Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Corporate welfare
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Background ==== [[Subsidies]] considered excessive, unwarranted, wasteful, unfair, inefficient, or bought by [[lobbying]] are often called corporate welfare.<ref name="NYT-20140327">{{cite news|last=Kristof|first=Nicholas|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/27/opinion/kristof-a-nation-of-takers.html|title=A Nation of Takers?|date=March 27, 2014|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=March 27, 2014|author-link=Nicholas Kristof}}</ref> The label of corporate welfare is often used to decry projects advertised as benefiting the general welfare that spend a disproportionate amount of funds on large corporations, and often in uncompetitive, or [[anti-competitive]] ways. For instance, in the United States, [[agricultural subsidy|agricultural subsidies]] are usually portrayed as helping independent farmers stay afloat. In actuality, the majority of income gained from commodity support programs has gone to large [[agribusiness]] corporations such as [[Archer Daniels Midland]], as they own a considerably larger percentage of production.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.usda.gov/factbook/chapter3.htm |title=USDA: American Farms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070210035144/http://www.usda.gov/factbook/chapter3.htm |archive-date=February 10, 2007 |work=[[United States Department of Agriculture]] }}</ref> Alan Peters and Peter Fisher, Associate Professors at the [[University of Iowa]],<ref>{{cite conference |url=https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/neer/neer297f.pdf |title=Tax and Spending Incentives and Enterprise Zones |last1=Fisher |first1=Peter S. |last2=Peters |first2=Alan H. |date=MarchโApril 1997 |publisher= [[Federal Reserve Bank of Boston|Boston Fed]] |pages=109โ137 |location=Boston |conference=New England Economic Review}}</ref> have estimated that state and local governments provide $40โ50 billion annually in economic development incentives,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fisher |first1=Peter |last2=Peters |first2=Alan |date=March 2004 |title=The Failures of Economic Development Incentives |url=http://www.crcworks.org/cfscced/fisher.pdf |journal=Journal of the American Planning Association |volume=70 |issue=1 |pages=27โ37 |doi=10.1080/01944360408976336 |access-date=April 13, 2018 |citeseerx=10.1.1.661.6308 }}</ref> which critics characterize as corporate welfare.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://baltimorebrew.com/2011/07/14/tax-breaks-for-developers-economic-development-or-corporate-welfare/ |title=Tax breaks for developers โ economic development or corporate welfare? |first=Mark |last=Reutter |date=July 13, 2011 |website=Baltimore Brew |access-date=November 3, 2019 }}</ref> Multiple economists have considered the [[Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008|2008 bank bailouts in the United States]] to be a form of corporate welfare.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.smh.com.au/business/us-could-cut-deficit-and-gain-but-thats-unlikely-20101207-18oew.html |access-date=December 22, 2010 | title=US could cut deficit and gain, but that's unlikely |work=Sydney Morning Herald |first=Joseph |last=Stiglitz |date=December 8, 2010 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/welfare-for-bankers/ | title=Welfare for Bankers |first=Nancy |last=Folbre | work=[[The New York Times]] |date=April 20, 2009 | url-access=limited}}</ref> U.S. politicians have also contended that zero-interest loans from the [[Federal Reserve System]] to financial institutions during and after the [[2008 financial crisis]] were a hidden, backdoor form of corporate welfare.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://thehill.com/policy/finance/131487-sanders-uses-fed-disclosures-to-call-for-further-inquiry |access-date=December 15, 2010 | title=Sanders uses 'jaw-dropping' Fed disclosures to call for further inquiry |work=The Hill |first=Peter |last=Schroeder |date=December 1, 2010 }}</ref> The term gained increased prominence in 2018 when Senator [[Bernie Sanders]] introduced a bill, singling out [[Amazon (company)|Amazon]] and [[Walmart]] in particular, to require a company with 500 or more employees to pay the full cost of welfare benefits received by its workers.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/5/17819450/bernie-sanders-stop-bezos-amazon-worker-pay-corporate-welfare-tax-bill |title=Bernie Sanders introduces "Stop BEZOS" bill to tax Amazon for underpaying workers |first=Adi |last=Robertson |website=The Verge |date=September 5, 2018 |access-date=September 14, 2018 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-amazon-walmart-with-100-tax/ |title=Bernie Sanders targets Amazon, Walmart with 100% tax |first=Kate |last=Gibson |publisher=CBS |date=September 5, 2018 |access-date=September 14, 2018 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/5/17822810/bernie-sanders-bill-bezos-amazon-ro-khanna |title=Bernie Sanders's BEZOS bill takes aim at how Amazon pays workers |first=Emily |last=Stewart |publisher=Vox |date=September 5, 2018 |access-date=September 14, 2018 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-amazon_n_5b8eecade4b0511db3dcfd55 |title=What the Bernie Sanders Amazon welfare fight is really about |first1=Arthur |last1=Delaney |first2=Dave |last2=Jamieson | work=[[HuffPost]] |date=September 5, 2018}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Corporate welfare
(section)
Add topic