Editing Military incompetence

{{Multiple issues|
{{More citations needed|date=May 2008}}
{{No inline citations|date=March 2021}}
{{Original research|date=March 2021}}
}}
'''Military incompetence''' refers to incompetencies and failures of military organisations, whether through incompetent individuals or through a flawed institutional culture.

The effects of isolated cases of ''personal'' incompetence can be disproportionately significant in military organisations. Strict [[hierarchies]] of command provide the opportunity for a single decision to direct the work of thousands, whilst an [[institutional culture]] devoted to following orders without debate can help ensure that a bad or miscommunicated decision is implemented without being challenged or corrected.

However, the most common cases of "military incompetence" can be attributable to a flawed [[organisational culture]]. Perhaps the most marked of these is a [[Conservatism|conservative]] and traditionalist attitude, where innovative ideas or new technology are discarded or left untested. A tendency to believe that a problem can be solved by applying an earlier (failed) solution "better", be that with more men, more firepower, or simply more zeal, is common. A strict hierarchical system often discourages the [[devolution]] of power to junior commanders, and can encourage [[micromanagement]] by senior officers.

The nature of warfare provides several factors which exacerbate these effects; the [[fog of war]] means that information about the enemy forces is often limited or inaccurate, making it easy for the [[military intelligence|intelligence process]] to interpret the information to agree with existing assumptions, or to fit it to their own preconceptions and expectations. Communications tend to deteriorate in battlefield situations, with the flow of information between commanders and combat units being disrupted, making it difficult to react to changes in the situation as they develop.

After operations have ceased, military organisations often fail to learn effectively from experience. In victory, whatever methods have been used{{emdash}}no matter how inefficient{{emdash}}appear to have been vindicated (see [[victory disease]]), whilst in defeat there is a tendency to select [[scapegoat]]s and to avoid looking in detail at the broader reasons for failure.

==See also==

* [[List of military disasters]]
* [[On the Psychology of Military Incompetence]]

==Further reading==
* {{cite book |last1= Cohen|first1= Eliot A.|last2= Gooch|first2= John|author-link1= Eliot A. Cohen|year= 2005|title= Military Misfortunes: The Anatomy of Failure in War|publisher= [[Free Press (publisher)|Free Press]]|isbn= 978-0-7432-8082-2}}
* {{cite book |last= David|first= Saul|author-link1= Saul David|year= 1997|title= Military Blunders: The How and Why of Military Failure|publisher= [[Constable & Robinson|Robinson Publishing Ltd]]|isbn= 1-85487-918-9}}
* {{cite book |last= Dixon|first= Norman F.| author-link1= Norman F. Dixon|year= 1976|title= On the Psychology of Military Incompetence|publisher= [[Jonathan Cape]]|isbn= 0-224-01161-8}} (also Pimlico, 1994 {{ISBN|0-7126-5889-0}})
* {{cite book|last1= Dunnigan|first1= James|last2= Nofi|first2= Albert|author-link1= Jim Dunnigan|author-link2= Albert Nofi|year= 1991|title= Shooting Blanks: War Making That Doesn't Work|url= https://archive.org/details/shootingblankswa00dunn|publisher= [[William Morrow and Company]]|isbn= 0-688-08947-X}}
* {{cite book|last= Fair|first= Charles|author-link= Charles M. Fair|year= 1961|title= From the Jaws of Victory: A History of the Character, Causes and Consequences of Military Stupidity, from Crassus to Johnson and Westmoreland|url= https://archive.org/details/fromjawsofvictor00fair|publisher= [[Simon & Schuster]]|isbn= 0-671-20997-3}}

[[Category:Military operations]]
[[Category:Military theory]]
[[Category:Military organization]]
[[Category:Incompetence]]