Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Intact dilation and extraction
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Complications == The risks of intact D&E are similar to the risks of non-intact D&E and include postoperative infection, hemorrhage, or uterine injury. Overall, the complication rate is low, with rates of serious complications (those requiring blood transfusion, surgery, or hospital treatment) ranging from 0 per 1,000 cases to 2.94 per 1,000 cases. The rate of minor complications is approximately 50 in 1,000 (5%), the same as the minor complication rate for non-intact D&E; the rate of serious complications is higher in non-intact D&E.<ref name="naf" /> Data directly comparing the safety of non-intact to intact D&E are limited.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last1=Prager|first1=Sarah Ward|last2=Oyer|first2=Deborah Jean|date=2009|title=Second-trimester surgical abortion|journal=Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology|volume=52|issue=2|pages=179β187|doi=10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181a2b43a|issn=1532-5520|pmid=19407524|s2cid=6805714}}</ref> There is no difference in postoperative blood loss or major complications when compared to non-intact D&E.<ref name=":1" /><ref name="ReferenceA">{{Cite journal|last1=Chasen|first1=Stephen T.|last2=Kalish|first2=Robin B.|last3=Gupta|first3=Meruka|last4=Kaufman|first4=Jane E.|last5=Rashbaum|first5=William K.|last6=Chervenak|first6=Frank A.|date=2004|title=Dilation and evacuation at >or=20 weeks: comparison of operative techniques|journal=American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|volume=190|issue=5|pages=1180β1183|doi=10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.034|issn=0002-9378|pmid=15167815}}</ref> There is no difference in risk of subsequent preterm delivery.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Chasen|first1=Stephen T.|last2=Kalish|first2=Robin B.|last3=Gupta|first3=Meruka|last4=Kaufman|first4=Jane|last5=Chervenak|first5=Frank A.|date=2005|title=Obstetric outcomes after surgical abortion at > or = 20 weeks' gestation|journal=American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|volume=193|issue=3 Pt 2|pages=1161β1164|doi=10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.078|issn=0002-9378|pmid=16157130}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceA"/> The risk of retained tissue is lower since the fetus is removed intact.<ref name="naf4"/> In some cases, the physician may not be able to remove the fetus intact due to anatomical limitations. This may present a psychological problem for the patient who wishes to view the remains, or make a comprehensive autopsy impossible, precluding an accurate postmortem diagnosis of fetal anomalies.<ref name="naf" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Intact dilation and extraction
(section)
Add topic