Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Immorality
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Violation of moral laws adapted by societal standards}} {{Distinguish|Amorality|Immortality}} '''Immorality''' is the violation of [[morality|moral]] [[law]]s, [[Norm (social)|norm]]s or standards. It refers to an agent doing or thinking something they know or believe to be [[wrong]].<ref>{{cite book |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=New School Dictionary |publisher=Collins |page=24 |date=1999 |isbn=0 00 472238-8}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=amoral vs. immoral on Vocabulary.com|url=https://www.vocabulary.com/articles/chooseyourwords/amoral-immoral|access-date=2020-10-14|website=www.vocabulary.com}}</ref> Immorality is normally applied to people or actions, or in a broader sense, it can be applied to groups or corporate bodies, and works of art. ==Ancient Greece== [[Callicles]] and [[Thrasymachus]] are two characters of [[Plato]]'s dialogues, [[Gorgias (dialogue)|Gorgias]] and [[Republic (dialogue)|Republic]], respectively, who challenge conventional morality.<ref>{{Citation |last=Barney |first=Rachel |title=Callicles and Thrasymachus |date=2017 |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/callicles-thrasymachus/ |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |edition=Fall 2017 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=2023-02-18}}</ref> [[Aristotle]] saw many vices as excesses or deficits in relation to some virtue, as cowardice and rashness relate to courage. Some attitudes and actions{{snd}}such as [[envy]], [[murder]], and [[theft]]{{snd}}he saw as [[wrong]] in themselves, with no question of a deficit/excess in relation to the [[Golden mean (philosophy)|mean]].<ref>Aristotle, ''Ethics'' (1976) p. 102</ref> ==Religion== In Islam, Judaism and Christianity, [[sin]] is a central concept in understanding immorality. Immorality is often closely linked with both [[religion and sexuality]].<ref>B. Kirkpatrick ed, ''Roget's Thesaurus'' (1998) pp. 650 and 670</ref> [[Max Weber]] saw rational articulated religions as engaged in a long-term struggle with more physical forms of religious experience linked to dance, intoxication and sexual activity.<ref>Max Weber, ''The Sociology of Religion'' (1971) p. 158</ref> [[Durkheim]] pointed out how many primitive rites culminated in abandoning the distinction between licit and immoral behavior.<ref>Émile Durkheim, ''The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life'' (1971) p. 383</ref> [[Freud]]'s dour conclusion was that "In every age immorality has found no less support in religion than morality has".<ref>S. Freud, ''Civilization, Society and Religion'' (PFL 12) p. 220</ref> ==Sexual immorality== {{Also|Sexual ethics}} Coding of sexual behavior has historically been a feature of all human societies; as too has been the policing of breaches of its [[mores]]{{snd}}sexual immorality{{snd}}by means of formal and [[informal social control]].<ref>F. Dabhoiwala, 'The first sexual revolution', ''The Oxford Historian'' X (2012) p. 426</ref> Interdictions and [[taboo]]s among primitive societies<ref>Durkheim, p. 410</ref> were arguably no less severe than in traditional agrarian societies.<ref>S. Freud, ''On Sexuality'' (PFL 7) p. 271</ref> In the latter, the degree of control might vary from time to time and region to region, being least in urban settlements;<ref>E. Ladurie, ''Montaillou'' (1980) p. 149 and p. 169</ref> however, only the last three centuries of intense urbanisation, commercialisation and modernisation have broken with the restrictions of the pre-modern world,<ref>Dabhoiwala, p. 41–3</ref> in favor of a successor society of fractured and competing sexual codes and subcultures, where sexual expression is integrated into the workings of the commercial world.<ref>Herbert Marcuse, ''One-Dimensional Man'' (2002) p. 78</ref> Nevertheless, while the meaning of sexual immorality has been [[sexual revolution|drastically redefined in recent times]], arguably the boundaries of what is acceptable remain publicly policed and as highly charged as ever, as the decades-long debates in the US over reproductive rights after ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'', or 21st-century [[Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia|controversy over child images on Wikipedia]] and Amazon would tend to suggest.