Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Boole's syllogistic
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Mathematical argument}} {{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}} [[File:Square of opposition, set diagrams.svg|thumb|Square of opposition<br>In the [[Venn diagram]]s black areas are [[empty set|empty]] and red areas are nonempty.<br>The faded arrows and faded red areas apply in traditional logic.]] '''[[Boolean logic]]''' is a system of [[syllogism|syllogistic]] [[logic]] invented by 19th-century British mathematician [[George Boole]], which attempts to incorporate the "empty set", that is, a class of non-existent entities, such as round squares, without resorting to uncertain [[truth value]]s. In Boolean logic, the universal statements "all S is P" and "no S is P" (contraries in the traditional Aristotelian schema) are compossible provided that the set of "S" is the empty set. "All S is P" is construed to mean that "there is nothing that is both S and not-P"; "no S is P", that "there is nothing that is both S and P". For example, since there is nothing that is a round square, it is true both that nothing is a round square and purple, and that nothing is a round square and ''not''-purple. Therefore, both universal statements, that "all round squares are purple" and "no round squares are purple" are true. Similarly, the [[subcontrary]] relationship is dissolved between the existential statements "some S is P" and "some S is not P". The former is interpreted as "there is some S such that S is P" and the latter, "there is some S such that S is not P", both of which are clearly false where S is nonexistent. Thus, the subaltern relationship between universal and existential also does not hold, since for a nonexistent S, "All S is P" is true but does not entail "Some S is P", which is false. Of the Aristotelian [[square of opposition]], only the contradictory relationships remain intact. ==See also== * [[Boolean logic]] * [[Propositional logic]] * ==References== {{reflist}} [[list of Boolean algebra topics]] {{DEFAULTSORT:Boole's Syllogistic}} [[Category:History of logic]] [[Category:Term logic]] [[Category:Syllogism]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Template:Unreferenced
(
edit
)
Search
Search
Editing
Boole's syllogistic
Add topic