Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Performance Rating
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{About|rating computer CPU performance|performance rating at the workplace|performance rating (work measurement)|chess ratings|rating performance (chess)}} {{short description|Figure of merit developed by AMD, Cyrix, IBM Microelectronics and SGS-Thomson}} The '''PR''' ('''performance rating''', '''P-rating''', or '''Pentium rating''') system was a [[figure of merit]] developed by [[AMD]], [[Cyrix]], [[IBM Microelectronics]] and [[SGS-Thomson]] in the mid-1990s as a method of comparing their [[x86]] processors to those of rival [[Intel]]. The idea was to consider [[instructions per cycle]] (IPC) in addition to the clock speed, so that the processors become comparable with Intel's Pentium that had a higher clock speed with overall lower IPC.<ref name=":0">{{Cite magazine|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K8IS2A_xDLUC&q=%22P-Rating%22&pg=PA31|title=Trends: Cyrix Scores|last=Metz|first=Cade|date=1996-04-09|magazine=[[PC Magazine]]|publisher=[[Ziff Davis, Inc.]]|volume=15|pages=31|language=en|issue=7}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cyrix.com/corpor/press/1996/pratg-pr.htm|title=Cyrix Corporate Information -- New P-Rating System for Microprocessors Simplifies Consumer Evaluation of Personal Computers|date=1996-02-05|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19960926233116/http://www.cyrix.com/corpor/press/1996/pratg-pr.htm|archive-date=1996-09-26|access-date=2019-12-17}}</ref> == Branding == The first use of the PR system was in 1995, when AMD used it to assert that their [[AMD 5x86]] processor was as fast as a [[Pentium (original)|Pentium]] running at 75 MHz. The designation "P75" was added to the chip to denote this.<ref name=pcgamer>{{Cite web|last=Lilly|first=Paul|date=2009-04-14|title=A Brief History of CPUs: 31 Awesome Years of x86|url=https://www.pcgamer.com/a-brief-history-of-cpus-31-awesome-years-of-x86/|access-date=2023-08-18|website=[[PC Gamer]]|language=en|df=mdy}}</ref>{{rp|3}} Later that year, [[Cyrix]] also adopted the PR system for its [[6x86]]<ref name=":0" /> and [[6x86MX]] line of processors.{{fact|date=August 2023}} These processors were faster than Pentiums of the same speed in some benchmarks, so Cyrix gave them a Performance Rating faster than their clock speed.<ref name=pcgamer/> Some [[AMD K5]] models also use the PR system. AMD initially branded its [[AMD K6]] processors with a "PR2" rating but dropped this after consumer confusion.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/42/amd-k6-review|title=AMD K6 Review|last=Shimpi|first=Anand Lal|work=[[AnandTech]]|date=1997-04-03|accessdate=2023-08-18}}</ref> AMD revived the branding for its [[Athlon XP]], which was released in 2001. The efficient Athlon XP chips could perform better than similarly-clocked chips from Intel's competing [[Pentium 4]] line-up, which depended on high clock speeds to overcome their low IPC. As a result, AMD believed consumers would be swayed by the [[megahertz myth]].<ref>{{cite web |last=McLaughlin |first=Laurianne |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/65171/amd_strikes_back.html |title=AMD Strikes Back |work=[[PC World]] |date=2001-11-02 |access-date=2012-01-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120420111758/https://www.pcworld.com/article/65171/amd_strikes_back.html|archive-date=2012-04-20}}</ref> These chips were rated against the [[Athlon Thunderbird]] but were popularly compared to the Pentium 4. As a result, the branding became colloquially known as a "Pentium Rating".<ref name=pcgamer/>{{rp|6}} ''[[Maximum PC]]'' criticized this as making it more difficult for power users to differentiate between the various Athlon XP chips. For example, two chips could be given the same "PR" branding but have much different engineering ([[CPU cache|cache]] size, [[bus (computing)|bus]] speed, etc), which would affect their performance at different tasks.<ref>{{cite book|title=Maximum PC Guide to Building a Dream PC|chapter=AMD, the Feisty Upstart|last=Smith|first=Will|publisher=[[Que Publishing]]|year=2005|isbn=0-7897-3193-2|page=48|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cnj_3fFfPdsC&pg=PA48}}</ref> ==See also== * [[iCOMP (index)]] == References == {{reflist}} == External links == * [https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/processor_performance_rating_(p-rating)_specification Processor Performance Rating (P-rating) Specification], February 1996. Uses Winstone 96. * [https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/p-rating P-rating] on wikichip [[Category:AMD]] [[Category:Rating systems]] [[Category:Computer performance]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:About
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite magazine
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Fact
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Rp
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Search
Search
Editing
Performance Rating
Add topic