<ref>A. Lih, ''The Wikipedia Revolution'' (2010) p. 204–9</ref> Defining sexual immorality across history is difficult as many different religions, cultures and societies have held contradictory views about sexuality. But there is an almost universal disdain for two sexual practices throughout history. These two behaviors include [[infidelity]] within a [[monogamous]], [[romance (love)|romantic]] relationship and [[incest]] between immediate family members.{{cn|date=February 2025}} Other than these two practices, some cultures{{which|date=February 2025}} throughout history have permitted sexual behaviors considered obscene by many cultures today, such as marriage between cousins, [[polygyny]], [[Underage sexual abuse|underage sex]], [[rape]] during [[war rape|war]] or forced [[cultural imperialism|assimilation]], and even [[zoophilia]].{{cn|date=February 2025}} ==Modernity== [[Michel Foucault]] considered that the modern world was unable to put forward a coherent [[morality]]<ref>G, Gutting ed., ''The Cambridge Companion to Foucault'' (2003) p. 87</ref>{{snd}}an inability underpinned philosophically by [[emotivism]]. Nevertheless, [[modernism]] has often been accompanied by a cult of immorality,<ref>Eric Berne, ''Games People Play'' (1966) p. 70</ref> as for example when [[John Ciardi]] acclaimed [[Naked Lunch]] as "a monumentally moral descent into the hell of narcotic addiction".<ref>Quoted in J. Campbell, ''This is the Beat Generation'' (1999) p. 265</ref> ==Immoral psychoanalysis== [[Psychoanalysis]] received much early criticism for being the unsavory product of an immoral town{{snd}}Vienna; psychoanalysts for being both unscrupulous and dirty-minded.<ref>Peter Gay, ''Freud'' (1989) p. 194-6</ref> Freud himself however was of the opinion that "anyone who has succeeded in educating himself to truth about himself is permanently defended against the danger of immorality, even though his standard of morality may differ".<ref>S. Freud, ''Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis'' (PFL 1) p. 485-6</ref> [[Nietzsche]] referred to his ethical philosophy as Immoralism.<ref name="Von Tevenar 2007 p. 55">{{cite book | last=Von Tevenar | first=G. | title=Nietzsche and Ethics | publisher=Peter Lang | year=2007 | isbn=978-3-03911-045-2 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yf445ypX8D0C&pg=PA55 | access-date=2023-01-25 | page=55}}</ref> ==Literary references== *When questioned by a proof-reader whether his description of [[Meleager of Gadara|Meleager]] as the immoral poet should be immortal poet, [[T. E. Lawrence]] replied: "Immorality I know. Immortality I cannot judge. As you please: Meleager will not sue us for libel".<ref>T. E. Lawrence, ''Seven Pillars of Wisdom'' (1936) p. 25</ref> *[[De Quincey]] set out an (inverted) hierarchy of immorality in his study [[On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts]]: "if once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to procrastination and incivility...this downward path".<ref>Thomas De Quincey, ''On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts'' (2004) p. 28</ref> ==See also== {{Columns-list|colwidth=20em| * [[Amorality]] * [[Antinomianism]] * [[Anti-social behaviour]] * [[Baudelaire]] * [[Criminality]] * [[Deviance (sociology)]] * [[Disinhibition]] – disregard for social conventions and norms * [[Ethics]] * [[Evil]] * [[Harm]] * [[Hedonism]] * [[Libertine]] * [[Limit-experience]] * [[Bernard Mandeville]] *[[Mann Act]] * [[Morality]] ** [[Morality in Islam]] * [[Moral psychology]] * [[Perversion]] * [[Raunch culture]] * [[Repressive desublimation]] * [[Selfishness]] * [[Sexual ethics]] * [[Seven deadly sins]] * [[Sin]] * [[Vice]] * [[Wickedness]] }} ==References== {{Reflist|2|}} ==Further reading== *[[Bible]] *[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]] *[[André Gide]], ''L'Immoraliste'' (1902) *Catherine Edwards, ''The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome'' (2002) ==External links== {{Americana Poster}} *{{Wiktionary-inline}} {{Ethics}} [[Category:Morality]] [[Category:Concepts in ethics]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Also
(
edit
)
Template:Americana Poster
(
edit
)
Template:Citation
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Cn
(
edit
)
Template:Columns-list
(
edit
)
Template:Distinguish
(
edit
)
Template:Ethics
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Snd
(
edit
)
Template:Which
(
edit
)
Template:Wiktionary-inline
(
edit
)
Search
Search
Editing
Immorality
Add topic