Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Empowerment
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==In economics== According to Robert Adams, there is a long tradition in the UK and the USA respectively to advance forms of self-help that have developed and contributed to more recent concepts of empowerment. For example, the free enterprise economic theories of [[Milton Friedman]] embraced self-help as a respectable contributor to the economy. Both the Republicans in the US and the Conservative government of [[Margaret Thatcher]] built on these theories. 'At the same time, the mutual aid aspects of the concept of self-help retained some currency with socialists and democrats.'<ref>Adams, Robert. ''Empowerment, participation and social work''. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, p.7-9</ref> In [[economic development]], the empowerment approach focuses on mobilizing the [[self-help]] efforts of the poor, rather than providing them with [[social welfare]]. Economic empowerment is also the empowering of previously disadvantaged sections of the population, for example, in many previously colonized African countries.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.microempowering.org |title=Welcome to MicroEmpowering! |publisher=Microempowering.org |access-date=2012-08-24}}</ref> ===Consumer empowerment=== A [[consumer]] empowerment strategy was put in place in the United Kingdom by the 2010-2015 [[Coalition Government 2010-2015|coalition government]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/next-steps-making-midata-a-reality--2|title=Next steps making midata a reality β GOV.UK|website=gov.uk|language=en|access-date=27 April 2017}}</ref> The strategy, produced by the [[Department for Business, Innovation and Skills]] and the [[Behavioural Insights Team]] at the UK [[Cabinet Office]], sought to introduce voluntary measures and "nudges" which could help consumers "find and adopt the best choices for their circumstances and needs".<ref name=bc>Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a78c18e40f0b63247699ecb/12-1324-better-choices-better-deals-report-on-progress-on-the-consumer-empowerment-strategy.pdf Better Choices: Better Deals: Report on progress on the Consumer Empowerment Strategy], URN 12/1324, published December 2012, accessed 27 December 2023</ref> Activities promoted by the strategy included the ''midata'' programme under the direction of Professor [[Nigel Shadbolt]], annual [[credit card]] usage statements, collective purchasing schemes, and presentational work on [[Energy Performance Certificate (United Kingdom)|Energy Performance Certificates]], motor vehicle sales literature and [[food hygiene]] ratings, so that consumers can make better use of the information they contain.<ref name=bc />{{rp|Annex}} ===Customer empowerment=== Companies that empower their customers have the potential to create superior products at reduced costs and risks, provided that customers are willing and able to contribute valuable input in the [[new product development]] process.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lilien |first1=Gary L. |last2=Morrison |first2=Pamela D. |last3=Searls |first3=Kathleen |last4=Sonnack |first4=Mary |last5=Hippel |first5=Eric von |date=August 2002 |title=Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development |url=https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171 |journal=Management Science |language=en |volume=48 |issue=8 |pages=1042β1059 |doi=10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171 |issn=0025-1909}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Dahan |first1=Ely |last2=Hauser |first2=John R. |date=September 2002 |title=The virtual customer |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1540-5885.1950332 |journal=Journal of Product Innovation Management |language=en |volume=19 |issue=5 |pages=332β353 |doi=10.1111/1540-5885.1950332 |issn=0737-6782}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ogawa |first1=Susumu |last2=Piller |first2=Frank T. |date=2006-01-01 |title=Reducing the Risks of New Product Development |url=https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/reducing-the-risks-of-new-product-development/ |journal=MIT Sloan Management Review |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Sawhney |first1=Mohanbir |last2=Verona |first2=Gianmario |last3=Prandelli |first3=Emanuela |date=November 2005 |title=Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1002/dir.20046 |journal=Journal of Interactive Marketing |language=en |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=4β17 |doi=10.1002/dir.20046 |issn=1094-9968}}</ref> Businesses that involve and empower customers in the process of creating new products can sometimes have a [[Competitive advantage|competitive edge]] over traditional firms that do not give their customers such involvement. This advantage is evident in the fact that consumers generally prefer the former.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fuchs |first1=Christoph |last2=Schreier |first2=Martin |date=January 2011 |title=Customer Empowerment in New Product Development*: Customer Empowerment in New Product Development |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00778.x |journal=Journal of Product Innovation Management |language=en |volume=28 |issue=1 |pages=17β32 |doi=10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00778.x|hdl=1765/40039 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> When customers have the authority to choose which products are [[Market entry strategy|brought to market]], they exhibit increased [[demand]] for the chosen products, even when they are objectively of the same [[Quality (business)|quality]]. This apparently irrational [[phenomenon]] can be explained by the heightened sense of [[psychological ownership]] that consumers develop for the selected products. Two conditions limit this effect: (1) it diminishes when the joint [[decision-making]] outcome does not align with [[Consumer preferences|consumers' preferences]] and (2) when consumers lack [[confidence]] in their ability to make informed decisions.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fuchs |first1=Christoph |last2=Prandelli |first2=Emanuela |last3=Schreier |first3=Martin |orig-date=2010 |title=The Psychological Effects of Empowerment Strategies on Consumers' Product Demand |url=https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.1.6 |journal=Journal of Marketing |date=2010 |volume=74 |issue=1 |pages=65β79 |doi=10.1509/jmkg.74.1.65}}</ref> ===Increasingly engaged corporate directors=== The [[World Pensions & Investments Forum|World Pensions Council (WPC)]] has argued that large [[institutional investor]]s such as [[pension fund]]s and [[Financial endowment|endowment]]s are exercising a greater influence on the process of adding and replacing corporate directors β as they are themselves steered to do so by their own board members (pension trustees). This could eventually put more pressure on the [[CEO]]s of [[public company|publicly listed companies]], as βmore than ever before, many [North American], UK and European Union [[trustee|pension trustees]] speak enthusiastically about flexing their [[fiduciary]] muscles for the UNβs [[Sustainable Development Goals]]β, and other [[Environmental, social and corporate governance|ESG-centric]] investment practices <ref name="pensions-expert1">{{cite news|last1=Firzli|first1=Nicolas|title=Greening, Governance and Growth in the Age of Popular Empowerment|url=http://www.pensions-expert.com/Special-Features/The-Cut/Greening-governance-and-growth-in-the-age-of-popular-empowerment|access-date=27 April 2018|work=FT Pensions Experts|publisher=Financial Times|date=3 April 2018}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Empowerment
(section)
Add topic