Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Action theory (philosophy)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Theory of the processes causing willful human bodily movements}} {{more footnotes|date=February 2018}} {{Agency sidebar}} '''Action theory''' or '''theory of action''' is an area in [[philosophy]] concerned with [[Theory|theories]] about the processes causing [[Will (philosophy)|willful]] [[Motor system|human bodily movements]] of a more or less complex kind. This [[List of academic disciplines|area of thought]] involves [[epistemology]], [[ethics]], [[metaphysics]], [[jurisprudence]], and [[philosophy of mind]], and has attracted the strong interest of philosophers ever since [[Aristotle]]'s ''[[Nicomachean Ethics]]'' (Third Book). With the advent of [[psychology]] and later [[neuroscience]], many theories of action are now subject to [[empirical test]]ing. '''Philosophical action theory''', or the '''philosophy of action''', should not be confused with [[sociological]] theories of [[social action]], such as the [[Action theory (sociology)|action theory]] established by [[Talcott Parsons]]. Nor should it be confused with [[activity theory]]. == Overview == Basic action theory typically describes [[action (philosophy)|action]] as intentional behavior caused by an ''agent'' in a particular ''situation''.<ref name="Funke">{{cite book |last1=Funke |first1=Joachim |editor-last1= Meusburger |editor-first1= P. |editor-last2= Werlen |editor-first2= B. |editor-last3= Suarsana |editor-first3= L. |title=Knowledge and Action |date=2017 |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-319-44588-5 |pages=99β111 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-44588-5_6 |language=en |chapter=How Much Knowledge Is Necessary for Action? |series=Knowledge and Space |volume=9 |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-44588-5_6 }}</ref> The agent's ''desires'' and ''beliefs'' (e.g. a person wanting a glass of water and believing that the clear liquid in the cup in front of them is water) lead to bodily behavior (e.g. reaching across for the glass). In the simple theory (see [[Donald Davidson (philosopher)|Donald Davidson]]), the desire and belief jointly cause the action. [[Michael Bratman]] has raised problems for such a view and argued that we should take the concept of intention as basic and not analyzable into beliefs and desires. Aristotle held that a thorough explanation must give an account of both the [[efficient cause]], the agent, and the [[Telos|final cause]], the intention. In some theories a desire plus a belief about the means of satisfying that desire are always what is behind an action. Agents aim, in acting, to maximize the satisfaction of their desires. Such a theory of prospective [[rationality]] underlies much of [[economics]] and other [[social science]]s within the more sophisticated framework of [[rational choice]]. However, many theories of action argue that rationality extends far beyond calculating the best means to achieve one's ends. For instance, a belief that I ought to do X, in some theories, can directly cause me to do X without my having to want to do X (i.e. have a desire to do X). Rationality, in such theories, also involves responding correctly to the reasons an agent perceives, not just acting on wants. While action theorists generally employ the language of [[causality]] in their theories of what the nature of action is, the issue of what causal determination comes to has been central to controversies about the nature of [[free will]]. Conceptual discussions also revolve around a precise definition of [[Action (philosophy)|action]] in philosophy. Scholars may disagree on which bodily movements fall under this category, e.g. whether thinking should be analysed as action, and how complex actions involving several steps to be taken and diverse intended consequences are to be summarised or decomposed. ==See also== * [[Praxeology]] * [[Free will]] * {{section link|Humeanism#Theory of action}} *[[Cybernetics]] ==References== {{reflist}} == Further reading == * Maurice Blondel (1893). ''L'Action - Essai d'une critique de la vie et d'une science de la pratique'' * G. E. M. Anscombe (1957). ''Intention'', Basil Blackwell, Oxford. * James Sommerville (1968). ''Total Commitment, Blondel's L'Action'', Corpus Books. * Michel Crozier, & Erhard Friedberg (1980). ''Actors and Systems'' Chicago: [University of Chicago Press]. * Donald Davidson (1980). ''Essays on Actions and Events'', Clarendon Press, Oxford. * Jonathan Dancy & Constantine Sandis (eds.) (2015). ''Philosophy of Action: An Anthology'', Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. * Jennifer Hornsby (1980). ''Actions'', Routledge, London. * Lilian O'Brien (2014). ''Philosophy of Action'', Palgrave, Basingstoke. * Christine Korsgaard (2008). ''The Constitution of Agency'', Oxford University Press, Oxford. * Alfred R. Mele (ed.) (1997). ''The Philosophy of Action'', Oxford University Press, Oxford. * John Hyman & Helen Steward (eds.) (2004). ''Agency and Action'', Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. * Anton Leist (ed.) (2007). ''Action in Context'', Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. * Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.) (2010). ''A Companion to the Philosophy of Action'', Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. * Sarah Paul (2020). ''The Philosophy of Action: A Contemporary Introduction'', London, Routledge. * Peter Ε ajda et al. (eds.) (2012). ''Affectivity, Agency and Intersubjectivity'', L'Harmattan, Paris. * Constantine Sandis (ed.) (2009). ''New Essays on the Explanation of Action'', Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. * Constantine Sandis (ed.) (2019). ''Philosophy of Action from Suarez to Anscombe'', London, Routledge. * Michael Thompson (2012). ''Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought'', Boston, MA, Harvard University Press. * Lawrence H. Davis (1979). ''Theory of Action'', Prentice-Hall, (Foundations of Philosophy Series), Englewood Cliffs, NJ. ==External links== *{{cite SEP |url-id=action |title=Action}} *{{cite IEP |url-id=reid-act |title=Thomas Reid's Theory of Action}} {{Philosophy topics}} {{Metaphysics}} {{Authority control}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Action Theory}} [[Category:Action (philosophy)|*]] [[Category:Free will]] [[Category:Subfields of metaphysics]] [[Category:Metaphysics of mind]] [[Category:Neuroscience]] [[Category:Ontology]] [[Category:Theory of mind]] [[Category:Epistemological theories]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Agency sidebar
(
edit
)
Template:Authority control
(
edit
)
Template:Cite IEP
(
edit
)
Template:Cite SEP
(
edit
)
Template:Cite book
(
edit
)
Template:Metaphysics
(
edit
)
Template:More footnotes
(
edit
)
Template:Philosophy topics
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Section link
(
edit
)
Template:Short description
(
edit
)
Search
Search
Editing
Action theory (philosophy)
Add topic