election

Template:Main Hamilton's resignation as secretary of the treasury in 1795 did not remove him from public life. With the resumption of his law practice, he remained close to Washington as an advisor and friend. Hamilton influenced Washington in the composition of his farewell address by writing drafts for Washington to compare with the latter's draft, although when Washington contemplated retirement in 1792, he had consulted Madison for a draft that was used in a similar manner to Hamilton's.<ref>Garrity and Spalding, pp. 47, 50–55.</ref><ref>Murray, p. 207.</ref>

In the election of 1796, under the Constitution as it stood then, each of the presidential electors had two votes, which they were to cast for different men from different states. The one who received the most votes would become president, the second-most, vice president. This system was not designed with the operation of parties in mind, as they had been thought disreputable and factious. The Federalists planned to deal with this by having all their electors vote for John Adams, then vice president, and all but a few for Thomas Pinckney.<ref name=chernow117>Chernow, p. 117.</ref>

Adams resented Hamilton's influence with Washington and considered him overambitious and scandalous in his private life; Hamilton compared Adams unfavorably with Washington and thought him too emotionally unstable to be president.<ref name=chernow510>Chernow, p. 510.</ref> Hamilton took the election as an opportunity: he urged all the northern electors to vote for Adams and Pinckney, lest Jefferson get in; but he cooperated with Edward Rutledge to have South Carolina's electors vote for Jefferson and Pinckney. If all this worked, Pinckney would have more votes than Adams, Pinckney would become president, and Adams would remain vice president, but it did not work. The Federalists found out about it and northern Federalists voted for Adams but not for Pinckney, in sufficient numbers that Pinckney came in third and Jefferson became vice president.<ref>Elkins and McKitrick; Age of Federalism, pp. 523–528, 859. Rutledge had his own plan, to have Pinckney win with Jefferson as Vice President.</ref> Adams resented the intrigue since he felt his service to the nation was much more extensive than Pinckney's.<ref>Elkins and McKitrick, p. 515.</ref>

Reynolds affair

File:James Monroe (1758-1831).jpg

James Monroe, a Democratic-Republican congressman and Hamilton's political rival

In summer 1797, Hamilton became the first major American politician publicly involved in a sex scandal.<ref name=Brookhiser3>Template:Cite book</ref> Six years earlier, in summer 1791, 34-year-old Hamilton became involved in an affair with 23-year-old Maria Reynolds. According to Hamilton, Maria approached him at his house in Philadelphia, claiming that her husband James Reynolds was abusive and had abandoned her, and she wished to return to her relatives in New York but lacked the means.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Hamilton recorded her address and subsequently delivered $30 personally to her boarding house, where she led him into her bedroom and "Some conversation ensued from which it was quickly apparent that other than pecuniary consolation would be acceptable". The two began an intermittent illicit affair that lasted approximately until June 1792.<ref name="Reynolds Pamphlet">Template:Cite web</ref>

James Reynolds was aware of his wife's infidelity, and likely orchestrated it from the beginning. He continually supported their relationship to extort blackmail money regularly from Hamilton. The common practice of the day for men of equal social standing was for the wronged husband to seek retribution in a duel. But Reynolds, of a lower social status and realizing how much Hamilton had to lose if his activity was made public, resorted to extortion.<ref>Template:Harvnb</ref> After an initial request of $1,000,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> with which Hamilton complied, Reynolds invited Hamilton to renew his visits to his wife "as a friend"<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> only to extort forced "loans" after each visit that, most likely in collusion, Maria solicited with her letters. In the end, the blackmail payments totaled over $1,300 including the initial extortion.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Hamilton at this point may have been aware of both spouses being involved in the blackmail,<ref>Murray, p. 165.</ref> and he welcomed and strictly complied with James Reynolds' eventual request to end the affair.<ref name="Reynolds Pamphlet"/><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In November 1792, James Reynolds and his associate Jacob Clingman were arrested for counterfeiting and speculating in Revolutionary War veterans' unpaid back wages. Clingman was released on bail and relayed information to Democratic-Republican congressman James Monroe that Reynolds had evidence incriminating Hamilton in illicit activity as Treasury Secretary. Monroe consulted with congressmen Muhlenberg and Venable on what actions to take and the congressmen confronted Hamilton on December 15, 1792.<ref name="Reynolds Pamphlet"/> Hamilton refuted the suspicions of financial speculation by exposing his affair with Maria and producing as evidence the letters by both of the Reynolds, proving that his payments to James Reynolds related to blackmail over his adultery, and not to treasury misconduct. The trio agreed on their honor to keep the documents privately with the utmost confidence.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

