User talk:Juliancolton

Template:Welcome/lang

Just say yes!

Welcome to Meta!

Hello Juliancolton, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Meta:Metapub (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing!

giggy _(:O) 11:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

File:Glazed apple Danish.jpg

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades... (our budget is smaller than Commons)

Juliancolton, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Meta. Please take a moment to read the Meta:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat, and Meta:Requests for deletion, but also Talk:Spam blacklist and Talk:Interwiki map), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

A tip: add this page Meta:Administrators' discussion index to your watchlist, it tracks the latest activity to various sections of many of the important pages.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-admin @ irc.freenode.net. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading although it doesn't always completely apply here at Meta.

Please also check or add your entry to Meta:Administrators#List_of_administrators and the Template:List of administrators.

--Dferg 21:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, Julian! :) – Katerenka (talk • contribs) 21:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Congrats! :) Cirt (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

thanks! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

A very late congrats. ;) Pmlineditor ∞ 08:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Re:

Then explain to me why have I been Invited. --すけ 22:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean, sorry. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

I think s/he means that. ;) --WizardOfOz ^talk 22:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

I mean this: http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/7573/marq.jpg --すけ 22:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC):

Yeah, he is confused about the centnotice. Tiptoety ^talk 22:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Else: Can you restore my votation please? --すけ 23:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Sadly the CentralNotice can't differentiate between eligible users and ineligible users, so everyone gets the invite. Unfortunately, as you don't happen to meet the voting requirements, you can't opine in this particular discussion. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Well I have other account from May 2009, that didn't get the Invitation, explain please, (you can use my IP) --85.87.112.15 00:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Or should i wait untill January, 16 ? http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=%E3%81%99%E3%81%91 --すけ 05:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: edit on my page, and removal of my comments re: sysops vote

Please do not edit my vote or comments on the global sysops proposal again, without demonstrating some right to do so or violation of policy that was corrected. RE: your comment on my talk page http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:%CE%94%CE%B6&oldid=1813606 Please indicate how my comment was inappropriate. Unless it violates some rule I am unaware of, in which case please indicate this to me, I do not care whether others find my reasoning appropriate, so long as they understand it. In any case, I see no justification for removing indications that I've edited on projects that will be affected by the proposal while leaving hundreds of other indications on the very same page. As stated in my edit, I feel my activity on other projects makes my vote and reasoning particularly persuasive, and intend to maintain my vote/reasoning until such time as its shown to be improper. Thanks for your consideration.--Δζ 15:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)