Editing Thoughtcrime

{{short description|Expression for unorthodox thoughts in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four}}
{{Redirect|Crimethink|the anarchist organisation/experiment|CrimethInc.}}
{{Other uses|Thoughtcrime (disambiguation)}}
{{Use British English|date=August 2012}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2022}}

In the dystopian novel ''[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]'', '''thoughtcrime''' is the offense of thinking in ways not approved by the ruling [[Ingsoc]] party. In the official language of [[Newspeak]], the word '''crimethink''' describes the intellectual actions of a person who entertains and holds politically unacceptable thoughts; thus the government of The Party controls the speech, the actions, and the thoughts of the citizens of Oceania.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Orwell |first1=George |last2=Rovere |first2=Richard Halworth |title=The Orwell Reader: Fiction, Essays, and Reportage |page=[https://archive.org/details/orwellreader00geor_0/page/409 409] |year=1984 |orig-year=1956 |location=San Diego |publisher=Harcourt, Brace |isbn=978-0-15-670176-1 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/orwellreader00geor_0/page/409 }}.</ref>

==Thought control==
{{main|Thought Police}}
In the story of ''Nineteen Eighty-Four'', the ''Thinkpol'' (Thought Police) are responsible for the detection and elimination of thoughtcrime, and for the social control of the populations of [[Oceania (Nineteen Eighty-Four)|Oceania]], by way of [[Surveillance|audio-visual surveillance]] and [[offender profiling]]. Such psychological monitoring allows the Thought Police to detect, arrest, and kill thought criminals, citizens whose independence (intellectual, mental, and moral) challenges the political orthodoxy of Ingsoc ([[Ingsoc|English Socialism]]) and thus the [[Legitimacy (political)|legitimate]] government authority of [[Nineteen Eighty-Four#The Party|the Party]].<ref>{{Citation |last=McCormick |first=Donald |title=Approaching 1984 |page=21 |year=1980 |location=Newton Abbot, Devon, England |publisher=David & Charles |isbn=978-0-7153-7654-6 }}.</ref> In the detection of thoughtcrime—and to overcome the physical impossibility of simultaneously policing every citizen of Oceania—the Thinkpol spy upon the populace through ubiquitous two-way [[telescreen]]s, and so can monitor any person's [[body language]], reflexive speech, and facial expressions:

{{Quote|Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by the [[telescreen]]; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard.  There was, of course, no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment.  How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork.|Part I, Chapter 1, ''Nineteen Eighty-Four''}}

The universal, physical presence of the telescreen, in public and in private spaces, exerted psychological pressure upon each citizen of Oceania to presume that they were under constant Thinkpol surveillance, and thus in danger of detection and arrest as a thought criminal; thus, whenever near a telescreen, Winston Smith was always mindful of that possibility: "If you made unexpected movements, they yelled at you from the telescreen."<ref>Part III, Chapter 1, ''Nineteen Eighty-Four'' (1949)</ref> Such surveillance methods allowed the Thinkpol and the Ministry of Love (Miniluv) to become universally feared by the citizens of Oceania, especially by the members of the Outer Party, which includes Winston Smith.

===Crimestop===
{{Redirect|Crimestop|anonymous crime reporting|CrimeStoppers}}
In the [[Newspeak]] vocabulary, the word '''crimestop''' denotes the citizen's instinctive desire to rid himself of unwanted, incorrect  thoughts (personal and political), the discovery of which, by the Thinkpol, would lead to detection and arrest, transport to and interrogation at  Miniluv (Ministry of Love). The protagonist, [[Winston Smith (Nineteen Eighty-Four)|Winston Smith]], describes crimestop as a conscious process of self-imposed [[cognitive dissonance]]:

{{quote|The mind should develop a blind spot whenever a dangerous thought presented itself. The process should be automatic, instinctive. Crimestop, they called it in Newspeak. . . . He set to work to exercise himself in crimestop. He presented himself with propositions—'the Party says the Earth is flat', 'the Party says that ice is heavier than water'—and trained himself in not seeing or not understanding the arguments that contradicted them.}}

Moreover, from the perspective of Oceania's principal enemy of the state, in the history book ''[[The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism]]'', Emmanuel Goldstein said that:

{{quote|''Crimestop'' means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. ''Crimestop'', in short, means protective stupidity.<ref>Orwell, George. ''Nineteen Eighty-Four'' (1949) Martin Secker & Warburg Ltd, London, pp. 220–21.</ref>}}

==Contemporary English usage==
In contemporary English usage, the word ''thoughtcrime'' describes the personal beliefs that are contrary to the accepted norms of society; thus thoughtcrime describes the theological practices of disbelief and [[idolatry]],<ref>Lewis, David. ''Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy'' (2000), Volume 3, p. 107.</ref> and the rejection of an [[ideology]].<ref>Glasby, John. ''Evidence, Policy and Practice: Critical Perspectives in Health and Social Care'' (2011), p. 22.</ref>

