Editing The Skeptical Environmentalist (section)

===Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation review and response===
On 13 February 2003, Lomborg filed a complaint against the DCSD's decision with the [[Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (Denmark)|Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation]] (MSTI), which oversees the group. On 17 December, the Ministry released a report identifying a number of procedural errors had made, although did not refute any criticisms of the book. It criticised the DCSD for not identifying specific areas of error and for not providing an opportunity for Lomborg to respond before the report's publication.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Revkin |first=Andrew C. |date=23 December 2003 |title=Danish Ethics Panel Censured for Critique of Book |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/science/danish-ethics-panel-censured-for-critique-of-book.html |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=3 April 2024 |archive-date=3 April 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240403192655/https://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/science/danish-ethics-panel-censured-for-critique-of-book.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

The Ministry then remitted the case to the DCSD, and instructed the DCSD to decide whether to reinvestigate. On 12 March 2004, the Committee formally decided not to act further on the complaints, reasoning that renewed scrutiny would, in all likelihood, result in the same conclusion.<ref name="icg2008" /><ref name=":7">{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3340305.stm |title=Lomborg celebrates ministry ruling |publisher=[[BBC]] |date=22 December 2003 |access-date=26 January 2008 |archive-date=30 August 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060830115754/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3340305.stm |url-status=live}}</ref>