Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Thomas Hunt Morgan
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|American biologist (1866–1945)}} {{other people|Thomas Morgan}} {{Infobox scientist | name = Thomas Hunt Morgan | honorific_suffix = {{post-nominals|country=GBR|size=100%|ForMemRS}} | image = Thomas_Hunt_Morgan.jpg | caption = Morgan in 1891 | birth_date = {{Birth date|1866|9|25}} | birth_place = [[Lexington, Kentucky]], US | death_date = {{Death date and age|1945|12|4|1866|9|25}} | death_place = [[Pasadena, California]], US | field = {{ublist|[[Genetics]]|[[Embryology]]}} | work_institutions = {{ublist|[[Bryn Mawr College]]|[[Columbia University]]|[[California Institute of Technology]]|[[Marine Biological Laboratory]]}} | alma_mater = {{ublist|[[University of Kentucky]] <small>([[Bachelor of Science|B.S.]])</small>|[[Johns Hopkins University]] <small>([[Doctor of Philosophy|Ph.D.]])</small>}} | doctoral_advisor = | doctoral_students = {{ublist|[[Nettie Maria Stevens]]|[[John Howard Northrop]]|[[Hermann Joseph Muller]]|[[Calvin Bridges]]|[[Alfred Sturtevant]]|[[Chester Ittner Bliss]]|[[Tan Jiazhen]]|[[Harold Henry Plough]]}} | known_for = {{ublist|Establishing ''[[Drosophila melanogaster]]'' as a major [[model organism]] in genetics|[[Linked genes]]}} | author_abbrev_bot = | author_abbrev_zoo = | influences = | influenced = | prizes = {{Plainlist| * [[Member of the National Academy of Sciences]] (1909)<ref name=nasmember/> * [[Foreign Member of the Royal Society]] (1919)<ref name="Fisher"/> * [[Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine]] (1933) * [[Copley Medal]] (1939)}} | footnotes = | signature = Thomas Hunt Morgan signature.svg }} '''Thomas Hunt Morgan''' (September 25, 1866 – December 4, 1945)<ref name="Fisher">{{Cite journal | last1 = Fisher | first1 = R. A. | author-link1 = Ronald Fisher| last2 = De Beer | first2 = G. R. | doi = 10.1098/rsbm.1947.0011 | title = Thomas Hunt Morgan. 1866–1945 | journal = [[Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society]] | volume = 5 | issue = 15 | pages = 451–466 | year = 1947 | jstor = 769094| s2cid = 178714833 }}</ref> was an American [[evolutionary biologist]], [[geneticist]], [[Embryology|embryologist]], and science author who won the [[Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine]] in 1933 for discoveries elucidating the role that the [[chromosome]] plays in [[heredity]].<ref name="nobelprize.org">{{cite web|title=The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1933|url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1933/index.html|access-date=2010-09-14|publisher=Nobel Web AB}}</ref> Morgan received his Ph.D. from [[Johns Hopkins University]] in [[zoology]] in 1890 and researched embryology during his tenure at [[Bryn Mawr College|Bryn Mawr]]. Following the rediscovery of [[Mendelian inheritance]] in 1900, Morgan began to study the genetic characteristics of the fruit fly ''[[Drosophila melanogaster]]''. In his famous Fly Room at [[Columbia University]]'s [[Schermerhorn Hall]], Morgan demonstrated that [[gene]]s are carried on [[chromosome]]s and are the mechanical basis of heredity. These discoveries formed the basis of the modern science of [[genetics]]. During his distinguished career, Morgan wrote [[List of books by Thomas Hunt Morgan|22 books]] and 370 scientific papers.<ref name="Fisher" /> As a result of his work, ''Drosophila'' became a major [[model organism]] in contemporary genetics. The Division of Biology which he established at the [[California Institute of Technology]] has produced seven Nobel Prize winners. ==Early life and education== Morgan was born in [[Lexington, Kentucky|Lexington]], [[Kentucky]], to Charlton Hunt Morgan and Ellen Key Howard Morgan.<ref name="nobelprize.org"/><ref name="p283">Sturtevant (1959), p. 283.</ref> Part of a line of [[Southern United States|Southern]] plantation and slave owners on his father's side, Morgan was a nephew of [[Confederate States Army|Confederate]] General [[John Hunt Morgan]]; his great-grandfather [[John Wesley Hunt]] had been one of the first millionaires west of the [[Allegheny Mountains]]. Through his mother, he was the great-grandson of [[Francis Scott Key]], the author of the "[[Star Spangled Banner]]", and [[John Eager Howard]], governor and senator from [[Maryland]].<ref name="p283"/> Following the Civil War, the family fell on hard times with the temporary loss of civil and some property rights for those who aided the Confederacy. His father had difficulty finding work in politics and spent much of his time coordinating veterans' reunions.{{cn|date=May 2024}} Beginning at age 16 in the Preparatory Department, Morgan attended the State College of Kentucky (now the [[University of Kentucky]]). He focused on science; he particularly enjoyed natural history, and worked with the [[United States Geological Survey|U.S. Geological Survey]] in his summers. He graduated as [[valedictorian]] in 1886 with a Bachelor of Science degree.<ref>Allen (1978), pp. 11–14, 24.