Wrongthink emerged in 2014 on the US [[alt-right]] in a [[subreddit]] called r/SRSSucks, an anti-political-correctness community and use of the term increased in 2017 after [[James Damore]] was let go by Google for publishing that women were biologically unsuited to coding.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-10-30 |title=The alt-right is creating its own dialect. Here’s the dictionary |url=https://qz.com/1092037/the-alt-right-is-creating-its-own-dialect-heres-a-complete-guide |access-date=2025-03-08 |website=Quartz |language=en}}</ref>
In 2024, Wrongthink was used on the far right platform [[Rumble (company)]]<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-11-04 |title=LIVE - WRONGTHINK: Wrongthink Primetime Best-Of (So far) |url=https://rumble.com/v3tjbra-live-wrongthink-wrongthink-primetime-best-of-so-far.html |access-date=2025-03-08 |language=en}}</ref> and as an alt-facebook.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Reynolds |first=Matt |title=The wheels are falling off the alt-right’s version of the internet |url=https://www.wired.com/story/alt-right-internet-is-a-ghost-town-gab-voat-wrongthink/ |access-date=2025-03-08 |website=Wired |language=en-US}}</ref>

==Analogy in Iran==
Various groups such as human rights organizations, journalists and activists have likened the [[Government of Iran|Iranian regime]], along with the [[Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting|IRIB]] and [[Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps|IRGC]], to an Orwellian government. This sentiment is due to reports of the Iranian government distributing death sentences for the crime of "advertising against the holy system".  “Zabane eghelab”, an Iranian phrase that translates to “tongue of revolution”, is used to describe the rhetoric used by the government to maintain ideological dominance over the population and is often compared to newspeak.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-07-10 |title=When the Thought Police Come for You |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/when-the-thought-police-c_b_7766282 |access-date=2024-02-19 |website=HuffPost |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-01-07 |title=قاضی‌هایی که طناب دار را گره می‌زنند |url=https://www.bbc.com/persian/articles/c51g5zw1536o |access-date=2024-02-19 |website=BBC News فارسی |language=fa}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Wright |first=Robin |date=2018-06-14 |title=Iran's Orwellian Arrest of Its Leading Female Human-Rights Lawyer |url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/irans-orwellian-arrest-of-a-leading-human-rights-lawyer |access-date=2024-02-19 |magazine=The New Yorker |language=en-US |issn=0028-792X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-01-20 |title=جمهوری اسلامی و اورول؛ در جهان ۱۹۸۴ رسانه بوق است |url=https://www.bbc.com/persian/blog-viewpoints-51181561 |access-date=2024-02-19 |website=BBC News فارسی |language=fa}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Esfandiari |first=Golnaz |title=In Iran, No Space On Cyberspace For Dissenting Voices As Tehran Takes 'Orwellian Approach' To Muffle Critics |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/in-iran-no-space-on-cyberspace-for-dissenting-voices-as-tehran-takes-orwellian-approach-to-muffle-critics/30680295.html |access-date=2024-02-19 |work=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |title=مستند: «تبلیغ علیه نظام مقدس» |date=2024-02-17 |url=https://ir.voanews.com/a/7491762.html |access-date=2024-02-19 |language=fa}}</ref>

== See also ==
* [[Censorship]]
* [[Freedom of thought]]
* [[Internal sin]]
* [[Mens rea]]
* [[Pre-crime]]
* [[Secret police]]
* [[Thou shalt not covet]]
* [[Thought Police]]
* [[Victimless crime]]
* [[Hate speech]]

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

== Further reading ==
* {{Citation |last=Kretzmer |first=David |editor-last=Kershman |editor-first=Hazan Francine |year=2000 |title=Freedom of Speech and Incitement Against Democracy |publisher=Kluwer Law International |location=The Hague, Netherlands |isbn=978-90-411-1341-2 |ref=none}}.
* {{cite journal | last=Swaine | first=Lucas | title=Freedom of Thought as a Basic Liberty | journal=Political Theory | volume=46 | issue=3 | date= 2016 | issn=0090-5917 | doi=10.1177/0090591716676293 | pages=405–425| s2cid=151827391 }}

{{Nineteen Eighty-Four}}

[[Category:Fictional elements introduced in 1949]]
[[Category:1940s neologisms]]
[[Category:Nineteen Eighty-Four]]
[[Category:Words originating in fiction]]
[[Category:Authoritarianism]]
[[Category:Political terminology]]
[[Category:Linguistic controversies]]