Editing Finitism

{{Short description|Philosophy of mathematics that accepts the existence only of finite mathematical objects}}
{{mfn|date=November 2024}}
'''Finitism''' is a [[philosophy of mathematics]] that accepts the existence only of [[finite set|finite]] [[mathematical object]]s. It is best understood in comparison to the mainstream philosophy of mathematics where infinite mathematical objects (e.g., [[infinite set]]s) are accepted as existing.

== Main idea ==
The main idea of finitistic mathematics is not accepting the existence of infinite objects such as infinite sets. While all [[natural number]]s are accepted as existing, the ''set'' of all natural numbers is not considered to exist as a mathematical object. Therefore [[quantifier (logic)|quantification]] over infinite domains is not considered meaningful. The mathematical theory often associated with finitism is [[Thoralf Skolem]]'s [[primitive recursive arithmetic]].

== History ==
The introduction of infinite mathematical objects occurred a few centuries ago when the use of infinite objects was already a controversial topic among mathematicians. The issue entered a new phase when [[Georg Cantor]] in 1874 introduced what is now called [[naive set theory]] and used it as a base for his work on [[transfinite number]]s. When paradoxes such as [[Russell's paradox]], [[Berry's paradox]] and the [[Burali-Forti paradox]] were discovered in Cantor's naive set theory, the issue became a heated topic among mathematicians.

There were various positions taken by mathematicians. All agreed about finite mathematical objects such as natural numbers. However there were disagreements regarding infinite mathematical objects. 
One position was the [[intuitionistic mathematics]] that was advocated by [[L. E. J. Brouwer]], which rejected the existence of infinite objects until they are constructed.

Another position was endorsed by [[David Hilbert]]: finite mathematical objects are concrete objects, infinite mathematical objects are ideal objects, and accepting ideal mathematical objects does not cause a problem regarding finite mathematical objects. More formally, Hilbert believed that it is possible to show that any theorem about finite mathematical objects that can be obtained using ideal infinite objects can be also obtained without them. Therefore allowing infinite mathematical objects would not cause a problem regarding finite objects. This led to [[Hilbert's program]] of proving both [[consistency]] and [[completeness (logic)|completeness]] of set theory using finitistic means as this would imply that adding ideal mathematical objects is [[conservative extension|conservative]] over the finitistic part. Hilbert's views are also associated with the [[Formalism (mathematics)|formalist philosophy of mathematics]]. Hilbert's goal of proving the consistency and completeness of set theory or even arithmetic through finitistic means turned out to be an impossible task due to [[Kurt Gödel]]'s [[incompleteness theorems]]. However, [[Harvey Friedman (mathematician)|Harvey Friedman]]'s [[Friedman's grand conjecture|grand conjecture]] would imply that most mathematical results are provable using finitistic means.

Hilbert did not give a rigorous explanation of what he considered finitistic and referred to as elementary. However, based on his work with [[Paul Bernays]] some experts such as {{harvtxt|Tait|1981}} have argued that [[primitive recursive arithmetic]] can be considered an upper bound on what Hilbert considered finitistic mathematics.{{sfn|Schirn|Niebergall|2005}}

As a result of Gödel's theorems, as it became clear that there is no hope of proving both the consistency and completeness of mathematics, and with the development of seemingly consistent [[axiomatic set theory|axiomatic set theories]] such as [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory]], most modern mathematicians do not focus on this topic.

== Classical finitism vs. strict finitism ==
In her book ''The Philosophy of Set Theory'', [[Mary Tiles]] characterized those who allow ''potentially infinite'' objects as '''classical finitists''', and those who do not allow potentially infinite objects as '''strict finitists''': for example, a classical finitist would allow statements such as "every natural number has a [[successor function|successor]]" and would accept the meaningfulness of [[infinite series]] in the sense of [[limit (mathematics)|limits]] of finite partial sums, while a strict finitist would not. Historically, the written history of mathematics was thus classically finitist until Cantor created the hierarchy of [[transfinite number|transfinite]] [[cardinal number|cardinals]] at the end of the 19th century.

== Views regarding infinite mathematical objects ==
[[Leopold Kronecker]] remained a strident opponent to Cantor's set theory:{{sfn|Eriksson|Estep|Johnson|2004|pages=230–232}}
{{blockquote|text=
{{lang|de|Die ganzen Zahlen hat der liebe Gott gemacht, alles andere ist Menschenwerk.}}
God created the integers; all else is the work of man.
|source=1886 lecture at the {{lang|de|Berliner Naturforscher-Versammlung}}{{refn|according to {{harvnb|Weber|1893|page=19}}}}}}

[[Reuben Goodstein]] was another proponent of finitism.  Some of his work involved building up to [[Mathematical analysis|analysis]] from finitist foundations.