Five years later however, in the summer of 1797, the "notoriously scurrilous" journalist James T. Callender published A History of the United States for the Year 1796.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp The pamphlet contained accusations based on documents from the confrontation of December 15, 1792, taken out of context, that James Reynolds had been an agent of Hamilton. On July 5, 1797, Hamilton wrote to Monroe,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Muhlenberg,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> and Venable,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> asking them to confirm that there was nothing that would damage the perception of his integrity while Secretary of Treasury. All but Monroe complied with Hamilton's request. This led to Hamilton and Monroe engaging in an argument that almost culminated in a duel, before the conflict was averted by Aaron Burr.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Hamilton then published a 100-page booklet, later usually referred to as the Reynolds Pamphlet, and discussed the affair in indelicate detail for the time. Hamilton's wife Elizabeth eventually forgave him, but never forgave Monroe.<ref>Template:Cite AV media</ref> Although Hamilton faced ridicule from the Democratic-Republican faction, he maintained his availability for public service.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp

Quasi-War

During the military build-up preceding the Quasi-War with France, and with the strong endorsement of Washington, Adams reluctantly appointed Hamilton a major general of the army. At Washington's insistence, Hamilton was made the senior major general prompting Henry Knox, who had served as United States Secretary of War and years earlier in wartime as a Continental Army major general, to decline the appointment to serve as Hamilton's junior believing it would be degrading to rank beneath him.<ref name=chernow558-560>Chernow, pp. 558–560.</ref><ref>Kaplan, pp. 147–149</ref>

Hamilton served as inspector general of the United States Army from July 18, 1798, to June 15, 1800. Because Washington was unwilling to leave Mount Vernon unless it were to command an army in the field, Hamilton was the de facto head of the army, to Adams's considerable displeasure. If full-scale war broke out with France, Hamilton argued that the army should conquer the North American colonies of France's ally, Spain, bordering the United States.<ref>Morison and Commager, p. 327; Mitchell II:445.</ref> Hamilton was prepared to march the army through the Southern United States if necessary.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

To fund the army, Hamilton wrote regularly to Oliver Wolcott Jr., his successor at the treasury, Representative William Loughton Smith, and U.S. senator Theodore Sedgwick. He urged them to pass a direct tax to fund the war. Smith resigned in July 1797, as Hamilton complained to him for slowness, and urged Wolcott to tax houses instead of land.<ref>Newman, pp. 72–73.</ref> The eventual program included taxes on land, houses, and slaves, calculated at different rates in different states and requiring assessment of houses, and a stamp act like that of the British before the Revolution, though this time Americans were taxing themselves through their own representatives.<ref>Kaplan, p. 155.</ref> This provoked resistance in southeastern Pennsylvania nevertheless, led primarily by men such as John Fries who had marched with Washington against the Whiskey Rebellion.<ref>Newman, pp. 44, 76–78.</ref>

Hamilton aided in all areas of the army's development, and after Washington's death he was by default the senior officer of the United States Army from December 14, 1799, to June 15, 1800. The army was to guard against invasion from France. Adams, however, derailed all plans for war by opening negotiations with France that led to peace.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> There was no longer a direct threat for the army Hamilton was commanding to respond to.<ref>Mitchell II:483</ref> Adams discovered that key members of his cabinet, namely Secretary of State Timothy Pickering and Secretary of War James McHenry, were more loyal to Hamilton than himself; Adams fired them in May 1800.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

1800 presidential election

File:Aaron Burr post-failure.jpg

Prior to running for Governor of New York, Hamilton's foe Aaron Burr was shut out of President Jefferson's administration and the Democratic-Republican Party.

In November 1799, the Alien and Sedition Acts had left one Democratic-Republican newspaper functioning in New York City. When the last newspaper, the New Daily Advertiser, reprinted an article saying that Hamilton had attempted to purchase the Philadelphia Aurora to close it down, and said the purchase could have been funded by "British secret service money". Hamilton urged the New York Attorney General to prosecute the publisher for seditious libel, and the prosecution compelled the owner to close the paper.<ref>James Morton Smith, Freedom's Fetters: The Alien and Sedition Laws and American Civil Liberties (Ithaca, repr. 1966), pp. 400–417.</ref>

In the 1800 presidential election, Hamilton worked to defeat both the Democratic-Republicans and also his party's own nominee, John Adams.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Aaron Burr had won New York for Jefferson in May via the New York City legislative elections, as the legislature was to choose New York's electors; now Hamilton proposed a direct election, with carefully drawn districts where each district's voters would choose an elector—such that the Federalists would split the electoral vote of New York. Jay, who had resigned from the Supreme Court to become Governor of New York, wrote on the back of a letter, "Proposing a measure for party purposes which it would not become me to adopt," and declined to reply.<ref>Monaghan, pp. 419–421.</ref>

