Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Cauchy's integral theorem
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Theorem in complex analysis}} {{Distinguish|Cauchy's integral formula|Cauchy formula for repeated integration}} {{Complex analysis sidebar}} In [[mathematics]], the '''Cauchy integral theorem''' (also known as the '''Cauchy–Goursat theorem''') in [[complex analysis]], named after [[Augustin-Louis Cauchy]] (and [[Édouard Goursat]]), is an important statement about [[line integral]]s for [[holomorphic function]]s in the [[complex number|complex plane]]. Essentially, it says that if <math>f(z)</math> is holomorphic in a [[simply connected]] [[Domain (mathematical analysis)|domain]] Ω, then for any simply closed contour <math>C</math> in Ω, that contour integral is zero. <math display="block">\int_C f(z)\,dz = 0. </math> ==Statement== === Fundamental theorem for complex line integrals === If {{math|''f''(''z'')}} is a holomorphic function on an open [[region (mathematical analysis)|region]] {{mvar|U}}, and <math>\gamma</math> is a curve in {{mvar|U}} from <math>z_0</math> to <math>z_1</math> then, <math display="block">\int_{\gamma}f'(z) \, dz = f(z_1)-f(z_0).</math> Also, when {{math|''f''(''z'')}} has a single-valued antiderivative in an open region {{mvar|U}}, then the path integral <math display="inline">\int_{\gamma}f(z) \, dz</math> is path independent for all paths in {{mvar|U}}. ==== Formulation on simply connected regions ==== Let <math>U \subseteq \Complex</math> be a [[Simply connected space|simply connected]] [[open subset|open]] set, and let <math>f: U \to \Complex</math> be a [[holomorphic function]]. Let <math>\gamma: [a,b] \to U</math> be a smooth closed curve. Then: <math display="block">\int_\gamma f(z)\,dz = 0. </math> (The condition that <math>U</math> be [[simply connected]] means that <math>U</math> has no "holes", or in other words, that the [[fundamental group]] of <math>U</math> is trivial.) ==== General formulation ==== Let <math>U \subseteq \Complex</math> be an [[open subset|open set]], and let <math>f: U \to \Complex</math> be a [[holomorphic function]]. Let <math>\gamma: [a,b] \to U</math> be a smooth closed curve. If <math>\gamma</math> is [[Homotopy|homotopic]] to a constant curve, then: <math display="block">\int_\gamma f(z)\,dz = 0. </math>where z є ''U'' (Recall that a curve is [[Homotopy|homotopic]] to a constant curve if there exists a smooth [[homotopy]] (within <math>U</math>) from the curve to the constant curve. Intuitively, this means that one can shrink the curve into a point without exiting the space.) The first version is a special case of this because on a [[Simply connected space|simply connected]] set, every closed curve is [[Homotopy|homotopic]] to a constant curve. ==== Main example ==== In both cases, it is important to remember that the curve <math>\gamma</math> does not surround any "holes" in the domain, or else the theorem does not apply. A famous example is the following curve: <math display="block">\gamma(t) = e^{it} \quad t \in \left[0, 2\pi\right] ,</math> which traces out the unit circle. Here the following integral: <math display="block">\int_{\gamma} \frac{1}{z}\,dz = 2\pi i \neq 0 , </math> is nonzero. The Cauchy integral theorem does not apply here since <math>f(z) = 1/z</math> is not defined at <math>z = 0</math>. Intuitively, <math>\gamma</math> surrounds a "hole" in the domain of <math>f</math>, so <math>\gamma</math> cannot be shrunk to a point without exiting the space. Thus, the theorem does not apply. ==Discussion== As [[Édouard Goursat]] showed, Cauchy's integral theorem can be proven assuming only that the complex derivative <math>f'(z)</math> exists everywhere in <math>U</math>. This is significant because one can then prove [[Cauchy's integral formula]] for these functions, and from that deduce these functions are [[infinitely differentiable]]. The condition that <math>U</math> be [[simply connected]] means that <math>U</math> has no "holes" or, in [[homotopy]] terms, that the [[fundamental group]] of <math>U</math> is trivial; for instance, every open disk <math>U_{z_0} = \{ z : \left|z-z_{0}\right| < r\}</math>, for <math>z_0 \in \Complex</math>, qualifies. The condition is crucial; consider <math display="block">\gamma(t) = e^{it} \quad t \in \left[0, 2\pi\right]</math> which traces out the unit circle, and then the path integral <math display="block">\oint_\gamma \frac{1}{z}\,dz = \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{1}{e^{it}}(ie^{it} \,dt) = \int_0^{2\pi}i\,dt = 2\pi i </math> is nonzero; the Cauchy integral theorem does not apply here since <math>f(z) = 1/z</math> is not defined (and is certainly not holomorphic) at <math>z = 0</math>. One important consequence of the theorem is that path integrals of holomorphic functions on simply connected domains can be computed in a manner familiar from the [[fundamental theorem of calculus]]: let <math>U</math> be a [[simply connected]] [[open subset]] of <math>\Complex</math>, let <math>f: U \to \Complex</math> be a holomorphic function, and let <math>\gamma</math> be a [[piecewise continuously differentiable path]] in <math>U</math> with start point <math>a</math> and end point <math>b</math>. If <math>F</math> is a [[complex antiderivative]] of <math>f</math>, then <math display="block">\int_\gamma f(z)\,dz=F(b)-F(a).