Editing Eastern philosophy

{{short description|Set of philosophies originating in Asia}}
{{For|the album by Apathy|Eastern Philosophy (album){{!}}''Eastern Philosophy'' (album)}}
{{distinguish|Middle Eastern philosophy}}
{{Asian philosophy sidebar}}
{{Philosophy sidebar}}

'''Eastern philosophy''' (also called '''Asian philosophy''' or '''Oriental philosophy''') includes the various [[philosophy|philosophies]] that originated in [[East Asia|East]] and [[South Asia]], including [[Chinese philosophy]], [[Japanese philosophy]], [[Korean philosophy]], and [[Vietnamese philosophy]], which are dominant in East Asia;<ref name="Source1">{{cite book|last1=Elman |first1=Benjamin A. |last2=Duncan |first2=John B. |last3=Ooms |first3=Herman |title=Rethinking Confucianism: Past and present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam |date=2005}}</ref> and [[Indian philosophy]] (including [[Hindu philosophy]], [[Jain philosophy]], [[Buddhist philosophy]]), which are dominant in [[Indian Subcontinent|South Asia]], [[Southeast Asia]], [[Tibet]], [[Japan]] and [[Mongolia]].<ref>Ram-Prasad, Chakravarthi; "Eastern philosophy" (2005)</ref><ref>Fischer-Schreiber, Ehrhard, Friedrichs; ''Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion'' (1994)</ref>

==Indian philosophy==
{{Main|Indian philosophy}}
{{Further|Hinduism|Hindu philosophy|Indonesian philosophy}}
[[File:திருவள்ளுவர் கலைப் படைப்பு.jpg|thumb|180px|[[Valluvar]], the Tamil philosopher of the post-[[Sangam era]]]]
[[Indian philosophy]] refers to [[Ancient India|ancient]] philosophical traditions ({{langx|sa|{{IAST|dárśana}}}}; 'world views', 'teachings')<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://spokensanskrit.de/index.php?tinput=darzana&direction=SE&script=HK&link=yes&beginning=0 |title=Spoken Sanskrit, ''darzana'' |access-date=2 March 2018 |archive-date=6 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160106200706/http://spokensanskrit.de/index.php?tinput=darzana&direction=SE&script=HK&link=yes&beginning=0 |url-status=live }}</ref> of the [[Indian subcontinent]]. [[Hinduism]] may have roots dating back to the times of the [[Indus Valley civilization]].<ref>Larson, Gerald James (1995) ''India's Agony over religion '' SUNY Press {{ISBN|0-7914-2412-X}}. "There is some evidence that Jain traditions may be even older than the Buddhist traditions, possibly going back to the time of the Indus valley civilization, and that Vardhamana rather than being a “founder" per se was, rather, simply a primary spokesman for much older tradition. p. 27"</ref><ref>Joel Diederik Beversluis (2000) In: ''Sourcebook of the World's Religions: An Interfaith Guide to Religion and Spirituality'', New World Library: Novato, CA {{ISBN|1-57731-121-3}} Originating on the Indian sub-continent, Jainism is one of the oldest religion of its homeland and indeed the world, having pre-historic origins before 3000 BC and the propagation of Indo-Aryan culture.... p. 81</ref><ref>Jainism by Mrs. [[Natalya Romanovna Guseva|N.R. Guseva]] p. 44</ref> The major orthodox schools arose sometime between the start of the [[Common Era]] and the [[Gupta Empire]].<ref>Students' Britannica India (2000), Volume 4, Encyclopædia Britannica, {{ISBN|978-0-85229-760-5}}, p. 316</ref> These Hindu schools developed what has been called the "Hindu synthesis" merging orthodox [[Brahmanical]] and unorthodox elements from Buddhism and [[Jainism]].<ref>Hiltebeitel, Alf (2007), Hinduism. In: Joseph Kitagawa, "The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture", Routledge</ref> Hindu thought also spread east to the Indonesian [[Srivijaya empire]] and the Cambodian [[Khmer Empire]]. These religio-philosophical traditions were later grouped under the label [[Hinduism]]. Hinduism is the dominant religion, or way of life,{{refn|group=note|name="definition"|Hinduism is variously defined as a "religion", "set of religious beliefs and practices", "religious tradition", "a way of life" ({{sfn|Sharma|2003|pp=12–13}}) etc. For a discussion on the topic, see: "Establishing the boundaries" in {{sfnlink|Flood|2008|pp=1–17}}.}} in [[South Asia]]. It includes [[Shaivism]], [[Vaishnavism]], and [[Shaktism]]{{sfn|Nath|2001|p=31}} among numerous [[Hindu denominations|other traditions]], and a wide spectrum of [[Dharmaśāstra|laws and prescriptions]] of "daily morality" based on [[karma]], [[dharma]], and societal norms. Hinduism is a categorization of distinct intellectual or philosophical points of view, rather than a rigid, common set of beliefs.{{sfn|Georgis|2010|p=62}} Hinduism, with about one billion followers<ref>{{cite web|title=The Global Religious Landscape – Hinduism|url=http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape-hindu.aspx|work=A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Major Religious Groups as of 2010|publisher=The pew foundation|access-date=31 March 2013|date=2012-12-18|archive-date=6 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130506104814/http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape-hindu.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref> is the [[Major religious groups|world's third-largest religion]], after [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]]. Hinduism has been called the "[[oldest religion]]" in the world and is traditionally called ''[[Sanātanī|{{IAST|Sanātana Dharma}}]]'', "the eternal [[dharma|law]]" or the "eternal way";{{sfn|Bowker|2000}}{{sfn|Harvey|2001|p=xiii}}{{sfn|Knott|1998|p=5}} beyond human origins.{{sfn|Knott|1998|p=5}} Western scholars regard Hinduism as a fusion{{refn|group=note|name=Lockard|{{harvnb|Lockard|2007|p=50}}: "The encounters that resulted from Aryan migration brought together several very different peoples and cultures, reconfiguring Indian society. Over many centuries a fusion of [[Indo-Aryan peoples|Aryan]] and [[Dravidian peoples|Dravidian]] occurred, a complex process that historians have labeled the Indo-Aryan synthesis." {{harvnb|Lockard|2007|p=52}}: "Hinduism can be seen historically as a synthesis of Aryan beliefs with Harappan and other Dravidian traditions that developed over many centuries."}} or synthesis{{sfn|Samuel|2010|p=193}}{{refn|group=note|name="Hiltebeitel-synthesis"|{{harvnb|Hiltebeitel|2007|p=12}}: "A period of consolidation, sometimes identified as one of "Hindu synthesis," Brahmanic synthesis," or "orthodox synthesis," takes place between the time of the late Vedic Upanishads (c. 500 BCE) and the period of Gupta imperial ascendency" (c. 320–467 CE)."}}{{sfn|Samuel|2010|p=193}} of various Indian cultures and traditions,{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2007|p=12}}{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=16}}{{sfn|Lockard|2007|p=50}} with diverse roots{{sfn|Narayanan|2009|p=11}}{{refn|group=note| Among its roots are the [[Historical Vedic religion|Vedic religion]] of the late [[Vedic period]] ({{harvnb|Flood|1996|p=16}}) and its emphasis on the status of Brahmans ({{harvnb|Samuel|2010|pp=48–53}}), but also the religions of the [[Indus Valley civilisation]],{{sfn|Narayanan|2009|p=11}}{{sfn|Lockard|2007|p=52}}{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2007|p=3}}{{sfn|Jones|Ryan|2006|p=xviii}} the [[Sramana]] or renouncer traditions of [[Maurya Empire|north-east India]],{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=16}}{{sfn|Gomez|2013|p=42}} and "popular or [[Adivasi|local traditions]]".{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=16}}}} and no single founder.{{sfn|Osborne|2005|p=9}}

Some of the earliest surviving philosophical texts are the [[Upanishads]] of the [[Vedic period#Later Vedic period (c. 1000 – c. 600 BCE)|later Vedic period (1000–500 BCE)]]{{Citation needed|date=June 2022}}. Important Indian philosophical concepts include [[dharma]], [[karma]], [[samsara]], [[moksha]], and [[ahimsa]]. Indian philosophers developed a system of epistemological reasoning ([[pramana]]) and logic and investigated topics such as [[Ontology]] ([[metaphysics]], [[Brahman]]-[[Atman (Hinduism)|Atman]], [[Sunyata]]-[[Anatta]]), reliable means of knowledge ([[epistemology]], [[Pramana]]s), value system ([[axiology]]) and other topics.<ref>{{cite book|author=Roy W. Perrett|title=Indian Philosophy: Metaphysics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=okkLgRTQ8mIC|year=2001|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-8153-3608-2|access-date=2 March 2018|archive-date=3 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703144429/https://books.google.com/books?id=okkLgRTQ8mIC|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Stephen H Phillips|title=Epistemology in Classical India: The Knowledge Sources of the Nyaya School|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ij4yOAP_6fcC |year=2013|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-136-51898-0 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Arvind Sharma|title=The Puruṣārthas: a study in Hindu axiology|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=USBtAAAAMAAJ |year=1982|publisher=Asian Studies Center, Michigan State University |isbn=9789993624318}};<br />{{cite book|author1=Purusottama Bilimoria|author2=Joseph Prabhu|author3=Renuka M. Sharma|title=Indian Ethics: Classical traditions and contemporary challenges|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g78Cw4xQmsMC |year=2007|publisher=Ashgate |isbn=978-0-7546-3301-3 }}</ref> Indian philosophy also covered topics such as political philosophy as seen in the [[Arthashastra]] c. 4th century BCE and the philosophy of love as seen in the [[Kama Sutra]]. The [[Tirukkural|Kural literature]] of the post-[[Sangam period]] between c. 1st century BCE and 5th century CE, written by the [[Tamil language|Tamil]] poet-philosopher [[Valluvar]], is believed by many scholars to be based on [[Jain]]{{sfn|Mohan Lal|1992|pp=4333–4334}}{{sfn|Kamil Zvelebil|1973|pp=156–171}}{{sfn|Sundaram, 1990|pp=xiii–xvii, Appendix note on verse 1103}} or [[Hindu]] philosophies.{{sfn|Kaushik Roy|2012|pp=152–154, context: 144–154 (Chapter: Hinduism and the Ethics of Warfare in South Asia)}}{{sfn|Swamiji Iraianban|1997|p=13}}{{sfn|Johnson, 2009}}{{sfn|Pillai, 2015|p=75}}