Adams was running this time with Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, the elder brother of former vice presidential candidate Thomas. Hamilton toured New England, again urging northern electors to hold firm for Pinckney in the renewed hope of making Pinckney president; and he again intrigued in South Carolina.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp Hamilton's ideas involved coaxing middle-state Federalists to assert their non-support for Adams if there was no support for Pinckney and writing to more of the modest supports of Adams concerning his supposed misconduct while president.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp Hamilton expected to see southern states such as the Carolinas cast their votes for Pinckney and Jefferson, and would result in the former being ahead of both Adams and Jefferson.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

In accordance with these plans, and a recent personal rift with Adams,<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp Hamilton wrote a pamphlet called Letter from Alexander Hamilton, Concerning the Public Conduct and Character of John Adams, Esq. President of the United States that was highly critical of him, though it closed with a tepid endorsement.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

Jefferson defeated Adams. But both he and Aaron Burr received 73 votes in the Electoral College. With Jefferson and Burr tied, the U.S. House of Representatives, under electoral laws of the time, had to choose between the two candidates.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp Several Federalists who opposed Jefferson supported Burr, and for the first 35 ballots, Jefferson was denied a majority. Before the 36th ballot, Hamilton threw his weight behind Jefferson, supporting the arrangement reached by James A. Bayard of Delaware, in which five Federalist representatives from Maryland and Vermont abstained from voting, allowing those states' delegations to go for Jefferson, ending the impasse and electing Jefferson president rather than Burr.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp

Even though Hamilton disliked Jefferson and disagreed with him on many issues, he viewed Jefferson as the lesser of two evils. Hamilton spoke of Jefferson as being "by far not so a dangerous man" and of Burr as a "mischievous enemy" to the principal measure of the past administration.<ref>Harper, p. 259.</ref> It was for that reason, along with the fact that Burr was a northerner and not a Virginian, that many Federalist representatives voted for him.<ref>Isenberg, Nancy. Fallen Founder: The Life of Aaron Burr, New York: Penguin Books, 2007, pp. 211–112.</ref>Template:Contradictory inline

Hamilton wrote many letters to friends in Congress to convince the members to see otherwise.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp In the end, Burr would become vice president after losing to Jefferson.<ref name=Monticello>Template:Cite web</ref> However, according to several historians, the Federalists had rejected Hamilton's diatribe as reasons to not vote for Burr.<ref name=McDonald />Template:Rp<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp In his book American Machiavelli: Alexander Hamilton and the Origins of US Foreign Policy, historian John Lamberton Harper stated Hamilton could have "perhaps" contributed "to a degree" in Burr's defeat.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Ron Chernow, alternatively, claimed that Hamilton "squelched" Burr's chance at becoming president.<ref name=chernow638>Chernow, p. 638.</ref> When it became clear that Jefferson had developed his own concerns about Burr and would not support his return to the vice presidency,<ref name=Monticello /> Burr sought the New York governorship in 1804 with Federalist support, against the Jeffersonian Morgan Lewis, but was defeated by forces including Hamilton.<ref>ANB, "Aaron Burr".</ref>

Duel with Burr and death

File:Duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton.jpg

A 1901 illustration of Burr fatally wounding Hamilton in their 1804 duel in Weehawken, New Jersey

File:Alexander Hamilton Grave.JPG

Hamilton's tomb in Trinity Church Cemetery in Lower Manhattan

Soon after Lewis' gubernatorial victory, the Albany Register published Charles D. Cooper's letters, citing Hamilton's opposition to Burr and alleging that Hamilton had expressed "a still more despicable opinion" of the vice president at an Upstate New York dinner party.<ref name=jbf/><ref>Kennedy, Burr, Hamilton, and Jefferson, p. 72.</ref> Cooper claimed that the letter was intercepted after relaying the information, but stated he was "unusually cautious" in recollecting the information from the dinner.<ref name=chernow680-681>Chernow, pp. 680–681.</ref>

Sensing an attack on his honor, and recovering from his defeat, Burr demanded an apology in the form of a letter. Hamilton wrote a letter in response and ultimately refused because he could not recall the instance of insulting Burr. Hamilton was also accused of recanting Cooper's letter out of cowardice.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp After a series of attempts to reconcile differences between the two failed, a duel was arranged through liaisons on June 27, 1804.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp

The concept of honor was fundamental to Hamilton's vision of himself and of the nation.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> As evidence of the importance that honor held in Hamilton's value system, historians observe that Hamilton previously was a party to seven "affairs of honor" as a principal, and to three as an advisor or second.<ref name=chernow-interview>Template:Cite journal</ref> Such affairs of honor were often concluded prior to reaching the final stage of a duel.<ref name=chernow-interview/>

