User:The Cunctator: Difference between revisions
imported>The Cunctator No edit summary |
imported>The Cunctator Good, bad, yeah yeah. |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Bad idea: Force attribution of authorship to every paragraph. | Bad idea: Force attribution of authorship to every paragraph. | ||
11 October: Good idea: <a href="Thoughts on Wikipedia interlanguage priorities">harmonize interlanguage efforts</a>. | |||
Bad idea: make stabs at political correctness without a clear understanding of the consequences. | |||
[[User:The Cunctator/Poetry|/Poetry]] | [[User:The Cunctator/Poetry|/Poetry]] | ||
[[User:The Cunctator/Talk|/Talk]] | [[User:The Cunctator/Talk|/Talk]] | ||
Revision as of 20:16, 11 October 2002
Good idea: test the PHP script
Bad idea: balkanize discussion.
One hopes enlightenment will come before total darkness falls.
12 November: too bad. I would have very much liked to build the entry on the plane crash. Oh well.
29 November: Good idea: Have policy pages as part of Wikipedia.
Bad idea: Military-analogy policies.
17 December: Good idea: be relativist about religion
Bad idea: In fit of political correctness, change all instances of "X mythology" to "stories of X religion".
10 January: Good idea: Only permanently and irrevocably delete pages that have no historical use or future use.
Bad idea: Delete a list of such entries which someone else put on meta-wikipedia.
17 January: Good idea: let people discuss merits of Wikipedia policy using the Wiki collaborative process.
Bad idea: Force attribution of authorship to every paragraph.
11 October: Good idea: <a href="Thoughts on Wikipedia interlanguage priorities">harmonize interlanguage efforts</a>.
Bad idea: make stabs at political correctness without a clear understanding of the consequences.