Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Paranthropus
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Description== ===Skull=== ''Paranthropus'' had a massively built, tall and flat skull, with a prominent [[gorilla]]-like [[sagittal crest]] along the midline which anchored large [[temporalis muscle]]s used in chewing.<ref name=Wood2004/> Like other australopithecines, ''Paranthropus'' exhibited sexual dimorphism, with males notably larger than females.<ref name=Wood2000/><ref name=McHenry1991a/><ref name=McHenry1991b/> They had large [[molar tooth|molars]] with a relatively thick [[tooth enamel]] coating ([[post-canine megadontia]]),<ref>{{cite journal|first1=A. J.|last1=Olejniczak|first2=T. M.|last2=Smith|first3=M. M.|last3=Skinner|display-authors=et al.|year=2008|title=Three-dimensional molar enamel distribution and thickness in ''Australopithecus'' and ''Paranthropus''|journal=Biology Letters|volume=4|issue=4|pages=406β410|doi=10.1098/rsbl.2008.0223|pmid=18522924|pmc=2610159}}</ref> and comparatively small [[incisor]]s (similar in size to modern [[human]]s),<ref>{{cite journal|first1=P. S.|last1=Ungar|first2=F. E.|last2=Grine|year=1991|title=Incisor size and wear in ''Australopithecus africanus'' and ''Paranthropus robustus''|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=20|issue=4|pages=313β340|doi=10.1016/0047-2484(91)90013-L|bibcode=1991JHumE..20..313U }}</ref> possibly adaptations to processing abrasive foods.<ref name=Williams2015>{{cite journal|first=F. L.|last=Williams|year=2015|title=Dietary proclivities of ''Paranthropus robustus'' from Swartkrans, South Africa|journal=Anthropological Review|volume=78|issue=1|pages=1β19|doi=10.1515/anre-2015-0001|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=Wood2012>{{cite journal|first1=B.|last1=Wood|first2=K.|last2=Schroer|year=2012|title=Reconstructing the Diet of an Extinct Hominin Taxon: The Role of Extant Primate Models|journal=International Journal of Primatology|volume=33|issue=3|pages=716β742|doi=10.1007/s10764-012-9602-7|s2cid=15983306}}</ref> The teeth of ''P. aethiopicus'' developed faster than those of ''P. boisei''.<ref>{{cite journal|first=F. V.|last=Ramirez-Rozzi|year=1993|title=Tooth development in East African ''Paranthropus''|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=24|issue=6|pages=429β454|doi=10.1006/jhev.1993.1030|bibcode=1993JHumE..24..429R }}</ref> ''Paranthropus'' had adaptations to the skull to resist large bite loads while feeding, namely the expansive [[squamosal suture]]s.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=C.|last1=Dzialo|first2=S. A.|last2=Wood|first3=M.|last3=Berthaume|display-authors=et al.|year=2013|title=Functional implications of squamosal suture size in ''Paranthropus boisei''|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|volume=153|issue=2|pages=260β268|doi=10.1002/ajpa.22427|pmid=24242913}}</ref> The notably thick [[palate]] was once thought to have been an adaptation to resist a high bite force, but is better explained as a byproduct of facial lengthening and nasal anatomy.<ref>{{cite journal|first=M. A.|last=McCollum|year=1998|title=Palatal thickening and facial form in ''Paranthropus'': Examination of alternative developmental models|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|volume=103|issue=3|pages=375β392|doi=10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199707)103:3<375::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-P|pmid=9261500|doi-access=free}}</ref> In ''P. boisei'', the [[temporomandibular joint|jaw hinge]] was adapted to grinding food side-to-side (rather than up-and-down in modern humans), which is better at processing the [[starch]]y abrasive foods that likely made up the bulk of its diet. ''P. robustus'' may have chewed in a front-to-back direction instead, and had less exaggerated (less [[synapomorphy and apomorphy|derived]]) anatomical features than ''P. boisei'' as it perhaps did not require them with this kind of chewing strategy. This may have also allowed ''P. robustus'' to better process tougher foods.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=K.|last1=Kupczik|first2=V.|last2=Toro-Ibacache|first3=G. A.|last3=Macho|year=2018|title=On the relationship between maxillary molar root shape and jaw kinematics in ''Australopithecus africanus'' and ''Paranthropus robustus''|journal=Royal Society Open Science|volume=5|issue=8|page=180825|doi=10.1098/rsos.180825|pmc=6124107|pmid=30225074|bibcode=2018RSOS....580825K}}</ref> The braincase volume averaged about {{cvt|500|cm3}}, comparable to gracile australopithecines, but smaller than ''Homo''.<ref name=Du2018>{{cite journal|first1=A.|last1=Du|first2=A. M.|last2=Zipkin|first3=K. G.|last3=Hatala|display-authors=et al.|year=2018|title=Pattern and process in hominin brain size evolution are scale-dependent|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B|volume=285|issue=1873|pages=20172738|doi=10.1098/rspb.2017.2738|pmc=5832710|pmid=29467267}}</ref> Modern human brain volume averages {{cvt|1270|cm3}} for men and {{cvt|1130|cm3}} for women.