Editing The Last Supper (Leonardo) (section)

=== Damage and restorations ===
{{Main|Conservation-restoration of Leonardo da Vinci's The Last Supper}}
Because Sforza had ordered the church to be rebuilt hastily, the masons filled the walls with moisture-retaining rubble.{{sfn|Wallace|1972|p=83}} The painting was done on a thin exterior wall, so the effects of [[humidity]] were felt keenly, and the paint failed to properly adhere to it. Because of the method used, soon after the painting was completed on 9 February 1498 it began to deteriorate.<ref name=smart /> In 1499, [[Louis XII]] contemplated removing the painting from the wall and taking it to France.{{sfn|Wallace|1972|p=127}} As early as 1517, the painting was starting to flake, and in 1532 [[Gerolamo Cardano]] described it as "blurred and colorless compared with what I remember of it when I saw it as a boy".<ref>{{cite book |title=Doctor Cardano, physician extraordinary |first=Alan |last=Wykes |page=26 |year=1969}}</ref> By 1556 – fewer than sixty years after it was finished – [[Giorgio Vasari]] described the painting as reduced to a "muddle of blots" so deteriorated that the figures were unrecognizable.{{sfn|Wallace|1972|p=83}} By the second half of the 16th century, Gian Paolo Lomazzo stated that "the painting is all ruined".<ref name=smart /> In 1652, a doorway was cut through the (then unrecognisable) painting, and later bricked up; this can still be seen as the irregular [[arch]]-shaped structure near the center base of the painting. It is believed, through early copies, that Jesus' feet were in a position symbolizing the forthcoming crucifixion. In 1768, a curtain was hung over the painting intended for its protection; the curtain instead trapped moisture on the surface, and whenever it was pulled back, it scratched the flaking paint.

A first restoration was attempted in 1726 by [[Michelangelo Bellotti]], who filled in missing sections with [[oil paint]] then [[varnish]]ed the whole mural. This repair did not last well and another restoration was attempted in 1770 by an otherwise unknown artist named Giuseppe Mazza. Mazza stripped off Bellotti's work then largely repainted the painting; he had redone all but three faces when he was halted due to public outrage. In 1796, French revolutionary anti-clerical troops used the refectory as an [[armory (military)|armory]] and [[stable]];<ref name=notebook>{{cite book |last=Da Vinci |first=Leonardo |editor-last=Taylor |editor-first=Pamela |title=The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci |publisher=New American Library |year=1971 |page=xvii}}</ref> they threw stones at the painting and climbed ladders to scratch out the Apostles' eyes. [[Goethe]] wrote that in 1800, the room was flooded with two feet of water after a heavy rainstorm.{{sfn|Wallace|1972|p=83}} The refectory was used as a prison;{{when|date=October 2019}} it is not known if any of the prisoners may have damaged the painting. In 1821, Stefano Barezzi, an expert in removing whole frescoes from their walls intact, was called in to remove the painting to a safer location; he badly damaged the center section before realizing that Leonardo's work was not a fresco. Barezzi then attempted to reattach damaged sections with [[adhesive|glue]]. From 1901 to 1908, [[Luigi Cavenaghi]] first completed a careful study of the structure of the painting, then began cleaning it. In 1924, [[Oreste Silvestri]] did further cleaning, and stabilised some parts with [[stucco]].

[[File:Last supper right wall.jpg|thumb|upright|A protective structure (right) was built in front of Leonardo's fresco. This photo shows the bombing damage in 1943.{{sfn|Wallace|1972|p=74}}]]

During [[World War II]], on 15 August 1943, the refectory was struck by Allied bombing; protective [[sandbag]]ging prevented the painting from being struck by bomb splinters,<ref>{{cite web |last=Traverso |first=V. M. |title=How 'The Last Supper' miraculously survived World War II bombs |url=https://aleteia.org/2019/06/05/how-the-last-supper-miraculously-survived-world-war-ii-bombs/ |website=Aleteia – Catholic Spirituality, Lifestyle, World News, and Culture |access-date=7 June 2019 |date=5 June 2019}}</ref> but it may have been damaged by the [[oscillation|vibration]]. Between 1946 and 1954, [[:it:Mauro Pellicioli|Mauro Pellicioli]] undertook a clean-and-stabilise restoration,{{sfn|Wallace|1972|p=83}} which [[Brera (district of Milan)|Brera]] director {{ill|Fernanda Wittgens|it}} was involved in<!-- in 1950 -->.<ref name=notebook /> Pellicioli reattached paint to the wall using a clear shellac, making it relatively darker and more colorful, and removed some of the [[overpainting]].{{sfn|Wallace|1972|p=93}} However, as of 1972, the repainting done in various restorations had made the heads of saints Peter, Andrew, and James differ significantly from the original design.{{sfn|Wallace|1972|p=83}}

==== Major restoration ====
[[File:Leonardo da Vinci - Ultima cena - ca 1975.jpg|thumb|upright=1.6|The painting as it looked in the 1970s]]

The painting's appearance by the late 1970s had badly deteriorated. From 1978 to 1999, Pinin Brambilla Barcilon guided a major restoration project to stabilize the painting and reverse the damage caused by dirt and pollution. The eighteenth- and nineteenth-century restoration attempts were also reversed. Since it had proved impractical to move the painting to a more controlled environment, the refectory was instead converted to a sealed, [[HVAC|climate-controlled]] environment, which meant bricking up the windows. Then, detailed study was undertaken to determine the painting's original form, using scientific tests (especially [[infrared]] reflectoscopy and microscopic core-samples), and original [[cartoon#Fine art|cartoons]] preserved in the Royal Library at [[Windsor Castle]]. Some areas were deemed unrestorable. These were {{nowrap|re-painted}} using [[watercolor painting|watercolor]] in subdued colors intended to indicate they were not original work, while not being too distracting.<ref>{{cite book |last1=King |first1=Ross |title=Leonardo and the Last Supper |isbn=978-0-8027-1705-4 |date=2012 |publisher=Bloomsbury |location=New York |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/leonardolastsupp0000king}}</ref>

This restoration took 21 years and, on 28 May 1999, the painting was returned to display. Intending visitors were required to book ahead and could only stay for 15 minutes. When it was unveiled, considerable controversy was aroused by the dramatic changes in colors, tones, and even some facial shapes. [[James Beck (art historian)|James Beck]], professor of [[art history]] at [[Columbia University]] and founder of [[ArtWatch International]], had been a particularly strong critic.<ref name="guardian">{{cite news |title=The Last Supper or a dog's dinner? |author=Phillip William |url=https://www.theguardian.com/culture/1999/may/25/artsfeatures3 |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=24 May 1999 |access-date=21 December 2012}}</ref> Michael Daley, director of ArtWatch UK, has also complained about the restored version of the painting. He has been critical of Christ's right arm in the image which has been altered from a draped sleeve to what Daley calls "muff-like drapery".<ref name="alberge">{{cite news |title=Have art restorers ruined Leonardo's masterpiece? |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/have-art-restorers-ruined-leonardos-masterpiece-7565727.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220618/https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/have-art-restorers-ruined-leonardos-masterpiece-7565727.html |archive-date=18 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |work=[[The Independent]] |date=14 March 2012 |last=Alberge |first=Dayla |access-date=21 December 2012}}</ref>