Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Airport (1970 film)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Critical response=== ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote: "Based on the novel by Arthur Hailey, over-produced by Ross Hunter with a cast of stars as long as a jet runway, and adapted and directed by George Seaton in a glossy, slick style, ''Airport'' is a handsome, often dramatically involving $10 million epitaph to a bygone brand of filmmaking" but added that the film "does not create suspense because the audience knows how it's going to end."<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://variety.com/1969/film/reviews/airport-1200422292/|magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|title=Film reviews: Airport|date=1970|access-date=July 22, 2019|archive-date=July 22, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190722211352/https://variety.com/1969/film/reviews/airport-1200422292/|url-status=live}}</ref>[[Boxoffice]] praised the film's strong production values, excellent cast, and potential to be very popular but foresaw that other critics' opinions would not be universally favourable.<ref>https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/29864529/boxoffice-february231970 Boxoffice, February 23, 1970, Feature Reviews, p.11</ref> Film critic [[Pauline Kael]] gave ''Airport'' one of its worst contemporary reviews, scornfully dismissing it as "bland entertainment of the old school."<ref name="Kael">{{Cite book |last=Kael |first=Pauline |author-link=Pauline Kael |title=5001 Nights at the Movies |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w4LzeUZ03vQC |year=2011 |orig-year=1991 |publisher=Henry Holt and Company |location=New York |isbn=978-1-250-03357-4 |page=12 |access-date=2016-11-02 |archive-date=2017-02-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170214220331/https://books.google.com/books?id=w4LzeUZ03vQC |url-status=live }}</ref> "There's no electricity in it", she wrote; "every stereotyped action is followed by a stereotyped reaction."<ref name="Kael"/> [[Roger Ebert]] gave the film two stars out of four and faulted a predictable plot and characters that "talk in regulation B-movie clichés like no B-movie you've seen in ten years."<ref name="Roger Ebert">{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19700101/REVIEWS/1010301/1023 |title=Ebert's review of 'Airport' |access-date=2009-08-31 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |archive-date=2013-03-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130309234742/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F19700101%2FREVIEWS%2F1010301%2F1023 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Gene Siskel]] gave the film two-and-a-half stars out of four and reported that while the theater audience cheered at the climax, "it's a long and torturous road to the applause. Blocking the path are speeches that promote the industry, dialog that ranks among the silliest in memory, and a labored plot that tells you everything twice.<ref>Siskel, Gene (March 25, 1970). "Airport". ''[[Chicago Tribune]]''. Section 2, p. 6.</ref> [[Vincent Canby]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' called it "an immensely silly film—and it will probably entertain people who no longer care very much about movies."<ref>Canby, Vincent (March 6, 1970). "[https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9E0DEFDB1638EE34BC4E53DFB566838B669EDE The Screen: Multi-Plot, Multi-Star 'Airport' Opens] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102005806/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9E0DEFDB1638EE34BC4E53DFB566838B669EDE |date=2013-11-02 }}". ''[[The New York Times]]''. 34.</ref> [[Charles Champlin]] of the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' called the film "breath-taking in its celebration of anything which used to work when Hollywood was younger and we were all more innocent."<ref>Champlin, Charles (March 21, 1970). "'Airport' Recalls Older Hollywood". ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''. Part II, p. 7.</ref> Gary Arnold of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' called it "a lousy movie" that was "utterly predictable."<ref>Arnold, Gary (March 24, 1970). "Lousy 'Airport'". ''[[The Washington Post]]''. B6.</ref> ''[[The Monthly Film Bulletin]]'' wrote, "Corny is really the only word for this unbelievably old-fashioned look at the modern phenomenon of an international airport: the one surprise is that the sweet old white-haired stowaway doesn't spring to the controls and bring the distressed aircraft down single-handed as [[Julie (1956 film)|Doris Day did]] once upon a time in analogous circumstances."<ref>{{cite journal |date=June 1970 |title=Airport |journal=[[The Monthly Film Bulletin]] |volume=37 |issue=437 |pages=126–127 }}</ref> [[Christopher Null]] wrote in 2000, "With one grandiose entrance, ''Airport'' ushered in a genre of moviemaking that is still going strong—the disaster movie... Too bad the 'disaster' doesn't happen until 2 hours into the 2:15 movie. No matter—''Airport''{{'}}s unending sequels and spoofs are a testament that this film is a true piece of Americana, for good or for bad."<ref name="filmcritic">{{cite web |url=http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Airport |work=Filmcritic.com |title=Airport |access-date=2009-08-31 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100202220109/http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Airport |archive-date=2010-02-02 }}</ref> Despite the film being one of the most profitable of Burt Lancaster's career, he called it "a piece of junk."<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=[[The Montreal Gazette]]|date=March 8, 1971|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1946&dat=19710308&id=uJgkAAAAIBAJ&sjid=oqAFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3906,1786621|title=Airport 'junk' – Lancaster|access-date=June 27, 2015|archive-date=April 26, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160426212652/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1946&dat=19710308&id=uJgkAAAAIBAJ&sjid=oqAFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3906,1786621|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Stafford, Jeff|url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/19875/airport#articles-reviews?articleId=66927|title=Airport|work=[[Turner Classic Movies]]|access-date=2024-10-24}}</ref> Review aggregator [[Rotten Tomatoes]] gives the film a rating of 75%, based on 16 reviews, with an average rating of 6.3/10.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/airport/ |title=Airport (1970) |access-date=July 10, 2022 |work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] |archive-date=April 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190430124223/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/airport |url-status=live }}</ref> On Metacritic, the film holds an average rating of 42/100, based on 5 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".<ref>{{Citation|title=Airport|url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/airport|access-date=2018-11-03|archive-date=2020-12-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201215195735/https://www.metacritic.com/movie/airport|url-status=live}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Airport (1970 film)
(section)
Add topic