Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
John Falstaff
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Cobhams=== It is not clear, however, if Shakespeare characterised Falstaff as he did for dramatic purposes, or because of a specific desire to satirise Oldcastle or the Cobhams. Cobham was a common butt of veiled satire in Elizabethan popular literature; he figures in [[Ben Jonson]]'s ''[[Every Man in His Humour]]'' and may have been part of the reason ''[[The Isle of Dogs (play)|The Isle of Dogs]]'' was suppressed. Shakespeare's desire to burlesque a hero of early English Protestantism could indicate [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] sympathies, but [[Henry Brooke, 11th Baron Cobham]] was sufficiently sympathetic to Catholicism that in 1603, he was imprisoned as part of the [[Main Plot]] to place [[Arbella Stuart]] on the English throne, so if Shakespeare wished to use Oldcastle to embarrass the Cobhams, he seems unlikely to have done so on religious grounds. The Cobhams appear to have intervened while Shakespeare was in the process of writing either ''The Merry Wives of Windsor'' or the second part of ''Henry IV''. The first part of ''Henry IV'' was probably written and performed in 1596, and the name Oldcastle had almost certainly been allowed by [[Master of the Revels]] [[Edmund Tilney]]. [[William Brooke, 10th Baron Cobham]] may have become aware of the offensive representation after a public performance; he may also have learned of it while it was being prepared for a court performance (Cobham was at that time [[Lord Chamberlain]]). As father-in-law to the newly widowed [[Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury|Robert Cecil]], Cobham certainly possessed the influence at court to get his complaint heard quickly. Shakespeare may have included a sly retaliation against the complaint in his play ''The Merry Wives of Windsor'' (published after the ''Henry IV'' series). In the play, the paranoid, jealous Master Ford uses the alias "Brook" to fool Falstaff, perhaps in reference to William Brooke. At any rate, the name is Falstaff in the ''Henry IV, Part 1'' [[quarto]], of 1598, and the epilogue to the second part, published in 1600, contains this clarification: {{quote |title=''Henry IV, Part 2'' |author=[[William Shakespeare]] |source=Epilogue.<ref>{{Folger inline|2H4|epilogue|line=28β34|bare=true}}</ref> |text=<poem> One word more, I beseech you: if you be not too much cloyed with fat meat, our humble author will continue the story, with Sir John in it, and make you merry with fair Katherine of France, where, for anything I know, Falstaff shall die of a sweat, unless already he be killed with your hard opinions; for Oldcastle died a martyr, and this is not the man. </poem> }}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
John Falstaff
(section)
Add topic