Editing Theopompus (section)

== Modern Scholarship ==
Modern scholarship by historians such as Gordon Shrimpton and W. Robert Connor have re-evaluated Theopompus's contributions to [[historiography]]. Shrimpton emphasizes Theopompus's refined portrayal of Phillip II. He argues that Theopompus's work reflected a sophisticated understanding of the nuances of power and corruption.<ref name=":1" /> Connor highlights Theopompus's disillusionment with the moral state of Greece. This presents him as a critical observer and recorder of society.<ref>Connor. p. 136-137.</ref>

Riccardo Vattoune's analysis further examines Theopompus's innovations in methodology. The chapter explores how Theopompus approached writing of history, specifically his use of sources and his treatment of historical events.<ref name=":2">Parmegianni, Giovanni. ''Between Thucydides and Polybius: The Golden Age of Greek Historiography.''

</ref> One key aspect discussed is Theopompus's interest in "invisible" parts of history such as motivations, emotions, and character traits. These parts of history aren't readily apparent from the historical record alone, but his work preserves that part of history. Additionally, Vattuone dives into Theopompus's use of speeches, anecdotes, and character sketch's to give life to these invisible parts of history.<ref name=":2" /> Overall, the chapter provides insight into Theopompus's innovations in the field of historiography.