Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
William of Ockham
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Logic=== In [[logic]], William of Ockham wrote down in words the formulae that would later be called [[De Morgan's laws]],<ref>In his ''Summa Logicae'', part II, sections 32 and 33.Translated on p. 80 of ''Philosophical Writings'', tr. [[Philotheus Boehner|P. Boehner]], rev. S. Brown, (Indianapolis, Indiana, 1990)</ref> and he pondered [[three-valued logic|ternary logic]], that is, a [[logical system]] with three [[truth values]]; a concept that would be taken up again in the [[mathematical logic]] of the 19th and 20th centuries. His contributions to [[semantics]], especially to the maturing [[theory of supposition]], are still studied by logicians.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Graham |last1=Priest |author-link1=Graham Priest |last2=Read |first2=S. |title=The Formalization of Ockham's Theory of Supposition |journal=Mind |volume=LXXXVI |pages=109β113 |year=1977 |doi=10.1093/mind/LXXXVI.341.109 |issue=341}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author-link1=John Corcoran (logician) |first1=John |last1=Corcoran |first2=John |last2=Swiniarski |year=1978 |title=Logical Structures of Ockham's Theory of Supposition |journal=Franciscan Studies |volume=38 |pages=161β183 |jstor=41975391 |doi=10.1353/frc.1978.0010 |s2cid=170450442}}</ref> William of Ockham was probably the first logician to treat empty terms in Aristotelian syllogistic effectively; he devised an empty term semantics that exactly fit the syllogistic. Specifically, an argument is valid according to William's semantics if and only if it is valid according to ''Prior Analytics''.<ref>John Corcoran (1981). "Ockham's Syllogistic Semantics", ''Journal of Symbolic Logic'', '''46''': 197β198.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
William of Ockham
(section)
Add topic