Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Pope Sergius III
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Legacy== Much of Sergius' pontificate has been maligned throughout history, principally through the reporting of his character and the state of Rome at the time by [[Liutprand of Cremona]]. His recounting of the period has led sixteenth-century cardinal and historian [[Caesar Baronius]] in his ''[[Annales Ecclesiastici]]'' to call it the ''[[Saeculum obscurum]]'', or dark century.<ref>{{cite book | title=Church history: twenty centuries of Catholic Christianity | author=Dwyer, John C. | year=1998 | page=[https://archive.org/details/churchhistorytwe00dwye/page/155 155] | isbn=0-8091-3830-1 | publisher=Paulist Press. | location=Mahwah, USA. | url=https://archive.org/details/churchhistorytwe00dwye/page/155}}</ref> Similarly 19th-century Protestant historians saw this period as a "pornocracy", or "rule of the harlots",<ref name='Squatriti'>Paolo Squatriti, "Pornocracy", in Christopher Kleinhenz (ed.), ''Medieval Italy: An Encyclopedia'', Vol. 2 (New York and London: [[Routledge]], 2004), pp. 926β27. {{ISBN|978-1-1380-6331-0}}.</ref> a reversal of the natural order as they saw it, according to ''[[Liber pontificalis]]'' and a later chronicler who was also biased against Sergius III. This "pornocracy" was an age with women in power: [[Theodora (senatrix)|Theodora]], whom Liutprand characterized as a "shameless whore... [who] exercised power on the Roman citizenry like a man"{{quote without source|date=January 2021}} and her daughter [[Marozia]], the mother of [[Pope John XI]] and reputed to be the mistress of Sergius III, largely upon a remark by Liutprand.<ref name=Marozia>{{cite book | title=Unzipped: The Popes Bare All: A Frank Study of Sex and Corruption in the Vatican | author=Ide, Arthur Frederick | year=1987 | isbn=0-910309-43-4 | publisher=American Atheist Press | location=Austin, Texas}}</ref> [[Caesar Baronius]], writing in the 16th century, and basing himself on Liutprand, was particularly scathing, describing Sergius as: "a wretch, worthy of the rope and of fire... flames could not have caused this execrable monster to suffer the punishments which he merited. It is impossible to believe that such a pope was a lawful one."<ref>De Cormenin 1857, p. 282</ref> The reality is that when Sergius was forcibly exiled by [[Lambert of Spoleto]], all the official records were destroyed; consequently, most of the surviving documentation about Sergius comes from his pro-Formosan opponents who had fled to [[Naples]].<ref>Collins 2010, p. 174</ref> Horace Mann, writing in the ''[[Catholic Encyclopedia]]'' states the following concerning the alleged illicit relationship of Pope Sergius III with Marozia: "that he put his two predecessors to death, and by illicit relations with Marozia had a son, who was afterwards John XI, must be regarded as highly doubtful. These assertions are only made by bitter or ill-informed adversaries, and are inconsistent with what is said of him by respectable contemporaries."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13729a.htm | title=''Catholic Encyclopedia'': Pope Sergius III}}</ref> Nevertheless, most modern opinions about Sergius' pontificate remain poor. According to [[Horace K. Mann]], "Sergius was, unfortunately, a pronounced party-man, and anxious for the supremacy of his party".<ref>Mann 1910, p. 140</ref> The best that [[Ferdinand Gregorovius]] could say of him was: "That Sergius, who remained Pope throughout the storms of seven years, was at least a man of energy must be admitted, although apostolic virtues are scarcely to be looked for in a character such as his".<ref>Gregorovius 1895, p. 245</ref> James S. Packer described him as malignant and ferocious, slaughtering his enemies with a private army,<ref>Packer, James, S. ''Saints, Sinners, and Christian History: The Contradictions of the Christian Past'' (2008), pg. 162</ref> while Walter Ullmann described Sergius as a typical representative of the House of Theophylact, concerned with power and sexual liaisons.<ref>Ullmann, Walter, ''A Short History of the Papacy in the Middle Ages'' (2003), pg. 113</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Pope Sergius III
(section)
Add topic