Editing Clear and present danger (section)

==Further reading==

* Chester James Antieau, "The Rule of Clear and Present Danger: Scope of Its Applicability," ''Michigan Law Review,'' vol. 48, no. 6 (April 1950), pp.&nbsp;811–840. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1284433 In JSTOR]
* Louis B. Boudin, "'Seditious Doctrines' and the 'Clear and Present Danger' Rule: Part I," ''Virginia Law Review,'' vol. 38, no. 2 (Feb. 1952), pp.&nbsp;143–186. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1069474 In JSTOR]
* Louis B. Boudin, "'Seditious Doctrines' and the 'Clear and Present Danger' Rule: Part II," ''Virginia Law Review,'' vol. 38, no. 3 (April 1952), pp.&nbsp;315–356. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1069631 In JSTOR]
* Mark Kessler, "Legal Discourse and Political Intolerance: The Ideology of Clear and Present Danger," ''Law & Society Review,'' vol. 27, no. 3 (1993), pp.&nbsp;559–598. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3054105 In JSTOR]
* Fred D. Ragan, "Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Zechariah Chafee, Jr., and the Clear and Present Danger Test for Free Speech: The First Year, 1919," ''Journal of American History,'' vol. 58, no. 1 (1971), pp.&nbsp;24–45.  [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1890079 In JSTOR]
* Bernard Schwartz, "Holmes versus Hand: Clear and Present Danger or Advocacy of Unlawful Action?" ''Supreme Court Review," vol. 1994, pp.&nbsp;209–245. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3109648 In JSTOR]