</ref> Following a summer at the Marine Biology School in [[Annisquam, Massachusetts]], Morgan began graduate studies in [[zoology]] at the recently founded [[Johns Hopkins University]]. After two years of experimental work with [[morphology (biology)|morphologist]] [[William Keith Brooks]] and writing several publications, Morgan was eligible to receive a Master of Science from the State College of Kentucky in 1888. The college required two years of study at another institution and an examination by the college faculty. {{Citation needed|date=February 2007}} The college offered Morgan a full professorship; however, he chose to stay at Johns Hopkins and was awarded a relatively large<!--USD500--> fellowship to help him fund his studies.{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}} Under Brooks, Morgan completed his thesis work on the embryology of [[sea spider]]s—collected during the summers of 1889 and 1890 at the [[Marine Biological Laboratory]] in [[Woods Hole, Massachusetts]]—to determine their [[Phylogenetics|phylogenetic]] relationship with other [[arthropod]]s. He concluded that concerning embryology, they were more closely related to [[Chelicerata|spiders]] than crustaceans. Based on the publication of this work, Morgan was awarded his [[Doctor of Philosophy|Ph.D.]] from Johns Hopkins in 1890 and was also awarded the Bruce Fellowship in Research. He used the fellowship to travel to [[Jamaica]], the [[Bahama]]s and [[Europe]] to conduct further research.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science'', pp. 46–51</ref> Every summer from 1910 to 1925, Morgan and his colleagues at the famous Fly Room at Columbia University moved their research program to the [[Marine Biological Laboratory]]. Aside from being an independent investigator at the MBL from 1890 to 1942, he became very involved in the governance of the institution, including serving as an MBL trustee from 1897 to 1945.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kenney |first1=D. E. |last2=Borisy |first2=G. G. |year=2009 |title=Thomas Hunt Morgan at the Marine Biological Laboratory: Naturalist and Experimentalist |journal=[[Genetics (journal)|Genetics]] |volume=181 |issue=3 |pages=841–846 |doi=10.1534/genetics.109.101659 |pmid=19276218 |pmc=2651058 }}</ref> ==Career and research== ===Bryn Mawr=== In 1890, Morgan was appointed associate professor (and head of the biology department) at Johns Hopkins' sister school [[Bryn Mawr College]], replacing his colleague [[Edmund Beecher Wilson]].<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Morgan | first1 = T. H. | author-link = Thomas Hunt Morgan| title = Edmund Beecher Wilson. 1856–1939 | doi = 10.1098/rsbm.1940.0012 | journal = [[Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society]] | volume = 3 | issue = 8 | pages = 123–126 | year = 1940 | title-link = Edmund Beecher Wilson | s2cid = 161395714 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Morgan taught all morphology-related courses, while the other member of the department, [[Jacques Loeb]], taught the physiological courses. Although Loeb stayed for only one year, it was the beginning of their lifelong friendship.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan'', pp. 50–53</ref> Morgan lectured in biology five days a week, giving two lectures a day. He frequently included his recent research in his lectures. Although an enthusiastic teacher, he was most interested in research in the laboratory. During the first few years at Bryn Mawr, he produced descriptive studies of [[sea acorn]]s, ascidian worms, and frogs.{{cn|date=May 2024}} In 1894 Morgan was granted a year's absence to conduct research in the laboratories of ''[[Stazione Zoologica]]'' in [[Naples]], where Wilson had worked two years earlier. There he worked with German biologist [[Hans Driesch]], whose research in the experimental study of development piqued Morgan's interest. Among other projects that year, Morgan completed an experimental study of [[ctenophore]] embryology. In Naples and through Loeb, he became familiar with the ''Entwicklungsmechanik'' (roughly, "developmental mechanics") school of experimental biology. It was a reaction to the vitalistic ''[[Naturphilosophie]]'', which was extremely influential in 19th-century morphology. Morgan changed his work from traditional, largely descriptive morphology to experimental embryology that sought physical and chemical explanations for organismal development.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan'', pp. 55–59, 72–80</ref> At the time, there was considerable scientific debate over the question of how an embryo developed. Following [[Wilhelm Roux]]'s mosaic theory of development, some believed that hereditary material was divided among embryonic cells, which were predestined to form particular parts of a mature organism. Driesch and others thought that development was due to epigenetic factors, where interactions between the protoplasm and the nucleus of the egg and the environment could affect development. Morgan was in the latter camp; his work with Driesch demonstrated that [[blastomeres]] isolated from [[sea urchin]] and ctenophore eggs could develop into complete larvae, contrary to the predictions (and experimental evidence) of Roux's supporters.