Editing Harthacnut (section)

== Reputation ==
[[Image:Painting of Hardeknud of Denmark and England (ca. 1880).jpg|thumb|A painting of Harthacnut by {{interlanguage link|Christen Nielsen Overgaard|da|C.N. Overgaard}} from around 1880 commissioned by [[Frederiksborg Castle#The Museum of National History|The Museum of National History at Frederiksborg Castle]].]]

Apart from the ''Ramsey Chronicle'', medieval sources are hostile to Harthacnut. According to the ''Anglo-Saxon Chronicle'', he "did nothing worthy of a king as long as he ruled".{{sfn|Howard|2008|p=119}} Modern historians are less dismissive. In the view of M. K. Lawson, he had at least two of the requisites of a successful medieval king: he was "both ruthless and feared"; had he not died young, the Norman Conquest might not have happened. Ian Howard praises Harthacnut for keeping peace throughout his empire, benefiting trade and merchants, and ensuring a peaceful succession by inviting Edward to his court as his heir. Had he lived longer, Howard believes, his character might have enabled him to become a successful king like his father.{{sfn|Howard|2008|p=136}}

[[Henry of Huntingdon]] (12th century) claimed that Harthacnut ordered for the dining tables of his court to be "''laid four times a day with royal sumptuousness''" which O'Brien says is likely a popular myth.{{sfn|O'Brien|2006|pp=202–203}} Henry of Huntingdon viewed this detail in the context of the monarch sharing these meals with the members of his household, making Harthacnut more generous than his own contemporaries, who "''through avarice, or as they pretend through disgust, ... set but one meal a day before their dependents''".{{sfn|Kerr|2007|p=77|loc=Note 25}} His account produced the image of Harthacnut as a "very generous [[wikt:bon viveur|bon viveur]]".{{sfn|O'Brien|2006|pp=202–203}} [[Ranulf Higden]] (14th century) viewed the same detail in a negative light. He claimed that Harthacnut insisted on having two dinners and two suppers per day. His example influenced the English people, who supposedly were to Higden's day gluttonous and extravagant. Higden so claimed that Harthacnut had a lasting effect on the English national character.{{sfn| Given-Wilson|2004|pp=133–134}} The association of Harthacnut with gluttony was well known enough to appear in the novel ''[[Ivanhoe]]'' (1819) by [[Walter Scott]]. The character Cedric comments on his friend Athelstane, whose main character trait is a love for food and drink: "The soul of Hardicanute hath taken possession of him, and he hath no pleasure save to fill, to swill, and to call for more."{{sfn|Scott|1998|p=177|loc=Ch. 21}}<ref name="shmoop.com" />

The ''[[Knýtlinga saga]]'' treats the death of Harthacnut as the end of an ancient line of kings, and notes that he was the last Danish king to rule over England. But otherwise, Harthacnut is treated as a mere footnote in the line of monarchs, while there are many observations on Cnut. The ''[[Morkinskinna]]'' covers Harthacnut's death in some detail, but records next to nothing about his life, suggesting a lack of memorable details on him, presumably due to his short reign.{{sfn|Fjalldal|2005|pp=51–53}}

The [[Brut Chronicle|''Brut'' Chronicle]] was an [[Anglo-Normans|Anglo-Norman]] work, covering British and English monarchs from Brut ([[Brutus of Troy]]) to the death of [[Henry III of England|Henry III]] in 1272. It was probably written during the reign of [[Edward I of England|Edward I]] (reigned 1272–1307), though the oldest surviving manuscript dates to 1338. The text often includes notable errors. The original author remains unknown, but there were a number of continuations by different hands, continuing the story to the [[Battle of Halidon Hill]] (1333).{{sfn|Marvin|2006|pp=40–42, 47–49, 75}} The material on Harthacnut is largely positive. The author considered both Harold Harefoot and Harthacnut to have been sons of Cnut and Emma of Normandy. He portrays Harold as lacking in chivalry, courtesy or honour, and Harthacnut as "a noble knight and stalwart of body, and he greatly loved knighthood and all virtues".  He praises Harthacnut for his generosity with food and drink, writing that his table was open "for all who wished to come to his court to be richly served with royal dishes". He concludes by portraying Harthacnut as a loyal son for accepting his mother, Emma, back to court.{{sfn|Marvin|2006|pp=223–225}}