Before the duel, Hamilton wrote an explanation of his decision to participate while at the same time intending to "throw away" his shot.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> His desire to be available for future political matters also played a factor.<ref name=jbf>Template:Cite journal</ref> A week before the duel, Hamilton and Burr both attended an annual Independence Day dinner held by the Society of the Cincinnati. Separate accounts confirm that Hamilton was uncharacteristically effusive while Burr was, by contrast, uncharacteristically withdrawn. Accounts also agree that Burr became roused when Hamilton, again uncharacteristically, sang a favorite song, which recent scholarship indicates was "How Stands the Glass Around", an anthem sung by military troops about fighting and dying in war.<ref>Template:Citation</ref>

The duel began at dawn on July 11, 1804, along the west bank of the Hudson River on a rocky ledge in Weehawken, New Jersey.<ref>Adams, pp. 93–94.</ref> Both opponents were rowed over from Manhattan separately from different locations, since the location of the duel was not accessible from the west due to the steepness of the adjoining cliffs. Coincidentally, the duel took place relatively close to the location of the duel that had ended the life of Hamilton's eldest son, Philip Hamilton, three years earlier.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Lots were cast for the choice of position and which second should start the duel. Both were won by Hamilton's second, who chose the upper edge of the ledge for Hamilton facing the city and the rising sun to the east.<ref>Winfield, Charles H. (1874). History of the County of Hudson, New Jersey from Its Earliest Settlement to the Present Time. New York: Kennard and Hay. Chapter 8, "Duels". pp. p.219</ref> After the seconds measured the paces, Hamilton, according to both William P. Van Ness and Burr, raised his pistol "as if to try the light" and had to wear his glasses to prevent his vision from being obscured.<ref>Fleming, p. 323</ref> Hamilton also refused the more sensitive hairspring setting for the dueling pistols offered by Nathaniel Pendleton, and Burr was unaware of the option.<ref name=Brookhiser212/>

Burr shot Hamilton, delivering what proved to be a fatal wound, while Hamilton apparently "deloped", as he had indicated was his intention in his letter beforehand; and his shot went well above Burr's head, breaking a tree branch. The seconds, Pendleton and Van Ness,<ref>Fleming, p. 345</ref> disagreed on which man fired first in the duel.<ref name=Brookhiser212>Template:Cite book</ref> Soon after, they measured and triangulated the shooting, but could not determine from which angle Hamilton had fired. Biographer Ron Chernow contends that, after taking deliberate aim, Burr fired second.<ref name=chernow704>Chernow, p. 704.</ref> Biographer James Earnest Cooke, however, believes that Burr took careful aim and shot first, and Hamilton fired while falling after being struck by Burr's bullet.<ref>Cooke, p. 242</ref>

The shot hit Hamilton in the lower abdomen above his right hip. The ball ricocheted off Hamilton's second or third false rib, fracturing it and causing considerable damage to his internal organs, particularly his liver and diaphragm, before becoming lodged in his first or second lumbar vertebra.<ref name=schachner />Template:Rp<ref>Emery, p. 243</ref>

The paralyzed Hamilton was immediately attended by the same surgeon who tended to Hamilton's son Philip. Hamilton was ferried to Greenwich Village and the boarding house of his friend William Bayard Jr., who was waiting on the dock.<ref name=chernow705>Chernow, pp. 705–708.</ref> On his deathbed, Hamilton asked the Episcopal Bishop of New York, Benjamin Moore, to give him holy communion.<ref name="papers-v26"/> Moore initially declined to do so on the grounds that participating in a duel was a mortal sin and that Hamilton, although undoubtedly sincere in his faith, was not a member of the Episcopalian denomination.<ref name=fleming>Template:Cite book</ref> After leaving, Moore was persuaded to return that afternoon by the urgent pleas of Hamilton's friends. After hearing Hamilton's solemn assurance that he repented his role in the duel, Moore gave him communion.<ref name=fleming/>

After final visits from his family, friends, and considerable suffering for at least 31 hours, Hamilton died at two o'clock the following afternoon, July 12, 1804,<ref name=chernow705/><ref name=jch836>Template:Cite book</ref> at Bayard's home just below present-day Gansevoort Street in Greenwich Village, New York City.<ref name=Miller1990>Template:Cite book Cited in Template:Cite news</ref> The city fathers halted all business at noon two days later for Hamilton's funeral. The procession route of about two miles organized by the Society of the Cincinnati had so many participants of every class of citizen that it took hours to complete and was widely reported nationwide by newspapers.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Moore conducted Hamilton's funeral service at Trinity Church at present-day 89 Broadway in Manhattan.<ref name="papers-v26" /> Gouverneur Morris gave the eulogy and secretly established a fund to support his widow and children.<ref name=chernow712-713-725>Chernow, pp. 712–713, 725.</ref> Hamilton was buried in the church's cemetery.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Religion

