Internet Authority Disease: Difference between revisions
Undo revision 22555768 by कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (talk) |
imported>JrandWP m Undid edits by 50.92.202.47 (talk) to last version by कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{essay|specifiedcategory=Essays on general topics}} | {{essay|specifiedcategory=Essays on general topics}} | ||
As the Internet became a sort of frontier for civilization, it was noticed that there was not some new egalitarian democratic playing field emerging. Rather, petty bureaucracies formed around those who had control of the various "territories" of the internet. Those who controlled the physical access to the servers and networks rose to authority in a way that surprised no one. After all, this was exactly analagous to what had happened in [[meatspace]] over thousands of years of history. However, the stranger phenomenon was of those who managed to somehow control these internet "territories" even though they had no legal or physical ownership of anything. In some cases, such as [[IRC]], this ownership was enforced by built in devices such as "ops" status, and "kick" and "ban" routines in the program code enabling the authority to banish arbitrary people from these "territories". In other cases, though, it was by merely working their ass off that a general consensus would grow around a certain person being "leader.", for what does a leader need other than followers? | |||
The Internet Authority Disease is a theory to explain how utterly addicted many internet "leaders" become to the sense of power they have on the internet, and the effects it has on their attitude towards the internet, their emotional state, and their feelings towards users. | |||
Unfortunately it's not a very well developed theory at the moment. | |||
[[Category:Community]] | [[Category:Community]] | ||
[[category:Conflicts]] | [[category:Conflicts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:29, 8 January 2022
Template:Essay As the Internet became a sort of frontier for civilization, it was noticed that there was not some new egalitarian democratic playing field emerging. Rather, petty bureaucracies formed around those who had control of the various "territories" of the internet. Those who controlled the physical access to the servers and networks rose to authority in a way that surprised no one. After all, this was exactly analagous to what had happened in meatspace over thousands of years of history. However, the stranger phenomenon was of those who managed to somehow control these internet "territories" even though they had no legal or physical ownership of anything. In some cases, such as IRC, this ownership was enforced by built in devices such as "ops" status, and "kick" and "ban" routines in the program code enabling the authority to banish arbitrary people from these "territories". In other cases, though, it was by merely working their ass off that a general consensus would grow around a certain person being "leader.", for what does a leader need other than followers?
The Internet Authority Disease is a theory to explain how utterly addicted many internet "leaders" become to the sense of power they have on the internet, and the effects it has on their attitude towards the internet, their emotional state, and their feelings towards users.
Unfortunately it's not a very well developed theory at the moment.