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan'', pp. 55–59, 80–82</ref> A related debate involved the role of [[epigenetic]] and environmental factors in development; on this front Morgan showed that [[sea urchin]] eggs could be induced to divide without fertilization by adding [[magnesium chloride]]. Loeb continued this work and became well known for creating fatherless frogs using the method.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Loeb, Jacques|author-link=Jacques Loeb |journal=American Journal of Physiology | volume=31 | pages=135–138 | year=1899 |title=On the Nature of the Process of Fertilization and the Artificial Production of Normal Larvae (Plutei) from the Unfertilized Eggs of the Sea Urchin|issue=3 |url=http://www.stanford.edu/group/Urchin/loeb.htm|doi=10.1152/ajplegacy.1899.3.3.135 |hdl=2027/hvd.32044107304297 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> <ref>{{cite book|title=Artificial parthenogenesis and fertilization|author=Loeb, Jacques |publisher=University of Chicago Press | year=1913 | url=https://archive.org/details/artificialparth00loebgoog|quote=jacques loeb sea urchin.}}</ref> When Morgan returned to Bryn Mawr in 1895, he was promoted to full professor. Morgan's main lines of experimental work involved [[regeneration (biology)|regeneration]] and larval development; in each case, his goal was to distinguish internal and external causes to shed light on the Roux-Driesch debate. He wrote his first book, ''The Development of the Frog's Egg'' (1897). He began a series of studies on different organisms' ability to regenerate. He looked at grafting and regeneration in tadpoles, fish, and earthworms; in 1901 he published his research as ''Regeneration''. Beginning in 1900, Morgan started working on the problem of [[Sex-determination system|sex determination]], which he had previously dismissed when [[Nettie Stevens]] discovered the impact of the Y chromosome on sex. He also continued to study the evolutionary problems that had been the focus of his earliest work.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan'', pp. 84–96</ref> ===Columbia University=== Morgan worked at Columbia University for 24 years, from 1904 until 1928 when he left for a position at the California Institute of Technology.{{cn|date=May 2024}} In 1904, his friend, Jofi Joseph died of tuberculosis, and he felt he ought to mourn her, though E. B. Wilson—still blazing the path for his younger friend—invited Morgan to join him at [[Columbia University]]. This move freed him to focus fully on experimental work.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan'', pp. 68–70</ref> [[File:Drosophila in the lab.jpg|right|thumb|200px|In a typical ''Drosophila'' genetics experiment, male and female flies with known [[phenotype]]s are put in a jar to mate; females must be virgins. Eggs are laid in porridge which the larvae feed on; when the life cycle is complete, the progeny are scored for the inheritance of the trait of interest.]] When Morgan took the professorship in experimental zoology, he became increasingly focused on the mechanisms of heredity and evolution. He published ''Evolution and Adaptation'' (1903); like many biologists at the time, he saw evidence for biological evolution (as in the [[common descent]] of similar species) but rejected Darwin's proposed mechanism of [[natural selection]] acting on small, constantly produced variations. Extensive work in [[biometry]] seemed to indicate that continuous natural variation had distinct limits and did not represent heritable changes. Embryological development posed an additional problem in Morgan's view, as selection could not act on the early, incomplete stages of highly complex organs such as the eye. The common solution of the [[Lamarckism|Lamarckian]] mechanism of [[inheritance of acquired characters]], which featured prominently in Darwin's theory, was increasingly rejected by biologists. According to Morgan's biographer [[Garland Allen]], he was also hindered by his views on taxonomy: he thought that species were entirely artificial creations that distorted the continuously variable range of real forms, while he held a "typological" view of larger taxa and could see no way that one such group could transform into another. But while Morgan was skeptical of natural selection for many years, his theories of heredity and variation were radically transformed through his conversion to Mendelism.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science'', pp. 105–116</ref> In 1900 three scientists, [[Carl Correns]], [[Erich von Tschermak]] and [[Hugo De Vries]], had rediscovered the work of [[Gregor Mendel]], and with it the foundation of [[genetics]]. De Vries proposed that new species were created by mutation, bypassing the need for either Lamarckism or Darwinism. As Morgan had dismissed both evolutionary theories, he was seeking to prove De Vries' [[mutation theory]] with his experimental heredity work. He was initially skeptical of Mendel's laws of heredity (as well as the related chromosomal theory of sex determination), which were being considered as a possible basis for natural selection. [[File:Sexlinked inheritance white.