Editing William Wilberforce (section)

===War with France===
On 26 February 1793, another vote to abolish the slave trade was narrowly defeated by eight votes. The outbreak of [[First Coalition|war with France]] the same month prevented further consideration of the issue, as politicians concentrated on the national crisis and the threat of invasion.<ref>{{Harvnb|Pollock|1977|pp=122–123}}</ref> The same year, and again in 1794, Wilberforce unsuccessfully brought before Parliament a bill to outlaw British ships from supplying enslaved people to foreign colonies.<ref name="Turner1997" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Hague|2007|p=242}}</ref> He voiced his concern about the war and urged Pitt and his government to make greater efforts to end hostilities.<ref>{{Harvnb|Pollock|1977|pp=121–122}}</ref> Growing more alarmed, on 31 December 1794, Wilberforce moved that the government seek a peaceful resolution with France, a stance that created a temporary breach in his long friendship with Pitt.<ref>{{Harvnb|Hague|2007|pp=247–249}}</ref>

Abolition continued to be associated in the public consciousness with the French Revolution and with British radical groups, resulting in a decline in public support.<ref>{{Harvnb|Hague|2007|pp=237–239}}</ref> Despite this, Wilberforce continued to introduce abolition bills throughout the 1790s.<ref name="Hochschild 2005 252">{{Harvnb|Hochschild|2005|p=252}}</ref><ref name="Hague 2007 511">{{Harvnb|Hague|2007|p=511}}</ref>

The early years of the 19th century saw an increased public interest in abolition.<ref name="Ackerson 2005 12">{{Harvnb|Ackerson|2005|p=12}}</ref> In June 1804, Wilberforce's bill to abolish the slave trade successfully passed all its stages through the House of Commons. However, it was too late in the parliamentary session for it to complete its passage through the House of Lords. On its reintroduction during the 1805 session, it was defeated, with even the usually sympathetic Pitt failing to support it.<ref>{{Harvnb|Hague|2007|pp=313–320}}</ref> On this occasion and throughout the campaign, abolition was held back by Wilberforce's trusting, even credulous nature, and his deferential attitude towards those in power. He found it difficult to believe that men of rank would not do what he perceived to be the right thing, and was reluctant to confront them when they did not.<ref name="Hague 2007 511"/>