Editing Samuel Johnson (section)

==Literary criticism==
{{Main|Samuel Johnson's literary criticism}}
{{Multiple image|total_width=300
|image1= Vanity of Human Wishes.jpg
|caption1= ''The Vanity of Human Wishes'' (1749) title page
|image2= Plays of Shakespeare title page.jpg
|caption2= ''Plays of William Shakespeare'' (1773 expanded edition) title page
}}

Johnson's works, especially his ''Lives of the Poets'' series, describe various features of excellent writing. He believed that the best poetry relied on contemporary language, and he disliked the use of decorative or purposely archaic language.<ref>{{Harvnb|Needham|1982|pp=95–96}}</ref> He was suspicious of the poetic language used by Milton, whose [[blank verse]] he believed would inspire many bad imitations. Also, Johnson opposed the poetic language of his contemporary [[Thomas Gray]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=27}}</ref> His greatest complaint was that obscure allusions found in works like Milton's ''Lycidas'' were overused; he preferred poetry that could be easily read and understood.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|pp=28–30}}</ref> In addition to his views on language, Johnson believed that a good poem incorporated new and unique imagery.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=39}}</ref>

In his smaller poetic works, Johnson relied on short lines and filled his work with a feeling of empathy, which possibly influenced [[Housman]]'s poetic style.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|pp=31, 34}}</ref> In ''London'', his first imitation of Juvenal, Johnson uses the poetic form to express his political opinion and approaches the topic in a playful and almost joyous manner.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=35}}</ref> However, his second imitation, ''The Vanity of Human Wishes'', is completely different; the language remains simple, but the poem is more complicated and difficult to read because Johnson is trying to describe complex Christian ethics.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=37}}</ref> These Christian values are not unique to the poem, but contain views expressed in most of Johnson's works. In particular, Johnson emphasises God's infinite love and argues that happiness can be attained through virtuous action.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=38}}</ref>

When it came to biography, Johnson disagreed with [[Plutarch]]'s use of biography to praise and to teach morality. Instead, Johnson believed in portraying the biographical subjects accurately and including any negative aspects of their lives. Because his insistence on accuracy in biography was little short of revolutionary, Johnson had to struggle against a society that was unwilling to accept biographical details that could be viewed as tarnishing a reputation; this became the subject of ''Rambler'' 60.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|pp=62–64}}</ref> Furthermore, Johnson believed that biography should not be limited to the most famous and that the lives of lesser individuals, too, were significant;<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=65}}</ref> thus in his ''Lives of the Poets'' he chose both great and lesser poets. In all his biographies he insisted on including what others would have considered trivial details to fully describe the lives of his subjects.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=67}}</ref> Johnson considered the genre of autobiography and diaries, including his own, as one having the most significance; in ''Idler'' 84 he writes that a writer of an autobiography would be the least likely to distort his own life.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=85}}</ref>

[[File:Apollo and the muses, inflicting penance on Dr Pomposo, round Parnassus' (Samuel Johnson) by James Gillray.jpg|200px|thumb|left|A caricature of Johnson by [[James Gillray]] mocking him for his literary criticism; he is shown doing penance for [[Apollo]] and the [[Muse]]s with [[Mount Parnassus]] in the background.]]

Johnson's thoughts on biography and on poetry coalesced in his understanding of what would make a good critic. His works were dominated with his intent to use them for literary criticism. This was especially true of his ''Dictionary'' of which he wrote: "I lately published a Dictionary like those compiled by the academies of Italy and France, ''for the use of such as aspire to exactness of criticism, or elegance of style''".<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=134}}</ref> Although a smaller edition became the household standard, Johnson's original ''Dictionary'' was an academic tool that examined how words were used, especially in literary works. To achieve this purpose, Johnson included quotations from Bacon, Hooker, Milton, Shakespeare, [[Edmund Spenser|Spenser]], and many others from what he considered to be the most important literary fields: natural science, philosophy, poetry, and theology. These quotations and usages were all compared and carefully studied in the ''Dictionary'' so that a reader could understand what words in literary works meant in context.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|pp=134–135}}</ref>

Johnson did not attempt to create schools of theories to analyse the aesthetics of literature. Instead, he used his criticism for the practical purpose of helping others to better read and understand literature.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=140}}</ref> When it came to Shakespeare's plays, Johnson emphasised the role of the reader in understanding language: "If Shakespeare has difficulties above other writers, it is to be imputed to the nature of his work, which required the use of common colloquial language, and consequently admitted many phrases allusive, elliptical, and proverbial, such as we speak and hear every hour without observing them".<ref name="Green p. 141">{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=141}}</ref>

His works on Shakespeare were devoted not merely to Shakespeare, but to understanding literature as a whole; in his ''Preface'' to Shakespeare, Johnson rejects the previous dogma of the [[classical unities]] and argues that drama should be faithful to life.<ref name="Greene p. 142">{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=142}}</ref> However, Johnson did not only defend Shakespeare; he discussed Shakespeare's faults, including what he saw as lack of morality, vulgarity, carelessness in crafting plots, and occasional inattentiveness when choosing words or word order.<ref>{{Harvnb|Needham|1982|p=134}}</ref> As well as direct literary criticism, Johnson emphasised the need to establish a text that accurately reflects what an author wrote. Shakespeare's plays, in particular, had multiple editions, each of which contained errors caused by the printing process. This problem was compounded by careless editors who deemed difficult words incorrect, and changed them in later editions. Johnson believed that an editor should not alter the text in such a way.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greene|1989|p=143}}</ref>