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Sex linked inheritance of the white eyed mutation.]] Following [[Charles W. Woodworth|C. W. Woodworth]] and [[William E. Castle]], around 1908 Morgan started working on the fruit fly ''[[Drosophila melanogaster]]'', and encouraging students to do so as well. With [[Fernandus Payne]], he mutated ''Drosophila'' through physical, chemical, and radiational means.<ref name="Kohler"/><ref name="Hamilton">{{cite journal|last1=Hamilton|first1=Vivien|title=The Secrets of Life: Historian Luis Campos resurrects radium's role in early genetics research|journal=Distillations|date=2016|volume=2|issue=2 |pages=44–45 |url=https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/magazine/the-secrets-of-life|access-date=22 March 2018}}</ref> He began cross-breeding experiments to find heritable mutations, but they had no significant success for two years.<ref name="Kohler">Kohler, ''Lords of the Fly'', pp. 37–43</ref> Castle had also had difficulty identifying mutations in ''Drosophila'', which were tiny. Finally, in 1909, a series of heritable mutants appeared, some of which displayed Mendelian inheritance patterns; in 1910 Morgan noticed a white-eyed [[mutant]] male among the red-eyed [[wild type]]s. When white-eyed flies were bred with a red-eyed female, their progeny were all red-eyed. A second-generation cross produced white-eyed males—a sex-linked recessive trait, the gene for which Morgan named ''[[White (mutation)|white]]''. Morgan also discovered a pink-eyed mutant that showed a different pattern of inheritance. In a paper published in ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' in 1911, he concluded that (1) some traits were [[sex-linked]], (2) the trait was probably carried on one of the [[sex chromosome]]s, and (3) other genes were probably carried on specific chromosomes as well. [[File:Morgan crossover 1.jpg|right|thumb|Morgan's illustration of [[chromosomal crossover|crossing over]], from his 1916 ''A Critique of the Theory of Evolution'']] [[File:First genetic map (Sturtevant, 1913).png|thumb|First genetic map (Sturtevant, 1913). It shows 6 sex-linked genes.]] Morgan and his students became more successful at finding mutant flies; they counted the mutant characteristics of thousands of fruit flies and studied their inheritance. As they accumulated multiple mutants, they combined them to study more complex inheritance patterns. The observation of a miniature-wing mutant, which was also on the sex chromosome but sometimes sorted independently to the white-eye mutation, led Morgan to the idea of [[genetic linkage]] and to hypothesize the phenomenon of [[Chromosomal crossover|crossing over]]. He relied on the discovery of [[Frans Alfons Janssens]], a Belgian professor at the [[Catholic University of Leuven (1834–1968)|University of Leuven]], who described the phenomenon in 1909 and had called it ''chiasmatypy''. Morgan proposed that the amount of crossing over between linked genes differs and that crossover frequency might indicate the distance separating genes on the chromosome. The later English geneticist [[J. B. S. Haldane]] suggested that the unit of measurement for linkage be called the [[centimorgan|morgan]]. Morgan's student [[Alfred Sturtevant]] developed the first [[genetic linkage#Linkage map|genetic map]] in 1913.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sturtevant |first1=A. H. |date=1913 |title=The linear arrangement of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila, as shown by their mode of association |url=http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/s/ahs-13.pdf |journal=Journal of Experimental Zoology |volume=14 |issue=1 |pages=43–59 |bibcode=1913JEZ....14...43S |doi=10.1002/jez.1400140104 |s2cid=82583173}}</ref> [[File:Drosophila Gene Linkage Map.svg|right|thumb|250px| Thomas Hunt Morgan's ''[[Drosophila melanogaster]]'' [[genetic linkage]] map. This was the first successful [[gene mapping]] work and provides important evidence for the [[chromosome theory of inheritance]]. The map shows the relative positions of [[allele|allelic]] characteristics on the second ''Drosophila'' chromosome. The distance between the genes (map units) is equal to the percentage of [[Chromosomal crossover|crossing-over]] events that occurs between different alleles.<ref name="image">{{cite book |last=Mader |first=Sylvia |date=2007 |title=Biology Ninth Edition |location= New York |publisher= McGraw-Hill |page= 209 |isbn= 978-0-07-325839-3 }}</ref>]] In 1915 Morgan, Sturtevant, [[Calvin Bridges]] and [[H. J. Muller]] wrote the seminal book ''The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity''.<ref>{{cite book|author=Morgan, Thomas Hunt; Alfred H. Sturtevant, H. J. Muller and C. B. Bridges|title=The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity|publisher=Henry Holt|location=New York| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GZEEAAAAYAAJ&q=mechanism+of+mendelian+heredity+morgan|year=1915}}</ref> Geneticist [[Curt Stern]] called the book "the fundamental textbook of the new genetics".