Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Source code
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Copyright and licensing == {{main|Software copyright|Software license}} {{see also|History of free and open-source software}} The situation varies worldwide, but in the United States before 1974, software and its source code was not [[copyright]]able and therefore always [[public domain software]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Liu |first1=Joseph P.|last2=Dogan |first2= Stacey L.|date=2005|title=Copyright Law and Subject Matter Specificity: The Case of Computer Software|url=https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp/536/|journal=New York University Annual Survey of American Law|language=en|volume=61|issue=2 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210625073240/https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp/536/ |archive-date=Jun 25, 2021}}</ref> In 1974, the US Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works ([[CONTU]]) decided that "computer programs, to the extent that they embody an author's original creation, are proper subject matter of copyright".<ref>[http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1344&context=ggulrev Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corporation Puts the Byte Back into Copyright Protection for Computer Programs] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170507231059/http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1344&context=ggulrev |date=7 May 2017 }} in Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 14, Issue 2, Article 3 by Jan L. Nussbaum (January 1984)</ref><ref name="sail_book">Lemley, Menell, Merges and Samuelson. ''Software and Internet Law'', p. 34.</ref> [[Proprietary software]] is rarely distributed as source code.{{sfn|Boyle|2003|p=45}} Although the term [[open-source software]] literally refers to [[source-available software|public access to the source code]],{{sfn|Morin ''et al.''|2012|loc=Open Source versus Closed Source}} open-source software has additional requirements: free redistribution, permission to modify the source code and release derivative works under the same license, and nondiscrimination between different uses—including commercial use.{{sfn|Sen ''et al.''|2008|p=209}}{{sfn|Morin ''et al.''|2012|loc=Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Licensing}} The free [[software reuse|reusability]] of open-source software can speed up development.{{sfn|O'Regan|2022|p=106}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Source code
(section)
Add topic