Editing Socinianism (section)

==Skepticism==
Later writers such as [[Archibald Alexander Hodge]] (1823–1886) asserted that Socinian theology was rooted in [[skepticism]].{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}} However, the original Polish Socinians were believers in miracles and the virgin birth,<ref>G. C. Berkouwer – 1954 The Person of Christ – Page 22  "The full consequences of this criticism, it is true, were not accepted in all respects, for the Socinians still believed that Christ was supernaturally begotten by way of the virgin birth, but the results of their criticism would soon</ref><ref>Coleridge, philosophy and religion: Aids to reflection and the&nbsp;... – Page 232 Douglas Hedley – 2000 "Socinian theology was severely critical of traditional dogmas. Faustus Socinus accepted the Virgin Birth, physical resurrection of Christ, and the exaltation to the right hand of God, but the orthodox Christological doctrine of two natures is rejected as contrary to sound reason (ratio sana)."</ref><ref>Religion, secularization, and political thought: Thomas Hobbes to&nbsp;... – Page 45  James E. Crimmins, Huron College – 1989 "Socinianism denied the Trinity (nowhere mentioned in the Bible), and with it the pre-existence of Christ before the virgin birth. It denied original sin and predestination, for those doctrines seemed to deny moral responsibility and&nbsp;... "</ref> although there were a few radicals, such as [[Symon Budny]] and [[Jacobus Palaeologus]], who denied these.<ref>better source needed : The faiths of the world James Gardner – 1858 "Budny – He and his followers were not contented, like other Socinians, with denying the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, and affirming him to be a mere man, but they denied the inspiration of the Sacred Scriptures."</ref>