Religious faith

As a youth in the West Indies, Hamilton was an Orthodox and conventional Presbyterian of the New Lights; he was mentored there by a former student of John Witherspoon, a moderate of the New School.<ref>McDonald, Alexander Hamilton p. 11; Adair and Harvey (1974)</ref> He wrote two or three hymns, which were published in the local newspaper.<ref name=chernow38>Chernow, p. 38.</ref> Robert Troup, his college roommate, noted that Hamilton was "in the habit of praying on his knees night and morning".<ref name=jch-life/>Template:Rp

During the American Revolution, however, Hamilton became less religious and instead became "a conventional liberal with theistic inclinations who was an irregular churchgoer at best," according to Brown University historian Gordon S. Wood. In his final years of life, though, Hamilton returned to his Protestant faith,<ref>Wood, Gordon. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815 (2009) pp. 589–590</ref> and was Episcopalian. Historian Ron Chernow wrote:

When the Constitutional Convention opened in Philadelphia in May 1787, stories circulated that Hamilton made two quips about God at the convention. Asked by a Presbyterian minister why God was not referenced in the Constitution, Hamilton responded "Indeed, Doctor, we forgot it." When Benjamin Franklin asked that each session of the Constitutional Convention be opened with prayer, Hamilton is reported to have replied that there was no need for "foreign aid".<ref name=adair1955>Template:Cite journal</ref> During the French Revolution, Hamilton displayed a utilitarian approach to using religion for political ends, including maligning Thomas Jefferson as "the atheist", and insisting that Christianity and Jeffersonian democracy were incompatible.<ref name=adair1955/>Template:Rp After 1801, Hamilton expressed his belief in Christianity, proposing a Christian Constitutional Society in 1802 to take hold of "some strong feeling of the mind" to elect "fit men" to office, and advocating "Christian welfare societies" for the poor.

After being shot in his duel with Aaron Burr on July 11, 1804, Hamilton spoke of his belief in God's mercy.Template:Efn On his deathbed, Hamilton asked the Episcopal Bishop of New York, Benjamin Moore, to give him holy communion.<ref name="papers-v26"/> Moore initially declined to do so, on two grounds: that to participate in a duel was a mortal sin, and that Hamilton, although undoubtedly sincere in his faith, was not a member of the Episcopalian denomination.<ref name=fleming /> After leaving, Moore was persuaded to return that afternoon following urgent pleas of Hamilton's friends. After receiving Hamilton's solemn assurance that he never intended to shoot Burr and repented for his part in the duel, Moore gave him communion.<ref name=fleming/> Bishop Moore returned the next morning, stayed with Hamilton for several hours until his death, and conducted his subsequent funeral service at Trinity Church.<ref name="papers-v26">Template:Cite book</ref>

Relationship with Jews and Judaism

Hamilton's birthplace had a large Jewish community, comprising roughly a quarter of Charlestown's white population by the 1720s.<ref name=chernow17/> He came into contact with Jews on a regular basis; as a small boy, he was tutored by a Jewish schoolmistress, and had learned to recite the Ten Commandments in the original Hebrew.<ref name=jch-life>Template:Cite book</ref>

Hamilton exhibited a respect for Jews, which was described as "a life-long reverence."<ref name=chernow18>Chernow, p. 18.</ref> He believed that Jewish achievement was a result of divine providence:

Based primarily on the phonetic similarity of Lavien to a common Jewish surname, it has been suggested that Johann Lavien, the first husband of Hamilton's mother, was Jewish or of Jewish descent.<ref name=chernow10-26>Chernow, pp. 10, 26.</ref> On this contested foundation, it was rumored that Hamilton himself was born Jewish, a claim that gained some popularity early in the 20th century<ref name=Newton34>Newton (2015),[[[:Template:GBurl]] p. 34].</ref> and which was given serious consideration by one present-day historian.<ref name=Porwancher>Template:Cite book</ref> The belief that Lavien was Jewish was popularized by Gertrude Atherton in her 1902 novel The Conqueror, a fictionalized biography of Hamilton which made the earliest known written assertion that Hamilton was Jewish.<ref>Newton (2015), [[[:Template:GBurl]] p. 14]</ref><ref>Newton (2019), p. 18 Template:Webarchive.</ref> The consensus of mainstream scholars and historians, however, is that Hamilton was not Jewish.<ref name=chernow_10-12_26>Chernow, pp. [[[:Template:GBurl]] 10–12], [[[:Template:GBurl]] 26].</ref>

