Editing Hesychasm (section)

===Hesychast controversy and Palamism===
[[Image:Gregor Palamas.jpg|thumb|upright|Gregory Palamas]]
{{main article|Hesychast controversy|Palamism}}

About the year 1337, hesychasm attracted the attention of [[Barlaam of Seminara]], a Calabrian monk who at that time held the office of abbot in the Monastery of [[Chora Church|St. Saviour]] in Constantinople and who visited [[Mount Athos]]. Mount Athos was then at the height of its fame and influence, under the reign of [[Andronicus III Palaeologus]] and under the leadership of the ''Protos'' Symeon.<ref name="EB1911">{{EB1911|inline=y|wstitle=Hesychasts|volume=13|page=414}}</ref> On Mount Athos, Barlaam encountered hesychasts and heard descriptions of their practices, also reading the writings of the teacher in hesychasm of St. [[Gregory Palamas]], himself an Athonite monk. Trained in Western [[Scholasticism|Scholastic]] theology, Barlaam was scandalized by hesychasm and began to combat it both orally and in his writings. As a private teacher of theology in the Western Scholastic mode, Barlaam propounded a more intellectual and propositional approach to the knowledge of God than the hesychasts taught.

Barlaam took exception to the doctrine entertained by the hesychasts as to the nature of the light, the experience of which was said to be the goal of hesychast practice, regarding it as [[Christian heresy|heretical]] and [[blasphemy|blasphemous]]. It was maintained by the hesychasts to be of divine origin and to be identical to [[Tabor Light|the light]] which had been manifested to Jesus' disciples on [[Mount Tabor, Israel|Mount Tabor]] at the [[Transfiguration of Jesus|Transfiguration]].{{sfnp|Parry|1999|p=231}}<ref>{{cite book |last=Slobodskoy |first=Serafim Alexivich |title=The Law of God |date=1992 |publisher=[[Holy Trinity Monastery (Jordanville, New York)]] |isbn=978-0884650447 |translator-last=Price |translator-first=Susan |chapter=The Sundays of Lent |access-date=21 March 2019 |translator-link=Susan Price |chapter-url=https://www.orthodoxphotos.com/readings/LGFLS/sundays.shtml |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180812061034/https://www.orthodoxphotos.com/readings/LGFLS/sundays.shtml |archive-date=12 August 2018 |url-status=live}} ''Original:'' {{cite book |last=Слободской |first=Серафим Алексеевич |date=1957 |publication-date=1966 |language=ru |script-title=ru:Закон Божий |trans-title=The Law of God |chapter=Недели Великого Поста |trans-chapter=The Sundays of Lent |quote={{langx|ru|Паламы […] учил, что за подвиг поста и молитвы Господь озаряет верующих благодатным Своим светом, каким сиял Господь на Фаворе.|label=none}} |access-date=21 March 2019 |chapter-url=https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Serafim_Slobodskoj/zakon-bozhij/277 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170725070702/https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Serafim_Slobodskoj/zakon-bozhij/277 |archive-date=25 July 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> This Barlaam held to be [[Polytheism|polytheistic]], inasmuch as it postulated two eternal substances, a visible and an invisible God.<ref name="EB1911"/> Hesychasm was linked with [[Euchites|Messalianiam]] and [[Bogomilism]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Russell |first=Norman |author-link=Norman Russell |title=Gregory Palamas and the making of Palamism in the Modern Age |publisher=[[Oxford University]] Press |year=2019 |chapter=1. The Orthodox struggle to assimilate Palamite thinking |doi=10.1093/oso/9780199644643.003.0001}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Meyendorff |first=John |author-link=John Meyendorff |date=1988 |title=Mount Athos in the Fourteenth Century: Spiritual and Intellectual Legacy. |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1291594?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents |journal=[[Dumbarton Oaks Papers]] |volume=42 |pages=157–165 |doi=10.2307/1291594 }}</ref>

On the hesychast side, the controversy was taken up by St. [[Gregory Palamas]], afterwards Archbishop of [[Thessalonica]],<ref name="EB1911"/> who was asked by his fellow monks on Mt Athos to defend hesychasm from the attacks of Barlaam. St. Gregory himself was well-educated in Greek philosophy. St. Gregory defended hesychasm in the 1340s at three different synods in [[Constantinople]], and he also wrote a number of works in its defense.

In these works, St. Gregory Palamas uses a distinction, already found in the 4th century in the works of the [[Cappadocian Fathers]], between the energies or operations (Gr. ''energeiai)'' of God and the essence of God. St. Gregory taught that the [[Essence-Energies distinction|energies or operations of God were uncreated]]. He taught that the essence of God can never be known by his creature even in the next life, but that his uncreated energies or operations can be known both in this life and in the next, and convey to the hesychast in this life and to the righteous in the next life a true spiritual knowledge of God. In Palamite theology, it is the uncreated energies of God that illumine the hesychast who has been vouchsafed an experience of the uncreated light.{{citation needed|date=January 2025}}

In 1341, the dispute came before a [[synod]] held at [[Constantinople]] and presided over by the Emperor Andronicus III; the synod, taking into account the regard in which the writings of the [[pseudo-Dionysius]] were held, condemned Barlaam, who recanted and returned to Calabria, afterwards becoming a bishop in the [[Catholic Church]].<ref name="EB1911"/>

One of Barlaam's friends, [[Gregory Akindynos]], who originally was also a friend of St. Gregory Palamas, took up the controversy, which also played a role in the [[Byzantine civil war of 1341–1347|civil war]] between the supporters of John Cantacuzenus and [[John V Palaiologos]].{{Citation needed|date=July 2023}} Three other synods on the subject were held, at the second of which the followers of Barlaam gained a brief victory. But in 1351 at a synod under the presidency of the Emperor [[John VI Cantacuzenus]], hesychast doctrine was established as the doctrine of the Orthodox Church.<ref name="EB1911"/>