Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Word problem for groups
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Proof that there is no universal solvable word problem group=== Suppose <math>G</math> were a universal solvable word problem group. Given a finite presentation <math>P = \langle X \, | \, R \rangle</math> of a group <math>H</math>, one can recursively enumerate all homomorphisms <math>h : H \to G</math> by first enumerating all mappings <math>h^\dagger : X \to G</math>. Not all of these mappings extend to homomorphisms, but, since <math>h^\dagger(R)</math> is finite, it is possible to distinguish between homomorphisms and non-homomorphisms, by using the solution to the word problem in <math>G</math>. "Weeding out" non-homomorphisms gives the required recursive enumeration: <math>h_1, h_2, \ldots, h_n, \ldots</math>. If <math>H</math> has solvable word problem, then at least one of these homomorphisms must be an embedding. So given a word <math>w</math> in the generators of <math>H</math>: ::<math>\text{If}\ w\ne 1\ \text{in}\ H,\ h_n(w)\ne 1\ \text{in}\ G\ \text{for some}\ h_n </math> ::<math>\text{If}\ w= 1\ \text{in}\ H,\ h_n(w)= 1\ \text{in}\ G\ \text{for all}\ h_n </math> Consider the algorithm described by the pseudocode: '''Let''' ''n'' = 0 '''Let''' ''repeatable'' = TRUE '''while''' (''repeatable'') increase ''n'' by 1 '''if''' (solution to word problem in ''G'' reveals ''h<sub>n</sub>''(''w'') β 1 in ''G'') '''Let''' ''repeatable'' = FALSE output 0. This describes a recursive function: ::<math>f(w) = \begin{cases} 0 &\text{if}\ w\neq1\ \text{in}\ H \\ \text{undefined/does not halt}\ &\text{if}\ w=1\ \text{in}\ H. \end{cases}</math> The function <math>f</math> clearly depends on the presentation <math>P</math>. Considering it to be a function of the two variables, a recursive function {{tmath|f(P,w)}} has been constructed that takes a finite presentation <math>P</math> for a group <math>H</math> and a word <math>w</math> in the generators of a group <math>G</math>, such that whenever <math>G</math> has soluble word problem: ::<math>f(P,w) = \begin{cases} 0 &\text{if}\ w\neq1\ \text{in}\ H \\ \text{undefined/does not halt}\ &\text{if}\ w=1\ \text{in}\ H. \end{cases}</math> But this uniformly solves the word problem for the class of all finitely presented groups with solvable word problem, contradicting Boone-Rogers. This contradiction proves <math>G</math> cannot exist.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Word problem for groups
(section)
Add topic