Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Pope Leo I
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Oriental Orthodox view === Leo's Christological formula however was not entirely well received. Following the death of Dioscorus, the [[List of patriarchs of Alexandria|See of Alexandria]] split into two rival patriarchates; opposing and supporting Chalcedon respectively. The former of which, led by [[Timothy II of Alexandria]] would condemn both the heresy of Eutyches as well as the Council of Chalcedon and the Tome of Leo at the [[Third Council of Ephesus]]. The communion that accepted Ephesus III is known today as the [[Oriental Orthodox Church]].<ref>{{cite book|author1=Richard Price|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6IUaOOT1G3UC&pg=PA94|title=The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon|author2=Michael Gaddis|date=2006|isbn=0-85323-039-0|pages=1–5| publisher=Liverpool University Press |access-date=2016-11-01}}</ref> Ephesus III accused Leo's formula of two natures after the union as being fundamentally no different to the view of Nestorius, contradicting Cyril of Alexandria's formula of "mia physis tou Theo logou sesarkōmenē", or "one (mia) nature of the Word of God incarnate" (μία φύσις τοῦ θεοῦ λόγου σεσαρκωμένη).{{sfn|Meyendorff|1989|p=196}}<ref>{{Cite web|title=Zachariah of Mitylene, Syriac Chronicle (1899). Book 5.|url=http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/zachariah05.htm|website=www.tertullian.org|access-date=2020-05-04}}</ref> Several Oriental Orthodox Church historians, such as Pakhoum A. El-Moharraky and Waheeb Atalla Girgis have viewed the council as a dispute with the Church of Rome over precedence among the various patriarchal sees. Coptic sources,<ref>{{Cite book|title=The christological teaching of the non-chalcedonian churches|last1=A. El-Moharraky|first1=Pakhoum|last2= Atalla Girgis|first2=Waheeb|publisher= Costa Tsoumas|year=1995|location=Manchester}}</ref> both in Coptic and in Arabic, suggest that questions of political and ecclesiastical authority exaggerated differences between the two professions of faith. The Coptic Orthodox Christians are Miaphysites, which means they believe that Jesus Christ is both 100% human and 100% divine but in one person without mingling, confusion or alteration. In every liturgy till this day, the Copts recite “Christ's divinity parted not from His humanity, not for a single moment nor a twinkling of an eye".<ref name=QA>{{Cite web |title=Coptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States - Q&A|url=https://www.suscopts.org/q&a/index.php?qid=918&catid=279 |website=suscopts.org |access-date=September 2, 2024}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Pope Leo I
(section)
Add topic