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=J. S.|last1=Allen|first2=H.|last2=Damasio|first3=T. J.|last3=Grabowski|year=2002|title=Normal neuroanatomical variation in the human brain: an MRI-volumetric study|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|volume=118|issue=4|pages=341β358|doi=10.1002/ajpa.10092|pmid=12124914|s2cid=21705705}}</ref> ===Limbs and locomotion=== Unlike ''P. robustus'', the forearms of ''P. boisei'' were heavily built, which might suggest habitual [[suspensory behaviour]] as in [[orangutan]]s and [[gibbon]]s.<ref name=McHenry2007/><ref name=Dominguez2013/><ref name=Lague2019/> A ''P. boisei'' [[shoulder blade]] indicates long [[infraspinatus muscle]]s, which is also associated with suspensory behavior.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=D. J.|last1=Green|first2=H.|last2=Chirchir|first3=E.|last3=Mbua|year=2018|title=Scapular anatomy of ''Paranthropus boisei'' from Ileret, Kenya|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=125|pages=181β192|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.06.013|pmid=30502893|doi-access=free|bibcode=2018JHumE.125..181G }}</ref> A ''P. aethiopicus'' ulna, on the other hand, shows more similarities to ''Homo'' than ''P. boisei''.<ref name=Lague2019>{{cite journal|first1=M. R.|last1=Lague|first2=H.|last2=Chirchir|first3=D. J.|last3=Green|first4=E.|last4=Mbua|year=2019|title=Humeral anatomy of the KNM-ER 47000 upper limb skeleton from Ileret, Kenya: Implications for taxonomic identification|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=126|pages=24β38|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.06.011|pmid=30583842|s2cid=58607106|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329486548|doi-access=free|bibcode=2019JHumE.126...24L }}</ref> ''Paranthropus'' were [[biped]]s, and their hips, legs and feet resemble ''A. afarensis'' and modern humans.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Wood B, Richmond BG |title=Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology |journal=Journal of Anatomy |volume=197 |issue=1 |pages=19β60 |date=July 2000 |pmid=10999270 |pmc=1468107 |doi=10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19710019.x}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|first1=T. M.|last1=Ryan|first2=K. J.|last2=Carlson|first3=A. D.|last3=Gordon|display-authors=et al.|year=2018|title=Human-like hip joint loading in ''Australopithecus africanus'' and ''Paranthropus robustus''|journal=Journal of Human Anthropology|volume=121|pages=12β24|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.03.008|pmid=29706230|s2cid=14060188|url=https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/277557|doi-access=free|bibcode=2018JHumE.121...12R }}</ref> The pelvis is similar to ''A. afarensis'', but the hip joints are smaller in ''P. robustus''. The physical similarity implies a similar walking gait.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Macchiarelli R, Bondioli L, Galichon V, Tobias PV |title=Hip bone trabecular architecture shows uniquely distinctive locomotor behaviour in South African australopithecines |journal=Journal of Human Evolution |volume=36 |issue=2 |pages=211β32 |date=February 1999 |pmid=10068067 |doi=10.1006/jhev.1998.0267|bibcode=1999JHumE..36..211M }}</ref> Their modern-humanlike big toe indicates a modern-humanlike foot posture and range of motion, but the more distal ankle joint would have inhibited the modern human toe-off [[bipedal gait cycle|gait cycle]]. By 1.8 mya, ''Paranthropus'' and ''[[H. habilis]]'' may have achieved about the same grade of bipedality.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=R. L.|last1=Susman|first2=T. M.|last2=Brain|year=1988|title=New first metatarsal (SKX 5017) from Swartkrans and the gait of ''Paranthropus robustus''|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|volume=77|issue=1|pages=7β15|doi=10.1002/ajpa.1330770103|pmid=3189526}}</ref> ===Height and weight=== In comparison to the large, robust head, the body was rather small. Average weight for ''P. robustus'' may have been {{cvt|40|kg}} for males and {{cvt|32|kg}} for females;<ref name=Wood2000/> and for ''P. boisei'' {{cvt|50|kg}} for males and {{cvt|34|kg}} for females.<ref name=Wood2000/> At Swartkrans Cave Members 1 and 2, about 35% of the ''P. robustus'' individuals are estimated to have weighed {{cvt|28|kg}}, 22% about {{cvt|43|kg}}, and the remaining 43% bigger than the former but less than {{cvt|54|kg}}. At Member 3, all individuals were about {{cvt|45|kg}}.<ref name=McHenry1991a/> Female weight was about the same in contemporaneous ''H. erectus'', but male ''H. erectus'' were on average {{cvt|13|kg|1}} heavier than ''P. robustus'' males.<ref name=Susman2001>{{cite journal|first1=R. L.|last1=Susman|first2=D.|last2=de Ruiter|first3=C. K.|last3=Brain|year=2001|title=Recently identified postcranial remains of ''Paranthropus'' and Early ''Homo'' from Swartkrans Cave, South Africa|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=41|issue=6|pages=607β629|doi=10.1006/jhev.2001.0510|pmid=11782111|bibcode=2001JHumE..41..607S |s2cid=26326715}}</ref> ''P. robustus'' sites are oddly dominated by small adults, which could be explained as heightened predation or mortality of the larger males of a group.