Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Lucian
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Treatises and letters=== {{multiple image | align = right | direction = horizontal | total_width = 440 | header = | width = <!-- Image 1 --> | image1 = Glycon.JPG | alt1 = | caption1 = Statue of the snake-god [[Glycon]], invented by the oraclemonger [[Alexander of Abonoteichus]], whom Lucian satirizes in his treatise ''Alexander the False Prophet''{{sfn|Gordon|1996|pages=94–115}} <!-- Image 2 --> | image2 = Atargatis, Nabatean, c.100 AD, Jordan Archaeological Museum.jpg | alt2 = | caption2 = [[Nabataean]] carving from {{circa}} 100 AD depicting the goddess [[Atargatis]], the subject of Lucian's treatise ''[[On the Syrian Goddess]]''{{sfn|Andrade|2013|page=288}} }} Lucian's treatise ''Alexander the False Prophet'' describes the rise of Alexander of Abonoteichus, a charlatan who claimed to be the prophet of the serpent-god [[Glycon]].{{sfn|Gordon|1996|pages=94–115}} Though the account is satirical in tone,{{sfn|Gordon|1996|page=114}} it seems to be a largely accurate report of the Glycon cult{{sfn|Gordon|1996|page=114}} and many of Lucian's statements about the cult have been confirmed through archaeological evidence, including coins, statues, and inscriptions.{{sfn|Gordon|1996|page=114}} Lucian describes his own meeting with Alexander in which he posed as a friendly philosopher,{{sfn|Gordon|1996|page=114}} but, when Alexander invited him to kiss his hand, Lucian bit it instead.{{sfn|Gordon|1996|page=114}} Lucian reports that, aside from himself, the only others who dared challenge Alexander's reputation as a true prophet were the [[Epicureans]] (whom he lauds as heroes) and the Christians.{{sfn|Gordon|1996|page=114}} Lucian's treatise ''[[On the Syrian Goddess]]'' is a detailed description of the cult of the Syrian goddess [[Atargatis]] at Hierapolis (now [[Manbij]]).{{sfn|Andrade|2013|page=288}} It is written in a faux-Ionic Greek and imitates the ethnographic methodology of the Greek historian Herodotus,{{sfn|Andrade|2013|page=288}} which Lucian elsewhere derides as faulty.{{sfn|Andrade|2013|page=288}} For generations, many scholars doubted the authenticity of ''On the Syrian Goddess'' because it seemed too genuinely reverent to have really been written by Lucian.{{sfn|Richter|2017|page=336}} More recently, scholars have come to recognize the book as satirical and have restored its Lucianic authorship.{{sfn|Richter|2017|page=336}} In the treatise, Lucian satirizes the arbitrary cultural distinctions between "Greeks" and "Assyrians" by emphasizing the manner in which Syrians have adopted Greek customs and thereby effectively become "Greeks" themselves.{{sfn|Andrade|2013|pages=289–292}} The anonymous narrator of the treatise initially seems to be a Greek Sophist,{{sfn|Andrade|2013|page=292}} but, as the treatise progresses, he reveals himself to actually be a native Syrian.{{sfn|Andrade|2013|pages=292–293}} Scholars dispute whether the treatise is an accurate description of Syrian cultural practices because very little is known about Hierapolis other than what is recorded in ''On the Syrian Goddess'' itself.{{sfn|Andrade|2013|page=288}} Coins minted in the late fourth century BC, municipal decrees from [[Seleucid]] rulers, and a late Hellenistic relief carving have confirmed Lucian's statement that the city's original name was ''Manbog'' and that the city was closely associated with the cults of Atargatis and [[Hadad]].{{sfn|Andrade|2013|page=288}} A Jewish [[rabbi]] later listed the temple at Hierapolis as one of the five most important pagan temples in the Near East.{{sfn|Andrade|2013|page=289}} ''Macrobii'' ("Long-Livers") is an essay about famous philosophers who lived for many years.{{sfn|Kechagia|2016|pages=183–184}} It describes how long each of them lived, and gives an account of each of their deaths.{{sfn|Kechagia|2016|pages=183–184}} In his treatises ''Teacher of Rhetoric'' and ''On Salaried Posts'', Lucian criticizes the teachings of master rhetoricians.{{sfn|Schlapbach|2018|page=81}} His treatise ''On Dancing'' is a major source of information about Greco-Roman dance.{{sfn|Schlapbach|2018|pages=82–84}} In it, he describes dance as an act of ''[[mimesis]]'' ("imitation"){{sfn|Schlapbach|2018|page=82}} and rationalizes the myth of [[Proteus]] as being nothing more than an account of a highly skilled Egyptian dancer.{{sfn|Schlapbach|2018|pages=82–84}} He also wrote about visual arts in ''Portraits'' and ''On Behalf of Portraits''.{{sfn|Schlapbach|2018|page=81}} Lucian's biography of the philosopher [[Demonax]] eulogizes him as a great philosopher{{sfn|Ferguson|1993|page=332}} and portrays him as a hero of ''[[parrhesia]]'' ("boldness of speech").{{sfn|Ferguson|1993|page=332}} In his treatise, ''[[How to Write History]]'', Lucian criticizes the historical methodology used by writers such as Herodotus and Ctesias,{{sfn|Kempshall|2011|pages=489–491}} who wrote vivid and self-indulgent descriptions of events they had never actually seen.{{sfn|Kempshall|2011|pages=489–491}} Instead, Lucian argues that the historian never embellish his stories and should place his commitment to accuracy above his desire to entertain his audience.{{sfn|Kempshall|2011|page=491}} He also argues the historian should remain absolutely impartial and tell the events as they really happened, even if they are likely to cause disapproval.{{sfn|Kempshall|2011|page=491}} Lucian names Thucydides as a specific example of a historian who models these virtues.{{sfn|Kempshall|2011|page=491}} In his satirical letter ''[[Passing of Peregrinus]]'' ({{lang|grc|italic=yes|Περὶ τῆς Περεγρίνου Τελευτῆς}}), Lucian describes the death of the controversial Cynic philosopher [[Peregrinus Proteus]],{{sfn|Van Voorst|2000|page=58}} who had publicly [[self-immolation|immolated himself]] on a pyre at the [[ancient Olympic Games|Olympic Games]] of AD 165.{{sfn|Van Voorst|2000|page=58}} The letter is historically significant because it preserves one of the earliest pagan evaluations of Christianity.{{sfn|Van Voorst|2000|pages=58–59}} In the letter, one of Lucian's characters delivers a speech ridiculing Christians for their perceived credulity and ignorance,{{sfn|Van Voorst|2000|page=59}} but he also affords them some level of respect on account of their morality.{{sfn|Van Voorst|2000|page=59}} In the letter ''Against the Ignorant Book Collector'', Lucian ridicules the common practice whereby Near Easterners collect massive libraries of Greek texts for the sake of appearing "cultured", but without actually reading any of them.{{sfn|Andrade|2013|pages=191–192}}{{sfn|Wallace-Hadrill|1983|page=79}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Lucian
(section)
Add topic