Later developments include the development of [[Tantra]] and Iranian-Islamic influences. Buddhism mostly disappeared from India after the [[Muslim conquest in the Indian subcontinent]], surviving in the Himalayan regions and south India.<ref>{{cite book|author=Randall Collins|title=he Sociology of Philosophies|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2HS1DOZ35EgC|year=2009|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-02977-4|pages=184–185|access-date=2 March 2018|archive-date=11 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111053959/https://books.google.com/books?id=2HS1DOZ35EgC|url-status=live}}</ref> The early modern period saw the flourishing of [[Navya-Nyāya]] (the 'new reason') under philosophers such as [[Raghunatha Siromani]] (c. 1460–1540) who founded the tradition, [[Jayarama Pancanana]], [[Mahadeva Punatamakara]] and [[Yashovijaya]] (who formulated a Jain response).<ref>Ganeri, Jonardon. ''The Lost Age of Reason Philosophy in Early Modern India 1450–1700'', Oxford U. press.</ref>

===Orthodox schools===
The principal Indian philosophical schools are classified as either orthodox or heterodox – [[Āstika and nāstika|āstika or nāstika]] – depending on one of three alternate criteria: whether it believes the [[Vedas]] are a valid source of knowledge; whether the school believes in the premises of [[Brahman]] and [[Atman (Hinduism)|Atman]]; and whether the school believes in afterlife and [[Deva (Hinduism)|Devas]].<ref>John Bowker, ''Oxford Dictionary of World Religions'', p. 259</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Wendy Doniger |title=On Hinduism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c8vRAgAAQBAJ |year=2014 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-936008-6 |page=46 |access-date=2 March 2018 |archive-date=3 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703144429/https://books.google.com/books?id=c8vRAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref>

There are six major schools of orthodox Indian [[Hindu philosophy]]—[[Nyaya]], [[Vaisheshika]], [[Samkhya]], [[Yoga (philosophy)|Yoga]], [[Mīmāṃsā]] and [[Vedanta]], and five major heterodox schools—[[Jainism|Jain]], [[Buddhism|Buddhist]], [[Ajivika]], [[Ajñana]], and [[Cārvāka]]. However, there are other methods of classification; [[Vidyaranya]] for instance identifies sixteen schools of Hindu Indian philosophy by including those that belong to the [[Shaivism|Śaiva]] and [[Raseśvara]] traditions.<ref name="cowell">Cowell, E.B.; Gough, A.E. (1882). Sarva-Darsana Sangraha of Madhava Acharya: Review of Different Systems of Hindu Philosophy. New Delhi: Indian Books Centre/Sri Satguru Publications. {{ISBN|81-7030-875-5}}, p. xii.</ref><ref name="nicholson">Nicholson, pp. 158–162.</ref>

Each school of Hindu philosophy has extensive [[Epistemology|epistemological]] literature called ''[[Pramana]]-sastras''.<ref name=kp>Karl Potter (2002), Presuppositions of India's Philosophies, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|81-208-0779-0}}, pp. 25–26</ref><ref name=pbil>[[Purushottama Bilimoria|P Bilimoria]] (1993), Pramāṇa epistemology: Some recent developments, in Asian philosophy – Volume 7 (Editor: G Floistad), Springer, {{ISBN|978-94-010-5107-1}}, pp. 137–154</ref>

In [[History of Hinduism|Hindu history]], the distinction of the six orthodox schools was current in the [[Gupta period]] "golden age" of Hinduism. With the disappearance of Vaisheshika and Mīmāṃsā, it became obsolete by the later Middle Ages, when the various sub-schools of Vedanta ([[Dvaita]] "dualism", Advaita Vedanta "non-dualism" and others) began to rise to prominence as the main divisions of religious philosophy. Nyaya survived into the 17th century as ''Navya Nyaya'' "Neo-Nyaya", while Samkhya gradually lost its status as an independent school, its tenets absorbed into Yoga and Vedanta.

====Sāmkhya and Yoga====
[[Samkhya|Sāmkhya]] is a [[Mind–body dualism|dualist]] philosophical tradition based on the [[Samkhyakarika]] (c. 320–540 CE),<ref>Gerald James Larson (2011), Classical Sāṃkhya: An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-0503-3}}, pp. 146–147</ref> while the [[Yoga (philosophy)|Yoga school]] was a closely related tradition emphasizing [[Dhyana in Hinduism|meditation]] and [[Kaivalya|liberation]] whose major text is the [[Yoga Sutras of Patanjali|Yoga sutras]] (c. 400 CE).<ref>Maas, Philipp A. (2006). ''Samādhipāda: das erste Kapitel des Pātañjalayogaśāstra zum ersten Mal kritisch ediert''. Aachen: Shaker. {{ISBN|3-8322-4987-7}}.</ref> Elements of proto-Samkhya ideas can, however, be traced back to the period of the early [[Upanishads]].<ref>GJ Larson, RS Bhattacharya and K Potter (2014), The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 4, Princeton University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-691-60441-1}}, pp. 4–5</ref> One of the main differences between the two closely related schools was that Yoga allowed for the existence of a God, while most [[Samkhya|Sāmkhya]] thinkers criticized this idea.<ref>Roy Perrett (2007), Samkhya-Yoga Ethics, Indian Ethics: Classical Traditions and Contemporary Challenges (Editors: Purusottama Bilimoria et al), Volume 1, {{ISBN|978-0-7546-3301-3}}, p. 151</ref>

Sāmkhya [[epistemology]] accepts three of six [[pramana]]s (proofs) as the only reliable means of gaining knowledge; ''pratyakṣa'' ([[perception]]), ''anumāṇa'' ([[inference]]) and ''śabda'' (word/testimony of reliable sources).<ref name="ReferenceA">John A. Grimes, A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English, State University of New York Press, {{ISBN|978-0-7914-3067-5}}, p. 238</ref> The school developed a complex theoretical exposition of the evolution of [[Purusha|consciousness]] and [[Prakṛti|matter]]. Sāmkhya sources argue that the universe consists of two realities, [[Purusha|puruṣa]] ([[consciousness]]) and [[prakṛti]] ([[matter]]).

As shown by the ''[[Samkhyapravachana Sutra|Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra]]'' (c. 14th century CE), Sāmkhya continued to develop throughout the medieval period.

====Nyāya====
[[Nyaya|The Nyāya]] school of [[epistemology]] explores [[Pramāṇa|sources of knowledge]] (''Pramāṇa'') and is based on the ''[[Nyāya Sūtras]]'' (circa 6th century BCE and 2nd century CE).<ref>Jeaneane Fowler (2002), Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism, Sussex Academic Press, {{ISBN|978-1-898723-94-3}}, p. 129</ref> [[Nyaya|Nyāya]] holds that human suffering arises out of ignorance and liberation arises through correct knowledge. Therefore, they sought to investigate the sources of correct knowledge or epistemology.

[[Nyaya|Nyāya]] traditionally accepts four ''[[Pramana]]s'' as reliable means of gaining knowledge – ''Pratyakṣa'' (perception), ''Anumāṇa'' (inference), ''Upamāṇa'' (comparison and analogy) and ''Śabda'' (word, testimony of past or present reliable experts).<ref name="ReferenceA"/> [[Nyaya|Nyāya]] also traditionally defended a form of philosophical [[Realism (philosophical)|realism]].<ref>Oliver Leaman (2006), Nyaya, in ''Encyclopaedia of Asian Philosophy'', Routledge, {{ISBN|978-0-415-86253-0}}, pp. 405–407</ref>

The ''[[Nyāya Sūtras]]'' was a very influential text in Indian philosophy, laying the foundations for classical Indian epistemological debates between the different philosophical schools. It includes, for example, the classic Hindu rejoinders against Buddhist not-self ([[anatta]]) arguments.<ref>P Bilimoria and JN Mohanty (2003), Relativism, Suffering and Beyond, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-566207-8}}, pp. i–ix with Introduction and Chapter 3</ref> The work also famously argues against a creator God ([[Ishvara]]),<ref>John Clayton (2010), Religions, Reasons and Gods: Essays in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Religion, Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-521-12627-4}}, p. 150</ref> a debate which became central to Hinduism in the medieval period.

====Vaiśeṣika====
[[Vaisheshika|Vaiśeṣika]] is a naturalist school of [[atomism]], which accepts only two sources of knowledge, perception, and inference.<ref>DPS Bhawuk (2011), Spirituality and Indian Psychology (Editor: Anthony Marsella), Springer, {{ISBN|978-1-4419-8109-7}}, p. 172</ref> This philosophy held that the universe was reducible to ''paramāṇu'' ([[atom]]s), which are indestructible (''anitya''), indivisible, and have a special kind of dimension, called "small" (''aṇu''). Whatever we experience is a composite of these atoms.<ref>[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/early-modern-india/#VaiAto Analytical philosophy in early modern India] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190318135737/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/early-modern-india/#VaiAto |date=18 March 2019 }} J Ganeri, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref>

Vaiśeṣika organized all objects of experience into what they called ''padārtha''s (literally: 'the meaning of a word') which included six categories; ''dravya'' (substance), ''guṇa'' (quality), ''karma'' (activity), ''sāmānya'' (generality), ''viśeṣa'' (particularity) and ''samavāya'' (inherence). Later ''Vaiśeṣika''s (''Śrīdhara'' and Udayana and ''Śivāditya'') added one more category ''[[abhava]]'' (non-existence). The first three categories are defined as ''artha'' (which can be perceived) and they have real objective existence. The last three categories are defined as ''budhyapekṣam'' (product of intellectual discrimination) and they are logical categories.<ref>[[Vaisheshika#CITEREFRadhakrishnan2006|Radhakrishnan 2006]], pp. 183–186</ref>

====Mīmāṃsā====
[[Mīmāṃsā]] is a school of ritual [[orthopraxy]] and is known for its [[Hermeneutics|hermeneutical]] study and interpretation of the [[Vedas]].<ref name="Oliver Leaman 2006">Oliver Leaman (2006), Shruti, in ''Encyclopaedia of Asian Philosophy'', Routledge, {{ISBN|978-0-415-86253-0}}, p. 503</ref> For this tradition, the study of ''[[dharma]]'' as ritual and social duty was paramount. They also held that the Vedas were "eternal, authorless, [and] infallible" and that Vedic injunctions and [[mantra]]s in rituals are prescriptive actions of primary importance.<ref name="Oliver Leaman 2006"/> Because of their focus on textual study and interpretation, Mīmāṃsā also developed theories of [[philology]] and the [[philosophy of language]] which influenced other Indian schools.<ref>Peter M. Scharf, ''The Denotation of Generic Terms in Ancient Indian Philosophy'' (1996), Chapter 3</ref> They primarily held that the purpose of language was to correctly ''prescribe'' proper actions, rituals, and correct [[dharma]] (duty or virtue).<ref>Chris Bartley (2013), Purva Mimamsa, in ''Encyclopaedia of Asian Philosophy'' (Editor: Oliver Leaman), Routledge, {{ISBN|978-0-415-86253-0}}, pp. 443–445</ref> Mīmāṃsā is also mainly atheistic, holding that the evidence for the existence of God is insufficient and that the Gods named in the Vedas have no existence apart from the names, mantras and their power.<ref>[[Harold Coward|Coward, Harold]] (2008). [https://books.google.com/books?id=LkE_8uch5P0C ''The perfectibility of human nature in eastern and western thought''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221206144339/https://books.google.com/books?id=LkE_8uch5P0C |date=6 December 2022 }}. p. 114. {{ISBN|978-0-7914-7336-8}}.</ref>