<ref name="Stern">{{cite journal |last1=Stern |first1=Curt |title=The Continuity of Genetics |journal=Daedalus |date=1970 |volume=99 |issue=4 |page=899 |jstor=20023976 |pmid=11609639 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20023976 |issn=0011-5266}}</ref> [[File:Genetic_map_of_drosophila,_as_of_1926.png|thumb|Genetic map of drosophila, published in ''The theory of the gene'' 1926 edition.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Morgan |first=Thomas Hunt |url=http://archive.org/details/theoryofgene00morg |title=The theory of the gene |date=1926 |publisher=New Haven, Yale University Press; [etc., etc.] |others=MBLWHOI Library}}</ref>]] In the following years, most biologists came to accept the [[Boveri-Sutton chromosome theory|Mendelian-chromosome theory]], which was independently proposed by [[Walter Sutton]] and [[Theodor Boveri]] in 1902/1903, and elaborated and expanded by Morgan and his students. [[Garland Allen]] characterized the post-1915 period as one of [[normal science]], in which "The activities of 'geneticists' were aimed at further elucidation of the details and implications of the Mendelian-chromosome theory developed between 1910 and 1915." But, the details of the increasingly complex theory, as well as the concept of the [[gene]] and its physical nature, were still controversial. Critics such as [[W. E. Castle]] pointed to contrary results in other organisms, suggesting that genes interact with each other, while [[Richard Goldschmidt]] and others thought there was no compelling reason to view genes as discrete units residing on chromosomes.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan'', pp. 208–213, 257–278. Quotation from p. 213.</ref> Because of Morgan's dramatic success with ''Drosophila'', many other labs throughout the world took up fruit fly genetics. Columbia became the center of an informal exchange network, through which promising mutant ''Drosophila'' strains were transferred from lab to lab; ''Drosophila'' became one of the first and for some time the most widely used, [[model organism]]s.<ref>Kohler, ''Lords of the Fly'', chapter 5</ref> Morgan's group remained highly productive, but Morgan largely withdrew from doing fly work and gave his lab members considerable freedom in designing and carrying out their own experiments. He returned to embryology and worked to encourage the spread of genetics research to other organisms and the spread of mechanistic experimental approach (''Enwicklungsmechanik'') to all biological fields.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan'', pp. 214–215, 285</ref> After 1915, he also became a strong critic of the growing [[eugenics]] movement, which adopted genetic approaches in support of [[racism|racist]] views of "improving" humanity.<ref>Allen, ''Thomas Hunt Morgan'', pp. 227–234</ref> Morgan's '''fly-room''' at Columbia became world-famous, and he found it easy to attract funding and visiting academics. In 1927 after 25 years at Columbia, and nearing the age of retirement, he received an offer from [[George Ellery Hale]] to establish a school of biology in California. ===Caltech=== [[File:Thomas Hunt Morgan sketch 1931.png|thumb|1931 drawing of Thomas Hunt Morgan]] In 1928 Morgan joined the faculty of the [[California Institute of Technology]] where he remained until his retirement 14 years later in 1942. Morgan moved to California to head the Division of Biology at the [[California Institute of Technology]] in 1928. In establishing the biology division, Morgan wanted to distinguish his program from those offered by Johns Hopkins and Columbia, with research focused on genetics and evolution; experimental embryology; physiology; biophysics, and biochemistry. He was also instrumental in the establishment of the [[Kerckhoff marine laboratory|Marine Laboratory]] at [[Corona del Mar]]. He wanted to attract the best people to the Division at Caltech, so he took Bridges, Sturtevant, [[Jack Shultz]] and [[Albert Tyler (biologist)|Albert Tyler]] from Columbia and took on [[Theodosius Dobzhansky]] as an international research fellow. More scientists came to work in the Division including [[George Beadle]], [[Boris Ephrussi]], [[Edward L. Tatum]], [[Linus Pauling]], [[Frits Went]], [[Edward B. Lewis]], and Sidney W. Byance with his reputation, Morgan held numerous prestigious positions in American science organizations. From 1927 to 1931 Morgan served as the President of the National Academy of Sciences; in 1930 he was the President of the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]; and in 1932 he chaired the Sixth [[International Congress of Genetics]] in [[Ithaca, New York]]. In 1933 Morgan was awarded the [[Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine]]; he had been nominated in 1919 and 1930 for the same work. As an acknowledgment of the group nature of his discovery, he gave his prize money to Bridges, Sturtevant, and his own children. Morgan declined to attend the awards ceremony in 1933, instead attending in 1934. The 1933 rediscovery of the giant [[polytene chromosome]]s in the salivary gland of ''Drosophila'' may have influenced his choice. Until that point, the lab's results had been inferred from phenotypic results, the visible polytene chromosome enabled them to confirm their results on a physical basis. Morgan's Nobel acceptance speech entitled "The Contribution of Genetics to Physiology and Medicine" downplayed the contribution genetics could make to medicine beyond [[genetic counseling]]. In 1939 he was awarded the [[Copley Medal]] by the Royal Society.