Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Standing (law)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Standing requirements=== There are three standing requirements: # '''Injury-in-fact:''' The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent (that is, neither conjectural nor hypothetical; not abstract).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Varma |first1=Corey |year=2016 |title=The Presumption of Injury: Giving Data Breach Victims 'A Leg To Stand On' |journal=Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law |volume=32 |issue=4 |url=http://repository.jmls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1794&context=jitpl }}</ref><ref>{{ussc|name=Clapper v. Amnesty International USA|568|398|2013}}</ref> The injury can be either economic, non-economic, or both. # '''Causation:''' There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.<ref>For example, ''[[Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency]]'' (global warming caused by EPA's refusal to regulate [[carbon dioxide]] emissions satisfied element of causation for Massachusetts's alleged injury of loss of coastland).</ref> # '''Redressability:''' It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.<ref name="Lujan v 1992">{{ussc|name=Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife|504|555|1992}}.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Standing (law)
(section)
Add topic