Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
List of climate change controversies
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|List of debates over global warming}} {{Use American English|date=August 2021}} {{Use dmy dates|date=January 2020}} There are past and present public debates over certain aspects of climate change: how much has occurred in modern times, [[Causes of climate change|what causes it]], what [[Effects of climate change|its effects]] will be, and what action should be taken to curb it now or later, and so forth. In the [[scientific literature]], there is a [[Scientific consensus on climate change|very strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased]] in recent decades and that the trend is caused by human-induced emissions of [[greenhouse gas]]es.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WGIAR5_SPM_brochure_en.pdf |title='Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.' IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Working Group I, Summary for Policymakers. 'The best estimate of the human-induced contribution to warming is similar to the observed warming over this period.' |access-date=26 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181022184656/https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WGIAR5_SPM_brochure_en.pdf |archive-date=22 October 2018 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The controversies are, by now, mostly political rather than scientific: there is a scientific consensus that global warming is happening and is caused by human activity.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ |title=Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming |website=Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet |access-date=16 September 2018}}</ref> Public debates that also reflect scientific debate include estimates of how responsive the climate system might be to any given level of greenhouse gases ([[climate sensitivity]]). Disputes over the key scientific facts of global warming are more prevalent in the [[Media coverage of climate change|media]] than in the scientific literature, where such issues are treated as resolved, and such disputes are more prevalent in the [[Climate change in the United States|United States]] and [[Climate change in Australia|Australia]] than [[Climate change opinion by country|globally]].<ref name="Stoddard">{{cite journal |last1=Stoddard |first1=Isak |last2=Anderson |first2=Kevin |last3=Capstick |first3=Stuart |last4=Carton |first4=Wim |last5=Depledge |first5=Joanna |last6=Facer |first6=Keri |last7=Gough |first7=Clair |last8=Hache |first8=Frederic |last9=Hoolohan |first9=Claire |last10=Hultman |first10=Martin |last11=Hällström |first11=Niclas |last12=Kartha |first12=Sivan |last13=Klinsky |first13=Sonja |last14=Kuchler |first14=Magdalena |last15=Lövbrand |first15=Eva |display-authors=etal |date=18 October 2021 |title=Three Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven't We Bent the Global Emissions Curve? |url=https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-011104 |journal=Annual Review of Environment and Resources |language=en |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=653–689 |doi=10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-011104 |issn=1543-5938 |s2cid=233815004 |access-date=31 August 2022 |last16=Nasiritousi |first16=Naghmeh |last17=Newell |first17=Peter |last18=Peters |first18=Glen P. |last19=Sokona |first19=Youba |last20=Stirling |first20=Andy |last21=Stilwell |first21=Matthew |last22=Spash |first22=Clive L. |last23=Williams |first23=Mariama |hdl=1983/93c742bc-4895-42ac-be81-535f36c5039d|hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|first1=M. |first2=J. |title=Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press |last1=Boykoff |journal=Global Environmental Change Part A |volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=125–136 |date=July 2004 |doi=10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001 |last2=Boykoff |bibcode=2004GEC....14..125B |url=http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/publications/downloads/boykoff04-gec.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151106081048/http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/publications/downloads/boykoff04-gec.pdf |archive-date= 6 November 2015 }}</ref><ref name="merchants_doubt">{{cite book | title=Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming | first1=Naomi | last1=Oreskes | author-link1=Naomi Oreskes | first2=Erik | last2=Conway | publisher=Bloomsbury Press | edition=first | isbn=978-1-59691-610-4 | date=2010 | url=https://archive.org/details/merchantsofdoubt00ores }}</ref> == Debates around details in the science == {{See also|Scientific consensus on climate change}} There have been many debates around the details of climate change science. [[Climate change denial|Climate change deniers]] and "skeptics" tend to [[Cherry picking|cherry-pick]] data or studies, and then trump up any scientific discussions or apparent discrepancies that match with their agenda.{{citation needed|date=December 2023}} Many of those apparent discrepancies have been reconciled in the meantime, [[Climate model|climate models]] have become more accurate, the [[scientific consensus on climate change]] has strengthened and so forth. For example, climatologist [[Kevin E. Trenberth]] has published widely on the topic of [[Climate variability and change|climate variability]] and has exposed flaws in the publications of other scientists.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Trenberth |first1=Kevin E. |last2=Fasullo |first2=John T. |last3=Abraham |first3=John P. |date=2011 |title=Issues in Establishing Climate Sensitivity in Recent Studies |journal=Remote Sensing |language=en |volume=3 |issue=9 |pages=2051–2056 |doi=10.3390/rs3092051 |bibcode=2011RemS....3.2051T |issn=2072-4292 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Trenberth |first1=Kevin E. |last2=Fasullo |first2=John T. |last3=O'Dell |first3=Chris |last4=Wong |first4=Takmeng |date=2010 |title=Relationships between tropical sea surface temperature and top-of-atmosphere radiation |journal=Geophysical Research Letters |language=en |volume=37 |issue=3 |doi=10.1029/2009GL042314 |bibcode=2010GeoRL..37.3702T |s2cid=6402800 |issn=0094-8276|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Foster |first1=G. |last2=Annan |first2=J. D. |last3=Jones |first3=P. D. |last4=Mann |first4=M. E. |last5=Mullan |first5=B. |last6=Renwick |first6=J. |last7=Salinger |first7=J. |last8=Schmidt |first8=G. A. |last9=Trenberth |first9=K. E. |date=2010 |title=Comment on "Influence of the Southern Oscillation on tropospheric temperature" by J. D. McLean, C. R. de Freitas, and R. M. Carter |journal=Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres |language=en |volume=115 |issue=D9 |doi=10.1029/2009JD012960 |bibcode=2010JGRD..115.9110F |issn=0148-0227|doi-access=free }}</ref> For past debates and controversies on scientific details see for example: * [[History of climate change science#Discredited theories and reconciled apparent discrepancies]] * [[Climate change denial#Discussing specific aspects of climate change science]] * [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change#Challenges and controversies]] (the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|IPCC]] assessment reports, like the most recent [[IPCC Sixth Assessment Report]] summarise the state of the art of climate science at the time). == Debates over most effective response to warming == {{See also|Politics of climate change|}} There have been debates on the best responses to slow global warming, and their timing. The debates are around the specific actions for [[climate change mitigation]] and [[climate change adaptation]], or [[climate action]] in general. See for example: *[[Economic analysis of climate change]] *[[Climate change denial#Delaying climate change mitigation measures]] *[[Climate change denial#Pushing for adaptation only]] *[[Climate action]] ([[Climate crisis]]) == See also == {{portal|border=no|Global warming|Ecology|Environment|World}} * [[Attitude polarization]] * [[History of climate change policy and politics]] * [[Manufactured controversy]] * [[Politicization of science]] * [[Right-wing antiscience]] == References == {{Reflist}} {{Climate change|state=expanded}} [[Category:Articles containing video clips]] [[Category:Climate change assessment and attribution]] [[Category:Climate change controversies]] [[Category:Climate change denial|.]] [[Category:Politics of science]] [[Category:21st-century controversies in the United States]] [[Category:21st-century controversies]] [[Category:Controversies in Australia]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Citation needed
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Climate change
(
edit
)
Template:Portal
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:See also
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Use American English
(
edit
)
Template:Use dmy dates
(
edit
)
Search
Search
Editing
List of climate change controversies
Add topic