{{cn|date=May 2024}} He received two extensions of his contract at Caltech, but eventually retired in 1942, becoming a professor and chairman emeritus. George Beadle returned to Caltech to replace Morgan as chairman of the department in 1946. Although he had retired, Morgan kept offices across the road from the Division and continued laboratory work. In his retirement, he returned to the questions of sexual differentiation, regeneration, and embryology. ==Death== Morgan had throughout his life suffered from a chronic [[duodenal ulcer]]. In 1945, at age 79, he experienced a severe heart attack and died from a ruptured artery. ==Morgan and evolution== Morgan was interested in evolution throughout his life. He wrote his thesis on the phylogeny of sea spiders ([[pycnogonids]]) and wrote four books about evolution. In ''Evolution and Adaptation'' (1903), he argued the anti-Darwinist position that selection could never produce wholly new species by acting on slight individual differences.<ref>{{cite book |first=Garland E. |last=Allen |editor1-first=Michael |editor1-last=Ruse |editor2-first=Joseph |editor2-last=Travis |year=2009 |title=Evolution. The First Four Billion Years |publisher=Harvard University Press |page=[https://archive.org/details/evolutionfirstfo00mich/page/746 746] |isbn=9780674031753 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/evolutionfirstfo00mich/page/746 }}</ref> He rejected Darwin's theory of sexual selection<ref>"I think we shall be justified in rejecting it as an explanation of the secondary sexual differences amongst animals", pp. 220–221, chapter VI, ''Evolution and Adaptation'', 1903.</ref> and the Neo-Lamarckian theory of the inheritance of acquired characters.<ref>Chapter VII of ''Evolution and Adaptation'', 1903.</ref> Morgan was not the only scientist attacking natural selection. The period 1875–1925 has been called '[[The eclipse of Darwinism]]'.<ref>{{cite book |first=Peter |last=Bowler |year=2003 |title=Evolution. The History of an Idea |publisher=University of California Press |at=chapter 7 }}</ref> After discovering many small stable heritable mutations in ''Drosophila'', Morgan gradually changed his mind. The relevance of mutations for evolution is that only characters that are inherited can have an effect on evolution. Since Morgan solved the problem of heredity (1915), he was in a unique position to examine critically Darwin's theory of natural selection. In ''[[s:A Critique of the Theory of Evolution|A Critique of the Theory of Evolution]]'' (1916), Morgan discussed questions such as: "Does selection play any role in evolution? How can selection produce anything new? Is selection no more than the elimination of the unfit? Is selection a creative force?" After eliminating some misunderstandings and explaining in detail the new science of Mendelian heredity and its chromosomal basis, Morgan concludes, "the evidence shows clearly that the characters of wild animals and plants, as well as those of domesticated races, are inherited both in the wild and in domesticated forms according to the Mendel's Law". "Evolution has taken place by the incorporation into the race of those mutations that are beneficial to the life and reproduction of the organism".<ref>'' A Critique of the Theory of Evolution'', Princeton University Press, 1916, pp. 193–194</ref> Injurious mutations have practically no chance of becoming established.<ref>''A Critique of the Theory of Evolution'', p. 189.</ref> Far from rejecting evolution, as the title of his 1916 book may suggest, Morgan, laid the foundation of the science of genetics. He also laid the theoretical foundation for the mechanism of evolution: natural selection. Heredity was a central plank of [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s theory of natural selection, but Darwin could not provide a working theory of heredity. [[Darwinism]] could not progress without a correct theory of genetics. By creating that foundation, Morgan contributed to the [[Neo-Darwinism|neo-Darwinian]] synthesis, despite his criticism of Darwin at the beginning of his career. Much work on the Evolutionary Synthesis remained to be done. ==Awards and honors== Morgan left an important legacy in genetics. Some of Morgan's students from Columbia and Caltech went on to win their own Nobel Prizes, including [[George Wells Beadle]] and [[Hermann Joseph Muller]].<!--there is seven--> Nobel prize winner [[Eric Kandel]] has written of Morgan, "Much as Darwin's insights into the evolution of animal species first gave coherence to nineteenth-century biology as a descriptive science, Morgan's findings about genes and their location on chromosomes helped transform biology into an experimental science."