</math> The Cauchy integral theorem is valid with a weaker hypothesis than given above, e.g. given <math>U</math>'','' a simply connected open subset of <math>\Complex</math>, we can weaken the assumptions to <math>f</math> being holomorphic on <math>U</math> and continuous on [[closure (topology)|<math display="inline">\overline{U}</math>]] and <math>\gamma</math> a [[rectifiable curve|rectifiable]] [[Jordan curve theorem|simple loop]] in <math display="inline">\overline{U}</math>.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Walsh|first=J. L.|date=1933-05-01|title=The Cauchy-Goursat Theorem for Rectifiable Jordan Curves|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=19|issue=5|pages=540–541| doi=10.1073/pnas.19.5.540|pmid=16587781|pmc=1086062|issn=0027-8424|doi-access=free|bibcode=1933PNAS...19..540W }}</ref> The Cauchy integral theorem leads to [[Cauchy's integral formula]] and the [[residue theorem]]. ==Proof== If one assumes that the partial derivatives of a holomorphic function are continuous, the Cauchy integral theorem can be proven as a direct consequence of [[Green's theorem]] and the fact that the real and imaginary parts of <math>f=u+iv</math> must satisfy the [[Cauchy–Riemann equations]] in the region bounded by {{nowrap|<math>\gamma</math>,}} and moreover in the open neighborhood {{mvar|U}} of this region. Cauchy provided this proof, but it was later proven by Goursat without requiring techniques from vector calculus, or the continuity of partial derivatives. We can break the integrand {{nowrap|<math>f</math>,}} as well as the differential <math>dz</math> into their real and imaginary components: <math display="block"> f=u+iv </math> <math display="block"> dz=dx+i\,dy </math> In this case we have <math display="block">\oint_\gamma f(z)\,dz = \oint_\gamma (u+iv)(dx+i\,dy) = \oint_\gamma (u\,dx-v\,dy) +i\oint_\gamma (v\,dx+u\,dy)</math> By [[Green's theorem]], we may then replace the integrals around the closed contour <math>\gamma</math> with an area integral throughout the domain <math>D</math> that is enclosed by <math>\gamma</math> as follows: <math display="block">\oint_\gamma (u\,dx-v\,dy) = \iint_D \left( -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} -\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \right) \,dx\,dy </math> <math display="block">\oint_\gamma (v\,dx+u\,dy) = \iint_D \left( \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} -\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} \right) \,dx\,dy </math> But as the real and imaginary parts of a function holomorphic in the domain {{nowrap|<math>D</math>,}} <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> must satisfy the [[Cauchy–Riemann equations]] there: <math display="block">\frac{ \partial u }{ \partial x } = \frac{ \partial v }{ \partial y } </math> <math display="block">\frac{ \partial u }{ \partial y } = -\frac{ \partial v }{ \partial x } </math> We therefore find that both integrands (and hence their integrals) are zero <math display="block">\iint_D \left( -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} -\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \right )\,dx\,dy = \iint_D \left( \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \right ) \, dx \, dy =0</math> <math display="block">\iint_D \left( \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} \right )\,dx\,dy = \iint_D \left( \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \right ) \, dx \, dy = 0</math> This gives the desired result <math display="block">\oint_\gamma f(z)\,dz = 0</math> ==See also== *[[Morera's theorem]] *[[Methods of contour integration]] *[[Star domain]] ==References== {{Reflist}} * {{citation |first = Kunihiko |last = Kodaira | author-link = Kunihiko Kodaira | year = 2007 | title = Complex Analysis | series= Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., 107 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press|CUP]] | isbn = 978-0-521-80937-5}} * {{citation |first = Lars |last = Ahlfors | author-link = Lars Ahlfors | year = 2000 | title = Complex Analysis | series= McGraw-Hill series in Mathematics | publisher = [[McGraw-Hill]] | isbn = 0-07-000657-1 }} * {{citation |first = Serge |last = Lang | author-link = Serge Lang | year = 2003 | title = Complex Analysis | series= Springer Verlag GTM | publisher = [[Springer Verlag]] }} * {{citation |first = Walter |last = Rudin | author-link = Walter Rudin | year = 2000 | title = Real and Complex Analysis | series= McGraw-Hill series in mathematics | publisher = [[McGraw-Hill]] }} == External links == * {{springer|title=Cauchy integral theorem|id=p/c020900}} * {{MathWorld | urlname= CauchyIntegralTheorem | title= Cauchy Integral Theorem}} *Jeremy Orloff, 18.04 [https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-04-complex-variables-with-applications-spring-2018/lecture-notes/ Complex Variables with Applications] Spring 2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare Creative Commons. [[Category:Augustin-Louis Cauchy]] [[Category:Theorems in complex analysis]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Citation
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Complex analysis sidebar
(
edit
)
Template:Distinguish
(
edit
)
Template:Math
(
edit
)
Template:MathWorld
(
edit
)
Template:Mvar
(
edit
)
Template:Nowrap
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Springer
(
edit
)
Search
Search
Editing
Cauchy's integral theorem
Add topic