Editing Microlith (section)

==Weapons and tools==
Not all the different types of laminar microliths had functions that are clearly understood. It is likely that they contributed to the points of spears or light projectiles, and their small size suggests that they were fixed in some way to a shaft or handle.<ref>{{Cite book
| author = Laming-Emperaire, Annette
| chapter = Los cazadores depredadores del posglacial y del Mesolítico
| title = La Prehistoria
| year = 1980
| publisher = Editorial Labor, Barcelona
| isbn = 84-335-9309-9
| page = 68
}} </ref><ref>{{Cite book
| author = Piel-Desruisseaux, Jean-Luc
| title = Outils préhistoriques. Forme. Fabrication. Utilisation.
| year = 1986
| publisher = Masson, Paris
| isbn = 2-225-80847-3
| pages =123–127}}</ref>

Backed edge bladelets are particularly abundant at a site in France that preserves habitation from the late [[Magdalenian]] &ndash; the [[Pincevent]]. In the remains of some of the hearths at this location, bladelets are found in groups of three, perhaps indicating that they were mounted in threes on their handles. A javelin tip made of horn has been found at this site with grooves made for flint bladelets that could have been secured using a resinous substance. Signs of much wear and tear have been found on some of these finds.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Caspar |first1=Jean-Paul |last2=De Bie |first2=Marc |title=Preparing for the Hunt in the Late Paleolithic Camp at Reken, Belgium |journal=Journal of Field Archaeology |date=1996 |volume=23 |issue=4 |pages=437–460 |doi=10.1179/009346996791973747 }}</ref>

Specialists have carried out [[lithic analysis|lithic or microwear analysis]] on artefacts, but it has sometimes proved difficult to distinguish those fractures made during the process of fashioning the flint implement from those made during its use. Microliths found at [[Hengistbury Head]] in [[Dorset]], England, show features that can be confused with chisel marks, but which might also have been produced when the tip hit a hard object and splintered.<ref>{{Cite journal
| author = Barton, R. N. E. y Bergman, C. A.
| title = Hunters at Hengistbury: some evidence from experimental archaeology
| year = 1982
| journal = World Archaeology
| volume =  14
| number = 2
| pages = 237–248
| doi = 10.1080/00438243.1982.9979864
| issn = 0043-8243
}}</ref> Microliths from other locations have presented the same problems of interpretation.<ref>M. Lenoir has found knapping similar to that used in chiseled bladelets from [[Gironde]], but considered this to be a coincidence and attributed the marks to the fact that the microliths were mounted on the tip of a projectile. A similar line of enquiry has also been followed by [[Lawrence H. Keeley]], who has studied a wide range of bladelets from the French site at Buisson Campin, in Verberie, [[Oise]].</ref>

An exceptional piece of evidence for the use of microliths has been found in the excavations of the cave at [[Lascaux]] in the French [[Dordogne]]. Twenty backed edge bladelets were found with the remains of a resinous substance and the imprint of a circular handle (a horn). It appears that the bladelets might have been fixed in groups like the teeth of a [[harpoon]] or similar weapon.

In all these locations, the microliths found have been backed edge blades, tips and crude flakes. Despite the great number of geometric microliths that have been found in Western Europe, few examples show any clear evidence of their use, and all the examples are from the [[Mesolithic]] or [[Neolithic]] periods. Despite this, there is unanimity amongst researchers that these items were used to increase the penetrating potential of light projectiles such as [[harpoon]]s, [[assegai]]s, [[javelin]]s and [[arrow]]s.