Legacy

Constitution

Template:See also Hamilton's interpretations of the Constitution, which are set forth in The Federalist Papers, remain highly influential, and continue to be cited in scholarly studies and court decisions.<ref>Susan Welch, John Gruhl and John Comer, Understanding American Government (2011) p. 70</ref> Although the Constitution was ambiguous as to the exact balance of power between national and state governments, Hamilton consistently took the side of greater federal power at the expense of the states, which placed him at odds with Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers.<ref>Melvyn R. Durchslag, State sovereign immunity: a reference guide to the United States Constitution (2002) p xix</ref> Jefferson especially opposed Hamilton's support of a de facto central bank, which Hamilton believed was permissible under Congress's constitutional authority to issue currency, regulate interstate commerce, and do anything else that would be "necessary and proper" to enact the provisions of the Constitution.<ref name="Thomas Frederick Wilson 1992 94">Template:Cite book</ref>

Jefferson, however, took a differing view. Parsing text carefully, Jefferson argued that no specific authorization for the establishment of a national bank existed. The controversy between the two was addressed in McCulloch v. Maryland, which largely adopted Hamilton's view, granting the federal government broad freedom to select the best means to execute its constitutionally enumerated powers and confirmed the doctrine of implied powers.<ref name="Thomas Frederick Wilson 1992 94"/> The American Civil War and the Progressive Era, Hamilton's defenders argue, demonstrated the sorts of crises and politics that Hamilton's administrative republic sought to avoid.<ref name="Tulis1987">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:How

Hamilton's policies have proven greatly influential on the development of the U.S. government. His constitutional interpretation, particularly of the Necessary and Proper Clause, set precedents for federal authority that are still cited by courts and are considered an authority on constitutional interpretation. French diplomat Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, who spent 1794 in the United States, wrote, "I consider Napoleon, Fox, and Hamilton the three greatest men of our epoch, and if I were forced to decide between the three, I would give without hesitation the first place to Hamilton," adding that Hamilton understood the problems of European conservatives trying to adapt to a liberalizing world.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Both John Adams and Jefferson, however, viewed Hamilton as unprincipled and dangerously aristocratic. Hamilton's reputation was mostly negative in the Jeffersonian democracy and Jacksonian democracy eras. During the Jeffersonian era, Hamilton was criticized as a centralizer, sometimes to the point of accusing him of being a proponent of monarchy.<ref name=chernow397-398>Chernow, pp. 397–398.</ref> Conversely, during the later Progressive Era, such figures as Herbert Croly, Henry Cabot Lodge, and Theodore Roosevelt praised Hamilton's leadership as a proponent of a strong national government. In the 19th and 20th centuries several Republicans wrote laudatory biographies on Hamilton prior to entering politics.<ref>Before they became senators, for instance, Henry Cabot Lodge and Arthur H. Vandenberg wrote highly favorable biographies of Hamilton.Template:Cite book</ref>

According to Princeton University historian Sean Wilentz, Hamilton and has been generally viewed favorably among contemporary scholars, who portray him as a visionary architect of a modern liberal capitalist economy and of a dynamic federal government headed by an energetic executive.<ref name=wilentz>Template:Cite journal</ref> Conversely, these modern scholars favoring Hamilton portray Jefferson and his allies as relatively naïve and dreamy idealists.<ref name=wilentz/>

Slavery

Hamilton is not known to have ever owned slaves, although members of his family did. At the time of her death, Hamilton's mother owned two slaves and wrote a will leaving them to her sons. Due to their illegitimacy, however, Hamilton and his brother were held ineligible to inherit her property and never took ownership of the slaves.<ref name="New-York Journal"/>Template:Rp As a youth in Saint Croix, Hamilton later worked for a company that traded slaves as well as sugar and other staples of the Transatlantic economy.<ref name="New-York Journal"/>Template:Rp Historians have discussed whether Hamilton personally owned slaves later in life.<ref>Multiple sources:

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book</ref>

Ron Chernow, in his 2004 biography of Hamilton, argued that, while there is "no definite proof" that Hamilton personally owned slaves, "oblique hints" in Hamilton's papers suggest "he and Eliza may have owned one or two household slaves."<ref name=chernow210>Chernow, p. 210.</ref> Hamilton handled slave transactions as the legal representative of his own family members, and his grandson, Allan McLane Hamilton, interpreted some of these journal entries as being purchases for himself.<ref name="Allan McLane Hamilton">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> In 1840, however, his son John maintained that his father "never owned a slave; but on the contrary, having learned that a domestic whom he had hired was about to be sold by her master, he immediately purchased her freedom."<ref>Hamilton, John C., The Life of Alexander Hamilton, D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1834–1840, vol. 2, p. 280</ref>