<ref>Kandel, Eric. 1999. [http://www.columbia.edu/cu/alumni/Magazine/Legacies/Morgan/ "Genes, Chromosomes, and the Origins of Modern Biology"], ''Columbia Magazine''</ref> * Johns Hopkins awarded Morgan an honorary LL.D. and the University of Kentucky awarded him an honorary Ph.D. * He was elected [[Member of the National Academy of Sciences]] in 1909.<ref name=nasmember>{{cite web|url=http://www.nasonline.org/member-directory/deceased-members/20001550.html|title=Thomas Morgan|website=Nasonline.org|access-date=28 April 2019}}</ref> * He was elected to the [[American Philosophical Society]] in 1915.<ref>{{Cite web |title=APS Member History |url=https://search.amphilsoc.org/memhist/search?creator=Thomas+H.+Morgan&title=&subject=&subdiv=&mem=&year=&year-max=&dead=&keyword=&smode=advanced |access-date=2023-11-02 |website=search.amphilsoc.org}}</ref> * He was a member of the [[American Association for Anatomy]].<ref>{{Cite book |title=The American Association of Anatomists, 1888-1987: essays on the history of anatomy in America and a report on the membership: past and present |date=1987 |publisher=Williams & Wilkins |isbn=978-0-683-06800-9 |editor-last=Pauly |editor-first=John Edward |location=Baltimore |editor-last2=Basmajian |editor-first2=John V. |editor-last3=Christensen |editor-first3=A. Kent |editor-last4=Jollie |editor-first4=William P. |editor-last5=Kelly |editor-first5=Douglas E.}}</ref> * He was elected a [[Foreign Member of the Royal Society]] (ForMemRS) in 1919<ref name="Fisher"/> * In 1924 Morgan received the [[Darwin Medal]]. * He was elected to the [[American Academy of Arts and Sciences]] in 1928.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-02-09 |title=Thomas Hunt Morgan |url=https://www.amacad.org/person/thomas-hunt-morgan |access-date=2023-11-02 |website=American Academy of Arts & Sciences |language=en}}</ref> * The Thomas Hunt Morgan School of Biological Sciences at the University of Kentucky is named for him. * The [[Genetics Society of America]] annually awards the [[Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal]], named in his honor, to one of its members who has made a significant contribution to the science of genetics. * Thomas Hunt Morgan's discovery was illustrated on a 1989 stamp issued in Sweden, showing the discoveries of eight Nobel Prize-winning geneticists.{{citation needed|date=April 2019}} * A junior high school in the [[Shoreline School District]] was named for Morgan until 1986.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 10, 2020 |title=Goodbye to Thomas Hunt Morgan Junior High |url=https://www.shorelineareanews.com/2020/06/goodbye-to-thomas-hunt-morgan-junior.html |website=Shoreline Area News}}</ref> ==Personal life== On June 4, 1904, Morgan married [[Lillian Vaughn Morgan|Lillian Vaughan Sampson]] (1870–1952), who had entered graduate school in biology at Bryn Mawr the same year Morgan joined the faculty; she put aside her scientific work for 16 years of their marriage when they had four children. Later she contributed significantly to Morgan's ''Drosophila'' work. One of their four children (one boy and three girls) was [[Isabel Morgan]] (1911–1996) (Marr. Mountain), who became a [[virologist]] at Johns Hopkins, specializing in [[poliomyelitis|polio]] research. Morgan was an atheist.<ref>{{cite book|title=Strange Angel: The Otherworldly Life of Rocket Scientist John Whiteside Parsons|year=2006|publisher=Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=9780156031790|author=George Pendle|page=69|quote=The Nobel Prize-winning geneticist and stringent atheist Thomas Hunt Morgan was developing the chromosome theory of heredity by examining his swarm of mutated Drosophila (fruit flies) through a jeweler's loupe.}}</ref><ref>"Morgan's passion for experimentation was symptomatic of his general skepticism and his distaste for speculation. He believed only what could be proven. He was said to be an atheist, and I have always believed that he was. Everything I knew about him—his skepticism, his honesty—was consistent with disbelief in the supernatural." Norman H. Horowitz, [http://www.genetics.org/content/149/4/1629.short T. H. Morgan at Caltech: A Reminiscence], Genetics, Vol. 149, 1629–1632, August 1998.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/3677/1/Goodstein.pdf|author=Judith R. Goodstein|title=The Thomas Hunt Morgan Era in Biology|website=Calteches.library.caltech.edu|access-date=28 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160822085324/http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/3677/1/Goodstein.pdf|archive-date=22 August 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.genetics.org/content/149/4/1629|title=T. H. Morgan at Caltech: A Reminiscence|first=Norman H.|last=Horowitz|date=1 August 1998|journal=Genetics|volume=149|issue=4|pages=1629–1632|doi=10.1093/genetics/149.4.1629|pmid=9691024|pmc=1460264|access-date=6 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160405111515/http://www.genetics.org/content/149/4/1629|archive-date=5 April 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> ==See also== * [[Mildred Hoge Richards]], pupil ==References== {{Reflist}} ==Further reading== * {{cite book|last=Allen|first=Garland E.