Editing Argument from ignorance (section)

==Related arguments==

=== Argument from self-knowing ===
{{See also|Autoepistemic logic}}
Arguments from self-knowing take the form:

# If P were true then I would know it; in fact I do not know it; therefore P cannot be true.
# If Q were false then I would know it; in fact I do not know it; therefore Q cannot be false.

In practice these arguments are often unsound and rely on the truth of the supporting [[premise]]. For example, the claim that ''If I had just sat on a wild [[porcupine]] then I would know it'' is probably not fallacious and depends entirely on the truth of the first premise (the ability to know it).