Hamilton expressed support for limited emancipation during the American Revolutionary War, when he endorsed a plan to recruit enslaved men to serve in the Continental Army. As a necessary inducement, Hamilton wrote, the Black soldiers should be promised their freedom upon enlistment. He dismissed objections that enslaved men were "too stupid" to fight well, arguing that their "want of cultivation" and "habit of subordination" made them ideal soldiers. Whereas officers should be "men of sense and sentiment," good enlisted men were unthinking "machines," a role to which white men, unaccustomed to a "life of servitude," were comparatively less suited than Blacks.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> In 1785, he joined his close associate John Jay and more than 30 fellow New Yorkers in founding the New York Manumission Society. The Society lobbied successfully for legislation to gradually abolish slavery in New York.<ref name="New-York Journal"/> Rather than legally emancipate all enslaved people in the state, the 1799 act declared all children born after July 4, 1799 free pending a period of apprenticeship lasting 28 years for men and 25 years for women. Enslaved people born prior to that date were not emancipated, and the final end of slavery in New York did not occur until 1827.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

In his letter recommending the enlistment of Black soldiers in the Continental Army, Hamilton rejected the racial essentialism found in the contemporaneous writings of Jefferson and other leading white intellectuals, asserting "their natural faculties are as good as ours."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> He never advocated for the colonization of free people of color outside the United States, which many contemporaries considered essential to any plan for emancipation.<ref name="New-York Journal">Template:Cite journal</ref>Template:Rp In the 1790s, Hamilton's political agenda sometimes came into conflict with proslavery interests. When the enslaved population of Saint-Domingue rose up against their French enslavers, Hamilton and other Federalists supported the revolutionaries and urged closer economic and diplomatic ties with new nation of Haiti.<ref name="New-York Journal"/>Template:Rp His suggestions shaped the Haitian constitution, promulgated the year after his death.<ref name="New-York Journal"/>Template:Rp At other times, political expediency led Hamilton to form close relationships with slaveholders like William Loughton Smith whose support was critical to the strength of the Federalist Party in South Carolina.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Economics

File:US10dollarbill-Series 2004A.jpg

Hamilton has appeared on the United States ten-dollar bill since 1928.

Hamilton has been portrayed as the patron saint<ref name=":0" /> of the American School economic philosophy that, according to historian Michael Lind, later dominated American economic policy after 1861.<ref name=":0">Lind, Michael, Hamilton's Republic, 1997, pp. xiv–xv, 229–230.</ref> Hamilton's ideas and work influenced 19th century German economist Friedrich List<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> and Henry Charles Carey, who served as Abraham Lincoln's chief economic advisor during the Lincoln administration.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

In fall 1781, Hamilton firmly supported government intervention in favor of business after the manner of Jean-Baptiste Colbert.<ref name=chernow170>Chernow, p. 170.</ref><ref>Continentalist V, April 1782 (but written in fall 1781).</ref><ref>Syrett, p. 3:77.</ref> In contrast to the British policy of international mercantilism, which he believed skewed benefits to colonial and imperial powers, Hamilton was a pioneering advocate of protectionism.<ref>Bairoch, pp. [[[:Template:GBurl]] 17], [[[:Template:GBurl]] 33].</ref> He is credited with the idea that industrialization was only possible with tariffs that protected the "infant industries" of an emerging nation.<ref name=Bairoch/>

Public administration

Template:Main Political theorists credit Hamilton with the creation of the modern administrative state, citing his arguments in favor of a strong executive, linked to the electoral support of the people, as the linchpin of an administrative republic.<ref name=Green2002>Template:Cite journal</ref>Template:Sfn The dominance of executive leadership in the formulation and carrying out of policy was, in Hamilton's view, essential to resist the deterioration of a republican government.<ref>Harvey Flaumenhaft, "Hamilton's Administrative Republic and the American Presidency", in Joseph M. Bessette and Jeffrey Tulis, The Presidency in the Constitutional Order (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1981)</ref> As evidence of Hamilton's global influence, some scholars have compared Hamilton's recommendations to the development of Meiji Japan.<ref>Austin, pp. 261–262.</ref>

In popular culture

File:Lin-Manuel Miranda in Hamilton.jpg

Lin-Manuel Miranda performing the title role in the musical Hamilton in April 2016

Hamilton has appeared as a significant figure in popular works of historical fiction, including many that focused on other American political figures of his time. In comparison to other Founding Fathers, however, Hamilton attracted relatively little attention in American popular culture in the 20th century.<ref name="Browne">Hamilton was not mentioned in standard reference guides to popular culture. See, e.g., Template:Cite book</ref>