A key text of the Mīmāṃsā school is the [[Purva Mimamsa Sutras|Mīmāṃsā Sūtra]] of [[Jaimini]] and major Mīmāṃsā scholars include [[Prabhākara]] (c. 7th century) and [[Kumārila Bhaṭṭa]] ([[Floruit|fl.]] roughly 700). The Mīmāṃsā school strongly influenced [[Vedanta|Vedānta]], which was also known as ''Uttara-Mīmāṃsā''; however, while Mīmāṃsā emphasized ''karmakāṇḍa'', or the study of ritual actions, using the four early [[Vedas]], the Vedānta schools emphasized ''jñanakāṇḍa'', the study of knowledge, using the later parts of Vedas like the [[Upaniṣads]].<ref name="Oliver Leaman 2006"/>

====Vedānta====
[[File:Raja Ravi Varma - Sankaracharya.jpg|thumb|right|x250px|[[Adi Shankara]] (8th century CE) the main exponent of [[Advaita]] Vedānta]]
[[Vedānta]] (meaning "end of the [[Vedas]]") or ''Uttara-Mīmāṃsā'', are a group of traditions which focus on the philosophical issues found in the [[Prasthanatrayi]] (the three sources), which are the ''[[Principal Upanishads]]'', the ''[[Brahma Sutras]]'' and the ''[[Bhagavad Gita]].''<ref>[[Vedanta#CITEREFRanganathan|Ranganathan]]; [[Vedanta#CITEREFHiriyanna1948|Hiriyanna 1948]], pp. 19, 21–25, 150–152; [[Vedanta#CITEREFGrimes1990|Grimes 1990]], pp. 6–7</ref> [[Vedānta]] sees the Vedas, particularly the [[Upanishads]], as a reliable source of knowledge.

The central concern for these schools is the nature of and the relationship between ''[[Brahman]]'' (ultimate reality, universal consciousness), ''[[Ātman (Hinduism)|Ātman]]'' (individual soul) and ''[[Prakriti]]'' (empirical world).

The sub-traditions of [[Vedānta]] include [[Advaita Vedanta|Advaita]] (non-dualism), [[Vishishtadvaita]] (qualified non-dualism), [[Dvaita]] (dualism), and [[Bhedabheda]] (difference and non-difference).<ref>[http://faculty.washington.edu/prem/Colloquium03%E2%80%93DiffVedantas.pdf Prem Pahlajrai, Asian Languages and Literature, University of Washington, ''Vedanta: A Comparative Analysis of Diverse Schools'']{{Dead link|date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Due to the popularity of the [[bhakti movement]], [[Vedānta]] came to be the dominant current of [[Hinduism]] in the post-medieval period.

====Other====
While the classical enumeration of Indian philosophies lists six orthodox schools, there are other schools that are sometimes seen as orthodox. These include:<ref name="cowell"/>
* [[Pasupata|Paśupata]], an [[Asceticism|ascetic]] school of Shaivism founded by [[Lakulisha]] (≈2nd century CE).
* [[Shaiva Siddhanta|Śaiva Siddhānta]], a school of dualistic [[Shaivism]] which was strongly influenced by Samkhya.
* [[Pratyabhijna|Pratyabhijña]] (recognition) school of [[Utpaladeva]] (10th century) and [[Abhinavagupta]] (975–1025 CE), a form of non-dual Shaiva [[tantra]].
* [[Raseśvara]], the mercurial school
* [[Pāṇini]] Darśana, the grammarian school (which clarifies the theory of [[Sphoṭa]])

===Heterodox or Śramaṇic schools===
{{Main|Śramaṇa}}
The nāstika or heterodox schools are associated with the non-Vedic [[Śramaṇa|Śramaṇic]] traditions that existed in India since before the 6th century BCE.<ref name="reginaldray247">Reginald Ray (1999), Buddhist Saints in India, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-513483-4}}, pp. 237–240, 247–249</ref> The [[Śramaṇa|Śramaṇa movement]] gave rise to a diverse range of non-Vedic ideas, ranging from accepting or denying the concepts of [[Ātman (Hinduism)|atman]], atomism, materialism, atheism, agnosticism, fatalism to free will, extreme asceticism, strict [[ahimsa]] (non-violence) and [[vegetarianism]].<ref>Padmanabh S Jaini (2001), Collected papers on Buddhist Studies, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1776-0}}, pp. 57–77</ref> Notable philosophies that arose from [[Śramaṇa|Śramaṇic]] movement were [[Jainism]], [[Pre-sectarian Buddhism|early Buddhism]], [[Cārvāka]], [[Ajñana]], and [[Ājīvika]].<ref>AL Basham (1951), History and Doctrines of the Ajivikas – a Vanished Indian Religion, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1204-8}}, pp. 94–103</ref>

====Jain philosophy====
[[Jain philosophy]] deals extensively with the problems of [[metaphysics]], [[reality]], [[cosmology]], [[ontology]], [[epistemology]], and [[divinity]]. [[Jainism]] is essentially a [[transtheistic]] religion of ancient India.<ref>{{cite book | last =Zimmer | first =Heinrich | editor =Joseph Campbell | title =Philosophies of India | publisher =Princeton University Press | year =1969 | location =New York | isbn =978-0-691-01758-7 }}</ref>{{rp|182}} It continues the ancient [[Sramana|{{IAST|Śramaṇa}}]] tradition, which co-existed with the [[Historical Vedic religion|Vedic tradition]] since ancient times.<ref>{{cite book | last =Sangave | first =Dr. Vilas A. | title =Facets of Jainology: Selected Research Papers on Jain Society, Religion, and Culture | publisher =Popular Prakashan | year =2001 | location =Mumbai | isbn =978-81-7154-839-2 }}, p. 14</ref><ref>{{cite book | last =Oldmeadow | first =Harry |author-link =Harry Oldmeadow | title =Light from the East: Eastern Wisdom for the Modern West | publisher =World Wisdom Inc | year =2007 | location =Indiana | isbn =978-1-933316-22-2 }}, p. 141</ref> The distinguishing features of Jain philosophy include a [[Mind–body dualism|mind-body dualism]], denial of a [[Creator god|creative]] and [[omnipotent]] God, [[Karma in Jainism|karma]], an [[Jainism and non-creationism|eternal and uncreated universe]], [[Ahimsa in Jainism|non-violence]], the theory of the [[Anekantavada|multiple facets of truth]], and morality based on [[Moksa (Jainism)|liberation]] of the [[Jīva (Jainism)|soul]]. Jain philosophy attempts to explain the rationale of being and existence, the nature of the Universe and its constituents, the nature of the bondage and the means to achieve liberation.<ref>{{cite book  | last =Warren  | first =Herbert  | title =Jainism  | publisher =Crest Publishing House  | year =2001  | location =Delhi  | url =http://www.ibiblio.org/jainism/database/BOOK/hwarren.doc  | isbn =978-81-242-0037-7  | access-date =2 July 2009  | archive-date =17 December 2008  | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20081217001747/http://www.ibiblio.org/jainism/database/BOOK/hwarren.doc  | url-status =live  }}</ref>
It has often been described as an [[Asceticism|ascetic]] movement for its strong emphasis on self-control, austerities, and renunciation.<ref>{{cite book  | last =Brodd  | first =Jeffery  |author2=Gregory Sobolewski  | title =World Religions: A Voyage of Discovery   | publisher =Saint Mary's Press  | year =2003  | isbn =978-0-88489-725-5 }} pp. 95–96</ref> It has also been called a model of philosophical [[liberalism]] for its insistence that truth is relative and multifaceted and for its willingness to accommodate all possible view-points of the rival philosophies.<ref>{{cite book  | last =Mohanty  | first =Jitendranath   | title =Classical Indian Philosophy  | publisher =Rowman & Littlefield  | year =2000  | location =Lanham  | isbn =978-0-8476-8933-0 }}</ref> Jainism strongly upholds the individualistic nature of the soul and personal responsibility for one's decisions, and that self-reliance and individual efforts alone are responsible for one's liberation.<ref>{{cite journal  | last =Carrithers  | first =Michael  | title =Naked Ascetics in Southern Digambar Jainism  | journal =Man |series=New Series  | volume =24  | issue =2  | pages =219–235  |date=June 1989  | doi =10.2307/2803303 | jstor =2803303}} p. 220</ref>

The contribution of the Jains in the development of Indian philosophy has been significant. Jain philosophical concepts like [[Ahimsa in Jainism|Ahimsa]], [[Karma in Jainism|Karma]], [[Moksa (Jainism)|Moksa]], [[Samsara (Jainism)|Samsara]], and the like are common with other [[Indian religions]] like [[Hinduism]] and [[Buddhism]] in various forms.<ref name="Zydenbos">{{cite book | last =Zydenbos | first =Robert J. | author-link =Robert J. Zydenbos | title =Jainism Today and Its Future | publisher =Manya Verlag | year =2006 | location =München | url =http://www.manyaverlag.de/jtaif.html | access-date =3 July 2009 | archive-date =9 September 2012 | archive-url =https://archive.today/20120909064758/http://www.manyaverlag.de/jtaif.html | url-status =live }}</ref> While Jainism traces its philosophy from teachings of [[Mahavira]] and other [[Tirthankara]]s, various Jain philosophers from [[Kundakunda]] and [[Umasvati]] in ancient times to [[Yashovijaya|Yasovijaya]] and [[Shrimad Rajchandra]] in recent times have contributed to Indian philosophical discourse in uniquely Jain ways.

