George Pappas
Template:Short description Template:For Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox philosopher George Sotiros Pappas (born 1942) is a professor of philosophy at Ohio State University.<ref>Departmental profile at OSU Template:Webarchive</ref> Pappas specializes in epistemology, the history of early modern philosophy, philosophy of religion and metaphysics. He is of Greek and English origin.
He is the author of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on "Internalist versus Externalist" conceptions of epistemic justification.<ref>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article</ref>
He was co-editor (with Marshall Swain) of Essays on Knowledge and Justification (1978), an anthology of essays relating to the Gettier problem<ref>Gettier Problem bibliography at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref> used as a core text in undergraduate epistemology courses.<ref>Suggested epistemology reading list</ref>
Pappas is an editorial consultant of Berkeley Studies.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Studies in Berkeley's philosophy
[edit]Pappas is knownTemplate:By whom to be a leading Berkeley scholar; his essay "Berkeley and Scepticism"<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> was in 1993 awarded the International Berkeley Prize.<ref>See: Berkeley Prize Winners.
The annual International Berkeley Essay Prize competition was established by Colin Murray Turbayne and his wife in 1990.</ref> Pappas is a regular participant of International Berkeley Conferences.<ref>International Berkeley Conferences Template:Webarchive</ref> At one such conference, celebrating the 300th anniversary of George Berkeley's birth, Pappas propounded a new approach to the relationship between Berkeley's anti-abstractionism and "esse est percipi"<ref>"To be is to be perceived." A core proposition of Berkeley's ontology.</ref> principle. On Pappas' reading, Berkeley's two theses — that there are no abstract ideas and that sensible objects must be perceived in order to exist — entail one another.<ref>Template:Cite conference</ref>
Pappas' interpretation of Berkeley's esse is percipi thesis has sparked much discussion.<ref>Template:Cite journal In Template:Harvnb
- McKim, Robert. "Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations", Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997–1998): 1–13.</ref> In 1989, the Garland Publishing Company brought out a 15-volume collection of major works on Berkeley; Pappas' paper "Abstract ideas and the 'esse is percipi' thesis" was included in the third volume,<ref>w Doney (ed), Berkeley on abstraction and abstract ideas, N.Y.; L.: Garland, 1989. — XVII, 434 p. — (Philosophy of George Berkeley; 3; A Garland series)</ref> as it was considered to be a significant contribution to Berkeley scholarship.
Pappas developed his treatment of Berkeley's "esse est percipi" principle<ref>Template:Harvnb</ref> to repudiate the "inherence interpretation of Berkeley", upon which Edwin E. Allaire, among others, elaborated.<ref>Template:Cite journal
The article is a classical work of Berkeley scholarship.</ref><ref>For more detail, see:
- Template:Cite journal (A wide grasp of literature on the "inherence account".)
- Template:Cite book (Muehlmann's Introduction provides further bibliographical information of the various articles in defense and in criticism of this view.)
- Template:Cite book
</ref><ref>For up-to-date criticism of the "inherence account," see: Template:Cite journal </ref>
That account is put forward to answer an extremely perplexing question in the history of philosophy: Why did Berkeley embrace idealism, i. e., why did he hold that esse est percipi, that to be is to be perceived? Template:Harv
After emerging in the early 1960s, the "inherence account" attracted numerous proponents and became an influential element of contemporary Berkeley scholarship. In his paper "Ideas, minds, and Berkeley"<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Pappas revealed some discrepancies between fountain-head evidences and Allaire's approach to a reconstruction of Berkeley's idealism. Pappas' critical examination of the "inherence account" is greatly appreciated by Berkeley scholars. Pappas' penetrating remarks compelled Edwin B. Allaire to revise and improve his conception.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Even those who share Allaire's account of Berkeley's idealism acknowledge Pappas' article to be "an excellent review and critique of the IA [inherence account]."<ref>Template:Harvnb</ref>
In 2000, Pappas published his monograph Berkeley's thought in which some parts were based on earlier papers of his. While writings by A. A. Luce or Geoffrey Warnock are long outdated, Berkeley's thought is often included in lists of recommended literature on Berkeley's philosophy.<ref>As examples, take:
</ref>