Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Daniel Ellsberg
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Trial and dismissal== On June 28, 1971, two days before a Supreme Court ruling saying that a federal judge had ruled incorrectly about the right of ''The New York Times'' to publish the Pentagon Papers,<ref name=upi1971yearinreview/> Ellsberg publicly surrendered to the [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts|United States Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts]] in [[Boston]]. In admitting to giving the documents to the press, Ellsberg said: {{blockquote|I felt that as an [[Citizenship of the United States|American citizen]], as a responsible citizen, I could no longer cooperate in concealing this information from the American public. I did this clearly at my own jeopardy and I am prepared to answer to all the consequences of this decision.<ref name=upi1971yearinreview/>}} He and Russo faced charges under the [[Espionage Act of 1917]] and other charges including theft and conspiracy, carrying a total maximum sentence of 115 years for Ellsberg and 35 years for Russo. Their trial commenced in Los Angeles on January 3, 1973, presided over by U.S. District Judge [[William Matthew Byrne Jr.]] Ellsberg tried to claim that the documents were "illegally" classified to keep them not from an enemy, but from the American public. However, that argument was ruled "irrelevant", and Ellsberg was silenced before he could begin. In a 2014 interview, Ellsberg stated that his "lawyer, exasperated, said he 'had never heard of a case where a defendant was not permitted to tell the jury why he did what he did.' The judge responded: 'Well, you're hearing one now'. And so it has been with every subsequent whistleblower under indictment".<ref>{{Citation | last = Ellsberg | first = Daniel | author-link = Daniel Ellsberg | date = May 30, 2014 | title = Daniel Ellsberg: Snowden would not get a fair trial β and Kerry is wrong | newspaper = The Guardian | url = https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/30/daniel-ellsberg-snowden-fair-trial-kerry-espionage-act | access-date = June 23, 2015}}</ref> In spite of being effectively denied a defense, Ellsberg began to see events turn in his favor when the break-in of Fielding's office was revealed to Judge Byrne in a memo on April 26; Byrne ordered that it be shared with the defense.<ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,907160,00.html|magazine=Time|date=May 7, 1973|title=Practicing on Ellsberg}}</ref><ref name=byrneobit>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/14/AR2006011401165.html|title=Judge William Byrne; Ended Trial Over Pentagon Papers|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=January 15, 2006|pages=C09}}</ref> On May 9, further evidence of illegal [[wiretapping]] against Ellsberg was revealed in court. The [[FBI]] had recorded numerous conversations between [[Morton Halperin]] and Ellsberg without a [[court order]], and furthermore the prosecution had failed to share this evidence with the defense.<ref>{{usurped|1=[https://archive.today/20120529203952/http://www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2007/February%202007/0207pentagon.aspx "''The Pentagon Papers''"]}} by John T. Correll, ''Air Force Magazine'', February 2007</ref> During the trial, Byrne also revealed that he personally met twice with John Ehrlichman, who offered him directorship of the FBI. Byrne said he refused to consider the offer while the Ellsberg case was pending, though he was criticized for even agreeing to meet with Ehrlichman during the case.<ref name=byrneobit/> [[File:PentPapers-DavidRoseCopyr.jpg | thumb | 220x124px | right | alt= A courtroom sketch of three men, attorneys in suits in a federal court in 1973 | Artist [[David Rose (artist)|David Rose]]'s rendering of attorneys during the 1973 trial of Ellsberg and Russo in Los Angeles]] Because of the gross governmental misconduct and illegal evidence gathering, and the defense by [[Leonard Boudin]] and [[Harvard Law School]] professor [[Charles Nesson]], Judge Byrne dismissed all charges against Ellsberg and Russo on May 11, 1973, after the government claimed it had lost records of wiretapping against Ellsberg. Byrne ruled: "The totality of the circumstances of this case which I have only briefly sketched offend a sense of justice. The bizarre events have incurably infected the prosecution of this case."