====Cārvāka====
[[Charvaka|Cārvāka]] or Lokāyata was an [[Atheism|atheistic]] philosophy of [[Philosophical skepticism|scepticism]] and [[materialism]], who rejected the [[Vedas]] and all associated supernatural doctrines.<ref>KN Tiwari (1998), Classical Indian Ethical Thought, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1607-7}}, p. 67;</ref> Cārvāka philosophers like Brihaspati were extremely critical of other schools of philosophy of the time. Cārvāka deemed the Vedas to be tainted by the three faults of untruth, self-contradiction, and tautology.<ref name="page4">Cowell, E.B.; Gough, A.E. (1882). Sarva-Darsana Sangraha of Madhava Acharya: Review of Different Systems of Hindu Philosophy. New Delhi: Indian Books Centre/Sri Satguru Publications. {{ISBN|81-7030-875-5}}, pp. xii, 4</ref> They declared the Vedas to be incoherent rhapsodies invented by humans whose only usefulness was to provide a livelihood to priests.<ref>Original Sanskrit version: [https://archive.org/stream/Sarva-Darsana-Samgraha.by.Madhavacharya-Vidyaranya.Hindi#page/n11/mode/2up Sarva-darsana-sangraha], pp. 3–7; English version: [https://archive.org/stream/thesarvadarsanas00madhuoft#page/4/mode/2up The Charvaka System] with commentary by Madhava Acharya, Translators: Cowell and Gough (1882), pp. 5–9</ref>

Likewise, they faulted Buddhists and Jains, mocking the concept of [[Nirvana|liberation]], [[reincarnation]], and accumulation of [[Merit (Buddhism)|merit]] or demerit through karma.<ref>Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna. [http://www.carvaka4india.com/2011/08/materialism-in-india-synoptic-view.html Materialism in India: A Synoptic View] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304091119/http://www.carvaka4india.com/2011/08/materialism-in-india-synoptic-view.html |date=4 March 2016 }}. Retrieved 27 July 2012.</ref> They believed the viewpoint of relinquishing pleasure to avoid pain was the "reasoning of fools".<ref name="page4" /> Cārvāka [[epistemology]] holds perception as the primary source of knowledge while rejecting inference which can be invalid.<ref>MM Kamal (1998), The Epistemology of the Cārvāka Philosophy, Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 46(2): 13–16</ref> The primary texts of [[Charvaka|Cārvāka]], like the [[Barhaspatya sutras]] (c. 600 BCE) have been lost.<ref>[[Charvaka#CITEREFRadhakrishnanMoore1957|Radhakrishnan 1957]], pp. 227–249</ref>

====Ājīvika====
[[Ājīvika]] was founded by [[Makkhali Gosala]], it was a [[Śramaṇa|Śramaṇa movement]] and a major rival of [[Pre-sectarian Buddhism|early Buddhism]] and [[Jainism]].<ref>Jeffrey D Long (2009), Jainism: An Introduction, Macmillan, {{ISBN|978-1-84511-625-5}}, p. 199</ref>

Original scriptures of the Ājīvika school of philosophy may once have existed, but these are currently unavailable and probably lost. Their theories are extracted from mentions of Ajivikas in the secondary sources of ancient Hindu Indian literature, particularly those of Jainism and Buddhism which polemically criticized the Ajivikas.<ref name="Basham, A.L. 1951">Basham, A.L. (1951). History and Doctrines of the Ājīvikas (2nd ed.). Chapter 1. Delhi, India: Moltilal Banarsidass (Reprint: 2002). {{ISBN|81-208-1204-2}}. originally published by Luzac & Company Ltd., London, 1951.</ref> The Ājīvika school is known for its ''Niyati'' doctrine of absolute determinism (fate), the premise that there is no free will, that everything that has happened, is happening and will happen is entirely preordained and a function of cosmic principles.<ref name="Basham, A.L. 1951"/><ref name="james22">James Lochtefeld, "Ajivika", The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing. {{ISBN|978-0-8239-3179-8}}, p. 22</ref> Ājīvika considered the [[karma]] doctrine as a fallacy.<ref name="philtarajiv">[http://www.philtar.ac.uk/encyclopedia/hindu/ascetic/ajiv.html Ajivikas] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190717212839/http://www.philtar.ac.uk/encyclopedia/hindu/ascetic/ajiv.html |date=17 July 2019 }} World Religions Project, [[University of Cumbria]], United Kingdom</ref> Ājīvikas were atheists<ref>Johannes Quack (2014), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism (Editors: Stephen Bullivant, Michael Ruse), Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-964465-0}}, p. 654</ref> and rejected the authority of the [[Vedas]], but they believed that in every living being is an ''[[Ātman (Hinduism)|ātman]]'' – a central premise of Hinduism and Jainism.<ref>Analayo (2004), Satipaṭṭhāna: The Direct Path to Realization, {{ISBN|978-1-899579-54-9}}, pp. 207–208</ref><ref>Basham, A.L. (1951). History and Doctrines of the Ājīvikas (2nd ed.). pp. 240–261, 270–273. Delhi, India: Moltilal Banarsidass (Reprint: 2002). {{ISBN|81-208-1204-2}}. originally published by Luzac & Company Ltd., London, 1951.</ref>

====Ajñana====
[[Ajñana]] was a Śramaṇa school of radical Indian skepticism and a rival of early Buddhism and Jainism. They held that it was impossible to obtain knowledge of metaphysical nature or ascertain the truth value of philosophical propositions;<ref>Jayatilleke, K.N. (1963). Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge (PDF) (1st ed.). London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. pp. 112–113.</ref> and even if knowledge was possible, it was useless and disadvantageous for final salvation. They were seen as sophists who specialized in refutation without propagating any positive doctrine of their own. [[Jayarāśi Bhaṭṭa]] (fl. c. 800), the author of the skeptical work entitled ''Tattvopaplavasiṃha'' ("The Lion that Devours All Categories"/"The Upsetting of All Principles"), has been seen as an important Ajñana philosopher.<ref>Salunkhe, AH (2009). Astikshiromani Charvaka (in Marathi). Satara: Lokayat Prakashan. p. 36.</ref>

===Buddhist philosophies===
{{Main|Buddhist philosophy|Buddhist ethics|Tibetan Buddhism}}
[[File:Nalanda_university.jpg|thumb|The Buddhist [[Nalanda]] university and monastery was a major center of learning in India from the 5th century CE to c. 1200.]]
[[File:Monks debating at Sera monastery, 2013.webm|thumb|Monks debating at [[Sera monastery]], Tibet, 2013]]

[[Buddhist philosophy]] begins with the thought of [[Gautama Buddha]] (fl. between sixth and fourth centuries BCE) and is preserved in the [[Buddhist texts#Texts of the Early schools|early Buddhist texts]]. It generally refers to the philosophical investigations that developed among various [[Buddhist schools]] in India and later spread throughout Asia through the [[Silk Road]]. Buddhist thought is trans-regional and trans-cultural. It is the dominant philosophical tradition in [[Tibet]] and Southeast Asian countries like [[Sri Lanka]] and [[Burma]].

[[Buddhism]]'s main concern is soteriological, defined as freedom from [[dukkha]] (unease).<ref>Gunnar Skirbekk, Nils Gilje, ''A history of Western thought: from ancient Greece to the twentieth century.'' 7th edition published by Routledge, 2001, p. 25.</ref> Because [[Avidyā (Buddhism)|ignorance]] of the true nature of things is considered one of the roots of suffering, Buddhist thinkers concerned themselves with philosophical questions related to epistemology and the use of reason.<ref name="Siderits, Mark 2007, page 6">Siderits, Mark. Buddhism as philosophy, 2007, p. 6</ref> Key Buddhist concepts include the [[Four Noble Truths]], [[Anatta]] (not-self) a critique of a fixed [[personal identity]], the transience of all things ([[Anicca]]), and a certain [[The unanswered questions|skepticism about metaphysical questions]]. Buddhist thinkers in India and subsequently in [[East Asia]] have covered topics as varied as [[Phenomenology (philosophy)|phenomenology]], [[ethics]], [[ontology]], [[epistemology]], [[logic]], and [[philosophy of time]].

Later Buddhist philosophical traditions developed complex phenomenological psychologies termed '[[Abhidharma]]'. [[Mahayana]] philosophers such as [[Nagarjuna]] and [[Vasubandhu]] developed the theories of [[Shunyata]] (emptiness of all phenomena) and Vijnapti-matra (appearance only), a form of phenomenology or [[transcendental idealism]].<ref>Butler, Sean (2011) "Idealism in Yogācāra Buddhism," The Hilltop Review: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/hilltopreview/vol4/iss1/6 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225022350/https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/hilltopreview/vol4/iss1/6/ |date=25 February 2021 }}</ref> The [[Dignāga]] (c. 480–540) school of [[Pramāṇa]] promoted a complex form of [[epistemology]] and [[Buddhist logic]]. This tradition contributed to what has been called an "epistemological turn" in Indian philosophy.<ref>Lawrence J. McCrea, and Parimal G. Patil. Buddhist Philosophy of Language in India: Jnanasrimitra on Exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. p 5.</ref> Through the work of [[Dharmakirti]], this tradition of Buddhist logic has become the major epistemological system used in [[Tibetan Buddhist]] philosophy and debate.<ref>Dreyfus, Georges B.J. ''Recognizing Reality: Dharmakirti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations''. pp. 24–25.</ref>

After the disappearance of Buddhism from India, these philosophical traditions continued to develop in the [[Tibetan Buddhist]], [[East Asian Buddhist]], and [[Theravada Buddhist]] traditions. In Tibet, the Indian tradition continued to be developed under the work of thinkers like [[Sakya Pandita]], [[Tsongkhapa]], and [[Ju Mipham]]. In [[East Asian Buddhism]], new developments were led by [[East Asian Yogācāra|East Asian Yogacara]] thinkers such as [[Paramartha]], [[Xuanzang]], and [[Wonhyo|Wŏnhyo]] and East Asian Madhyamaka thinkers like [[Jizang]]. New sinitic schools also arose, like [[Tiantai]], founded by [[Zhiyi]], [[Huayan]], defended by figures like [[Fazang]], and [[Zen]], which included philosophers like [[Guifeng Zongmi]].

====Buddhist modernism====
{{Main|Buddhist philosophy#Modern philosophy|Buddhist modernism}}
[[File:Hu Shih and D. T. Suzuki.jpg|thumb|right|[[Hu Shih]] and [[DT Suzuki]] during his visit to China in 1934]]
The modern period saw the rise of [[Buddhist modernism]] and [[Humanistic Buddhism]] under Western influences and the development of [[Buddhism in the West|Western Buddhism]] with influences from modern psychology and Western philosophy. Important exponents of Buddhist modernism include [[Anagarika Dharmapala]] (1864–1933) and the American convert [[Henry Steel Olcott]], the Chinese modernists [[Taixu]] (1890–1947) and [[Yin Shun]] (1906–2005), Zen scholar [[D. T. Suzuki|D.T. Suzuki]], and the Tibetan [[Gendün Chöphel]] (1903–1951). Buddhist modernism refers to "forms of Buddhism that have emerged out of engagement with the dominant cultural and intellectual forces of modernity."<ref>McMahan, David L. (2008). The Making of Buddhist Modernism. Oxford University Press. p. 6</ref> Forces which influenced modernists like [[Anagarika Dhammapala|Dhammapala]] and Yin Shun included Enlightenment values and Western science. A [[Neo-Buddhist movement]] was founded by the influential Indian [[Dalit]] leader [[B. R. Ambedkar]] in the 1950s who emphasized social and political reform.<ref>Gary Tartakov (2003). Rowena Robinson, ed. [https://books.google.com/books?id=eNsoAAAAYAAJ ''Religious Conversion in India: Modes, Motivations, and Meanings''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221206144339/https://books.google.com/books?id=eNsoAAAAYAAJ |date=6 December 2022 }}. Oxford University Press. pp. 192–213. {{ISBN|978-0-19-566329-7}}.</ref>

