Editing Judas Iscariot (section)

===Catholic doctrine===
The [[Catholic Church]] took no specific view concerning the damnation of Judas during [[Second Vatican Council|Vatican II]]; speaking in generalities, that Council stated, "[We] must be constantly vigilant so that ... we may not be ordered to go into the eternal fire (cf. Mk. 25, 41) like wicked and slothful servants (cf. Mk. 25, 26), into the exterior darkness where 'there will be the weeping and the gnashing of teeth' (Mt. 22, 13 and 25, 30)."<ref>{{cite book |editor1-link="Constitution on the Church" (section 48) |title=Teachings of the Second Vatican Council |date=1966 |publisher=Newman Press |page=146}}</ref> [[Holy See|The Vatican]] only proclaims individuals' Eternal Salvation through the [[Saint#Christianity#Catholic Church|Canon of Saints]]. There is no '[[Damnation|Canon of the Damned]].'

Thus, there is a school of thought within the Catholic Church that it is unknown whether Judas Iscariot is in Hell; for example, David Endres, writing in ''[[The Catholic Telegraph]]'', cites ''[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'' §597 for the inability to make any determination whether Judas is in Hell.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Endres |first1=David |title=Who's In Hell? |journal=The Catholic Telegraph |date=October 2021 |volume=190 |issue=10 |page=7}}</ref> However, while that section of the catechism does instruct Catholics that the personal sin of Judas is unknown but to God, that statement is within the context that the Jewish people have no collective responsibility for Jesus's death: "... the Jews should not be spoken of as rejected or accursed as if this followed from holy Scripture."<ref>{{cite book |title=Catechism of the Catholic Church |date=1997 |publisher=Libreria Editrice Vaticana |pages=153–154 |edition=2nd}}</ref> This seems to be defining a different doctrinal point (i.e., the relationship of Catholics with Jewish people), rather than making any sort of decision concerning Judas's particular judgment.

[[Ludwig Ott]]'s reference book ''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'' identifies Judas Iscariot as an example of a person receiving punishment as a particular judgment.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ott |first1=Ludwig |title=Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma |date=1954 |publisher=Mercier Press |page=476 |edition=2nd}}</ref>

The [[Roman Catechism|Catechism of the Council of Trent]], which mentions Judas Iscariot several times, wrote that he possessed "motive unworthy" when he entered the priesthood and was thus sentenced to "eternal perdition".<ref>{{cite book |translator1-last=Donovan |translator1-first=Rev. J. |title=Catechism of the Council of Trent |date=1829 |publisher=Lucas Brothers |page=213}}</ref> Furthermore, Judas is given as an example of a sinner that will "despair of mercy" because he looked "...on God as an avenger of crime and not, also, as a God of clemency and mercy."<ref>{{cite book |translator1-last=Donovan |translator1-first=Rev. J. |title=Catechism of the Council of Trent |date=1829 |publisher=Lucas Brothers |page=365}}</ref> The [[Roman Catechism|Catechism of the Council of Trent]] continued the tradition of the early Church fathers, such as [[Pope Leo I]] ("...had [Judas] not thus denied His omnipotence, he would have obtained His mercy..."),<ref>{{cite book |last1=Aquinas |first1=Thomas |title=Catena Aurea, vol. II |date=2009 |publisher=Preserving Christian Publications |page=932}}</ref> and [[Pope Gregory I]] ("The godless betrayer, shutting his mind to all these things, turned upon himself, not with a mind to repent, but in a madness of self destruction: ... even in the act of dying sinned ''unto the increase'' of his own eternal punishment.")<ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=Toal |editor1-first=M.F. |title=Sunday Sermons of the Great Fathers |series=Vol.2 |date=1958 |publisher=Henry Regnery Co. |page=183}}</ref>

Also, the ''Decree of Justification'', promulgated during Session VI of the [[Council of Trent]], states in Canon 6, "If anyone shall say that it is not in the power of man to make his ways evil, but that God produces evil as well as the good works, not only by permission, but also properly and of Himself, so that the betrayal of Judas is not less His own proper work than the vocation of Paul; let him be anathema."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Denzinger |first1=Henry |title=The Sources of Catholic Dogma |date=1957 |publisher=B. Herder Book Co |page=258 |edition=30th}}</ref> Here, the Council is making it clear that Judas exercised his own free will to commit the betrayal of Jesus Christ, rather than being predestined by God.

Liturgical institutions are part of the expressions of Sacred Tradition of the [[Catholic Church]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Malloy |first1=Christopher |title=False Mercy: Recent Heresies Distorting Catholic Truth |date=2021 |publisher=Sophia Institute Press |page=41}}</ref> Within the 1962 ''Roman Missal'' for the [[Tridentine Mass|Tridentine Latin Mass]], the ''Collect'' for [[Maundy Thursday|Holy Thursday]] states: "O God, from whom Judas received the punishment of his guilt, and the thief the reward of his confession ... our Lord Jesus Christ gave to each a different recompense according to his merits..."<ref>{{cite web  |website=Extraordinary Form.org |title=extraordinaryform.org/propers/Lent6thThursday-HolyD20.pdf |url=https://extraordinaryform.org/propersprint.html |access-date=28 December 2022}}</ref> In his commentary on the [[The Liturgical Year|Liturgical Year]], [[Prosper Guéranger|Abbot Gueranger, O.S.B.]] states that the ''Collect'' reminds Catholics that both Judas and the good thief are guilty, "...and yet, the one is condemned, the other pardoned."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Gueranger, O.S.B. |first1=Prosper |title=The Liturgical Year |date=2021 |publisher=Preserving Christian Publications |series=Vol.6: ''Passiontide and Holy Week'' |page=375}}</ref> Thus, the [[Tridentine Mass|Tridentine Latin Mass]], as currently celebrated, continues to foster the tradition within the Catholic Church that Judas was punished.