Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Appeal to tradition
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Logical fallacy in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of tradition}} {{POV|date=July 2024}} {{More citations needed|date=June 2024}} '''Appeal to tradition''' (also known as '''''argumentum ad antiquitatem''''' or '''''argumentum ad antiquitam''''',<ref>{{cite web | title=Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate | url=http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html|work=www.csun.edu | access-date=29 January 2014 |ref=refLogicalFal}}</ref> '''appeal to antiquity''', or '''appeal to common practice''') is a claim in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of correlation with past or present [[tradition]]. The appeal takes the form of "this is right because we've always done it this way", and is a [[Fallacy|logical fallacy]].<ref name="Palomar"/><ref>{{cite book | title = Argumentation and Debating | first = William | last = Trufant | publisher = Houghton Mifflin company | year = 1917 |ref=refTrufant1917 | isbn=978-1-4067-5258-8 | oclc=1154091080}}</ref> The opposite of an appeal to tradition is an [[appeal to novelty]], in which one claims that an idea is superior just because it is new. An appeal to tradition essentially makes two assumptions that may not be [[logical truth|''necessarily'' true]]: * The old way of [[thought|thinking]] was proven correct when introduced, i.e. since the old way of thinking was prevalent, it was necessarily correct. :In reality, this may be false—the tradition might be entirely based on incorrect grounds. * The past justifications for the tradition are still valid. :In reality, the circumstances may have changed; this assumption may also therefore have become untrue. Appeal to tradition imports the value of not needing to reinvent ways to do things for which effective ways have already been established. But, "is fallacious when it confuses a long tradition of careful testing with the mere tendency to hold on to ideas because they are old".<ref name="Palomar">{{Cite web |title=Appeal to Tradition |url=https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Appeal%20to%20Tradition.html |url-status=dead}}</ref> An appeal to tradition can be complicated by the possibility that different people might have different views, each with their own tradition to appeal to. For example, "[[Augustine]]'s appeal to tradition against the [[Donatists]] is more complicated because the Donatists had appealed to tradition against the Catholics".<ref>Ronnie J. Rombs, Alexander Y. Hwang (2010), ''Tradition and the Rule of Faith in the Early Church'', Page 159.</ref> == Argument from inertia == A close relative/variant of the appeal to tradition is the '''argument from inertia''' or '''appeal to inertia''' (sometimes called "Stay the Course"), which states a mistaken ''[[status quo]]'', potentially related to existing customs be maintained for its own sake, usually because making a change would require admission of fault in the mistake or because correcting the mistake would require extraordinary effort and resources<ref name="utep">{{cite web |last1=Williamson |first1=Owen M. |title=Master List of Logical Fallacies |url=http://utminers.utep.edu/omwilliamson/engl1311/fallacies.htm |website=[[The University of Texas at El Paso]] |accessdate=April 1, 2020 |date=January 2018}}</ref> Its name derives from [[inertia]], a concept in physics representing the resistance of any physical object to any change in its velocity. ==Contrasting fallacies== * Where appeal to tradition might seek to avoid expending resources and effort on making the necessary change, the [[sunk-cost fallacy]] resists change due to that which has already been expended in the past to contribute to the present condition. * The appeal to tradition counterpoints with the [[appeal to novelty]] (''argumentum ad novitatem''), where the alternative is sought simply on the basis that it is new, or that old customs are incorrect because of being traditional. == See also == {{Div col|colwidth=30em}} * [[Appeal to novelty]] * [[Argument from authority]] * [[Argument to moderation]] * [[Common sense]] * [[Conservatism]] * [[Herd mentality]] * [[Inductive reasoning]] * [[List of logical fallacies]] * [[Precedent]] * [[Social inertia]] * [[Status quo]] {{Div col end}} == Notes == {{reflist}} {{Fallacies}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Appeal To Tradition}} [[Category:Appeals to emotion|Tradition]] [[Category:Conservatism]] [[Category:Genetic fallacies]] [[Category:Fallacies]] [[Category:Tradition]] {{logic-stub}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Div col
(
edit
)
Template:Div col end
(
edit
)
Template:Fallacies
(
edit
)
Template:Logic-stub
(
edit
)
Template:More citations needed
(
edit
)
Template:POV
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Search
Search
Editing
Appeal to tradition
Add topic