Buddhist modernism includes various movements like [[Humanistic Buddhism]], [[Secular Buddhism]], the [[Vipassana movement]], and [[Engaged Buddhism]]. Chinese [[humanistic Buddhism]] or "Buddhism for Human Life" (Chinese: 人生佛教; pinyin: rénshēng fójiào) which was to be free of supernatural beliefs has also been an influential form of modern Buddhism in Asia.<ref name="mbingenheimer.net">Bingenheimer, Marcus (2007). "Some Remarks on the Usage of Renjian Fojiao 人間佛教 and the Contribution of Venerable Yinshun to Chinese Buddhist Modernism". In Hsu, Mutsu; Chen, Jinhua; Meeks, Lori. [http://mbingenheimer.net/publications/bingenheimer.yinshunRenjianFojiao.2007.pdf ''Development and Practice of Humanitarian Buddhism: Interdisciplinary Perspectives''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140623135303/http://mbingenheimer.net/publications/bingenheimer.yinshunRenjianFojiao.2007.pdf |date=23 June 2014 }} (PDF). Hua-lien (Taiwan): Tzuchi University Press. pp. 141–161. {{ISBN|978-986-7625-08-3}}.</ref>

===Sikh philosophy===
{{Main|Sikh religious philosophy}}
[[Sikhism]] is an Indian religion developed by [[Guru Nanak]] (1469–1539) in the [[Punjab (region)|Punjab region]] during the [[Mughal Empire|Mughal Era]].{{Citation needed|date=June 2022}} Their main sacred text is the ''[[Guru Granth Sahib]].'' The fundamental beliefs include constant spiritual meditation of [[God in Sikhism|God]]'s name, being guided by the Guru instead of yielding to capriciousness, living a householder's life instead of monasticism, truthful action to [[dharma]] (righteousness, moral duty), equality of all human beings, and believing in God's grace.<ref>Arvind-pal Singh Mandair (2014). Pashaura Singh; Louis E. Fenech, eds. [https://books.google.com/books?id=7YwNAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA302 ''The Oxford Handbook of Sikh Studies'']. Oxford University Press. pp. 302–314. {{ISBN|978-0-19-100411-7}}.</ref><ref>William Owen Cole; Piara Singh Sambhi (1995). ''The Sikhs: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices''. Sussex Academic Press. pp. 130–133, 200.</ref> Key concepts include ''[[Simran (Sanskrit word)|Simran]]'', ''[[Selfless service|Seva]]'', the [[Three Pillars of Sikhism]], and the [[Five Thieves]].

===Modern Indian philosophy===
[[File:Swami_Vivekananda_at_Parliament_of_Religions.jpg|thumb|From left to right: [[Virchand Gandhi]], [[Anagarika Dharmapala]], [[Swami Vivekananda]], [[G. Bonet Maury]]. [[Parliament of the World's Religions|Parliament of World Religions]], 1893]]
In response to [[colonialism]] and their contact with [[Western philosophy]], 19th-century Indians developed new ways of thinking now termed [[Neo-Vedanta]] and Hindu modernism. Their ideas focused on the universality of Indian philosophy (particularly Vedanta) and the unity of different religions. It was during this period that Hindu modernists presented a single idealized and united "[[Hinduism]]." exemplified by the philosophy of [[Advaita Vedanta]].<ref>Yelle, Robert A. (2012), "Comparative Religion as Cultural Combat: Occidentalism and Relativism in Rajiv Malhotra's Being Different", International Journal of Hindu Studies, 16 (3): 335–348, {{doi|10.1007/s11407-012-9133-z}}</ref> They were also influenced by Western ideas.<ref>Halbfass, Wilhelm (2007a), "Research and reflection: Responses to my respondents. III. Issues of comparative philosophy (pp. 297–314)", in Franco, Eli; Preisendanz, Karin, Beyond Orientalism: the work of Wilhelm Halbfass and its impact on Indian and cross-cultural studies (1st Indian ed.), Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, {{ISBN|81-208-3110-1}}</ref> The first of these movements was that of the [[Brahmo Samaj]] of [[Ram Mohan Roy]] (1772–1833).<ref>Michelis, Elizabeth De (2005), A History of Modern Yoga: Patanjali and Western Esotericism, Continuum, {{ISBN|978-0-8264-8772-8}}</ref> [[Swami Vivekananda]] (1863–1902) was very influential in developing the [[Hindu reform movements]] and in bringing the worldview to the West.<ref>Georg, Feuerstein (2002), The Yoga Tradition, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass</ref> Through the work of Indians like Vivekananda as well as westerners such as the proponents of the [[Theosophical Society|Theosophical society]], modern Hindu thought also influenced western culture.<ref>Renard, Philip (2010), Non-Dualisme. pp. 185–188. De directe bevrijdingsweg, Cothen: Uitgeverij Juwelenschip</ref>

{{See also|Hinduism in the West}}

The political thought of [[Hindu nationalism]] is also another important current in modern Indian thought. The work of [[Mahatma Gandhi]], [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]], [[Rabindranath Tagore]], [[Sri Aurobindo|Aurobindo]], [[Krishna Chandra Bhattacharya]], and [[Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan]] has had a large impact on modern Indian philosophy.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Schneider |first1=Herbert Wallace |title=Modern Indian Thought (review) |journal=Journal of the History of Philosophy |date=1966 |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=88 |id={{Project MUSE|229758}} |doi=10.1353/hph.2008.1443 |s2cid=143889851 }}</ref>

[[Jainism]] also had its modern interpreters and defenders, such as [[Virchand Gandhi]], [[Champat Rai Jain]], and [[Shrimad Rajchandra]] (well known as a spiritual guide of [[Mahatma Gandhi]]).

==East Asian philosophies==
{{Main|Chinese philosophy|Japanese philosophy|Korean philosophy|Vietnamese philosophy}}

[[Image:Pyd.jpg|thumb|One of the main halls of the ''[[Guozijian]]'' (Imperial College) in downtown [[Beijing]], the highest institution of higher learning in pre-modern China]]

===Chinese===
East Asian philosophical thought began in [[History of China#Ancient China|Ancient China]], and [[Chinese philosophy]] begins during the [[Western Zhou]] dynasty and the following periods after its fall when the "[[Hundred Schools of Thought]]" flourished (6th century to 221 BCE).<ref>Garfield  (Editor), Edelglass (Editor); ''The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy'', Chinese philosophy.</ref><ref name="pe">{{cite book|last= Ebrey |first=Patricia|year=2010 |page= 42|title=The Cambridge Illustrated History of China|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref> This period was characterized by significant intellectual and cultural developments and saw the rise of the major Chinese philosophical schools ([[Confucianism]], [[Legalism (Chinese philosophy)|Legalism]], and [[Daoism]]) as well as numerous less influential schools ([[Mohism]], [[School of Names]], [[School of Yin Yang]]). These philosophical traditions developed metaphysical, political, and ethical theories which, along with [[Chinese Buddhism]], had a direct influence on the rest of [[East Asian cultural sphere|the East Asian cultural sphere]]. Buddhism began arriving in China during the [[Han dynasty]] (206 BCE–220 CE), through a [[Silk Road transmission of Buddhism|gradual Silk road transmission]] and gradually developed distinct Chinese forms (such as Chan/[[Zen]]).

====Confucianism====
{{Main|Confucianism}}
[[File:Konfuzius-1770.jpg|thumb|x230px|[[Confucius]]]]
[[Confucianism]] (孔教, ''Kǒngjiào'' — "Confucius' doctrine"), also known as "Ruism" (''Rújiào'' — "doctrine of the scholars"), is a Chinese philosophical system with ritual, moral, and religious applications.<ref>Yao, Xinzhong (2000). An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|0-521-64312-0}}. pp. 38–47.</ref> The tradition developed around the teachings of [[Confucius]] (''Kǒng Fūzǐ'', 孔夫子, "Master Kong", 551–479 BCE) who saw himself as transmitting the values and theology of the ancestors before him.<ref>Fung, Yiu-ming (2008), "Problematizing Contemporary Confucianism in East Asia", in Richey, Jeffrey, Teaching Confucianism, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|0-19-804256-6}}. p. 163.</ref> Other influential classical Confucian philosophers include [[Mencius]] and [[Xun Kuang]] who famously disagreed on the innate moral nature of humans.

Confucianism focuses on humanistic values like familial and social harmony, [[filial piety]] (孝, ''xiào''), ''[[Ren (Confucianism)|Rén]]'' (仁, "benevolence" or "humaneness") and ''[[Li (Confucianism)|Lǐ]]'' (禮/礼) which is a system of ritual norms that determines how a person should act to be in harmony with the law of Heaven. Confucianism traditionally holds that these values are based on the transcendent principle known as [[Tian|Heaven]] (''Tiān'' 天), and also includes the belief in spirits or gods (''[[Shen (Chinese religion)|shén]]'').<ref>Littlejohn, Ronnie (2010), Confucianism: An Introduction, I.B. Tauris, {{ISBN|1-84885-174-X}}. pp. 34–36.</ref>

Confucianism was a major ideology of the imperial state during the [[Han dynasty]] (206 BCE–220 CE) and was revived as [[Neo-Confucianism]] during the [[Tang dynasty]] (618–907). During later Chinese dynasties like [[Song dynasty]] (960–1297) and the [[Ming dynasty]] (1368–1644) as well as in the Korean [[Joseon dynasty]] (1392–1897) a resurgent [[Neo-Confucianism]] led by thinkers such as [[Zhu Xi]] (1130–1200) and [[Wang Yangming]] (1472–1529) became the dominant school of thought and was promoted by the imperial state. Beginning in the [[Song dynasty]], [[Confucian classics]] were the basis of the [[imperial exams]] and became the core philosophy of the [[Scholar-officials|scholar-official class]]. Confucianism suffered setbacks during the 20th century, but is recently undergoing a revival, which is termed [[New Confucianism]].<ref>Benjamin Elman, John Duncan and Herman Ooms ed. ''Rethinking Confucianism: Past and Present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam''(Los Angeles: UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series, 2002).</ref>

Traditionally, East Asian cultures and countries in the [[East Asian cultural sphere|cultural sphere]] are strongly influenced by Confucianism, including [[Culture of China|Mainland China]], [[Culture of Hong Kong|Hong Kong]], [[Culture of Macau|Macau]], [[Culture of Japan|Japan]], [[Culture of Korea|Korea]], [[Culture of Taiwan|Taiwan]], and [[Culture of Vietnam|Vietnam]] as well as various overseas territories settled predominantly by [[Overseas Chinese]], such as [[Culture of Singapore|Singapore]].

