Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Product liability
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Types of liability==== Section 2 of the ''Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability'' distinguishes between three major types of product liability claims: * Manufacturing defect * Design defect * Failure to warn (also known as marketing defects) However, in most states, these are not legal claims in and of themselves, but are pleaded in terms of the legal theories mentioned above. For example, a plaintiff might plead negligent failure to warn or strict liability for defective design.<ref>See, e.g., ''Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.'', [http://online.ceb.com/calcases/C4/26C4t465.htm 26 Cal. 4th 465] (2001).</ref> The three types of product liability claims are defined as follows: * Manufacturing defects are those that occur in the manufacturing process and usually involve poor-quality materials or shoddy [[Skill|workmanship]]. In other words, the defective product differs from the others on the same assembly line and does not conform to the manufacturer's intended design.<ref name="Vandall_Page91" /> * Design defects occur where the product design is inherently dangerous or useless (and hence defective) no matter how carefully manufactured. In other words, the defective product is the same as every other one on the same assembly line because it is exactly what the manufacturer designed and intended to build, but the plaintiff is contending that the design itself is defective.<ref name="Vandall_Page91" /> The Third Restatement expressly prefers to measure defective design in terms of whether the product design's risks outweigh its benefits, and expressly deprecates the consumer expectations test associated with Section 402A of the Second Restatement. As noted above, state courts either use one test or the other or both.<ref name="Owen_DesignDefects" /> The Third Restatement also places the burden of proof on the plaintiff to prove that risks outweigh benefits by proving the feasibility of a safer alternative design.<ref name="Owen_DesignDefects" /> * Failure-to-warn defects arise in products that carry inherent nonobvious dangers which can be mitigated through adequate warnings to the user, and which are present regardless of how well the product is manufactured and designed for its intended purpose. This class of defects also includes failure to provide relevant product instructions or sufficient product warnings.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Noel |first1=Dix W. |title=Products Defective because of Inadequate Directions or Warnings |journal=Southwestern Law Journal |date=1969 |volume=23 |page=256 |url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/smulr23&div=29&id=&page= |access-date=11 August 2018}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Product liability
(section)
Add topic