|year=1978|title=Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science|publisher=[[Princeton University Press]]|isbn=0-691-08200-6}} * {{cite journal|last=Allen|first=Garland E.|year=2000|journal=[[American National Biography]]|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|title=Morgan, Thomas Hunt}} * {{cite book|author=Kohler, Robert E.|year=1994|title=Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life|url=https://archive.org/details/lordsofflydrosop0000kohl|url-access=registration|publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]]|isbn=0-226-45063-5}} * {{cite book|last=Shine|first=Ian B|author2=Sylvia Wrobel|year=1976|title=Thomas Hunt Morgan: Pioneer of Genetics|publisher=[[University Press of Kentucky]]|isbn=0-8131-0095-X}} * {{cite journal |last=Stephenson |first=Wendell H. |title=Thomas Hunt Morgan: Kentucky's Gift to Biological Science |journal=Filson Club History Quarterly |volume=20 |issue=2 |date=April 1946 |url=http://connect1.ajaxdocumentviewer.com/viewerajax.php?YH6zlSpldS1Kk8DNWczPQfWRQEZaQiigWtcQqyAJPOzwCuENy3X9NEGHGfp5ezCHJdgdN49hce5zRYKQV9Ooz8GIMU6APbD3Q44QsntYrbvmOfVZcl%2Fc%2F%2F5A%2F7UCCAINs5TDdf9GrHiUxgTSHv2Jd52MmR0%2F6g%2BvmyEeqX%2BT749vkDd6hg8ex8I%2Blw72Drk7SZGOzSYgb9%2F%2BUfLtOqzVmePrUKPKEE9t36zcvEkB%2BvXI9s5sm1%2F7h3zK02hRslDLJrcdjcGmmkY0fztmIHiQNPDYl83%2FUr4vLG8T8goUT7L5s97UVjU2ZXl6aCrbfElXaHhEzcVOZP1oTfgzQVHJqtBxl%2BAOUqfEitnUEF1O3RyGXrogBGYt0fuLdiWLorXwxBK1T32%2FNtWmvGjLETcouG9zhPWncybvoRFWp%2FsX%2BQk%3D |access-date=2012-02-22 }}{{dead link|date=March 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} * {{cite journal|last=Sturtevant|first=Alfred H.|author-link=Alfred Sturtevant|year=1959|journal=Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=33|title=Thomas Hunt Morgan|pages=283–325}} ==External links== {{Commons and category}} {{Wikisource author}} * {{Nobelprize}} including the Nobel Lecture on June 4, 1934 ''The Relation of Genetics to Physiology and Medicine'' * [http://ukcc.uky.edu/cgi-bin/dynamo?maps.391+campus+0225 Thomas Hunt Morgan Biological Sciences Building at University of Kentucky] * [https://web.archive.org/web/20090211065202/http://nobelmedicine.co.uk/thomashuntmorgan.htm Thomas Hunt Morgan] * [https://www.nasonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/morgan-thomas-hunt.pdf Thomas Hunt Morgan] – [https://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/ Biographical Memoirs] of the [[National Academy of Sciences]] * {{Gutenberg author | id=34763| name=Thomas Hunt Morgan}} * {{Internet Archive author |sname=Thomas Hunt Morgan |sopt=t}} * {{Librivox author |id=15789}} * {{BHL author|1119}} {{Copley Medallists 1901–1950}} {{Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Laureates 1926-1950}} {{1933 Nobel Prize winners}} {{NAS presidents}} {{Hunt–Morgan family tree}} {{Authority control}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Morgan, Thomas Hunt}} [[Category:1866 births]] [[Category:1945 deaths]] [[Category:American atheists]] [[Category:American geneticists]] [[Category:American Nobel laureates]] [[Category:California Institute of Technology faculty]] [[Category:Columbia University faculty]] [[Category:Corresponding Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences (1917–1925)]] [[Category:Corresponding Members of the USSR Academy of Sciences]] [[Category:Foreign members of the Royal Society]] [[Category:History of genetics]] [[Category:Honorary members of the USSR Academy of Sciences]] [[Category:Johns Hopkins University alumni]] [[Category:Key family (Maryland)]] [[Category:Members of the Lwów Scientific Society]] [[Category:Members of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences]] [[Category:Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine]] [[Category:Presidents of the United States National Academy of Sciences]] [[Category:Recipients of the Copley Medal]] [[Category:University of Kentucky alumni]] [[Category:Scientists from Lexington, Kentucky]] [[Category:Writers from Lexington, Kentucky]] [[Category:Members of the Royal Society of Sciences in Uppsala]] [[Category:Hunt–Morgan family|Thomas Hunt]] [[Category:Members of the American Philosophical Society]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:1933 Nobel Prize winners
(
edit
)
Template:Authority control
(
edit
)
Template:BHL author
(
edit
)
Template:Citation needed
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Cn
(
edit
)
Template:Commons and category
(
edit
)
Template:Copley Medallists 1901–1950
(
edit
)
Template:Dead link
(
edit
)
Template:Gutenberg author
(
edit
)
Template:Hunt–Morgan family tree
(
edit
)
Template:Infobox scientist
(
edit
)
Template:Internet Archive author
(
edit
)
Template:Librivox author
(
edit
)
Template:NAS presidents
(
edit
)
Template:Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Laureates 1926-1950
(
edit
)
Template:Nobelprize
(
edit
)
Template:Other people
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Wikisource author
(
edit
)
Search
Search
Editing
Thomas Hunt Morgan
Add topic