====Legalism====
[[Legalism (Chinese philosophy)|Legalism]] (法家，[[pinyin]]: ''Fǎjiā;'' school of "methods" or "standards")<ref>Paul R. Goldin, Persistent Misconceptions about Chinese Legalism. pp. 6, 7 https://www.academia.edu/24999390/Persistent_Misconceptions_about_Chinese_Legalism_ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308062755/https://www.academia.edu/24999390/Persistent_Misconceptions_about_Chinese_Legalism_ |date=8 March 2021 }}</ref> was a philosophical tradition which focused on laws, realpolitik, and bureaucratic management.<ref>Ross Terril 2003 p. 68. The New Chinese Empire. https://books.google.com/books?id=TKowRrrz5BIC&pg=PA68</ref> Largely ignoring [[morality]] or idealized views of how society should be, they focused on the pragmatic [[government]] through the power of the [[Autocracy|autocrat]] and [[State (polity)|state]]. Their goal was to achieve increased order, security, and stability.<ref>Pines, Yuri, "Legalism in Chinese Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2. Philosophical Foundations. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-legalism/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210112094249/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-legalism/ |date=12 January 2021 }}</ref> They were initially influenced by Mohist ideas.<ref>Hansen, Chad. Philosophy East & West. Jul 94, Vol. 44 Issue 3, pp. 54, 435. Fa (standards: laws) and meaning changes in Chinese philosophy.

Chad Hansen, Shen Buhai http://www.philosophy.hku.hk/ch/Shen%20Bu%20Hai.htm {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171119041933/http://philosophy.hku.hk/ch/Shen%20Bu%20Hai.htm |date=19 November 2017 }}</ref> A key figure of this school was administrator and political philosopher [[Shen Buhai]] (c. 400–337 BCE).<ref>Creel, 1974 p. 4, 119 Shen Pu-hai: A Chinese Political Philosopher of the Fourth Century BCE.</ref> Another central figure, [[Shang Yang]] (390–338 BCE), was a leading statesman and reformer who transformed the [[Qin (state)|Qin state]] into the dominant power that conquered the rest of China in 221 BCE.<ref>Chad Hansen, University of Hong Kong. Lord Shang. http://www.philosophy.hku.hk/ch/Lord%20Shang.htm {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426092620/http://www.philosophy.hku.hk/ch/Lord%20Shang.htm |date=26 April 2012 }}</ref> Shen's successor [[Han Fei]] (c. 280–233 BCE) synthesized the thought of the other Legalists in his [[eponym]]ous text, the ''[[Han Feizi]],'' one of the most influential Legalist texts which was used by successive Chinese statesmen and rulers as a guide for statesmanship and bureaucratic organization of the imperial state.<ref>Paul R. Goldin, Persistent Misconceptions about Chinese Legalism. p. 15 https://www.academia.edu/24999390/Persistent_Misconceptions_about_Chinese_Legalism_ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308062755/https://www.academia.edu/24999390/Persistent_Misconceptions_about_Chinese_Legalism_ |date=8 March 2021 }}</ref><ref>Hengy Chye Kiang 1999. p.v44. Cities of Aristocrats and Bureaucrats. https://books.google.com/books?id=BIgS4p8NykYC&pg=PA44</ref>

====Mohism====
[[Mohism]] (墨家，''Mòjiā''; "School of Mo"), was founded by [[Mozi]] (c. 470–391 BCE) and his students. It was a major school of thought and rival of Confucianism and Taoism during the [[Spring and Autumn period|Spring and Autumn]] and [[Warring States period|Warring States]] periods (c. 770–221 BCE). The main text of the school is the [[Mozi (book)|''Mozi'' (book)]]. The administrative thought of Mohism was later absorbed by Legalism, their ethics absorbed into Confucianism and its books were also merged into the [[Taoist canon]], as Mohism all but disappeared as an independent school after the [[Qin dynasty]] era.

Mohism is best known for the idea of "impartial care" ([[Chinese language|Chinese]]: 兼愛; [[pinyin]]: ''jiān ài''; literally: "inclusive love/care").<ref>The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward Craig. Routledge Publishing. 2005.</ref> According to Master Mo, persons should care equally for all other individuals, regardless of their actual relationship to them. Mo also advocated impartial [[meritocracy]] in government which should be based on talent, not blood relations. Mozi was against Confucian ritualism, instead emphasizing [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] survival through farming, [[fortification]], and [[Public administration|statecraft]]. Tradition is inconsistent, and human beings need an extra-traditional guide to identify which traditions are acceptable. The moral guide must then promote and encourage social behaviors that maximize the general benefit. As motivation for his theory, Mozi brought in the ''Will of Heaven'', but rather than being religious his philosophy parallels [[utilitarianism]].

Mohism was also associated with and influenced by a separate philosophical school known as the [[School of Names]] (''Míngjiā''; also known as 'Logicians'), that focused on the [[philosophy of language]], [[definition]], and [[logic]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Liu |first1=Fenrong |title=A Note on Mohist Logic |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241916514 |website=Research Gate |access-date=May 1, 2024 |date=January 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Willman |first1=Marshall D |title=Logic and Language in Early Chinese Philosophy |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-logic-language/ |website=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=May 1, 2024 |date=2023}}</ref>

====Taoism====
[[File:WLA vanda The Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove.jpg|thumb|x160px|The [[Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove]], embroidery, 1860–1880]]
{{Main|Taoist philosophy}}
Taoism (or Daoism) is a term for various philosophies and religious systems that emphasize harmony with the ''[[Tao]]'' ([[Chinese language|Chinese]]: 道; [[pinyin]]: ''Dào''; literally: "the Way") which is seen as the principle which is the source, pattern, and substance of everything that exists.<ref>Pollard; Rosenberg; Tignor, Elizabeth; Clifford; Robert (2011). ''Worlds Together Worlds Apart''. New York, New York: Norton. p. 164. {{ISBN|978-0-393-91847-2}}.</ref> Taoism tends to emphasize virtues such as ''[[wu wei]]'' (effortless action), ''[[ziran]]'' (naturalness), [[Pu (Daoism)|''pu'']] (simplicity), and spontaneity while placing less emphasis on norms and ritual (as opposed to Confucianism). The [[Taoism and death|attainment of immortality]] through external alchemy ([[waidan]]) and internal alchemy ([[neidan]]) was an important goal for many Taoists historically.<ref>Henri Maspero, ''Taoism and Chinese Religion'', translated by Frank A. Kierman, Jr. (University of Massachusetts Press, 1981).</ref>

Early forms of Taoism developed in the 4th century BCE, influenced by the cosmological theories of the [[School of Naturalists]] and the ''[[I Ching]].'' The School of Naturalists or Yin-yang was another philosophical school that synthesized the concepts of [[yin-yang]] and the [[Five elements (Chinese philosophy)|Five Elements]]; [[Zou Yan]] is considered the founder.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/607826/Zou-Yan "Zou Yan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150426150251/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/607826/Zou-Yan |date=26 April 2015 }}. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 1 March 2011.</ref>

The ''[[Dao De Jing]]'' (''Tao-Te-Ching,'' c. 4th century BCE), traditionally attributed to [[Laozi]], and the ''[[Zhuangzi (book)|Nan Hua Jing]]'' (''Zhuang Zi'') are considered the key texts of the tradition.<ref>Kohn, Livia, ed. ''Daoism Handbook'' (Leiden: Brill, 2000). p. 44.</ref> The first organized form of Taoism, the [[Tianshi Dao|Tianshi]] (Celestial Masters') school arose in the 2nd century CE. [[Xuanxue]] ("deep learning", also "Neo-Taoism") was a major philosophical movement influenced by Confucian scholarship, which focused on the interpretation of the ''[[Yijing]],'' ''[[Daodejing]],'' and ''[[Zhuangzi (book)|Zhuangzi]]'' and which flourished during the third to sixth centuries CE.<ref>Chan, Alan, "Neo-Daoism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/neo-daoism/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190318042139/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/neo-daoism/ |date=18 March 2019 }}.</ref> The most important philosophers of this movement were [[He Yan]], [[Wang Bi]], the [[Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove]], [[Ge Hong]], and [[Guo Xiang]].<ref>"Daoist Philosophy," by Ronnie Littlejohn, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, {{ISSN|2161-0002}}, <nowiki>http://www.iep.utm.edu/</nowiki>.</ref> Thinkers like He Yan and Wang Bi focused on the deep nature of Tao, which they saw as being best exemplified by the term "Wu" (nothingness, non-being, negativity).<ref>Chan, Alan, "Neo-Daoism", ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/neo-daoism/ .</ref>

Other schools rose to prominence throughout Chinese history, such as the [[Shangqing School|Shangqing school]] during the [[Tang dynasty]] (618–907), the [[Lingbao School|Lingbao school]] during the [[Song dynasty]] (960–1279) and the [[Quanzhen School]] which develop during the 13th–14th centuries and during the [[Yuan dynasty]].<ref>"Daoist Philosophy," by Ronnie Littlejohn, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, {{ISSN|2161-0002}}, <nowiki>http://www.iep.utm.edu/</nowiki>.</ref> The later Taoist traditions were also influenced by [[Chinese Buddhism]].<ref>"Daoist Philosophy," by Ronnie Littlejohn, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, {{ISSN|2161-0002}}, <nowiki>http://www.iep.utm.edu/</nowiki>.</ref>

===Modern East Asian philosophy===
====Chinese====
[[File:熊十力 1960s.jpg|thumb|right|[[Xiong Shili]] circa 1960]]

Modern Chinese thought is generally seen as being rooted in Classical Confucianism (''Jingxue''), Neo-Confucianism (''Lixue''), Buddhism, Daoism, and ''Xixue'' ("[[Western learning|Western Learning]]" which arose during the late [[Ming dynasty]]).<ref>"Modern Chinese Philosophy," by Yih-Hsien Yu, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, {{ISSN|2161-0002}}, <nowiki>http://www.iep.utm.edu/</nowiki>.</ref>

The [[Opium war|Opium war of 1839–42]] saw the beginning of Western and Japanese invasions and exploitation of China which was humiliating to Chinese thinkers. The late 19th and early 20th century saw Chinese thinkers such as [[Zhang Zhidong]] looking to Western practical knowledge as a way to preserve traditional Chinese culture, a doctrine that he defined as "Chinese Learning as Substance and Western Learning as Function" (''Zhongti Xiyong'').<ref>"Modern Chinese Philosophy," by Yih-Hsien Yu, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, {{ISSN|2161-0002}}, <nowiki>http://www.iep.utm.edu/</nowiki>.</ref>

The traditionalists meanwhile sought to revive and fortify traditional Chinese philosophical schools. Chinese Buddhist thought was promoted by thinkers like Yang Rensan and Ou-Yang Jingwu<ref>"Modern Chinese Philosophy," by Yih-Hsien Yu, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, {{ISSN|2161-0002}}, <nowiki>http://www.iep.utm.edu/</nowiki>.</ref> while another influential movement is [[New Confucianism]] (Chinese: 新儒家; [[pinyin]]: ''xīn rú jiā''). New Confucianism is a traditionalist revival of Confucian thought in China beginning in the 20th-century [[Republic of China (1912–1949)|Republican China]] which is also associated with [[New Conservatism (China)|New Conservatism]]. Key New Confucians of the first generation are [[Xiong Shili]] and [[Feng Youlan|Fung Youlan]].<ref>"Modern Chinese Philosophy," by Yih-Hsien Yu, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, {{ISSN|2161-0002}}, <nowiki>http://www.iep.utm.edu/</nowiki>.</ref> The second generation (1950–1979) include individuals like [[Tang Junyi]], [[Mou Zongsan]], and [[Xu Fuguan]], all three students of Xiong Shili. Together with [[Zhang Junmai]], the second generation published the [[A Manifesto for a Re-appraisal of Sinology and Reconstruction of Chinese Culture|New Confucian Manifesto]] in 1958.

