Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Atomic units
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== A convention that eliminates units === In atomic physics, it is common to simplify mathematical expressions by a transformation of all quantities: * Hartree suggested that expression in terms of atomic units allows us "to eliminate various universal constants from the equations", which amounts to informally suggesting a transformation of quantities and equations such that all quantities are replaced by corresponding dimensionless quantities.<ref name="Hartree1928"/>{{rp|91}} He does not elaborate beyond examples. * McWeeny suggests that "... their adoption permits all the fundamental equations to be written in a dimensionless form in which constants such as {{tmath|1= e }}, {{tmath|1= m }} and {{tmath|1= h }} are absent and need not be considered at all during mathematical derivations or the processes of numerical solution; the units in which any calculated quantity must appear are implicit in its physical dimensions and may be supplied at the end." He also states that "An alternative convention is to interpret the symbols as the numerical measures of the quantities they represent, referred to some specified system of units: in this case the equations contain only pure numbers or dimensionless variables; ... the appropriate units are supplied at the end of a calculation, by reference to the physical dimensions of the quantity calculated. [This] convention has much to recommend it and is tacitly accepted in atomic and molecular physics whenever atomic units are introduced, for example for convenience in computation." * An informal approach is often taken, in which "equations are expressed in terms of atomic units simply by setting {{tmath|1= \hbar = m_\text{e} = e = 4 \pi \epsilon_0 = 1}}".<ref name="Pilar2001"/><ref>{{cite book |last=Bishop |first=David M. |title=Group Theory and Chemistry |year=1993 |publisher=Dover Publications |isbn=978-0-486-67355-4 |page=217 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l4zv4dukBT0C&pg=PA217}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Drake |first=Gordon W. F. |title=Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics |year=2006 |edition=2nd |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-387-20802-2 |page=5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Jj-ad_2aNOAC&pg=PA5 }}</ref> This is a form of shorthand for the more formal process of transformation between quantities that is suggested by others, such as McWeeny.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Atomic units
(section)
Add topic