Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Copper IUD
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Contraceptive failure === [[File:Ultrasonography of IUD with copper.jpg|thumb|[[Transvaginal ultrasonography]] visualizing an IUD with copper in the optimal location within the uterus.]] The absolute risk of [[ectopic pregnancy]] with IUD use is lower than with no contraception due to the dramatically decreased rate of pregnancy overall. However, when pregnancy does occur with a copper IUD in place, a higher percentage of those pregnancies are ectopic, from 3% to 6%, a two to sixfold increase. This corresponds to an absolute rate of ectopic pregnancy in copper IUD users of 0.2β0.4 per 1000 person-years, compared to 3 per 1000 person-years in the population using no contraception.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name="Good2010" /> If a pregnancy continues with the IUD in place, there is an increased risk of complications including preterm delivery, [[chorioamnionitis]], and spontaneous abortion. If the IUD is removed, these risks are lower, especially the risks of bleeding and miscarriage; the rate of miscarriage approaches that of the general population depending on study population.<ref name=":4">{{cite journal | vauthors = Molino GO, Santos AC, Dias MM, Pereira AG, Pimenta ND, Silva PH | title = Retained versus removed copper intrauterine device during pregnancy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica | date = January 2025 | pmid = 39868878 | doi = 10.1111/aogs.15061 | doi-access = free | pmc = 11981102 }}</ref><ref name="Good2010" /><ref name=":2" /> Overall failure rates with the copper IUD are low, and are mainly dependent on the surface area of copper in the device. After 12 years of continuous use, the TCu{{Nbsp}}380A device has a cumulative pregnancy rate of 1.7%.<ref name="Good2010" /> The TCu 380A is more effective than the MLCu375, MLCu350, TCu220, and TCu200. The TCu 380S is more effective than the TCu 380A.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Kulier R, O'Brien PA, Helmerhorst FM, Usher-Patel M, D'Arcangues C | title = Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 4 | pages = CD005347 | date = October 2007 | pmid = 17943851 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD005347.pub3 | collaboration = Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group }}</ref> The frameless device has similar failure rates to conventional devices.<ref name=":9" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Copper IUD
(section)
Add topic