====Japanese====
[[File:FukuzawaYukichi.jpg|thumb|right|[[Fukuzawa Yukichi]] (1862) a key civil rights activist and liberal thinker]]
Modern Japanese thought is strongly influenced by Western science and philosophy. Japan's rapid modernization was partly aided by the early study of western science (known as [[Rangaku]]) during the [[Edo period]] (1603–1868). Another intellectual movement during the Edo period was [[Kokugaku]] (national study), which sought to focus on the study of ancient Japanese thought, classic texts, and culture over and against foreign Chinese and Buddhist cultures.<ref>Earl, David Margarey, Emperor and Nation in Japan, Political Thinkers of the Tokugawa Period, University of Washington Press, 1964, pp. 66 ff.</ref> A key figure of this movement is [[Motoori Norinaga]] (1730–1801), who argued that the essence of classic Japanese literature and culture was a sense called [[mono no aware]] ("sorrow at evanescence").<ref>Motoori, Norinaga (2007). [https://books.google.com/books?id=Zk4EucRlvSwC&dq=motoori+norinaga&pg=PR9 ''The Poetics of Motoori Norinaga: A Hermeneutical Journey''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151448/https://books.google.com/books?id=Zk4EucRlvSwC&dq=motoori+norinaga&pg=PR9 |date=3 July 2023 }}. University of Hawaii Press. {{ISBN|978-0-8248-3078-6}}.</ref>

In the [[Meiji period]] (1868–1912), the modernist [[Meirokusha]] (Meiji 6, formed in 1874) intellectual society promoted [[Age of Enlightenment|European enlightenment]] thought. Meirokusha philosophers like [[Mori Arinori]], [[Nishi Amane]], and [[Fukuzawa Yukichi]] sought ways to combine Western ideas with [[Culture of Japan|Japanese culture]] and values. The [[Shōwa period]] (1926–1989) saw the rise of [[State Shinto]] and [[Statism in Shōwa Japan|Japanese nationalism]].

Japanese Buddhist philosophy was influenced by the work of the [[Kyoto School]] which drew from western philosophers (especially German philosophy) and Buddhist thought and included [[Kitaro Nishida]], [[Keiji Nishitani]], [[Hajime Tanabe]], and [[Masao Abe]]. The most important trend in Japanese Buddhist thought after the formation of the Kyoto school is [[Critical Buddhism]], which argues against several Mahayana concepts such as [[Buddha nature|Buddha-nature]] and [[Hongaku|original enlightenment]].<ref name="mbingenheimer.net"/>

====North Korean====
{{Main|Juche}}
Juche, usually translated as "self-reliance", is the official political [[ideology]] of [[North Korea]], described by the regime as [[Kim Il-Sung]]'s "original, brilliant and revolutionary contribution to national and international thought".<ref name="North Korea: State of Paranoia">{{cite book |author= Paul French|date= 2014|title= North Korea: State of Paranoia|publisher= Zed Books|isbn= 978-1-78032-947-5}}<!--|access-date= June 2015--> {{page needed|date=July 2015}}</ref> The idea states that an individual is "the master of his destiny"<ref name="Juche Idea: Answers to Hundred Questions">{{cite book|author=North Korean Government|date=2014|title=Juche Idea: Answers to Hundred Questions|publisher=Foreign Languages Publishing House, Democratic People's Republic of Korea|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yC42jwEACAAJ|isbn=978-9946-0-0822-6|access-date=31 October 2020|archive-date=3 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151448/https://books.google.com/books?id=yC42jwEACAAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> and that the North Korean masses are to act as the "masters of the revolution and construction".<ref name="Juche Idea: Answers to Hundred Questions"/>

==Syntheses of Eastern and Western philosophy==
{{see also|Buddhism and Western Philosophy|Perennial philosophy|Intercultural philosophy|New Age}}

===Modern===
{{more citations needed section|date=January 2020}}
In the modern era, there have been many attempts to integrate Western and Eastern philosophical traditions.

[[Arthur Schopenhauer]] developed a philosophy that was essentially a synthesis of [[Hinduism]] with Western thought. He anticipated that the ''[[Upanishad]]s'' (primary [[Hindu]] scriptures) would have a much greater influence in the West than they have had. However, Schopenhauer was working with heavily flawed early translations (and sometimes second-degree translations), and many feel that he may not necessarily have accurately grasped the Eastern philosophies which interested him.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.schopenhauer.philosophie.uni-mainz.de/Aufsaetze_Jahrbuch/87_2006/2006_App_Initial%20Encounter.pdf |title=Schopenhauer's Initial Encounter with Indian Thought |publisher=Uni Mainz |author=Urs App |access-date=December 14, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215022234/https://www.schopenhauer.philosophie.uni-mainz.de/Aufsaetze_Jahrbuch/87_2006/2006_App_Initial%20Encounter.pdf |archive-date=15 December 2018 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

Recent attempts to incorporate Western philosophy into Eastern thought include the [[Kyoto School]] of philosophers, who combined the [[Phenomenology (philosophy)|phenomenology]] of [[Husserl]] with the insights of [[Zen Buddhism]]. [[Watsuji Tetsuro|Watsuji Tetsurô]], a 20th-century [[Japan]]ese philosopher attempted to combine the works of [[Søren Kierkegaard]], Nietzsche, and Heidegger with Eastern philosophies. Some have claimed that there is also a definite eastern element within [[Heidegger]]'s philosophy.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.academia.edu/1816669 |title=Zen in Heidegger's Way |journal=Journal of East-West Thought |volume=2 |issue=4 |date=2012 |pages=113–137 |author=David Storey |access-date=December 14, 2018 |archive-date=17 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210817180503/https://www.academia.edu/1816669 |url-status=live }}</ref> For the most part, this is not made explicit within Heidegger's philosophy, apart from in the dialogue between a Japanese and inquirer. Heidegger did spend time attempting to translate the Tao Te Ching into German, working with his Chinese student Paul Hsaio. It has also been claimed that much of Heidegger's later philosophy, particularly the sacredness of Being, bears a distinct similarity to Taoist ideas. There are clear parallels between Heidegger and the work of Kyoto School, and ultimately, it may be read that Heidegger's philosophy is an attempt to 'turn eastwards' in response to the crisis in Western civilization. However, this is only an interpretation.

The 20th-century [[Hindu]] [[guru]] [[Sri Aurobindo]] was influenced by [[German Idealism]] and his [[integral yoga]] is regarded as a synthesis of Eastern and Western thought. The German [[Phenomenology (philosophy)|phenomenologist]] [[Jean Gebser]]'s writings on the history of [[consciousness]] referred to a new planetary consciousness that would bridge this gap. Followers of these two authors are often grouped together under the term Integral thought.

Following the [[Xinhai Revolution]] in 1911 and the end of the [[Qing dynasty]], the [[May Fourth Movement]] sought to completely abolish the old imperial institutions and practices of China (such as the old civil service system). There were two major philosophical trends during this period. One was anti-traditional and promoted Western learning and ideas. A key figure of this anti-traditional current was [[Yan Fu]] (1853–1921) who translated various Western philosophical works including Smith's The [[The Wealth of Nations|Wealth of Nations]] and Mill's [[On Liberty]].<ref>"Modern Chinese Philosophy," by Yih-Hsien Yu, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, {{ISSN|2161-0002}}, <nowiki>http://www.iep.utm.edu/</nowiki>.</ref> There were also attempts to incorporate Western ideas of [[democracy]], and [[republicanism]] into Chinese political philosophy, notably by [[Sun Yat-Sen]] (1866–1925) at the beginning of the 20th century. Another influential modern Chinese philosopher was [[Hu Shih]], who was a student of [[John Dewey]] at Columbia University and who promoted a form of pragmatism.

The influence of [[Marxism]] on modern Chinese political thought is vast, especially through the work of [[Mao Zedong]], the most famous thinker of [[Chinese Marxist Philosophy]]. Maoism is a [[Chinese Marxist philosophy]] based on the teachings of the 20th-century [[Chinese Communist Party]] revolutionary leader [[Mao Zedong]]. It is based partially on earlier theories by Marx and Lenin, but rejects the urban [[proletariat]] and [[Leninism|Leninist]] emphasis on heavy industrialization in favor of a revolution supported by the peasantry, and a decentralized agrarian economy based on many collectively worked farms. The current government of the [[People's Republic of China]] continues to espouse a pragmatic form of [[socialism]] as [[Ideology of the Chinese Communist Party|its official party ideology]] which it calls [[Socialism with Chinese characteristics]]. When the Chinese Communist Party [[Chinese Civil War|took over]] the reign, previous schools of thought such as Taoism and Confucianism (except [[Legalism (Chinese philosophy)|Legalism]]) were denounced as backward, and later purged during the violence of the [[Cultural Revolution]] which saw many Taoist and Buddhist temples and institutions destroyed.

Swiss psychologist [[Carl Jung]] was deeply influenced by the [[I Ching]] (Book of Changes), an ancient Chinese text that dates back to the Bronze Age [[Shang dynasty]] (c. 1700–1050 BCE). It uses a system of Yin and Yang, which it places into hexagrams for the purposes of divination. Carl Jung's idea of [[synchronicity]] moves towards an Oriental view of [[causality]], as he states in the foreword to Richard Wilhelm's translation of the [[I Ching#Influence on Western culture|I Ching]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.iging.com/intro/foreword.htm#2 |title="Foreword to the I Ching – By C.G. Jung." I Ching – The Book of Changes. |publisher=Iging |access-date=December 14, 2018 |archive-date=20 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190620152547/https://www.iging.com/intro/foreword.htm#2 |url-status=live }}</ref> He explains that this Chinese view of the world is based not on science as the West knows it, but on chance.

