Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Jackson Pollock
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Critical debate=== Pollock's work has been the subject of important critical debates. Critic [[Robert Coates (critic)|Robert Coates]] once derided a number of Pollock's works as "mere unorganized explosions of random energy, and therefore meaningless".<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/05/nyregion/05spotli.html Steven McElroy, "If It's So Easy, Why Don't You Try It"], ''[[The New York Times]]'', December 3, 2010.</ref> ''[[Reynold's News]]'', in a 1959 headline, said, "This is not art—it's a joke in bad taste."<ref name="Expression of an age" /> French abstract painter [[Jean Hélion]], on the other hand, remarked on first seeing a Pollock, "It filled out space going on and on because it did not have a start or end to it."<ref>Gray Martin, Quote in Book One 'Breaking the Ice' of 'Jackson Pollock — Memories arrested in Space', Santa Monica Press, 2003, {{ISBN|1891661329}}</ref> [[Clement Greenberg]] supported Pollock's work on formalistic grounds. It fit well with Greenberg's view of art history as a progressive purification in form and elimination of historical content. He considered Pollock's work to be the best painting of its day and the culmination of the Western tradition via [[Cubism]] and [[Cézanne]] to [[Manet]]. In a 1952 article in ''ARTnews'', [[Harold Rosenberg]] coined the term "[[action painting]]" and wrote that "what was to go on the canvas was not a picture but an event. The big moment came when it was decided to paint 'just to paint'. The gesture on the canvas was a gesture of liberation from value—political, aesthetic, moral." Many people{{who|date=August 2021}} assumed that he had modeled his "action painter" paradigm on Pollock.<ref>{{Cite web|last=MacAdam|first=Barbara A.|date=2007-11-01|title=Top Ten ARTnews Stories: 'Not a Picture but an Event'|url=https://www.artnews.com/artnews/news/top-ten-artnews-stories-not-a-picture-but-an-event-181/|access-date=2021-03-23|website=ARTnews.com|language=en-US}}</ref> The [[Congress for Cultural Freedom]], an organization to promote American culture and values, backed by the [[Central Intelligence Agency]] (CIA), sponsored exhibitions of Pollock's work. Some left-wing scholars, including [[Eva Cockcroft]], have argued that the United States government and wealthy elite embraced Pollock and abstract expressionism to place the United States in the forefront of global art and devalue [[socialist realism]].<ref name="Expression of an age">{{cite web |url=http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/sr229/molyneux.htm |title=Expression of an age |publisher=Pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk |access-date=August 30, 2009 |archive-date=February 5, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205061454/http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/sr229/molyneux.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>Saunders, F. S. (2000), ''The Cultural Cold War. The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters'', New York: Free Press.</ref> Cockcroft wrote that Pollock became a "weapon of the [[Cold War]]".<ref>Eva Cockcroft, "Abstract Expressionism, Weapon of the Cold War", ''Artforum'', vol. 12, no. 10, June 1974, pp. 43–54.</ref> Pollock described his art as "motion made visible memories, arrested in space".<ref>Text written by Pollock on the reverse of a photo of himself, taken in his studio, circa 1948/49</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Jackson Pollock
(section)
Add topic