Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Sandra Day O'Connor
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Fourth Amendment ==== According to law professor [[Jeffrey Rosen (legal academic)|Jeffrey Rosen]], "O'Connor was an eloquent opponent of intrusive group searches that threatened privacy without increasing security. In a [[United States v. Place|1983 opinion]] upholding searches by drug-sniffing dogs, she recognized that a search is most likely to be considered [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|constitutionally reasonable]] if it is very effective at discovering [[contraband]] without revealing ''innocent but embarrassing'' information."<ref>{{cite news |author-link=Jeffrey Rosen (legal academic) |last=Rosen |first=Jeffrey |date=November 28, 2010 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/26/AR2010112604290.html |title=The TSA is invasive, annoying β and unconstitutional |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |access-date=August 22, 2017 |archive-date=December 5, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101205063930/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/26/AR2010112604290.html |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Washington College of Law]] professor Andrew Taslitz, referencing O'Connor's [[Atwater v. City of Lago Vista#Dissenting opinion|dissent]] in a [[Atwater v. City of Lago Vista|2001 case]], said of her [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendment]] jurisprudence: "O'Connor recognizes that needless humiliation of an individual is an important factor in determining Fourth Amendment reasonableness."<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GOpW_DdlMSIC&q=o%27connor+%22fourth+amendment%22&pg=PA83 |page=83 |title=Reconstructing the Fourth Amendment: A History of Search and Seizure, 1789β1868 |isbn=978-0814783153 |last1=Taslitz |first1=Andrew E. |date=October 1, 2006 |publisher=[[NYU Press]] |location=New York City |access-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-date=November 8, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108151021/https://books.google.com/books?id=GOpW_DdlMSIC&q=o%27connor+%22fourth+amendment%22&pg=PA83 |url-status=live }}</ref> O'Connor once quoted the [[social contract theory]] of [[John Locke]] as influencing her views on the reasonableness and constitutionality of government action.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.utahpatentattorneys.com/File/c2c851b5-8b2b-4dfb-b1b7-ff7ba1ead084 |title=Regula Pro Lege, Si Deficit Lex: The Latin Sapience of High Judges |access-date=November 17, 2016 |work=[[The Federal Bar Association]] |archive-date=November 19, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161119120343/http://www.utahpatentattorneys.com/File/c2c851b5-8b2b-4dfb-b1b7-ff7ba1ead084 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Sandra Day O'Connor
(section)
Add topic