Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Regular language
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Generalizations == The notion of a regular language has been generalized to infinite words (see [[ω-automaton|ω-automata]]) and to trees (see [[tree automaton]]). [[Rational set]] generalizes the notion (of regular/rational language) to monoids that are not necessarily [[free monoid|free]]. Likewise, the notion of a recognizable language (by a finite automaton) has namesake as [[recognizable set]] over a monoid that is not necessarily free. Howard Straubing notes in relation to these facts that “The term "regular language" is a bit unfortunate. Papers influenced by [[Samuel Eilenberg|Eilenberg]]'s monograph<ref name="Eilenberg1974">{{cite book|author=Samuel Eilenberg|title=Automata, languages, and machines|publisher=Academic Press}} in two volumes "A" (1974, {{isbn|9780080873749}}) and "B" (1976, {{isbn|9780080873756}}), the latter with two chapters by Bret Tilson.</ref> often use either the term "recognizable language", which refers to the behavior of automata, or "rational language", which refers to important analogies between regular expressions and rational [[power series]]. (In fact, Eilenberg defines rational and recognizable subsets of arbitrary monoids; the two notions do not, in general, coincide.) This terminology, while better motivated, never really caught on, and "regular language" is used almost universally.”<ref>{{cite book | last=Straubing | first=Howard | title=Finite automata, formal logic, and circuit complexity | url=https://archive.org/details/finiteautomatafo0000stra | url-access=registration | series=Progress in Theoretical Computer Science | location=Basel | publisher=Birkhäuser | year=1994 | isbn=3-7643-3719-2 | zbl=0816.68086 | page= [https://archive.org/details/finiteautomatafo0000stra/page/8 8] }}</ref> [[Rational series]] is another generalization, this time in the context of a [[formal power series over a semiring]]. This approach gives rise to [[weighted rational expression]]s and [[weighted automata]]. In this algebraic context, the regular languages (corresponding to [[Boolean semiring|Boolean]]-weighted rational expressions) are usually called ''rational languages''.<ref>Berstel & Reutenauer (2011) p.47</ref><ref>{{cite book | last=Sakarovitch | first=Jacques | title=Elements of automata theory | others=Translated from the French by Reuben Thomas | location=Cambridge | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | year=2009 | isbn=978-0-521-84425-3 | zbl=1188.68177 | page = 86 }}</ref> Also in this context, Kleene's theorem finds a generalization called the [[Kleene–Schützenberger theorem]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Regular language
(section)
Add topic