Although he denied it, much of [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]]'s writing on mathematics has a strong affinity with finitism.{{sfn|Rodych|2018}}

If finitists are contrasted with [[Transfinite number|transfinitists]] (proponents of e.g. [[Georg Cantor]]'s hierarchy of infinities), then also [[Aristotle]] may be characterized as a finitist. Aristotle especially promoted the [[potential infinity]] as a middle option between strict finitism and [[actual infinity]] (the latter being an actualization of something never-ending in nature, in contrast with the Cantorist actual infinity consisting of the transfinite [[cardinal number|cardinal]] and [[ordinal number|ordinal]] numbers, which have nothing to do with the things in nature):

{{blockquote
|text=But on the other hand to suppose that the infinite does not exist in any way leads obviously to many impossible consequences: there will be a beginning and end of time, a magnitude will not be divisible into magnitudes, number will not be infinite. If, then, in view of the above considerations, neither alternative seems possible, an arbiter must be called in.
|source=Aristotle, Physics, Book 3, Chapter 6}}

== Other related philosophies of mathematics ==
{{no sources|section|date=October 2024}}
[[Ultrafinitism]] (also known as ultraintuitionism) has an even more conservative attitude towards mathematical objects than finitism, and has objections to the existence of finite mathematical objects when they are too large.

Towards the end of the 20th century [[John Penn Mayberry]] developed a system of finitary mathematics which he called "Euclidean Arithmetic". The most striking tenet of his system is a complete and rigorous rejection of the special foundational status normally accorded to iterative processes, including in particular the construction of the natural numbers by the iteration "+1". Consequently Mayberry is in sharp dissent from those who would seek to equate finitary mathematics with [[Peano arithmetic]] or any of its fragments such as [[primitive recursive arithmetic]].

== See also ==
* [[Temporal finitism]]
* [[Transcomputational problem]]
* [[Rational trigonometry]]

== Notes ==
{{Reflist}}

==Further reading==
*{{harvtxt|Feng Ye|2011}}
*{{harvtxt|Van Bendegem|2019}}

== References ==
*{{cite book
|chapter=17 Do Mathematicians Quarrel? §17.7 Cantor Versus Kronecker
|editor-first=K.
|editor-last=Eriksson
|editor2-first=D.
|editor2-last=Estep
|editor3-first=C.
|editor3-last=Johnson
|title=Derivatives and Geometry in IR3 |publisher=Springer
|year=2004
|isbn=9783540008903
|series=Applied Mathematics: Body and Soul
|volume=1
}}

*{{cite book
|author=Feng Ye  <!-- don't know which is first= an which is last= -->
|title=Strict Finitism and the Logic of Mathematical Applications
|year=2011
|publisher=Springer
|isbn=978-94-007-1347-5
}}

*{{Cite encyclopedia 
|last=Rodych
|first=Victor
|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein-mathematics/#WittLateFiniCons
|title=Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics
|year=2018
|orig-year=2007
|encyclopedia=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]
|access-date=1 October 2023
|editor-first=Zalta
|editor-last=Edward N.
|editor-link=Edward N. Zalta
}}

*{{cite journal
|last1=Schirn
|first1=Mathias
|last2=Niebergall
|first2=Karl-Georg
|title=Finitism = PRA? On a thesis of W. W. Tait
|url=https://rml.tcs.uj.edu.pl/rml-39/schirn.pdf
|journal=Reports on Mathematical Logic
|volume=39
|date=2005
|pp=3-26
}}

*{{cite journal
|last= Tait
|first= William W.
|authorlink= William W. Tait
|year= 1981
|title= Finitism
|journal= [[The Journal of Philosophy]]
|volume= 78
|issue= 9
|pages= 524–546
|doi= 10.2307/2026089
|jstor= 2026089
}}

* {{cite encyclopedia 
|last=Van Bendegem
|first=Jean Paul
|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/geometry-finitism/
|title=Finitism in Geometry
|year=2019
|orig-year=2002
|encyclopedia=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]
|access-date=1 October 2023
|editor-first=Zalta
|editor-last=Edward N.
|editor-link=Edward N. Zalta
}}

*{{cite book|last=Weber|first=Heinrich Martin|author-link=Heinrich Martin Weber|year=1893|url=http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms/load/img/?PPN=PPN37721857X_0002&DMDID=dmdlog6|title=Leopold Kronecker|series=Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung|volume=2, 1891-92|publisher=Georg Reimer }}

{{Philosophical logic}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Constructivism (mathematics)]]
[[Category:Infinity]]
[[Category:Epistemological theories]]