<ref name=byrneobit/> As a result of the revelations involving the Watergate scandal, [[John Ehrlichman]], [[H. R. Haldeman]], [[Richard Kleindienst]], and [[John Dean]] were forced out of office on April 30, and all would later be convicted of crimes related to [[Watergate]]. [[Egil Krogh]] later pleaded guilty to conspiracy, and [[White House counsel]] [[Charles Colson]] pleaded no contest for obstruction of justice in the burglary.<ref>{{citation |url=https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1974061400 |title=Plea Bargaining |author=S. Stencel, S. |year=1974 | work=Editorial research reports 1974 |series=CQ Researcher Online |volume=1 |pages=427β446 |publisher=CQ Researcher|doi=10.4135/cqresrre1974061400 |s2cid=267330835 }}</ref> ===Halperin case=== It was also revealed in 1973, during Ellsberg's trial, that the telephone calls of [[Morton Halperin]], a member of the [[U.S. National Security Council]] staff suspected of leaking information about the secret U.S. bombing of [[Khmer Republic|Cambodia]] to ''The New York Times'', were being recorded by the FBI at the request of [[Henry Kissinger]] to [[J. Edgar Hoover]].<ref>{{citation |last=Hosansky |first=David |page=89 |title=Eyewitness to Watergate |date=December 1, 2006 |publisher=CQ Press |isbn=978-1-4522-6731-9 |language=en}}</ref> Halperin and his family sued several federal officials, claiming the wiretap violated their [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendment]] rights and Title III of the [[Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968]]. The court agreed that Richard Nixon, John Mitchell, and H. R. Haldeman had violated the Halperins' Fourth Amendment rights and awarded them $1 in nominal damages.<ref>[http://openjurist.org/606/f2d/1192#fn4_ref Halperin v. Kissinger] 1977</ref> ===Plumbers' Ellsberg neutralization proposal=== Ellsberg later claimed that after his trial ended, Watergate prosecutor [[William H. Merrill]] informed him of an aborted plot by Liddy and the "[[White House Plumbers|Plumbers]]" to have 12 [[Cuban American]]s who had previously worked for the [[CIA]] "totally incapacitate" Ellsberg when he appeared at a public rally. It is unclear whether they were meant to assassinate Ellsberg or merely to hospitalize him.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=http://www.democracynow.org/2006/4/27/exclusive_nixon_white_house_counsel_john|title=Nixon White House Counsel John Dean and Pentagon Papers Leaker Daniel Ellsberg on Watergate and the Abuse of Presidential Power from Nixon to Bush|date=April 27, 2006|journal=Democracy Now!}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/guides/debate/chats/ellsberg/ |title=COLD WAR Chat: Daniel Ellsberg, Anti-war activist |date=January 10, 1999 |journal=Cold War |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081219071852/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/guides/debate/chats/ellsberg/ |archive-date=December 19, 2008 }}</ref> In his autobiography, Liddy describes an "Ellsberg neutralization proposal" originating from Howard Hunt, which involved drugging Ellsberg with [[LSD]], by dissolving it in his soup, at a fund-raising dinner in Washington to "have Ellsberg incoherent by the time he was to speak" and thus "make him appear a near burnt-out drug case" and "discredit him". The plot involved waiters from the [[Cuban migration to Miami|Miami Cuban]] community. According to Liddy, when the plan was finally approved, "there was no longer enough lead time to get the Cuban waiters up from their Miami hotels and into place in the Washington Hotel where the dinner was to take place" and the plan was "put into abeyance pending another opportunity."<ref>{{Cite book|title=Will: The Autobiography of G. Gordon Liddy|url=https://archive.org/details/willautobiograp00lidd|url-access=limited|last=Liddy|first=G. Gordon|author-link=G. Gordon Liddy|year=1980|publisher=St. Martin's Press|location=New York|pages=[https://archive.org/details/willautobiograp00lidd/page/170 170]β171|isbn=978-0-312-88014-9}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Daniel Ellsberg
(section)
Add topic