In 2015, he gained significant mainstream attention with the debut of the Broadway musical Hamilton, which is based on a biography by Ron Chernow. Lin-Manuel Miranda plays Hamilton in the musical, which was described by The New Yorker in February 2015 as "an achievement of historical and cultural reimagining. In Miranda's telling, the headlong rise of one self-made immigrant becomes the story of America."<ref name="Mead2015">Template:Cite magazine</ref> The Off-Broadway production of Hamilton won the 2015 Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Musical and seven other Drama Desk Awards. In 2016, Hamilton received the Pulitzer Prize for Drama, and set a record for Tony Award nominations with 16,<ref name="nyti-Ham">Template:Cite news</ref> winning 11, including Best Musical.<ref name="Viagas2016">Template:Cite journal</ref> During the Obama administration, a plan to replace Hamilton on the ten-dollar bill was shelved due partly to the musical's popularity.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> On July 3, 2020, Disney+ released the movie Hamilton, an authorized film of the Broadway stage production performed by the original cast.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

References

Bibliography

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book

Studies

• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Balogh, Brian. 2009. A Government out of Sight: The Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth Century American. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Bordewich, Fergus M. The First Congress: How James Madison, George Washington, and a Group of Extraordinary Men Invented the Government (2016) on 1789–91.
• Template:Cite book A one-volume recasting of Brant's six-volume life.
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book Detailed political history of the 1790s; online free
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book. Four volumes, with various subtitles, cited as "Flexner, Washington". Vol. IV. Template:ISBN.
• Template:Cite book
• Gaspar, Vitor. "The making of a continental financial system: Lessons for Europe from early American history." Journal of European Integration 37.7 (2015): 847–859, summarizes Hamilton's achievements in Atlantic perspective.
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book Reviewed in Reason, July 2024, https://reason.com/2024/06/16/the-dark-side-of-alexander-hamilton/
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Knott, Stephen F. "The Four Faces of Alexander Hamilton: Jefferson's Hamilton, Hollywood's Hamilton, Miranda's Hamilton, and the Real Hamilton." American Political Thought 7.4 (2018): 543–564.
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal A review of the evidence on Newburgh; despite the title, Kohn is doubtful that a coup d'état was ever seriously attempted.
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book First volume of two, contains Hamilton's lifetime.
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite journal Summarizes speculations of William Duer and others in the context of the national economy.
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book Survey of politics in the 1790s.
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal An undergraduate paper, which concludes that Hamilton was ambivalent about slavery.
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book Coverage of how the Treasury and other departments were created and operated.
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book The most recent synthesis of the era.
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book

Sources

• Cooke, Jacob E., ed. Alexander Hamilton: A Profile. 1967. (Short excerpts from Hamilton and his critics.)
• Cunningham, Noble E. Jefferson vs. Hamilton: Confrontations that Shaped a Nation. 2000. (Short collection of primary sources, with commentary.)
• Template:Cite book (All of Hamilton's major writings and many of his letters.)
• Freeman, Joanne B., ed., The Essential Hamilton: Letters & Other Writings (abridged ed.) (Library of America, 2017)
• Frisch, Morton J., ed. Selected Writings and Speeches of Alexander Hamilton. 1985.
• Goebel, Julius Jr., and Joseph H. Smith, eds. The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton. 5 vols. Columbia University Press, 1964–80. (Comprehensive edition of Hamilton's legal papers.)
• Hamilton, Alexander. Report on Manufactures. (Economic program for the United States.)
• Hamilton, Alexander. Report on Public Credit. (Financial program for the United States.)
• Hamilton, Alexander; Hamilton, John Church. The Works of Alexander Hamilton: Miscellanies, 1789–1795: France; Duties on imports; National bank; Manufactures; Revenue circulars; Reports on claims. 1850. John F. Trow, printer. (free online e-book edition Template:Webarchive)
• Hamilton, Alexander; Madison, James; Jay, John. The Federalist Papers. (Published under the shared pseudonym "Publius".)
• Template:Cite book
• Morris, Richard, ed. Alexander Hamilton and the Founding of the Nation. 1957. (Excerpts from Hamilton's writings.)
• National Archives, Founders Online Template:Webarchive – searchable edition
• Sylla, Richard and David J. Cowen, eds. Alexander Hamilton on Finance, Credit, and Debt (Columbia UP, 2018) 346 pp. (partly abridged version of key documents; online review Template:Webarchive)
• Syrett, Harold C., Jacob E. Cooke, and Barbara Chernow, eds. The Papers of Alexander Hamilton. 27 vols. Columbia University Press, 1961–87. (Includes all letters and writings by Hamilton, and all important letters written to him; the definitive edition of Hamilton's works, intensively annotated.)
• Taylor, George Rogers, ed. Hamilton and the National Debt. 1950. (Excerpts from 1790s writings representing all sides.)

External links

• Alexander Hamilton: A Resource Guide from the Library of Congress
• Template:Internet Archive author
• Template:Librivox author