Spivak pronoun: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 08:17, 17 May 2025

Template:Multiple issues The Spivak pronouns 'e/em/eir' are a set of gender-neutral pronouns in English promoted on the virtual community LambdaMOO based on pronouns used in a book by American mathematician Michael Spivak. Though not in widespread use, they have been employed in writing for gender-neutral language by those who wish to avoid the standard terms he, she, or singular they.

History

The precise history of the Spivak pronouns is unclear, since they appear to have been independently created multiple times.

The first recorded<ref name="Dennis Barton">Template:Cite journal</ref> use of the pronouns was in a January 1890 editorial by James Rogers, who derives e, es, and em from he and them in response to the proposed thon.<ref name="James Rogers">Rogers, James "That Impersonal Pronoun." Editorial. Comp. William Henry Hills The Writer Boston. Jan. 1890, 4th ed.: 12-13. Google Books. Google. Web. Accessed 31 July 2014. [1].</ref> Coincidentally, Scottish author David Lindsay used the similar forms ae and aer in his novel A Voyage to Arcturus, to refer to non-terrestrial beings "unmistakably of a third positive sex".

In 1975, Christine M. Elverson of Skokie, Illinois, won a contest by the Chicago Association of Business Communicators to find replacements for "she and he", "him and her", and "his and hers". Her pronouns ey, em, and eir were formed by dropping the "th" from they, them, and their.<ref name="Elverson">Scanned clipping from Template:Cite news, published in Template:Cite journal</ref> (See 'em.) The article that first reported the pronouns treated them as something of a joke, concluding with the line, "A contestant from California entered the word 'uh' because 'if it isn't a he or a she, it's uh, something else.' So much of eir humor."<ref name="Christine Elverson">Black, Judie. "Ey Has a Word for It." Chicago Tribune 23 Aug. 1975, sec. 1: 12.</ref>

Writing in 1977, poet, playwright, and linguist Lillian Carlton submitted a letter to the journal American Speech reporting (and arguing against) the invention by "an American professor" (likely Donald MacKay<ref name="Martyna">Template:Cite journal Citing Donald G. MacKay, "Birth of a Word," manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles. However, if MacKay ever wrote this manuscript, it does not appear on his CV or anywhere else easily discernable.</ref>) of pronouns based on "the long sound of the vowel e i".<ref name="Lillian Carlton">Template:Cite journal</ref> Although her primary argument against the proposed word is her assertion that English "already [has] a perfectly good... word that refers to either sex", namely "one", she also raises the observations that "spoken fast, it comes uncomfortably close to the illiterate hisself... [Furthermore], ee sounds too much like he and would therefore be confusing."<ref name="Lillian Carlton" /> Similar arguments, along with the desire to distance themselves from the male-centric singular he and derivatives, are still a primary factor in the proliferation of constructed pronouns.Template:Citation needed

Also in 1977, Jeffery J. Smith, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy and Humanities at Stanford University, writing under the pen name "Tintajl jefry", proposed "Em" as "a personal noun-pronoun which in itself gives no indication of sex, age, or number, though these may be shown by its context."<ref name="Tintajl jefry">jefry [sic.], Tintajl. "Una: The Emerging Language of the World". (Em Institute 1997), pp. 1-4., cited in Lockheed, Marlaine E. Curriculum and Research for Equity: A Training Manual for Promoting Sex Equity in the Classroom. Rep. no. Classroom Guide. Washington, DC.: Women's Educational Equity Act Program (ED), 1982. pp. 110-113 [2]</ref> He proposes a vast number of possible uses for "em", including but not limited to the replacement of "the formal Dear, because em is a thou word, a term of respect for all people, bar none... Dear Em Doe is redundant. Em Doe is enough, and, since it is brief; it makes room for given names: Em John Doe, Em Mary and John Doe, or, better, Em Doe John, Em Doe John and Mary."

The May 1980 issue of American Psychologist reported on another study by MacKay, testing rates at which subjects miscomprehended the gender of a subject in textbook paragraphs when written with he meaning he or she compared with three epicene pronoun sets: E, E, Es, Eself; e, e, es, eself; and tey, tem, ter, temself.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

In 1983, mathematician Michael Spivak wrote the AMS-TeX manual The Joy of TEX: A Gourmet Guide to Typesetting with the AMS-TEX Macro Package (1986) using E, Em, and Eir. His set was similar to Elverson's, but capitalized like one of MacKay's sets.