==Criticism==
According to the British philosopher Victoria S. Harrison, the category of "Eastern philosophy", and similarly "Asian philosophy" and "Oriental philosophy" is a product of 19th-century Western scholarship and did not exist in East Asia or India. This is because in Asia there is no single unified philosophical tradition with a single root, but various autonomous traditions that have come into contact with each other over time.<ref>Harrison, Victoria S; "Eastern Philosophy: The Basics, Introduction</ref>

Some [[Eurocentrism|Eurocentric]] thinkers claim that philosophy as such is only characteristic of Western cultures. The German philosopher [[Martin Heidegger]] is reported to have said that only Greek and German languages are suitable for philosophizing.<ref name="Spiegel">{{cite news |first1=Rudolf |last1=Augstein |first2=Georg |last2=Wolff |first3=Martin |last3=Heidegger |title=''Nur noch ein Gott kann uns retten'' |url=http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-41238349.html |newspaper=[[Der Spiegel]] |date=31 May 1976 |pages=193–219 |access-date=14 June 2013 |archive-date=6 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130206225835/http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-41238349.html |url-status=live }} [http://www.ditext.com/heidegger/interview.html English translation] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131016094800/http://www.ditext.com/heidegger/interview.html |date=16 October 2013 }} by [[William J. Richardson]] in {{cite book |title=Heidegger: the Man and the Thinker |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qIrWZajVZuwC |editor1-link=Thomas Havens |editor-first=Thomas |editor-last=Sheehan |orig-year=1981 |year=2010 |version=reprint |publisher=[[Transaction Publishers]] |location=[[Piscataway, New Jersey]] |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=qIrWZajVZuwC&dq=%22Only+a+God+Can+Save+Us%22%22:+The+Spiegel+Interview+(1966)+Martin+Heidegger%22&pg=PA45 45–67] |isbn=978-1-4128-1537-6 }}[https://books.google.com/books?id=XVnePQAACAAJ 1st edition] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150320072759/http://books.google.com/books?id=XVnePQAACAAJ |date=20 March 2015 }}</ref> It is still commonplace in Western universities to teach only Western philosophy and to ignore Asian philosophy altogether, or consider only newer Western-influenced Asian thought proper "philosophy". Carine Defoort, herself a specialist in Chinese thought, has offered support for such a "family" view of philosophy,<ref>Defoort, Carine. (2001). "Is There Such a Thing as Chinese Philosophy? Arguments of an Implicit Debate",
''Philosophy East and West''
51 (3) 393–413.</ref> while [[Rein Raud]] has presented an argument<ref>[[Rein Raud|Raud, Rein]]. (2006) "Philosophies versus Philosophy: In Defense of a Flexible Definition". ''Philosophy East & West'' 56 (4) 618–625. [https://www.academia.edu/217793/Philosophies_vs_Philosophy_In_Defense_of_A_Flexible_Definition] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170723052150/http://www.academia.edu/217793/Philosophies_vs_Philosophy_In_Defense_of_A_Flexible_Definition|date=23 July 2017}}</ref> against it and offered a more flexible [[definition of philosophy]] that would include both Western and Asian thought on equal terms. In response, Ouyang Min argues that philosophy proper is a Western cultural practice and essentially different from ''zhexue'', which is what the Chinese have,<ref>Ouyang Min. (2012). "There is No Need for ''Zhongguo Zhexue'' to be Philosophy" Asian Philosophy 22 (3) 199–223.</ref> even though ''zhexue'' (originally ''tetsugaku'') is actually a neologism coined in 1873 by [[Nishi Amane]] for describing Western philosophy as opposed to traditional Asian thought.<ref>Havens, Thomas R.H. (1970).''Nishi Amane and Modern Japanese Thought'' Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 50.</ref>

==See also==
* [[Eastern ethics in business]]
* [[Eastern religions]]
{{Portal bar|Hinduism|Religion|Philosophy|Mythology}}

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Sources==
{{refbegin}}
* {{Citation | last =Bowker | first =John | year =2000 | title =The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions | publisher =Oxford University Press }}
* {{Citation | last =Flood | first =Gavin D. | author-link = Gavin Flood | year =1996 | title =An Introduction to Hinduism | publisher =Cambridge University Press }}
* {{Cite book |last=Flood |first=Gavin |title=The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |year=2008 |author-link=Gavin Flood}}
* {{Citation | last =Georgis | first =Faris | year =2010 | title =Alone in Unity: Torments of an Iraqi God-Seeker in North America | publisher =Dorrance Publishing | isbn =978-1-4349-0951-0 | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=vFZrxLjtiI8C&pg=PA62 }}
* {{Citation | last =Gomez | first =Luis O. | year =2013 | title =Buddhism in India. In: Joseph Kitagawa, "The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture" | publisher =Routledge | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=9fyzAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA42 | isbn =978-1-136-87590-8 | access-date =27 January 2016 | archive-date =3 July 2023 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151512/https://books.google.com/books?id=9fyzAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA42 | url-status =live }}
* {{Citation | last =Harvey | first =Andrew | author-link = Andrew Harvey (religious writer) | year =2001 | title =Teachings of the Hindu Mystics | publisher =Shambhala | isbn =978-1-57062-449-0 }}
* {{Citation | last =Hiltebeitel | first =Alf | year =2007 | title =Hinduism. In: Joseph Kitagawa, "The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture". Digital printing 2007 | publisher =Routledge | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=9fyzAAAAQBAJ | isbn =978-1-136-87590-8 | access-date =27 January 2016 | archive-date =3 July 2023 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151449/https://books.google.com/books?id=9fyzAAAAQBAJ | url-status =live }}
* {{Citation | last1 =Jones | first1 =Constance | last2 =Ryan | first2 =James D. | year =2006 | title =Encyclopedia of Hinduism | publisher =Infobase Publishing | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=OgMmceadQ3gC&q=hinduism+neolithic&pg=PR17 | isbn =978-0-8160-7564-5 | access-date =31 October 2020 | archive-date =3 July 2023 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151504/https://books.google.com/books?id=OgMmceadQ3gC&q=hinduism+neolithic&pg=PR17 | url-status =live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Knott |first=Kim |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p4kzNzII3zAC&pg=PA6 |title=Hinduism: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-19-160645-8 |access-date=10 February 2023 |archive-date=3 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151955/https://books.google.com/books?id=p4kzNzII3zAC&pg=PA6 |url-status=live }}
* {{Citation |author=Kamil Zvelebil |title=The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=degUAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA155 |access-date=7 March 2018 |year=1973 |publisher=E.J. Brill |location=Leiden |isbn=978-90-04-03591-1 |archive-date=5 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405220135/https://books.google.com/books?id=degUAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA155 |url-status=live }}
* {{Citation | last =Lockard | first =Craig A. | year =2007 | title =Societies, Networks, and Transitions. Volume I: to 1500 | publisher =Cengage Learning | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=yJPlCpzOY_QC&pg=PA50 | isbn =978-0-618-38612-3 | access-date =27 January 2016 | archive-date =3 July 2023 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151955/https://books.google.com/books?id=yJPlCpzOY_QC&pg=PA50 | url-status =live }}
* {{Citation |author=Mohan Lal |title=Encyclopaedia of Indian Literature: Sasay to Zorgot |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KnPoYxrRfc0C&pg=PA4341 |year=1992 |publisher=Sahitya Akademi |isbn=978-81-260-1221-3 }}
* {{cite book|author=P.S. Sundaram|title=Kural (Tiruvalluvar)|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aPpv2F2RRgcC|year=1990|publisher=Penguin Books|isbn=978-93-5118-015-9|ref={{sfnRef|Sundaram, 1990}}|access-date=7 July 2022|archive-date=5 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405220115/https://books.google.com/books?id=aPpv2F2RRgcC|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book |author=Kaushik Roy |title=Hinduism and the Ethics of Warfare in South Asia: From Antiquity to the Present |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vRE3n1VwDTIC |year=2012 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-01736-8 }}
* {{cite book |author=Swamiji Iraianban |title=Ambrosia of Thirukkural |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dPmMQoJkXV0C&pg=PA13 |year=1997 |publisher=Abhinav Publications |isbn=978-81-7017-346-5 }}
* {{cite book |author=W. J. Johnson |title=A dictionary of Hinduism |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198610250.001.0001/acref-9780198610250-e-2475?rskey=HcmgW0&result=1 |year=2009 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford, UK |access-date=12 March 2021 |series=Oxford Reference |isbn=978-01-98610-25-0 |ref={{sfnRef|Johnson, 2009}} |archive-date=28 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210728145953/https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198610250.001.0001/acref-9780198610250-e-2475?rskey=HcmgW0&result=1 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |author= M. S. Purnalingam Pillai |title= Tamil Literature |year= 2015 |edition= |publisher=International Institute of Tamil Studies | location= Chennai |language=|pages=75 | ref={{sfnRef|Pillai, 2015}} }}
* {{Citation | last =Narayanan | first =Vasudha | year =2009 | title =Hinduism | publisher =The Rosen Publishing Group | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=E0Mm6S1XFYAC | isbn =978-1-4358-5620-2 | access-date =27 January 2016 | archive-date =3 July 2023 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151957/https://books.google.com/books?id=E0Mm6S1XFYAC | url-status =live }}
* {{Citation | last =Nath | first =Vijay | date =March–April 2001 | title =From 'Brahmanism' to 'Hinduism': Negotiating the Myth of the Great Tradition | journal =Social Scientist | volume =29 | issue =3/4 | pages =19–50 | doi=10.2307/3518337 |jstor=3518337 }}
* {{Citation|last= Osborne|first=E|year=2005|title=Accessing R.E. Founders & Leaders, Buddhism, Hinduism and Sikhism Teacher's Book Mainstream|publisher= Folens Limited }}
* {{Citation | last =Samuel | first =Geoffrey | year =2010 | title =The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century | publisher =Cambridge University Press }}
* {{Cite book |last=Sharma |first=Arvind |title=The Study of Hinduism |publisher=[[University of South Carolina Press]] |year=2003 |author-link=Arvind Sharma}}
{{refend}}

==External links==
{{Commons category}}
* [https://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/class/110/4-eastern.htm Jim Fieser: Classical Eastern Philosophy]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20041205035315/http://www.atmajyoti.org/spirwrit.asp Articles and commentaries on a wide range of topics related to practical Eastern Philosophy] at atmajyoti.org
* [http://www.kheper.net/topics/eastern/ Eastern Philosophy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303235543/http://www.kheper.net/topics/eastern/ |date=3 March 2016 }} on Kheper website
*{{cite IEP |url-id=chin-ovr |title=Chinese Philosophy: Overview of Topics |last=Littlejohn |first=Ronnie}}

{{Eastern world}}
{{East Asian topics}}
{{Philosophy topics}}
{{Asia topics}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2017}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Eastern Philosophy}}
[[Category:Eastern philosophy| ]]
[[Category:Culture of Asia]]
[[Category:History of Asia]]
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]
[[Category:Eastern culture]]
[[Category:Philosophy by region]]