<ref name=Braga2017>{{cite journal|first1=J.|last1=Braga|first2=J. F.|last2=Thackeray|first3=L.|last3=Bruxelles|first4=J.|last4=Dumoncel|first5=J.-P.|last5=Fourvel|year=2017|title=Stretching the time span of hominin evolution at Kromdraai (Gauteng, South Africa): Recent discoveries|journal=Comptes Rendus Palevol|volume=16|issue=1|pages=58β70|doi=10.1016/j.crpv.2016.03.003|bibcode=2017CRPal..16...58B |doi-access=free}}</ref> The largest-known ''Paranthropus'' individual was estimated at {{cvt|54|kg}}.<ref name=McHenry1991a>{{cite journal|first=H. M.|last=McHenry|author-link=Henry McHenry (anthropologist)|year=1991|title=Petite bodies of the "robust" australopithecines|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|volume=86|issue=4|pages=445β454|doi=10.1002/ajpa.1330860402}}</ref> According to a 1991 study, based on [[femur]] length and using the dimensions of modern humans, male and female ''P. robustus'' are estimated to have stood on average {{cvt|132|and|110|cm|ftin|0}}, respectively, and ''P. boisei'' {{cvt|137|and|124|cm|ftin|0}}. However, the latter estimates are problematic as there were no positively identified male ''P. boisei'' femurs at the time.<ref name=McHenry1991b>{{cite journal|first=H. M.|last=McHenry|author-link=Henry McHenry (anthropologist)|year=1991|title=Femoral lengths and stature in Plio-Pleistocene hominids|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|volume=85|issue=2|pages=149β158|doi=10.1002/ajpa.1330850204|pmid=1882979}}</ref> In 2013, a 1.34 Ma male ''P. boisei'' partial skeleton was estimated to be at least {{cvt|156|cm|ftin|0}} and {{cvt|50|kg}}.<ref name=Dominguez2013>{{cite journal|first1=M.|last1=DomΓnguez-Rodrigo|first2=T. R.|last2=Rayne|first3=E.|last3=Baquedano|display-authors=et al.|year=2013|title=First Partial Skeleton of a 1.34-Million-Year-Old ''Paranthropus boisei'' from Bed II, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania|journal=PLOS ONE|volume=8|issue=12|page=e80347|pmc=3855051|pmid=24339873|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0080347|bibcode=2013PLoSO...880347D|doi-access=free}}</ref> ===Pathology=== ''Paranthropus'' seems to have had notably high rates of [[pitting enamel hypoplasia]] (PEH), where [[tooth enamel]] formation is spotty instead of mostly uniform. In ''P. robustus'', about 47% of [[baby teeth]] and 14% of adult teeth were affected, in comparison to about 6.7% and 4.3%, respectively, in any other tested hominin species. The condition of these holes covering the entire tooth is consistent with the modern human ailment [[amelogenesis imperfecta]]. However, since circular holes in enamel coverage are uniform in size, only present on the [[molar teeth]], and have the same severity across individuals, the PEH may have been a genetic condition. It is possible that the [[coding region|coding-DNA]] concerned with thickening enamel also left them more vulnerable to PEH.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=I.|last1=Towle|first2=J. D.|last2=Irish|year=2019|title=A probable genetic origin for pitting enamel hypoplasia on the molars of ''Paranthropus robustus''|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=129|pages=54β61|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.01.002|pmid=30904040|bibcode=2019JHumE.129...54T |s2cid=85502058|url=http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/10289/1/Towle_Irish_JHE%202019.pdf}}</ref> There have been 10 identified cases of [[tooth decay|cavities]] in ''P. robustus'', indicating a rate similar to modern humans. A molar from [[Drimolen]], South Africa, showed a cavity on the [[tooth root]], a rare occurrence in fossil [[great ape]]s. In order for cavity-creating bacteria to reach this area, the individual would have had to have also presented either [[alveolar process#Alveolar bone loss|alveolar resportion]], which is commonly associated with [[gum disease]]; or super-eruption of teeth which occurs when teeth become worn down and have to erupt a bit more in order to maintain a proper bite, and this exposed the root. The latter is most likely, and the exposed root seems to have caused [[hypercementosis]] to anchor the tooth in place. The cavity seems to have been healing, which may have been caused by a change in diet or [[oral microbiology|mouth microbiome]], or the loss of the adjacent molar.<ref name=Towle2019>{{cite journal|first1=I.|last1=Towle|first2=A.|last2=Riga|first3=J. D.|last3=Irish|display-authors=et al.|year=2019|title=Root caries on a ''Paranthropus robustus'' third molar from Drimolen|journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology|volume=170|issue=2|pages=319β323|doi=10.1002/ajpa.23891|pmid=31265762|s2cid=195786562|url=https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/04/11/573964.full.pdf}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Paranthropus
(section)
Add topic