In May 1991, a MOO programmer, Roger Crew, added "spivak" as a gender setting for players on LambdaMOO, causing the game to refer to such players with the pronouns e, em, eir, eirs, emself. The setting was added along with several other "fake genders" in order to test changes to the software's pronoun code, and was left in place as a novelty. To Crew's surprise, the Spivak setting caught on among the game's players, while the other gender settings were mostly ignored.<ref name="CyberSociety 2.0">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Moomail from Rog to Lig, 2001-08-26, quoted in Template:Cite journal</ref>

Other writers applied Elverson's original "th"-dropping rule and revived ey, such as Eric Klein in his legal code for a planned micronation called Oceania.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> John Williams's Gender-neutral Pronoun FAQ (2004) promoted the original Elverson set (via Klein) as preferable to other major contenders popular on Usenet (singular they, sie/hir/hir/hirs/hirself, and zie/zir/zir/zirs/zirself).<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Variations

Three variants of the Spivak pronouns are in use,Template:Clarify Rogers (1890), Elverson (1975), and LambdaMOO (1991), highlighted in the declension table below. The pronoun set used by Lindsay (1920) is also in use,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> although generally not in the context of Spivak pronouns.

Declension table for Spivak pronoun variants
Variant	Subject	Object	Possessive adjective	Possessive pronoun	Reflexive
Masculine	he laughs	I hugged him	his heart warmed	that is his	he loves himself
Feminine	she laughs	I hugged her	her heart warmed	that is hers	she loves herself
Singular they	they laugh	I hugged them	their heart warmed	that is theirs	they love themself
Rogers (1890)<ref name="James Rogers" />	e laughs	I hugged em	es heart warmed
Lindsay (1920)	ae laughs	I hugged aer	aer heart warmed	that is *aers	ae loves *aerself
Elverson (1975)<ref name="Christine Elverson" />	ey laughs	I hugged em	eir heart warmed	that is eirs	ey loves emself
"anti-Carlton" (1977)<ref name="Lillian Carlton" />	ee laughs		*ees heart warmed	that is *ees	ee loves eeself
Tintajl (1977)<ref name="Tintajl jefry" />	em laughs	I hugged em	ems heart warmed	that is ems	em loves emself
MacKay (1980)	E laughs	I hugged E	Es heart warmed
Spivak (1983)Template:Efn	E laughs	I hugged Em	Eir heart warmed
LambdaMOO "spivak" (1991)<ref>Template:Cite newsgroup</ref>Template:Efn	e laughs	I hugged em	eir heart warmed	that is eirs	e loves emself

The original ey has been argued to be preferable to e, because the latter would be pronounced the same as he in those contexts where he, him, his loses its h sound.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Usage

Spivak is one of the allowable genders on many multi-user dungeons (MUDs) and MOOs (MUD object-oriented). Others might include some selection of: masculine, feminine, neuter, either, both, "splat", plural, egotistical, royal, and second. The selected gender determines how the game engine refers to a player.Template:Citation needed

On LambdaMOO, they became standard practice for help texts ("The user may choose any description e likes"), referring to people of unknown gender ("Who was that guest yesterday, eir typing was terrible"), referring to people whose gender was known but without disclosing it ("Yes I've met Squiggle. E was nice."), or of course characters declaring themselves to be of gender Spivak. Since 2000 this usage has been declining.Template:Citation needed

Nomic games, especially on the Internet, often use Spivak pronouns in their rulesets, as a way to refer to indefinite players.<ref>Martin, W. Eric. Meta-Gaming 101. Games. Issue 193 (Vol. 27, No. 7). Pg.7. September 2003.</ref>

Spivak pronouns and gender in virtual communities

In online anonymous situations, Spivak and other gender neutral pronouns can be motivated by avoiding gendered speech that would make divisions in the social group more likely and the group possibly less productive or enjoyable.<ref>Herring, Susan. "Gender Differences in Computer-Mediated Communication: Bringing Familiar Baggage to the New Frontier." Making the Net*Work: Is There a Z39.50 in Gender Communication? American Library Association Annual Convention, Miami. 27 June 1994. Web. 1 Aug. 2014. <http://urd.let.rug.nl/~welling/cc/gender-differences-communication.pdf></ref> This contact with genderless pronouns in virtual communities is sometimes a person's first experience and experimentation with presenting their gender in a genderqueer or transgender manner.<ref name="CyberSociety 2.0" />